Paul's Message is Irrefutable

Author: Fruit_Inspector

Posts

Total: 244
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
Fruit_inspector should be able to lead me through his reasoning (rather than question how justification works) if his position is something he has considered.
I think he wants you to identify what you mean by justification. I find this very reasonable since the definition needs to be ironed out before the discussion can go further and avoids you both speaking past each other. 

PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@FLRW
 Which seems to be your justification for the claim that no one knows what happens after death - because no one has convinced you.
I think it is that no one has come back from death and shown us pictures that they had taken on their iphone. Remember that your afterlife will be the same as your beforelife.
The biblical accounts provide statements of eyewitnesses that claim Jesus came back to life after death. If Jesus came back to life we can know it is possible. While it is not the same as an iPhone snap shot, it is reasonably justified. These disciples go to their deaths proclaiming what, a lie? Would you be willing to go to your death for what you know was a lie? Do they act as deceived? No. Is their message dishonest and unloving? You can't show that it is. It is a hope for humanity. What hope do you have? Without God, what makes you think anything has meaning. You would deceive yourself in thinking it was, yet I'm sure you not only look for meaning in life but believe there is meaning. 

The statement assumes a before life. What makes you think your afterlife will be the same as your before life and how do you know you had a before life?  How can there be life for you before you were alive? I see the statement as self-refuting.  
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,612
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
What makes you think your afterlife will be the same as your before life 
Because the 86 billion neurons in your brain will not exist after you die just like they didn't exist before you were born. You can only think in the language you learned while you were alive.
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
@Fruit_Inspector
I'll just make my point so it doesn't seem tangential. Circular reasoning is not necessarily invalid if the reasoning is based on a valid premise:

If the Bible is true, then circular reasoning based on the Bible claiming it is true is not fallacious - though it may not be particularly persuasive to someone else.
Precisely!!!

We all appeal to authority of some kind in justifying claims. The question is whether the authority is true to what is the case. Skep works from the presuppositional framework that the Bible is not true and cannot be reasonably shown to be consistent or true. He cannot prove it is not true, it is just his biased opinion based on his worldview analysis. The biblical evidence goes against what he has been taught to believe by people of like agendas. (^8

He puts his trust in something he cannot confirm is the real case. The question is why should we or anybody believe that what he believes is more reasonable? I don't believe he can say it is more reasonable and we have delved into this issue many times before. 
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
Circular reasoning which adds nothing new to the conversation is fallacious. To your point we all rely on circular reasoning of some sort, thats true, but the fallaciousness comes in the small circles. 'My book is true because it says its true' is a tiny circle compared to 'trial and error has shown us (humanity) these rules of logic are always true (or have never been shown wrong)'.  All rings are not equal. ;-)
You assume the circle is small, but it reaches into every area of life in regards to its authority, wisdom, and reason. There are many confirmations that the Bible is what it claims to be. I have argued a couple with you for a long time (Prophecy and Morality) in getting you to make sense of them outside the biblical framework.
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
If the Bible is true, then circular reasoning based on the Bible claiming it is true is not fallacious - though it may not be particularly persuasive to someone else.
The argument is fallacious- and it can be demonstrated with every Biblical error, scientific absurdity, ignorance, and inequality attributed to an 'all knowing, all powerful, loving god' ...along with the interpolation, redaction, and general and undeniable human corruption of the so-called "Word of God". 

If that is your standard, you don't know very much about the Bible, my friend. I don't imagine this is something you will be able to accept from me though. We can discuss it only if you prefer. If not, suffice to say there's probably not any way I'm going to be able to accept your standard and we'll leave it at that.
I would argue it is you who does not know much about the Bible, as determined by our debates on prophecy. 

What biblical errors are you speaking of with nothing more than assertion?
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@FLRW
What makes you think your afterlife will be the same as your before life 
Because the 86 billion neurons in your brain will not exist after you die just like they didn't exist before you were born. You can only think in the language you learned while you were alive.
Again, assuming we are nothing more than biological beings. 
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
@Stephen
-->@SkepticalOne
Well he was nailed to the wall the second Polytheist - Witch posted this:


#3  Polytheist-Witch  "Paul is a liar and corruptor of the messages of Jesus Christ you are either a Christian or Pauline".

