Post to get a theme song, closest matching fictional character and general (exaggerated) overview.

Sum1hugme probably will bear hug you back if he's in a bad mood but generally is a gentle giant of sorts. It's unclear what brings him to the site other than a passion to discuss certain topics and then discuss nothing at all about others, though what those topics have in common isn't clear.

Mysterious in core beliefs or even core style of debate, Sum1hugme is recognised by his openness to engage on the formal 1v1 arena surprisingly more than his otherwise background, laidback demeanour would have you believe. There perhaps is a quiet bloodlust in there but he remains respectful throughout all encounters, disciplined and resolute no matter what the opponents bring to the table in behaviour or style.

Undefeatable wants to destroy you in a debate. It isn't that he resents you, it's that he wants you to envy and respect him. This runs much deeper than the shallow thing it appears to be, after all there are other ways to have an ego trip than debating on DART. Undefeatable needs to know that absolutely nobody can truly defeat his capacity to reason, he will try desperately to rematch against previous victors and puts his all into learning from defeats. Undefeatable doesn't actually have delusions of self-grandeur, instead he recognises where he stands as a debater and intellectual (or at least where he thinks he stands on the only scale he thinks matters) and strategises multiple areas to improve on to move 'up the ladder' (not just in Rating, in pure skill which is his main focus and yearning to use the website).

It isn't about the glory of winning that drives him, it's about him knowing and feeling the surge or pride and joy that comes from defeating a formally terrifying opponent. He will keep trying until he feels everyone here is either his equal or inferior, a competitor in its truest form.

Goody two-shoes Whiteflame is at first unbelievably good, it almost can seem fake to some, what's underneath it all? Where is the Hulk to his Bruce Banner? It isn't there, he doesn't snap, he doesn't break rules, he doesn't falter and yet he doesn't mock those that do either. He watches, waits and takes opportunities as they come, never overpressing an advantage in or outside of debates and yet being well-respected and well-renowned as a formidable opponent.

If you yell at him, he will ignore you and maybe calmly reply if he deems it appropriate but overall it's irrelevant to him what rules you break or the tone you talk, he finds it immature and entirely irrelevant to the conversation at hand. This skill is invaluable to him as a debater and he treats debating and everything in life as some fusion of science and art, where the rules and principles are to be studied and held to in a rigid manner but the rest is creativity where the highest artistic approach is most fascinating.

Honest, jaded, humble and driven by an urge to do good by those who've done good by him, MisterChris is a well-liked member of the community. He seemingly came out of nowhere as a chosen assistant Mod by David and has since maintained a position of putting his loyalties and do-gooder zeal above all else, never caring of his position and caring much more about the bigger picture at all times.

He enjoys debating in small bursts on topics he feels he either can properly defend Libertarianism with or some stance he feels strong enough on, it's safe to say you'll never see him enjoying or thriving in playing the Devil's Advocate. Chris is cynical about both the government and big corporations and this ethos applies also to a local level on a website like this, he doesn't tend to uphold either mainstream 'rebels' or mainstream status quo advocates, he prefers everyone to be free to be their own person and pushes outcomes that favour this in his interactions.

He doesn't say much but the times he isn't replying 4 words or less per post to mock how pointless he thinks your thread is, he'll actually post pro-anarchy pro-right-wing ethos stuff making him an Ancap of the pure kind (as opposed to a typical Right-Wing Libertarian). He wants a world where the citizens are free to protect each other against the evil and where the worthy rise, no unfair advantage or disadvantage at all.

The problem for Dr. Franklin seems to be that he would rather physically show you his ideas or allude to them with a few words rather than discuss them in-depth. A man of few words but a lot of passionate thoughts, angry ones at that, he could be likened to the Punisher in quite a few ways including a very dark, sarcastic sense of humour.

Paranoid and self-doubting in many respects, SirAnonymous tries to avoid others as much as possible. Yet, he is drawn to the website for some reason, the community drives him to suddenly come out of his shell for reasons that don't make sense to any, least of all himself. His self-doubt is his predominant trait as are the periods of long absence from the website.

He most likely is a pragmatist at his core who hates that he is that way (wishes he was an idealist). Life and the world have jaded him and he is rather paranoid about anyone finding out something about him to the extent that one may wonder why he participates in this website at all. The only thing he has explicitly claimed to believe in is Christianity and some resultant brand of Theological Conservatism.

He did try to start a journalistic paper of sorts regarding DART that was aimed at a satire-seeking audience, though that's stopped. This shows that he is quite the observer on the low and has a talent for writing if he'd choose to develop and reveal it more.