Atheism and humanism are completely contradictory

Secular humanism is a contradiction. Here's why(note: I am neither an atheist or a humanist) :

Humanism: puts humans at a prime moral/social/philosophical importance.

Atheism: there is no god, therefore there is no afterlife, therefore nothing you do or think matters at all. There is no moral standpoint, only what you like matters.

Here's the problem: In an atheist worldview, why do humans have to be more important than animals? Why aren't monkeys or rats of prime moral importance? Why of all the animals supposedly generated by blind natural processes do humans have to be of any major moral importance? After all, in atheistic worldview, a very good person who does good things like donating to charities, saving people, being kind to others, has the same fate as an evil man who kills everyone he doesn't like, steals whatever he wants, and has lots of hatred - when they both die, they completely disappear. This is the problem with every atheistic world view that claims to have a strong moral code - like communism. 

morality is just your feelings. It's an evolutionary advantage to think that they are more than that (i.e. divined by the creator Himself), but they're just evolutionary impulses at the end of the day.

So do you regard someone as immoral that doesn’t share the same musical feelings as you?

No, I don't.

Okay so define morality, because chalking it up to feelings doesn’t really set it apart from anything (e.g, music).

Morality: an innate sense of fairness.

Okay, but how often have we seen arguments pertaining to music? Clearly some people feel that talent isn’t being judged fairly.

not whether the music is fairly judging.

innate fairness judgement

So do you regard someone as immoral that doesn’t share the same feelings as you pertaining to murder?

Morality: an innate sense of fairness.

So how does an impartial judge fairness if the definition is inconsistent, inconsistency doesn’t make much sense.

Atheism: there is no god, therefore there is no afterlife, therefore nothing you do or think matters at all. There is no moral standpoint, only what you like matters.

Okay so define morality, because chalking it up to feelings doesn’t really set it apart from anything (e.g, music).

Morality: an innate sense of fairness.

The distinction from the broader category of "feelings" is that "feelings" don't have to necessarily refer to an innate sense of fairness.

In an atheist worldview,

No such thing. Atheism isn't an epistemology, a moral framework, an ontology, a methodology, etc. Atheists' outlook on life can be shaped by any number of things, but it ain't their answer to 'Do you believe in gods'.

That's where the OP goes wrong.

-->@Conservallectual

Personally my opinion aligns in a similar manner as,

zedvictor4           #3

3RU7AL                #21

SkepticalOne     #23

Though arguably atheists could be grouped into various groups based on beliefs, the variety, number of beliefs, and lack of formal organization makes that difficult.

. . .

But for conversation,

Let's say you were talking about a specific atheist/s

Who did not believe in God, an Afterlife, or Objective Morality.

And wanted to follow Humanism.

My view of such, is the divorce between the intellect and the heart, as well as conditioning.

I 'already stated my opinion that that he was using the word atheism a bit broadly.

But still, ideas, people who claim identities,

Can be roughly categorized at times,

Depending on when and where.

Take the identity of Americans for example,

They can 'roughly be identified by different values, depending on timeframe.

Take Communists, 

They can 'roughly be identified by different values, depending on timeframe.

Though for the Communists as time passes, it becomes required to use where,

As the belief spreads over such distances and numbers, that vast variation occurs.

Anyway,

I like talking with people at times,

And wanted to address his topic for what I thought he 'meant,

Rather than harping on what he 'said.

Personally my opinion aligns in a similar manner as,

zedvictor4           #3

3RU7AL                #21

SkepticalOne     #23

Though arguably atheists could be grouped into various groups based on beliefs, the variety, number of beliefs, and lack of formal organization makes that difficult I think.

. . .

But for conversation,

Let's say you were talking about a specific atheist/s

Who did not believe in God, an Afterlife, or Objective Morality.

And wanted to follow Humanism.

My view of such, is the divorce between the intellect and the heart, as well as conditioning.

. . .

Also the having of other values.

Yeah I agree that it's a problem. It's compounded by the fact that it's impossible to be impartial.