He was just far too up himself to see where that was going .
Again, you show your ignorance in matters pertaining to the Bible. Paul's message was often one that followed closely or reiterated to the teachings of Christ, especially in the theme of the Olivet Discourse. Paul's message pertained to Christ or Christianity. 

PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Fruit_Inspector
I agree that we are the ones who create words and their definitions. However, words in and of themselves do not change the ontological nature of a thing. If I see a horse but I call it a tree, it doesn't change the fact that I am looking at a large four-legged animal. But in this case, my deviation from the accepted definition of tree will probably not cause an ethical dilemma.

On the other hand, if I exclude a fetus from the definition of human because it has not exited the birth canal, all of a sudden we have an ethical issue created by a definition. If human rights only apply to humans, then our definition of "human" will have serious ethical implications. So, if those who are communicating cannot agree on what a human is in the abortion debate, how can we ever know whether a fetus is a human?
Adding to your statement, to that I say, if it comes from two being of like biological nature then how can it be something other than what those beings are? IOW's, horses do not produce cows. If two animals with the same genetic make-up mate then the outcome is of the same nature. Thus, an atheist arguing that a fetus is not a human being goes against the nature of what that being is. And they do this so that equal justice under the law is not applied.

The fact is that we can identify and agree upon what the unborn is ( a human being who should have the same rights as any other human being), we just chose not to because it goes against the popular prevalent indoctrination or group-think. 
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
No. I'm saying claims should not be accepted as true until they can be shown connected to objective reality in some way. 

Can you show Paul is talking about a real thing? If not, you're skipping a step in asking for refutation. 
I'm curious. In regards to what?
Something in the thread, I'm sure. (I don't remember, it was a long time ago!) 

Welcome back, Peter!
Thank you, Chuck! I am just dropping in for now. My wife has been in the hospital for three weeks and the times leading up to and preceding that have been busy. I want to get back to a few threads but don't want to until things are going more smoothly. I think we agreed to a debate on morality too.   
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@FLRW
Stephen Hawking spoke candidly in a 2011 Guardian interview about what he believes happens when people die. He told the Guardian that while he "wasn't afraid of death," he was in no hurry to die. "I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail," he said. "There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark." 

Wow, SkepticalOne sounds like Hawking and PGA2.0 sounds like Jim Bakker.
Why do you think that is of any significance to me - what Stephen Hawking's thinks on such matters? He is not an authority in life and death. I question the truth claims he is making as valid. He is just pontificating his subjective viewpoint. What does it matter in his universe if his universe does not correspond with reality? He has a mechanical and material view of life that cannot account for how or why there is life and life and death are ultimately meaningless with such a worldview. IMO, he is leading you down another dead end (pardon the pun). 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,078
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@PGA2.0
Et tu, Brute.
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@zedvictor4
Thus the need for a greater authority.

Jesus rose from the dead!
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,616
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@PGA2.0
Jesus rose from the dead!

You are lacking in evidence though, aren't you? An empty rich man's tomb is only evidence of an empty rich man's tomb. No one witnessed the stone being rolled away and no one actually witnessed Jesus rising from being "dead". And many are only alleged to have witnessed a very  much alive and healthy Jesus, wounds and all. 

Paul was a self confessed liar. He spoke of him lying to further the cause of his beliefs. 


“If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?”Romans 3:7

So there it is.  Paul claiming to do what ever it takes including telling bare faced lies.


Paul also doctors Old Testament verses to further his own Christian agenda . .... just as many Christians do to this day. A lesson they learned fromlying   ' St' Paul no doubt.

Example:


Isaiah 28:16  King James Version

" Therefore thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste".


Now see what crafty ole' Paul does with that?


Romans 9:33 PAUL's   Version
As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumbling stone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.


Would you like another?


Deuteronomy 30:14 PAUL's   Version
" But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it".


Romans 10:8  PAUL's Version
 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;".




