-->
@RationalMadman
You can care about starving people without donating a massive amount, especially if you're a low income earner.
They don't have to donate a massive dollar amount. They just need to donate a large percentage of their excess funds to the cause. I mean, Joe Biden, for all of his flaws summarized it here:
Quotation-Joe-Biden-Don-t-tell-me-what-you-value-Show-me-your-34-65-42.jpg (1200×640) (azquotes.com)
I don't know what EQ is. I'm just not an emotional person.
You can care about something that you can't do much about, that feeling is real and exists.
Most people in the US who claim to care about an issue have a huge ability to do a lot of numerical stuff about that issue. Sponsoring a kid in a 3rd world country costs about $1 a day. The typical person makes $80/day more than they need to survive in the US (Assuming you need $30,000/year to survive). One person can take all their excess money and sponsor 80 starving 3rd worlders with it, and all they have to sacrifice is money they don't need. 10 million liberals(6% of the left wing population in the US) with an average salary and average living expenses can sponsor 800 million starving 3rd worlders and eliminate world hunger.
Despite this, most people don't feel like contributing, so they may claim, "I want to end world hunger!" But actions speak louder than words. There is nothing wrong with refusing to help out hungry people. But come as advertised. Neither the bleeding heart liberal nor myself is helping as many starving 3rd worlders as we can, so we are both selfish. At least I'm honest about it, and honesty is a good trait to have.
If yoy don't care about cops and how they may mistreat people, especially when it's based on something as severely wrong as racism, then kindly state your position.
I don't care about extremely rare events, like the cops killing a very few number of people.
You couldn't give a duck about the suffering if the arbitrary number doesn't fit your arbitrary scale right?
I wouldn't call my scale arbitrary. I'd call it proportional.