What have you changed your mind about?

Author: Yassine

Posts

Total: 163
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Incel-chud
He merits your faith whether he is compassionate or not. Even if he were evil, he would merit it. You are merely human and cannot possibly comprehend his morality in any sane way.
Amazing, isn't it, how one's political ideology reflects one's one's theology?

You are arguing that Christians should submit to evil. Let's assume that if the devil has any competence at all, you are already enlisted in his ranks.

Hell is not a biblical concept,

Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.

Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
And these shall go away into everlasting punishment
Matthew 25



I assume, you know how to get to heaven, but if you don't. Here you go

 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
  • But Jesus never claimed to be God's "one and only Son."  The apostles and the first three generations of Christians, the Synoptic Gospels and St. Paul refer to Jesus as "a son of God" or "Son of God."   
    • "One and only Son of God"  MONOGENES in Alexandrian Koine Greek,  is John's latter-day assertion, four generations after Christ.
  • So Jesus' pre--requisite for heaven is that you must  feed the hungry, house the homeless, clothe the naked, nurse the sick, befriend the imprisoned, etc but John's only pre-requisite for heaven is simple belief? 
    • You can get children to believe in Santa Claus with little enough effort.  
  • I prefer Jesus' test to John's- it  has the advantage of actually working toward practically improving life on earth (that is, making one's own heaven) and is a far more difficult thing to accomplish than just belief-
      • Belief is easy. 
        • a three year old can believe what he's told to believe- there's not much accomplishment to it.
        • The devil can just as easily and truthfully say, "I am a Son of God (which must be true) whoever believes in me shall not perish but have eternal life [suffering in Hell]
      • Compassionate works are hard. 
        • An act of charity is far more difficult to corrupt than a mere credence
        • And Jesus told us that it is hard to get to heaven.
          • I prefer Jesus' version


FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,613
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

I predict that within 3 years some major Christian Televangelist is going to say that he has found that God is a myth and he is going to change his Church to service Humanism. And no, it won't be Jim Bakker.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,358
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@FLRW
Likely that's 'already happened many times in history.
The 'gist of your post, anyhow.

Some individuals lack honesty in their reasons for representing groups,
Or change their minds, after experiences in life, I suppose.

. . .
Also the opposite with Atheists.

@Topic
I think my mind on Islam remains unchanged.

I suppose if I took the time every X amount of time,
To state my opinion on various subjects,
I could read it back, and see how my answers change over time,
But I don't and in the gradual process of my mind,
I often miss changes in it.

Of Islam though, I still don't know much,
But even with much,
Likely I'll view it as I do other religions, ways of life, philosophies, movements.
Incel-chud
Incel-chud's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 434
2
3
8
Incel-chud's avatar
Incel-chud
2
3
8
-->
@oromagi
Amazing, isn't it, how one's political ideology reflects one's one's theology?

You are arguing that Christians should submit to evil. Let's assume that if the devil has any competence at all, you are already enlisted in his ranks.

God defines what is good and evil. Judging by your previous posts, your IQ is likely in the 120 to 130 range. 

Why do you struggle with philosophy and lean heavy on pragmatic styles of thinking? 


oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Incel-chud
I’ll accept the descent into ad hom as your concession on arguments. 
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,358
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
By, "Also the opposite with Atheists."

I mean Atheists 'also,
"Some individuals lack honesty in their reasons for representing groups,
Or change their minds, after experiences in life, I suppose."

I would edit the post, but it's been too long,
But my bad phrasing irritates me still.

Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,205
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
-->
@oromagi
I got ya IQ at 176.
Anyway.....

What old mate is trying to say is. 
Your smart but. 
Its just.
Well. 
Your a Dumb Dumb.   For thinking straightforward

He wants you to.   The frozen song . ( Let it go ) 
He thinks you should think more ,  Off with the feairies if you will. 

Also magi.
99 debates .  I don't like 99.
Hurry up Do one more or something.  

Thanks. 
 

oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
-->@oromagi
I got ya IQ at 176.
Anyway.....
When IQ figures out how to quantify wit, inspiration, and imagination then it can be called Intelligence quotient.  Until then, let's call it EA- aptitude for engineering.

Your a Dumb Dumb.   For thinking straightforward
If thinking straightforward is dumb I don't want to be smart.