Jeremiah 31:32 King James Version

" Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord":


Hebrews 8:9   PAUL's Version
"Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord".


PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Stephen
Jesus rose from the dead!

You are lacking in evidence though, aren't you? An empty rich man's tomb is only evidence of an empty rich man's tomb. No one witnessed the stone being rolled away and no one actually witnessed Jesus rising from being "dead". And many are only alleged to have witnessed a very  much alive and healthy Jesus, wounds and all. 
No, there is sufficient evidence. The entire writing of the NT, of all the authors, speak of the resurrection of Jesus. The apostles understood the significance of His rising from the dead, witnessed it, and most of them went to their deaths never recanting of that belief, even after suffering excruciating tortures. So, the question is, would you go to your death for a lie? These apostles/disciples went throughout the known world of the Jews preaching the Gospel of hope, for what, a lie? The intricate prophecies in Scripture confirm the truthfulness of what is written. That would include the OT as well as the NT. So, there are many evidence related confirmations in addition to the promised Holy Spirit working in the lives of believers that confirms God's word as truth. Faith and trust in Jesus opens our eyes to the truth of the word, a truth that the world scoffs at, to their demise. The types and shadows  are also another confirmation. What is applied to God in the OT is applied to Jesus in the NT. For instance, God takes a people for Himself to make Himself known to the world and establishes a covenant (the Mosaic Covenant with them). Jesus takes a people for Himself (Christians, starting with His twelve disciples) and makes Himself known to the world through them (the New Covenant established with His blood). God takes His people out of slavery and bondage in Egypt and leads them through Moses to the Promised Land. The journey takes forty years. Jesus takes His people out of the bondage or slavery of sin into the new promised land, the heavenly country. Again, the journey takes forty years. In the OT Moses is the intercessor and mediator between God and Israel. In the NT, Jesus is the Intercessor and Mediator between God and humanity. I could go on and on with the comparisons that include the temple, the sacrifices, the events, the people who are types of Jesus, etc., but I think my point is made, briefly. 

Not only this, the spread of Christianity could have been stopped by the Romans and the Jews by producing the body of Jesus. That is a significant point. They could not do that because there was no body to produce. He had risen. Just by showing a decaying body would have ended the claim that He had risen. There were accounts of over 500 people seeing Him after death. To squash the spread of Christianity a body would have ended these peoples eye witness claims.  

So, we as Christians have a reasonable faith that is not easily disputed. Show me that any of what I said is false. You can't. 
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Stephen
Paul was a self confessed liar. He spoke of him lying to further the cause of his beliefs. 


“If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?”Romans 3:7

So there it is.  Paul claiming to do what ever it takes including telling bare faced lies.
What you do is take selected Scripture out of its context or collapse it to make it a pretext.

Here is the greater context:

3 What then? If some [b]did not believe, their [c]unbelief will not nullify the faithfulness of God, will it? 4 [d]Far from it! Rather, God must prove to be true, though every person be found a liar, as it is written:
“So that You are justified in Your words,
And prevail [e]when You are judged.”
5 But if our unrighteousness [f]demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? (I am speaking from a human viewpoint.) 6 Far from it! For otherwise, how will God judge the world? 7 But if through my lie the truth of God abounded to His glory, why am I also still being judged as a sinner? 8 And why not say (just as we are slanderously reported and as some claim that we say), “Let’s do evil that good may come of it”? [g]Their condemnation is deserved.
9 What then? [h]Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; 10 as it is written:
There is no righteous person, not even one;
11 There is no one who understands,
There is no one who seeks out God;
12 They have all turned aside, together they have become [i]corrupt;
There is no one who does good,
There is not even one.”
13 “Their throat is an open grave,
With their tongues they keep deceiving,”
“The venom of [j]asps is under their lips”;
14 “Their mouth is full of cursing and bitterness”;
15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood,
16 Destruction and misery are in their paths,
17 And they have not known the way of peace.”
18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”
19 Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are [k]under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; 20 because by the works [l]of the Law [m]none of mankind will be justified in His sight; for [n]through the Law comes [o]knowledge of sin.

