I've seen people advocate for banning pro lifers, for banning people who believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I've met plenty of people that are fine with someone getting beat up for misgendering. An entire family personally hates me for being open about my disapproval of BLM.
It is impossible to evaluate such generalities and certainly not in keeping with my experience. If you give me a specific case of some institution banning people for PRO life opinion, we can evaluate that case on its merits. Otherwise, it just sounds like more FOX News grievance bullshit.
The left (and the right) is polarizing this country and we are heading towards a civil war.
And yet only a tiny group of right wingers who get their news from Russian posts on Facebook and Fox News and infowars are talking about civil war. Only one political wing is shrinking rapidly and is thinking about Civil War as a desperate effort to maintain power. The rest of America, most of America, is talking about infrastructure, voting rights, improving education, improving healthcare, etc.
I notice you are characterizing people who advocate for social justice as extremists. Why would any good citizen be against social justice?
Social justice is very vague and people shouldn't back vague causes.
Liberty is vague... may I assume that you are anti-freedom?
The pursuit of happiness is vague....may I assume you don't advocate the Declaration of Independence?
Believing in social justice means believing that society works best when society is fair and reasonable. I think America was invented to promote social justice and that you're not really on board with the American project unless you think American society should be fair and reasonable.
SJWs believe in hating anybody who is even the slightest bit right of center.
Well, SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR was a term invented by the alt-right during the gamergate controversy as a term of derision. If you are wondering who is hating who, a good place to start is who is making up the derisive terms. That fact alone tells us much about who is doing the hating.
Looks like every dude who attacked our Nation's Capitol on Jan 6th. When the alt-Right invented the term, it was decidedly projected at feminists and I always picture a woman when the alt-Righters use the term.
Similarly, if your definition of, "social justice" is vehemently hating anybody who disagrees with even one tenant of left leaning theory,
I have never seen a single solitary person ever use this definition of Social Justice Warrior.
then normal people are going to disapprove of SJW theory.
There is nothing to your IF so there is nothing to your THEN.
Here are some examples of SJWs:
Here is the problem and it has nothing to do with the left. You are being lied to and you are willingly and unquestioningly believing those lies. You, Alec, have a responsibility to check these facts and your failure to do so has led you to believe a lot of things about America and Americans that are simply not true.
mediabiasfactcheck.
Analysis / Bias
In review, PJ Media is a popular conservative news and opinion website that garners 13 million+ page views per month. PJ Media uses moderately loaded emotional language in their articles that favor the right, such as this: Suspended Pentagon Whistleblower Says FBI’s Russia Probe Was ‘All a Set-Up.’ When it comes to the sourcing of information, they usually use credible right-leaning media sources. However, they also use poor sources such as Jihad Watch, which has been labeled a hate group by the SPLC. Almost all stories reviewed favored the right and denigrated the left through wording and story selection. Failed Fact Checks
Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks
Fact checkers like Snopes and Politifact shoot down Pajamas Media and Senior Editor Tyler O'Neil all the time. Look with your own eyes at the mentally ill Army Vet being harrassed by O'Neil in the video. Look at his ZZ Top beard and unkempt hair. If this is representative of the kind of people who you have a problem with than you are just picking on sad loners. This dude does not represent any kind of political movement and to make a newspaper article about provoking him is just cruel and selfish.
RT stands for RUSSIA TODAY.
"RT (formerly Russia Today) is a Russian state-controlled international television network funded by the federal tax budget of the Russian government"
This is a classic example of Putin's propaganda attack on our country and the way the right-wing blindly helps Putin attack us. You should always check all of your sources for links to Russian Intelligence but if you are using Russia Today as your source then you are broadcasting that you are not even trying to vet your sources. Please stop spreading enemy propaganda in your country.
Just look at how your opinion is being manipulated here. Jamil Smith argues that the term pro-life should be retired like the Redskins name or Aunt Jemima. Russia turn that into "they're trying to ban us!" and you fall for that lie. Why?
I think you should work much harder at finding truthful sources, at least ones that aren't actively trying to bring your country down.
.jpg){kind=link}