I am sure anybody can see it is odd how you keep pandering to somebody you should be leading a lynch on or at least heavily suspecting if ypu were really the cop.
Instead, your entire series of interactions after I voted you are to make me feel insecure about my vote amd reasoning. This fits perfectly with your DP1 behaviour in fact.
RM, at what point did you think I was pandering to you? I'm getting more and more reason to suspect you, so well done there, but my only goal in responding to you is to address what you believe makes me sus. I don't agree that I would automatically heavily suspect you on the basis that you are the Justice and I am the Cop. This would not be the first time that Luna set up the roles in a distinct way, and I don't see the combination of a Justice and a Cop as absurd. I do, however, see having a Watcher/Tracker, Cop and Justice as problematic, so yes, I have reason to suspect that either you or Earth are scum at this point, and based on your responses to him and me, I'm suspecting you more at the moment.
Throughout this DP and the last one, my only goal has been to try to understand the theme split and, absent any clear split, focus on behavioral choices and claims that make each player stand out. I'm not responding to you to make you feel insecure and I don't know why you're personalizing this. I'm trying to understand where you're coming from and why you are so solid in your conclusion, in part because there are 4 other people in this game besides the two of us and it would be great if they had a clearer decision to make based on the available information. If I'm one of the prime suspects, so be it. I don't even care if you refuse to change your vote, but if you're going to be this obstinate, justify it to convince others. So far, most of what I've seen are assertions about the likely roles in the game, more questionable theme analysis with (I'll give this to you) some willingness to consider alternatives, and some weak behavioral tells based largely on you not liking my analyses. If that convinces people, great, but I don't think it's going to do you many favors.
If you are town, (I am not really considering it but I am curious what you will reply)
What is the theme split?
I've suggested two before, though you dismissed both of them as gaslighting. Of those two, I'd still consider geography. I initially thought that this meant Japanese martial arts against others, and at this point any difference is going to be at least somewhat arbitrary.
As for alternatives at this point, I wouldn't say that there's any obvious theme split based on the given roles, though I think at least one of them is fake. We haven't seen Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu or Taekwondo, both of which are listed as primary fighting styles among champions. I suspect that at least the former is in this game, and if so, either Judo or Sambo, as both are ground fighting techniques, would fit into the split between those and other styles. It seems more common in Sambo, though I could see that split going either way.
I'm not seeing a good reason to go by any suggested split so far, though, including these. There are plenty of ways we could isolate two of the martial arts from the rest and they would all lead us to different conclusions. We have more information that is more solid than our purported splits. Your grappling theme split, for example, depends on how you define it. Grappling occurs in boxing, just not offensively. Muay Thai isn't all that different in this respect, though it does have clinch holds.
