-->
@Vader
Btw if it isn't obvious, I am Drug Distribution and I am a Role Vendor. I have 2 more left to give
Why did you claim without any pressure?
Crimes Mafia - DP2
Posts
Total:
314
-->
@ILikePie5
My point is that "corruption" is, at best a qualifier for a crime, not a crime unto itself. Would you buy someone claiming "aggravation" because "aggravated assault" is a crime?
-->
@Speedrace
I'm saying why would he claim a roleblocker role as scum
??
-->
@drafterman
Bruh what the fuck?
Where did I do that?
-->
@drafterman
My point is that "corruption" is, at best a qualifier for a crime, not a crime unto itself. Would you buy someone claiming "aggravation" because "aggravated assault" is a crime?
Democrats bought Abuse of Power in the impeachment articles without specifically saying which power. So yes people would buy it
-->
@Speedrace
SPEAK
No u
-->
@drafterman
Ok, that's good enough for me.I'm prostitution, role blocker. Mafia role blocker is not uncommonly known as "hooker" which is why that is my role.I was thinking that Lunatic might be angling for also claiming role blocker as you can bribe people not to do something, so some shit. I was trying to set up a possible CC.
Lol Mafia Hooker and Prostitution. Sounds like a perfect justification
-->
@ILikePie5
Democrats bought Abuse of Power in the impeachment articles without specifically saying which power. So yes people would buy it'
Impeachment is not a criminal process.
I will venmo $10 to anyone who can point out where I was being "contrarian" with regards to drafter/lunatic when drafter was trying to pressure him.
-->
@Danielle
Drafterman's claim was blatantly obvious from last DP. There are only a handful of "town roles with mafia equivalents" and one of them is HOOKER whereas the others are things like Scout, Lookout, etc. In a themed game about crimes, drafterman was obviously Prostitution. The fact that he wasn't killed when he essentially claimed role blocker yesterday is interesting. More interesting is drafter's willingness to get himself lynched and say that his role wasn't useful to town. That's one of the biggest reasons I voted for him because I thought he was trying to back out of claiming Prostitution.
He’s trying to talk his way out of a lynch as usual. How convenient that Lunatic has a day role and Drafter magically visits him.
-->
@drafterman
...
-->
@Danielle
Thoughts?Also I absolutely want warren to answer this from last day phase. He disappeared after I posted: Once again I am wondering the point of you asking me questions about my win con when #1 the OP clarifies that no win con = town, so even if I were scum I'd know how to answer this question and #2 there has already been discussion about how detailed or explicit the roles are to characters. Deciding to go into a deep dive about my PM analysis therefore seems like a waste of time at this point, or a way to look like you're investigating something thoroughly when scum is not going to get caught with these questions. You should have done this with people that posted much earlier. Explain your reason for going along with this line of questioning.
Still a +1
-->
@warren42
What changed from your stance here:
Where you were unpersuaded to here:
Where all of a sudden you agree.
VTL warren
-->
@drafterman
Also, one rather obvious reason why mafia wouldn't NK me: they think they can get me mislynched. So maybe look at the people who can out of the gate trying to lynch me?
This is just WIFOM
I'm gonna let you think on this and figure this one out yourself. Take a good hard look at those posts.
Unvote, since Pie is active now.
-->
@ILikePie5
It is, but that wasn't the point. The point was there are reasons why Mafia might not NK me, so the fact that wasn't killed is null.
-->
@warren42
I did. I don't see it. Perhaps you can stop hiding your information and tell us.
Wow. I'm dumb.
I totally got whiteflame and warren confused.
Unvote
-->
@drafterman
Your original posts were from whiteflame, not me
-->
@warren42
My bad.
-->
@drafterman
Impeachment is not a criminal process.
It’s an analogy to prove that yes people do buy into it and think that
-->
@ILikePie5
It's not a bad analogy because you can impeach for anything and call it anything you want. You can't do that for crimes.
-->
@Bullish
What’s the vote count?
It IS a bad analogy, that is.*
-->
@drafterman
It's not a bad analogy because you can impeach for anything and call it anything you want. You can't do that for crimes.
The point was that people would believe it not whether it is or isn’t a crime