1. There should be no central governments, only private dispute resolution organizations.
2. The American Medical Association, and any other cartel for labor, should be dissolved.
3. Taxation is robbery and theft.
4. Equality is illogical.
4. Equality is illogical.
What is socialism? We miss the boat if we say it's the agenda of those left-wingers and Democrats. According to Marxist doctrine, socialism is a stage of society between capitalism and communism where private ownership and control over property is eliminated. The essence of socialism is the attenuation and ultimate abolition of private property rights. Attacks on private property include, but are not limited to, confiscating the rightful property of one person and giving it to another to whom it doesn't belong. When this is done privately we call it theft. When it's done collectively we use the euphemisms: income transfers or redistribution. It's not just left-wingers and Democrats who call for and admire socialism but right-wingers and Republicans as well.
Getting rid of the Electoral College might be considered radical policy-wise.I don't think that should even be controversial- as much a unnecessary holdover from agrarian thinking as daylight savings or pickup truck subsidies
Crazy how the notion of one person one vote is "controversial"...
I believe that cancel culture can only ever be countered by further cancel culture.I thusly understand and surrender to the idea of censorship on any platform and hope to wage war against one side of cancel culture by pressuring it to censor itself and be weary of the other side's wrath.I see it as a balanced tug of war, not a pendulum, in its optimal state.
Crazy how the notion of one person one vote is "controversial"...
Most people can't even make good, informed choices regarding their own lives.
Perfect clones eventually breed monsters.
We shouldn't treat people like monsters merely because they were born pedophiles.
So relative to your opinion, would this be a worthless, uninformed result?
Religious private schools should be afforded the same taxpayer benefits as their public school counterparts.In fact, given that public schools regularly teach material harmful to religious communities, the only way to avoid violating the Establishment Clause is to eliminate the public-private school distinction, with all schools being private but supported by key public infrastructure and quality controls. The sectarian/nonsectarian nature of a school will reflect what the parents of that local area want; if most want a nonsectarian school then that's fine. If a sizable minority wants, say, a Catholic school, then one would be erected with funding proportionate to the size of its student body. If there are too few parents to justify their own school, then they could homeschool/outsource the homeschooling job to an instructor, and it wouldn't cost them substantially more than for the school option.