Also magi.
99 debates .  I don't like 99.
Hurry up Do one more or something.  

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Benjamin
This site was my first exposure to logical critique of my fundamentalist religious views. 
- What were you before?


Here is the first things that pop to my mind:
  • I have rejected my certainty of Christianity being true, in fact, I now view every religion as meaningless speculation without evidence
- What prompted you to reject Christianity? How did you generalize on the rest of religions?


  • My view of abortion, animal rights and morality in general have become more nuanced as I understand kantian and utilitarian ethics
- Specifically?


  • The indoctrination of PragerU has been eradicated from my mind;
- I always wondered who in their right mind would believe those bozos.


  • Political and economic issues have been brought to my attention, as well as opposing ideas to the ones I already knew
- Specifically?


  • At the moment I think of unquestionable certainty as mostly an illusion and of science as the logical and mathematical route to becoming near-certain.
- Science, as in Natural Science, has no epistemic relation to Logic or Mathematics. Science is not about about truth or certainty, it's about accuracy; that is, the margin of error between observable facts and predictions of the hypothesis. There are other paths to achieve confidence beyond Science, through deductive modes of reasoning or inductive modes of reasoning.


These are a lot of things I have changed my mind about. Now I have been on this site a year and am 17 so it has affected me quite a lot.
- That is indeed a huge transformation. What are the major factors that affected your beliefs?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
It's part of Norse myth. He doesn't have a hall in Germanic myth. There are several different afterlife places in Germanic and Norse mythology. The Viking were a small portion of worshipers. They also didn't go out and kill people for Odin. They hope to die in battle to go to Valhalla or Freya's Hall. She actually gets first pick of the war dead. They generally leave that out of all the movies.
- I'm pretty familiar with Nordic & Germanic history. I want to know though why do you believe these are gods & what does 'god' exactly mean for you?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@zedvictor4
And mainstream religion isn't weird?
Well no, not if you have a conditioned mindset.
A mindset that's prepared to accept old Middle Eastern folk tales as a reasonable hypothesis.
- Yours are weird because they are essentially similar to those "folk tales". 


Whereas, it is clearly apparent that material development has moved on a tad since those days of ignorance,
- Rational development, however, caved in.


But you just take this for granted, 
Yet you happily tap away at your device, when all that your omniscient saviours could achieve was tablets of stone.
- A device is also a tablet of stone.


And it's also clear that things are still developing, and therefore logical to suggest that material development will continue developing way way into the future,
Maybe with us, maybe without us.
And all this may or may not be purposeful....The jury is is still out, and will continue to be out for as long the appropriate knowledge remains undiscovered..
- What does this have to do with the topic at hand?


All that I do, is propose a reasonable purpose, which I refer to as the continuation of the universal sequence....Or the re-initiation of matter.
And the difference between you and I is,
I am a 21st century man trying to think ahead,
- You sound very religious for someone who says no to religion. So, you effectively believe in God just not the label?


Whereas, you are a 21st century man who prefers to think backwards.
- "Ahead' & 'backwards' are meaningless & are no valid criteria for Truth.


Of course there's still a 50/50 chance that everything is pointless.
We just don't know,
Which is probably just as well,
Otherwise the futility of internet religious forum arguments, wouldn't be quite so entertaining.
- So, which is it? Are you theist or atheist?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@oromagi
So you are prepared to show evidence for Isra and Mi'raj- winged steeds climbing to heaven and all that?  
- Maybe we can have a debate on the miracles of the beloved Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). Care to incur your second loss?


No, that's just what Democracy looks like.  Everybody's got a different idea.  If Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion ever make it to the Middle East, you will suddenly discover that there have been atheists in the Masjid al-Haram all along.
- There is a lot more freedom of religion in the Middle East than in any western country. How about incurring your third loss in a debate about freedom of religion in Islam vs. Secularism?


You see that beautiful act of comfort and compassion and human dignity- the heart of Christianity expressed in a moment and you ask "Why bother?"  The answer is manifest to those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear and the brain to acknowledge the promise of heaven within humanity itself.
- But this isn't Christianity is it! Are you a humanist?