The greater context is a contrast between the Law and grace, which Paul goes onto explain further on in Romans 3. 

Paul includes himself like everyone else as a sinner, yet one who is saved and justified through faith. You and I are no better. We have all lied and failed to live up to the Law. Paul is not saying he lied in this instance. Please notice the verse in question:

7 But if through my lie the truth of God abounded to His glory, why am I also still being judged as a sinner?

Paul is making the point that IF He lied the truth of God would still abound. He is not saying he was lying in what he said while inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Deep Concern for Israel
I am telling the truth in Christ, I am not lying; my conscience testifies with me in the Holy Spirit.

For I say that Christ has become a servant to the circumcision in behalf of the truth of God, to confirm the promises given to the fathers,

but we have renounced the things hidden because of shame, not walking in trickery nor distorting the word of God, but by the open proclamation of the truth commending ourselves to every person’s conscience in the sight of God.


PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Stephen


Paul also doctors Old Testament verses to further his own Christian agenda . .... just as many Christians do to this day. A lesson they learned from lying   ' St' Paul no doubt.

Example:


Isaiah 28:16  King James Version

" Therefore thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste".


Now see what crafty ole' Paul does with that?


Romans 9:33 PAUL's   Version
As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumbling stone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
Then He will become a sanctuary; But to both houses of Israel, He will be a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, And a snare and a trap for the inhabitants of Jerusalem.


Would you like another?


Deuteronomy 30:14 PAUL's   Version
" But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it".


Romans 10:8  PAUL's Version
 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;".
What is the difference? I'm not understanding the point you are making. Paul is taking an OT verse and applying it to Jesus. Have you considered a few explanations? Different translations use different words in translating the verse to the equivalency of the day we live in, or alternatively, have you ever heard of paraphrasing? Many times Jesus applied verses from the OT to Him. He gave greater understanding of them, just as Paul is doing while guided by the Holy Spirit. 

Romans 10:8-9
New International Version


8 But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,”[
a] that is, the message concerning faith that we proclaim: 9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.

Romans 10:8-9
New American Standard Bible


8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart”—that is, the word of faith which we are preaching, 9 [a]that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;

How is the message changed by these two versions?

On the contrary, the word is very near youin youmouth and in youheart, that you may follow it.

Jeremiah 31:32 King James Version

" Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord":


Hebrews 8:9   PAUL's Version
"Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord".

Jeremiah 31:31-34
New American Standard Bible

31 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant which I made with their fathers on the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord. 33 “For this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the Lord: “I will put My law within them and write it on their heart; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 34 They will not teach again, each one his neighbor and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the Lord, “for I will forgive their wrongdoing, and their sin I will no longer remember.”

Hebrews 8:8-12
New American Standard Bible


"Behold, days are coming, says the Lord,
[b]When I will bring about a new covenant
With the house of Israel and the house of Judah,
9 Not like the covenant which I made with their fathers
On the day I took them by the hand
To bring them out of the land of Egypt;
For they did not continue in My covenant,
And I did not care about them, says the Lord.
10 For this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel
After those days, declares the Lord:
[c]I will put My laws into their minds,
And write them on their hearts.
And I will be their God,
And they shall be My people.
11 And they will not teach, each one his fellow citizen,
And each one his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’
For they will all know Me,
From [d]the least to the greatest of them.
12 For I will be merciful toward their wrongdoings,
And their sins I will no longer remember.”

What is the difference between the two verses? The author (many believe it to be Paul), under the guidance of the Holy Spirit (God) gives and explanation in Hebrews that is not included in Jeremiah. The one verse about God being a husband to them is excluded in Hebrews while the author adds, "For they did not continue in My covenant,.." which is another way of saying that they broke the covenant. In the NT sometimes two verses are combined and condensed into one, for instance, Revelation 1:7.  

Revelation 1:7

7 Behold, He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. [a]So it is to be. Amen.

That combines Daniel 7:13 and Zechariah 12:10.

Daniel 7:13
NASB

The Son of Man Presented
13 “I kept looking in the night visions,
And behold, with the clouds of heaven
One like a son of man was coming,
And He came up to the Ancient of Days
And was presented before Him.

