-->
@ILikePie5
"There is no stare decisis in the selection of Supreme Court Justices."
Right... I never said there was. I've already clarified but it's obvious you still have no idea what I meant. I said "Packing the court is very bad for democracy and the judicial system, but Democrats have no choice if certain precedents are not adhered to." The precedents I am referring to are ones like the rulings on gay marriage and healthcare which I just specified in my last post. In other words, if Dems think these issues are on the table because ACB will not follow Supreme Court precedent, they think it's justifiable to pack the court because these issues are that important to them. I wasn't talking at all about the "historical precedent" of appointing judges, which is why the article you shared about it was useless and wholly irrelevant to my point.
Next time just say you don't know what I'm referring to instead of acting like I'm "wrong" when you have no idea what I'm talking about.