Sorry, but that's absurd.  So you think that when Paul says in the previous sentence "Love is patient, love is kind, it keeps no records of wrongs, etc" Paul is telling the Corinthians to be kind to God?  to keep no record of God's wrongs against them?  No, sorry.  One of the most essential Christian passages and you've completely missed the mark.
- I don't have an opinion either way, I was referencing Biblical commentators.


You are dodging by answering a question with a question. 
- I'm not even dodging, I'm asking for your justifications?


Answer the question:  explain the compassion to be discovered in the creation of eternal suffering.
- Punishment of injustice is compassion to the oppressed in restitution, & to the oppressor in atonement. Executing Jeffery Dahmer, albeit cruel, is in essence compassionate to his victims & to himself.


Explain the compassion of creating eternal paradise as a prize for winning a cruel game show called THIS MORTAL COIL.
- That's quite the wordy statement. I'm not sure about your intent here. If you wish to discuss this topic in sincerity, I'll be happy to accommodate. It's not so trivial a topic...


It could be put better but that's my argument, yes.  
- So your argument is an absurd statement? Is your beef with religion the problem of evil thingy?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Incel-chud


NY digging deeper into them. Learning the culture at the time, studying the words that the verses were interpreted from. Learning the events at that time, etc. 
- Any thing you're still struggling with or chose to not deal with it?


For example. The turning the other cheek I mentioned thinking it was a command to be a door mat. The speech was about how to commit a non violent revolution, like grand did. The Roman's would only be allowed to smack people with their left hand, so by presenting your other cheek, they were forced to smack you with the incorrect hand. 

The same speech he says, if your enemy asks you to carry their belongings one mile, carry them 2, because Roman law said romans were only allowed to have the community they were occupying carry stuff for one mile.
- Why not a command for forbearance?


With the camel and the eye of the needle. Jesus did not make up the phrase. A lot of rabbis before him used it, so I looked at the context those rabbis said it in. The rabbis meant it was hard and used it as a way to just help get the message across. 
- My point was, the beloved Jesus (pbuh) belonged to the same cultural pool of pre-Islamic Arabs (Arabic & Aramaic are the closest semitic languages), thus shared similar knowledge of proverbs & idioms. It makes more sense that the original Aramaic expression should translate to "fit a thick rope through the eye of a needle" rather than "fit a camel through the eye of a needle", just as its Arabic counterpart does.

- About that debate though, any interest?
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Lemming
@Topic
I think my mind on Islam remains unchanged.

I suppose if I took the time every X amount of time,
To state my opinion on various subjects,
I could read it back, and see how my answers change over time,
But I don't and in the gradual process of my mind,
I often miss changes in it.
- Any change in understanding of Islam then? What drives your position?


Of Islam though, I still don't know much,
- At least, that's honest. Unlike some here who pretend to know more about Islam than the Prophet (pbuh) himself...


But even with much,
Likely I'll view it as I do other religions, ways of life, philosophies, movements.
- What do you personally believe in? Why? 
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Reece101
I don’t know, it all sort of built up into a large mound. 
- What replaced your belief in Evolution then?


I have no idea. What makes the most logical sense? 
- I was hoping you would tell me. I can't know what you believe!


If it doesn’t lead to Allah, then it’s not science. Amirite?
- That's a non sequitur.
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@FLRW
I predict that within 3 years some major Christian Televangelist is going to say that he has found that God is a myth and he is going to change his Church to service Humanism. And no, it won't be Jim Bakker.
- I don't follow the reference here?

Incel-chud
Incel-chud's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 434
2
3
8
Incel-chud's avatar
Incel-chud
2
3
8
-->
@Yassine
- Any thing you're still struggling with or chose to not deal with it?
Only internally, not with the word.

Why not a command for forbearance?
I think the story of Job does enough to stress the importance of forbearance.

It makes more sense that the original Aramaic expression should translate to "fit a thick rope through the eye of a needle" rather than "fit a camel through the eye of a needle", just as its Arabic counterpart does.
What's important I think is the meaning of the verse, which is the same whether you use camel or rope 

About that debate though, any interest?
No, I don't like how the debate is framed. I am willing to consider debates titled things such as 

1. Muhammed was not a prophet

It's a difficult thing to argue argue refined absurdities though. You would have similar difficulty arguing against obsessed 9/11 truthers. 
.
I'd rather pick a topic topic the sits outside of both of our comfort zones. Do you ever talk about anything non Islam related? Like for example things relating to work or money etc.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,358
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@Yassine
I think of Islam as a religion which believes in the Abrahamic God,
,
The Religion is 'primarily in the Middle East, which I view as 'currently 'overall having less Infrastructure/Tech/Modernization, than the West.