Zechariah 12:10
New American Standard Bible

10 “And I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem [a]the Spirit of grace and of pleading, so that they will look at Me whom they pierced; and they will mourn for Him, like one mourning for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.



SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@PGA2.0
Ok, I will amend my statement:

I don't know what happens after death, and no one that I know of can show they know more. ;-)

Better?
Again, it is your presumption that no one can show they know. 
Its not a presumption when there is no demonstration of an afterlife. :-)
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,616
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@PGA2.0
Paul was a self confessed liar. He spoke of him lying to further the cause of his beliefs. 


“If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?”Romans 3:7

So there it is.  Paul claiming to do what ever it takes including telling bare faced lies.
What you do is take selected Scripture out of its context or collapse it to make it a pretext.



Watch this 5 minute clip that sums up the ignorant buffoons that make this  uneducated ridiculous claim perfectly. 




zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,078
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@PGA2.0
And so the story goes.
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
Ok, I will amend my statement:

I don't know what happens after death, and no one that I know of can show they know more. ;-)

Better?
Again, it is your presumption that no one can show they know. 
Its not a presumption when there is no demonstration of an afterlife. :-)

During the 1st-century over 500 eyewitnesses attested to the resurrection of Jesus Christ. It is also a main doctrine of the Christian belief. 

3 For I handed down to you [b]as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He appeared to [c]Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 After that He appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep; 7 then He appeared to [d]James, then to all the apostles; 8 and last of all, as [e]to one untimely born, He appeared to me also. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, [f]and not fit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me did not prove vain; but I labored even more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me. 11 Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.
12 Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised; 14 and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain, your faith also is in vain.

That He appeared to over 500 at the same time could have been disputed by producing a corpse and squashing the movement. It never happened. At the time of writing Paul said many of them were still alive also. 

PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@Stephen
Paul was a self confessed liar. He spoke of him lying to further the cause of his beliefs. 


“If my falsehood enhances God’s truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?”Romans 3:7

So there it is.  Paul claiming to do what ever it takes including telling bare faced lies.
What you do is take selected Scripture out of its context or collapse it to make it a pretext.

Watch this 5 minute clip that sums up the ignorant buffoons that make this  uneducated ridiculous claim perfectly. 



The video is side-stepping the verse under consideration in which you charged Paul as a liar while ignoring the immediate context, which includes in it the phrase, "Romans 3:10
as it is written: “There is no righteous person, not even one;..."

The video brings up the problem of evil. Should a good and righteous God address evil? What you are charging God with is that He does not have the right to address and punish evil (that which is wrong). It brings to the table the issue of whether a good and righteous Judge should wink at evil? You also do not understand the Old Covenant and its times as to the barbarity. The Old Covenant law or Law of Moses went above and beyond the practices of other nations of the times. God made a covenant with Israel in which He was teaching Israel that He was holy, righteous, and pure, and Israel agreed to live according to that covenant in which, if they were obedient to it, He would bless them like no other nation on earth. As for the people within the land God gave Israel, they were evil and would corrupt Israel into worshiping false gods and abandoning God, the very thing God warned them of and they did. They became as corrupt and vile as the nations around them and God continually sent them warnings, reminding them to turn from their wickedness and repent or He would bring judgment upon them. In Deuteronomy 28, there is describe the blessings of obedience and the curse of disobedience. Israel knew this and agreed to live by the covenant with God of their own will that Moses was the mediator of. 

Exodus 24:3, 7
New American Standard Bible

3 Then Moses came and reported to the people all the words of the Lord and all the [a]ordinances; and all the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words which the Lord has spoken we will do!”
7 Then he took the Book of the Covenant and read it [a]as the people listened; and they said, “All that the Lord has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient!”

They took lightly their relationship with a holy God despite His loving rebukes and warnings. 

