MORE than HALF of POLICE KILLINGS are MISLABELED, NEW STUDY SAYS

Would you care to figure that by economic class? If you do I don't think you will see much difference between people of color and other ethnic groups. You may however see a difference in conviction rates as people of color are disproportionally convicted.

At the very least it makes you far more likely to be convicted for crimes. No expensive lawyers or connections.

No, counting dead bodies. Police aren't even involved in this. It's a coroner statistic.

What if the reason has nothing to do with race?

It's obviously a cultural thing, and not a race thing.

I'd bet that the number of crimes committed is way higher per conviction in black communities than others because of "no snitching" and jury nullification.

The numbers do not back this up. Quite the opposite in fact as predominantly black communities are disproportionally targeted by police.

Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps high-crime neighborhoods are  disproportionately targeted by police?

You mean high poverty areas? Yes it has. In fact I accept that as an axiom. That is precisely why it is indicative of systemic racism that so many such communities are black communities. 

Yes, because human agency inside said communities cannot ever explain it, right?

 That people of color are just intrinsically more inclined to criminality than whites? I hate to belabor the obvious but that is a racist attitude to hold so I hope that isn't what you are saying. I hope you aren't just a blatant racist. 

The poor have little agency compared with the wealthy

If the problem is poverty, then you'd expect maybe theft to be at a higher rate. But why do blacks rape more people per capita? What about having less money makes you more inclined to rape? That doesn't make any coherent sense.

Typical of a lib to just offhandedly call any naysayer a racist to try to discredit them while parroting the status quo talking points, though.

Because incidents of rape in the wealthy and powerful are coming to light in record numbers where before they simply went uninvestigated.

I said if you think ethnicity makes you more or less inclined to criminality that would by definition be racist. Is that what you believe or not?

To what degree are White people at fault for the failings of Black people?

Would their crime rates and incomes be identical without slavery and segregation?

Well there are many other forms of racism besides these and many are more subtle and insidious but yeah all things being equal we would expect all things to be equal. If all things are not equal then all things must not be equal. 

So, in other words, anecdotal evidence.

Do I think genetics on average differ by race? Yes, that's hardly controversial.

I agree that not all things are equal. It just seems that I am open to more factors causing said equality than you, and hence the perceived weighting of each reason is different.

Would their crime rates and incomes be identical without slavery and segregation?

It's probs nothing to do with slavery or very little.

Slavery is part of the same ugly weed as the systemically oppressive policies introduced as a direct response from racists then in power to the civil rights movement. The base issue is viewing other humans as lesser or as dangerous or perhaps worst of all just not even human.

The same base of endemic racism lead to slavery as lead to the pushback against the civil rights movement. 

Personally, I think every death during police action should be tagged for State and Federal databases.  As a citizen, I want to know how many fat guy police chase heart attacks agencies are reporting so I can see how that number compares to other police agencies, other states, other nations, other years , etc.

It is a fact that the rich are often shielded from the consequences of their wrongdoings by their wealth. Do you dispute this?

There is not enough difference in allele frequency to make the distinction between races. There us only one race. The human race. A white European descended person may easily bear more genetic similarities to any given person of color chosen at random than any given white person chosen at random. Your argument is scientifically fallacious. 

If you believe that the reason is one "races" "superior genes" then, not to beat a dead horse but that would be racist by definition. I am not trying to put words in your mouth I'm just being very clear about what I think is racism so that we can avoid confusion. I cannot make you racist by my definition only you can and only by fitting that definition. 

If you can provide facts showing that rich people are shielded from consequences for crimes (obviously, they are shielded from crimes resulting in fines) that require jail time, then I'd be happy to look at that and make an assessment based on the facts provided.

You can break it down to be more specific. It depends on how specific you want to be with "race" categories. They can trace your origins to where your ancestors lived geographically. Geographic locations are highly correlated with skin color.

I'm not calling any one set of genes better than another. Some genes make people better at certain things and worse at others. Based on the Olympics and US sports leagues, you can make assumptions about superiority at sports for different races. That doesn't seem to be a controversial claim. But whenever it has to do with... let's say genes related to delayed gratification or even average brain mass, then we start having issues. I think that people from different geographic locations have different genes on average and that those genes lead to a higher likelihood of certain outcomes. 

Also, I (non-controversially) think that people from different geographic locations have different races. (Ex. before colonialization of Africa or the North African slave trade, you would be hard-pressed to find a White person on the continent)