If people speak of individuals being stoned, then I view this as due to location, culture, more than Islam itself.

Only requires different time period, culture shift, for the West to stone people, Whether for Religion or Atheism.
. . .
Islam has various sects, adherents, thus it's more valuable for me to judge it on individual persons and individual group basis.
Same as other religions, or atheisms.
. . .

My position is driven by Truth, Nationalism, Tradition, Honor.
I prefer my own nation, my own tribe, people,
But that's no reason to deny the value of other's ideas.
No reason to dismiss their humanity, or one's obligation to other life forms.

. . . . . . . . .

I believe that there is no god/s,
No afterlife,
That life arose out of material existences workings, habits, chance and opportunity.
I believe that morality is a subjective construct, but that we are wired with preferences, These preferences are hard to deny, and as a game of chess already invested in, may as well follow one's creed.

I'd like to live as long as I can, but am lazy,
Sometimes feel bad about not helping others, but I am self centered,
So, I'll try to love myself more than others,
Find what gives myself enjoyment, be it indulgence of the senses, or meaning external.
Thinking on the logic systems, games we humans have invented and be genetically,
Arguing logically or societally preferring what is best.

Still, perhaps I'll Suprise myself with altruism,
Or by the fact I have times past, perhaps I don't know myself.
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Incel-chud

No, I don't like how the debate is framed. I am willing to consider debates titled things such as 

1. Muhammed was not a prophet
- I can work with that. How do you define 'prophet'?


It's a difficult thing to argue argue refined absurdities though. You would have similar difficulty arguing against obsessed 9/11 truthers. 
- I'd argue for anything & everything I believe to be the case.


I'd rather pick a topic topic the sits outside of both of our comfort zones. Do you ever talk about anything non Islam related? Like for example things relating to work or money etc.
- I could, but it inevitably goes back to Islam, as I find myself coming from a different paradigm & worldview than the average English speaker. I made a thread a while back, which didn't bear fruit: fun challenges < you could pick any of the mentioned topics therein... I could discuss Philosophy, History & Physics, but it quickly gets boring for the uninitiated. 
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Lemming
I think of Islam as a religion which believes in the Abrahamic God,
- Do you know anything more about the faith?


The Religion is 'primarily in the Middle East
- Only 20% of Muslims live in the Middle East.


, which I view as 'currently 'overall having less Infrastructure/Tech/Modernization, than the West.
- I like the "currently", indeed. Prior to Western dominion, Muslims led in economy, trade, science & technology for 10 centuries. Today, the West is deindustrializing & declining, while the Muslim world in rising at a fast pace. 


If people speak of individuals being stoned, then I view this as due to location, culture, more than Islam itself.
- It's exclusively due to Salafism.


Only requires different time period, culture shift, for the West to stone people, Whether for Religion or Atheism.
- The West does awfully a lot worse. Much of the injustice in the world is carried out by the West.


Islam has various sects, adherents, thus it's more valuable for me to judge it on individual persons and individual group basis.
Same as other religions, or atheisms.
- I guess that's one way to look at it, from the perspectives of the practitioners, though these do not necessarily conform to the perspective of the founder.


My position is driven by Truth, Nationalism, Tradition, Honor.
I prefer my own nation, my own tribe, people,
But that's no reason to deny the value of other's ideas.
No reason to dismiss their humanity, or one's obligation to other life forms.
- This sounds like a contradiction! You say you're driven by Nationalism, yet you declare obligation to others' life. Do you believe your country should grant rights to other peoples or just nationals?


I believe that there is no god/s,
No afterlife,
That life arose out of material existences workings, habits, chance and opportunity.
I believe that morality is a subjective construct, but that we are wired with preferences, These preferences are hard to deny, and as a game of chess already invested in, may as well follow one's creed.
- What makes you confident in theses beliefs? 

oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Yassine
-->@oromagi
- Maybe we can have a debate on the miracles of the beloved Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). Care to incur your second loss?