And one more point I want to make here. God does not take an innocent life without restoring it to a better place, a better existence. We all die, and our times are within His hands. Now, I've explained all this to you before and you continue to talk past the issue of justice and righteousness. In effect, what you are doing is trying to govern how God should act, not knowing the thoughts and actions of those you think are innocent. To this I say, have you ever lied, stolen, borne false witness against your neighbour, murdered or had hateful thoughts of malice in your mind, coveted, committed adultery in your mind or outright physically betrayed your wife? If so, what makes you think you're righteous and have the right to judge others, especially God? How do you live up to His righteousness? Yet, for those who will believe, God offers reconciliation through His Son, who He loving gave that we could have abundant life in the presence of God. That is your dilemma, whether you will believe or reject/deny God in His mercy and grace, found exclusively in Jesus Christ. 
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,616
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@PGA2.0
Context

CONTEX!!


The video shows that this is the famous default of ALL Christians when caught cold. 

Paul admits to being a Liar. In any "CONTEXT"
Fruit_Inspector
Fruit_Inspector's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 855
3
4
7
Fruit_Inspector's avatar
Fruit_Inspector
3
4
7
-->
@Stephen
Your video is a great example of why climate change should not be a concern of the government and that science has been hijacked by activists.
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,616
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@PGA2.0
as it is written: “There is no righteous person, not even one;..."

CONTEXT!!!


This is the account of Noah and his family. Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked faithfully with God.Genesis 6:9

[Zechariah and Elizabeth] And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.Luke 1:6

And if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the depraved conduct of the lawless. 2 Peter 2:7

By faith Abel brought God a better offering than Cain did. By faith he was commended as righteous, when God spoke well of his offerings. And by faith Abel still speaks, even though he is dead. Hebrews 11:4

Let me know if you need any more lessons.

CONTEXT!!!!


Like I said, Paul was a liar and had  doctored OT verses to suit and further his own agenda.

CONTEXT!!!!🤣



SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@PGA2.0
During the 1st-century over 500 eyewitnesses attested to the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Actually, one man *claimed* there was 500 witnesses.
PGA2.0
PGA2.0's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,179
3
5
8
PGA2.0's avatar
PGA2.0
3
5
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
During the 1st-century over 500 eyewitnesses attested to the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Actually, one man *claimed* there was 500 witnesses.
There is no historical account of it being disputed, and it was not just one man that witnessed His resurrection. Peter, John, James, and other NT writers speak of witnessing the resurrected Christ.

Matthew - 
and coming out of the tombs after His resurrection, they entered the holy city and appeared to many.

Mark -
Mark 16 records Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of [a]James, and Salome witnessing the empty tomb and are told,
"7 But go, tell His disciples and Peter, ‘He is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see Him, just as He told you.’” 

Luke - 
just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word,

Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary the mother of James; also the other women with them reported the empty tomb and spread the news to the Apostles. Later on that very day two disciples meet the resurrected Christ on the road to Emmaus.
13 And behold, on that very day two of them were going to a village named Emmaus, which was [g]sixty stadia from Jerusalem...31 And then their eyes were opened and they recognized Him; and He vanished from [o]their sight.

They tell this to others and while doing so Christ once again appears to the group.
36 Now while they were telling these things, Jesus Himself suddenly stood in their midst and *said to them, “Peace be to you.”

John - 
John 20 records the resurrected Jesus appearing to the disciples and later to Thomas.
19 Now when it was evening on that day, the first day of the week, and when the doors were [b]shut where the disciples were together due to fear of the [c]Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst, and *said to them, “Peace be to you.” 20 And when He had said this, He showed them both His hands and His side. The disciples then rejoiced when they saw the Lord...26 [f]Eight days later His disciples were again inside, and Thomas was with them. Jesus *came, the doors having been [g]shut, and stood in their midst and said, “Peace be to you.” 27 Then He *said to Thomas, “Place your finger here, and see My hands; and take your hand and put it into My side; and do not continue in disbelief, but be a believer.” 28 Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus *said to him, “Because you have seen Me, have you now believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.”