I'm debating whiteflame now so you're too late to hand me my second loss.  Instead of expanding the subject, why not just present all of your hard, scientific evidence for the existence of winged horses in Seventh Century Arabia?

There is a lot more freedom of religion in the Middle East than in any western country.

The Pew Report says otherwise;

There are major differences among regions as well as among countries when it comes to government restrictions on religion. On average, restrictions are highest in the Middle East North Africa, where the median score for the 20 countries (4.9) is considerably higher than for the 35 countries in the Americas (1.0), the region with the lowest median score. The 51 Asian and Pacific countries have a median score in the middle range (3.3), but this masks enormous variability within this large region. Several of the more populous Asian and Pacific countries have high levels of government restrictions. Indeed, the nearly 20 countries in the region with very high or high government restrictions on religion – including Iran, Uzbekistan, China, Burma, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Vietnam and India – account for more than half of the world’s population. On the other hand, some of the least restrictive governments are also found in the Asia-Pacific region; these include Japan, Taiwan and Australia.
Most objective analysis consistently ranks the Middle East as the least free region in the world for the practice of religion.

How about incurring your third loss in a debate about freedom of religion in Islam vs. Secularism?
Don't change the subject.  I said that the Middle east lacked freedom of religion.  Islam, at its inception at least, granted greater freedom for Christians and Jews and apostates within its realm than Christians granted non-Christians.  Hell, there were still polytheists worshiping at the Kaaba at Islam's inception.  The governments comprising the modern Middle East are objectively far less tolerant of alternative religious thought than government  in Muhammed's time.

You see that beautiful act of comfort and compassion and human dignity- the heart of Christianity expressed in a moment and you ask "Why bother?"  The answer is manifest to those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear and the brain to acknowledge the promise of heaven within humanity itself.
All humans are humanists- that is they prioritize human considerations before supernatural ones by nature.  Some humans are more deluded about their humanism than others.  Christianity is an essentially humanist reaction to Old Testament Judaism- fewer giants and unicorns and burning bushes, more good Samaritans and golden rules.  Compare OT's  "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth [powers surpassing man's understanding] to John's "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God.   [human language being a uniquely human ability- god reduced from universal superforce to the product of the human tongue].  More than any religion that preceded Jesus, Christianity was primarily concerned with how humans treated other humans and let stories of evil snakes and burning bushes recede to an older testament.

- I don't have an opinion either way, I was referencing Biblical commentators.
So you concede my point that even Paul put human love ahead of faith.

I'm not even dodging, I'm asking for your justifications?
Eternal suffering is manifestly uncompassionate- it disallows forgiveness and inflict harms without any necessity.

Punishment of injustice is compassion to the oppressed in restitution,
Sorry, but I would never consider another man's pain compensation for any loss- I don't see how any human pain might be restorative or remunerative and frankly, such an assertion seems childishly barbaric.  Yuck.

& to the oppressor in atonement.
That's false.  Atonement depends on reconciliation and restoration of the prior social state.  Since eternal damnation denies any hope of reconciliation or restoration it can not, by definition, be considered atonement.

 Executing Jeffery Dahmer, albeit cruel, is in essence compassionate to his victims & to himself.
That's false.  Jeffrey Dahmer and another murderer were beaten to death with a barbell by a fellow murderer in incarceration.  Execution implies a government sanction which Dahmer's brutal murder was not.  I detect no compassion in the manner of Dahmer's death and while some victim's relatives might claim some profit by that cruelty I don't think experience ever really bears out such claims.

That's quite the wordy statement. I'm not sure about your intent here.
It's not difficult.  God denied humans paradise for seeking knowledge.  He created a creature that was curious by nature and then punished that creature for expressing the characteristic God instilled.  If God wanted perfect obedience, he should have made us perfectly obedient.  To give us free will and then punish us (often eternally) for expressing that will (absent, it should be said, any authoritative instruction from God)  is objectively sadistic.

Is your beef with religion the problem of evil thingy?
I don't have a problem with religion, per se.  I just consider it an obviously human artifact- a series of explanations for phenomenon in the absence of more rigorous understanding.  Likewise, I consider evil an entirely human artifact- there's no evidence of such corruption in the natural world.

Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,358
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@Yassine
I know little of Islam, other than superficial generalities.

True, Muslims exist in more places than the Middle East.

Middle East has potential to rise,
And the West, to fall.
History, Culture, Power of many places on Earth, interesting to read.

I'd have to read more, to have a stronger opinion of 'claimed injustice.

I think it's difficult of Isms to stand apart from their practitioners,
If one speaks of a country, and it's practices, one speaks of generalities, percentages of 'more oftens,
A country of one generation, infrastructure, resources, is not the country of 'another generation, infrastructure, resources.
So the same,
Religion, or 'even individuals, if one separates their life into different pieces of time.

. . .

I think a country worth admiring by my own standards,
Would grant rights to individuals 'not of said country,
Human Rights/Privileges are valuable in my eyes, though artificial,
Due to the existence of empathy, logic.
That is not to say I think countries are wrong to prioritize their own people,
But to actively prey on, disregard any rights of 'other countries, comes off as monstrous.
Though,
As the world has 'shrunk, due to technology,
- eh, thought for a different conversation.

My beliefs are driven by public records, facts, science, accounts, observation, logic, reason, as well as personal experiences.
Also reasons underlying and forgotten.
Though putting all these driving reasons together into a convincing document, is difficult without time and great effort.
I can speak casually about it,
But my casual talk will not be convincing, I think.

Casually,
I don't see God/s, the supernatural, evidence of anything after, or come from the after.
I see writings corrupted by individuals, time, and space.
Facts and claims that don't 'all stand up with time.

Of my claim of life coming from material and chance,
Science has records of life forms time way back,
Geography of tectonic plates and continents movements,

Higher than Heaven, one finds space, and the void.
Deeper than Hell, a molten core.
Though I use the phrasings Heaven and Hell to speak of shallow pop culture understandings, as they relate to religion.

Of morality, my view is tied to Nihilism, Existentialism.
Though I've a 'VERY poor understanding of either, so I speak loosely.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,358
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@oromagi
"I consider evil an entirely human artifact- there's no evidence of such corruption in the natural world." oromagi #81

Can you elaborate on this thought?
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,975
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Yassine
- What replaced your belief in Evolution then?
Nothing.

- I was hoping you would tell me. I can't know what you believe!
The best I’ve got so far is spontaneous generation. What do you think? 
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Yassine
I'm pretty familiar with Nordic & Germanic history. I want to know though why do you believe these are gods & what does 'god' exactly mean for you?

LOL, that isn't history it's mythology. The same reason you think your god is a god, because other people have told you that down through the years that when you work with this being it's a god. Personally don't like the word god I prefer the word deity. People have work with these beings for centuries so the relationships, ideas and rituals are already established. 
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
LOL, that isn't history it's mythology. The same reason you think your god is a god, because other people have told you that down through the years that when you work with this being it's a god.
- How exactly do you define 'god'?


Personally don't like the word god I prefer the word deity. People have work with these beings for centuries so the relationships, ideas and rituals are already established. 
- What's the difference between gods & deities?

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Reece101
Nothing.
- I'm confused. Do you or do you not subscribe to the myth that is evolutionation?


The best I’ve got so far is spontaneous generation. What do you think? 
- Any reason why you believe this over the mythevolution? Do you believe in God?
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@oromagi
I'm debating whiteflame now so you're too late to hand me my second loss. 
- There is no harm in a third loss is there? Or maybe you could restore your second...


Instead of expanding the subject, why not just present all of your hard, scientific evidence for the existence of winged horses in Seventh Century Arabia?
- Maybe you can bring this up in our upcoming debate. 


The Pew Report says otherwise;
- I remember this dumb report. It should be rightly called freedom of unaffiliation. 