Acts - 
Acts 1:2 until the day when He was taken up to heaven, after He had given orders [b]by the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom He had chosen. 3 To [c]these He also presented Himself alive after His suffering, by many convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of forty days and speaking of things regarding the kingdom of God. 4 [d]Gathering them together, He commanded them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait for [e]what the Father had promised, “Which,” He said, “you heard of from Me; 5 for John baptized [f]with water, but you will be baptized [g]with the Holy Spirit [h]not many days from now.”...

Peter - 
Eyewitnesses
For we did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty.

Then you have Paul's Damascus experience and I could probably cite many more recorded Scriptural instances, so you point does not meet the evidence of Scripture presented by many authors. 

Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,616
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@PGA2.0


During the 1st-century over 500 eyewitnesses attested to the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Actually, one man *claimed* there was 500 witnesses.
There is no historical account of it being disputed, and it was not just one man that witnessed His resurrection. Peter, John, James, and other NT writers speak of witnessing the resurrected Christ.

Matthew - 
and coming out of the tombs after His resurrection, they entered the holy city and appeared to many.

Mark -
Mark 16 records Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of [a]James, and Salome witnessing the empty tomb and are told,
"7 But go, tell His disciples and Peter, ‘He is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see Him, just as He told you.’” 

Luke - 
just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word,

Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary the mother of James; also the other women with them reported the empty tomb and spread the news to the Apostles. Later on that very day two disciples meet the resurrected Christ on the road to Emmaus.
13 And behold, on that very day two of them were going to a village named Emmaus, which was [g]sixty stadia from Jerusalem...31 And then their eyes were opened and they recognized Him; and He vanished from [o]their sight.

They tell this to others and while doing so Christ once again appears to the group.
36 Now while they were telling these things, Jesus Himself suddenly stood in their midst and *said to them, “Peace be to you.”

John - 
John 20 records the resurrected Jesus appearing to the disciples and later to Thomas.
19 Now when it was evening on that day, the first day of the week, and when the doors were [b]shut where the disciples were together due to fear of the [c]Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst, and *said to them, “Peace be to you.” 20 And when He had said this, He showed them both His hands and His side. The disciples then rejoiced when they saw the Lord...26 [f]Eight days later His disciples were again inside, and Thomas was with them. Jesus *came, the doors having been [g]shut, and stood in their midst and said, “Peace be to you.” 27 Then He *said to Thomas, “Place your finger here, and see My hands; and take your hand and put it into My side; and do not continue in disbelief, but be a believer.” 28 Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus *said to him, “Because you have seen Me, have you now believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.”

Acts - 
Acts 1:2 until the day when He was taken up to heaven, after He had given orders [b]by the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom He had chosen. 3 To [c]these He also presented Himself alive after His suffering, by many convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of forty days and speaking of things regarding the kingdom of God. 4 [d]Gathering them together, He commanded them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait for [e]what the Father had promised, “Which,” He said, “you heard of from Me; 5 for John baptized [f]with water, but you will be baptized [g]with the Holy Spirit [h]not many days from now.”...

Peter - 
Eyewitnesses
For we did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty.

Then you have Paul's Damascus experience and I could probably cite many more recorded Scriptural instances, so you point does not meet the evidence of Scripture presented by many authors. 

CONTEXT!!!  CHERRY PICKING!!!!!


Fruit_Inspector
Fruit_Inspector's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 855
3
4
7
Fruit_Inspector's avatar
Fruit_Inspector
3
4
7
-->
@Stephen

No response?
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,616
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Fruit_Inspector
No response?


"CONTEXT!!!!!, CHERRY PICKING!!!!!"



as it is written: “There is no righteous person, not even one;..."

CONTEXT!!!


This is the account of Noah and his family. Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked faithfully with God.Genesis 6:9

[Zechariah and Elizabeth] And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.Luke 1:6

And if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the depraved conduct of the lawless. 2 Peter 2:7

By faith Abel brought God a better offering than Cain did. By faith he was commended as righteous, when God spoke well of his offerings. And by faith Abel still speaks, even though he is dead. Hebrews 11:4

Let me know if you need any more lessons.

CONTEXT!!!!


Like I said, Paul was a liar and had  doctored OT verses to suit and further his own agenda.

CONTEXT!!!!🤣