There are major differences among regions as well as among countries when it comes to government restrictions on religion. On average, restrictions are highest in the Middle East North Africa, where the median score for the 20 countries (4.9) is considerably higher than for the 35 countries in the Americas (1.0), the region with the lowest median score. The 51 Asian and Pacific countries have a median score in the middle range (3.3), but this masks enormous variability within this large region. Several of the more populous Asian and Pacific countries have high levels of government restrictions. Indeed, the nearly 20 countries in the region with very high or high government restrictions on religion – including Iran, Uzbekistan, China, Burma, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Vietnam and India – account for more than half of the world’s population. On the other hand, some of the least restrictive governments are also found in the Asia-Pacific region; these include Japan, Taiwan and Australia.
Most objective analysis consistently ranks the Middle East as the least free region in the world for the practice of religion.
- 'Here is a report, therefore it's true' is not a valid argument in a debate about its very point of contention. Also, there is no such thing as "objective analysis". You have to establish & defend the claim yourself, that freedom of religion in Europe is superior to that in the Middle East based on defined criteria.


Don't change the subject.  I said that the Middle east lacked freedom of religion.  Islam, at its inception at least, granted greater freedom for Christians and Jews and apostates within its realm than Christians granted non-Christians.  Hell, there were still polytheists worshiping at the Kaaba at Islam's inception.  The governments comprising the modern Middle East are objectively far less tolerant of alternative religious thought than government  in Muhammed's time.
- The governments in the modern Middle East also happen to be fashioned in Western style, secular democratic nation-states. Regardless, the proposed debate is freedom of religion in Islam vs. Secularism, not Christianity. 


All humans are humanists- that is they prioritize human considerations before supernatural ones by nature.  Some humans are more deluded about their humanism than others.
- The only delusion humans have is the denial of their powerlessness under God's absolute Will.


Christianity is an essentially humanist reaction to Old Testament Judaism- fewer giants and unicorns and burning bushes, more good Samaritans and golden rules.  Compare OT's  "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth [powers surpassing man's understanding] to John's "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God.   [human language being a uniquely human ability- god reduced from universal superforce to the product of the human tongue].  More than any religion that preceded Jesus, Christianity was primarily concerned with how humans treated other humans and let stories of evil snakes and burning bushes recede to an older testament.
- It kinda sounds like you are making Christianity to be a fake religion.


So you concede my point that even Paul put human love ahead of faith.
- Take it up with the commentators. I don't speak for the Bible, but I'd trust a Biblical scholar's interpretation over yours.


Eternal suffering is manifestly uncompassionate- it disallows forgiveness and inflict harms without any necessity.
- Where should Hitler go then?


Sorry, but I would never consider another man's pain compensation for any loss- I don't see how any human pain might be restorative or remunerative and frankly, such an assertion seems childishly barbaric.  Yuck.
- This is an emotional barrage of childish rant. Grow up! If this is how you wish to defend your feelings, then go to a bar & rant. – Human pain is indeed often restorative & remunerative, from one's own coming into life in pregnancy & birth. Restoration is, by design, painful, as is any prior transgression. A surgery restores one's peace, albeit painful. All things are God's right, we are but proxies on Earth acting on His behalf, within the boundaries which God granted us. Injustice is transgression over one's boundaries into another's. Upon Judgement, divine Justice, hence, is -forceful- restoration of transgressed boundaries -that is also Divine Mercy, for Mercy is bountiful expansion of boundaries. Still, God's Mercy is infinite & supersedes His Justice. God boundlessly forgives the transgressors who seek His forgiveness by granting them repentance -which is the volitional restoration of boundaries, then further expanding their boundaries. The arrogant unrepentant transgressors, unwilling to restore the boundaries they violated, shall then receive Divine Justice, in penalty. While the transgressed receives God's Mercy in restoring & bountifully expanding his boundaries.


That's false. Atonement depends on reconciliation and restoration of the prior social state. Since eternal damnation denies any hope of reconciliation or restoration it can not, by definition, be considered atonement.
- No. Eternal damnation is for disbelievers who denied God & His Bounty ("Allah does not forgive associating others with Him 'in worship', but forgives anything else of whoever He wills."), for restoration of such transgression against God is unattainable, unlike other transgressions into His creations' boundaries, which are punished up to a point until the transgressor is cleansed. Also, God does whatever He pleases, there is no questioning what He does, else not God. God can punish His most devout slave, & reward His most arrogant creature. God can not transgress, for all things are within His sole right.


That's false.  Jeffrey Dahmer and another murderer were beaten to death with a barbell by a fellow murderer in incarceration.  Execution implies a government sanction which Dahmer's brutal murder was not.  I detect no compassion in the manner of Dahmer's death and while some victim's relatives might claim some profit by that cruelty I don't think experience ever really bears out such claims.
- Aside from you missing the point, I'm waiting for the justification of "that's false". You're just ranting like a child. It is to be expected, for denial of God's Justice & Mercy stems from emotional responses arising from the ego, rather than from rational reasons. How exactly do you define compassion?


It's not difficult.  God denied humans paradise for seeking knowledge.  He created a creature that was curious by nature and then punished that creature for expressing the characteristic God instilled.  If God wanted perfect obedience, he should have made us perfectly obedient.  To give us free will and then punish us (often eternally) for expressing that will (absent, it should be said, any authoritative instruction from God)  is objectively sadistic.
- Correction: 'God according to the Bible'. We don't believe any of this. Why don't you become Muslim?


I don't have a problem with religion, per se.  I just consider it an obviously human artifact- a series of explanations for phenomenon in the absence of more rigorous understanding. 
- You're not speaking of religion, you're speaking of Christianity. Why do I have to abide by your assumptions?


Likewise, I consider evil an entirely human artifact- there's no evidence of such corruption in the natural world.
- There is no Good vs. Evil, it's all relative. What is good for one or at a point in not necessarily good for another or at another point. You're close to becoming Muslim.
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Lemming

I'd have to read more, to have a stronger opinion of 'claimed injustice.
- The more you read, the stronger that opinion.


I think it's difficult of Isms to stand apart from their practitioners,
- The founder's perspective supersedes all others. 


If one speaks of a country, and it's practices, one speaks of generalities, percentages of 'more oftens,
A country of one generation, infrastructure, resources, is not the country of 'another generation, infrastructure, resources.
So the same,
Religion, or 'even individuals, if one separates their life into different pieces of time.
- You're speaking of religion from a social standpoint, not from an epistemic view.


I think a country worth admiring by my own standards,
Would grant rights to individuals 'not of said country,
- Do you believe the US should grant equal rights to all extra-national humans as nationals? 


Human Rights/Privileges are valuable in my eyes, though artificial,
Due to the existence of empathy, logic.
That is not to say I think countries are wrong to prioritize their own people,
But to actively prey on, disregard any rights of 'other countries, comes off as monstrous.
- You should become Muslim then. In Sharia, inviolability (right to faith, life, reason, progeny, property & honor) extends to all non-militant humans on Earth. We don't believe in Nationalism or the modern Nation-state.


My beliefs are driven by public records, facts, science, accounts, observation, logic, reason, as well as personal experiences.
Also reasons underlying and forgotten.
Though putting all these driving reasons together into a convincing document, is difficult without time and great effort.
I can speak casually about it,
But my casual talk will not be convincing, I think.

Casually,
I don't see God/s, the supernatural, evidence of anything after, or come from the after.
I see writings corrupted by individuals, time, and space.
Facts and claims that don't 'all stand up with time.
- How did you reach 'all'?


Of my claim of life coming from material and chance,
Science has records of life forms time way back,
- That's Nature, not Science. Science is the human endeavor which seeks to explain Nature.


Geography of tectonic plates and continents movements,
Higher than Heaven, one finds space, and the void.
Deeper than Hell, a molten core.
Though I use the phrasings Heaven and Hell to speak of shallow pop culture understandings, as they relate to religion.
Of morality, my view is tied to Nihilism, Existentialism.
- You're nihilist? 

oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Lemming
"I consider evil an entirely human artifact- there's no evidence of such corruption in the natural world."
EVIL in the narrow sense is an ethical judgement- it denotes an intentional infliction of unnecessary harm.  Hurricanes and rockslides are not evil, even when people are harmed them because they are natural events within natural cycles.  Plants and animals do no evil because they are instinctively performing adaptive behaviors.  What makes a harm evil is a lack of necessity and an intentional choice.  Only humans have the requisite ethical tools to delineate a choice as immoral.  I know some people think of evil as an elemental or supernatural force but I see no evidence backing that theory.  Most evil in the narrow sense seems to emerge from complex human systems (such as religions, oftentimes)- competing and conflicting ethical frameworks that subjugate one's instinctive moral code.