Abiogenesis

Author: Goldtop

Posts

Total: 334
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@MagicAintReal
Please don't doxx yourself.

Your identity is only useful for ad hominem attacks.

It doesn't matter if you are a world renown billionaire super genius or a homeless person.

You should be able to defend your positions with logic.
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@3RU7AL
You should be able to defend your positions with logic.

Can and have.
With this guy though, he attacked first and I'm all about self-defense.
That's actually logical.
I provided evidence and logic and he's just dismissed it all.
So now we're in idiot town.
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@ethang5
You couldn't toss me if I let you lift me up...
Lol. Don't look at the ground.

LMAO

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@MagicAintReal
I like to imagine that ethang5 is a very sophisticated AI.

The thing is simply grasping at straws because it scores points when you reply to it.
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@3RU7AL
I like to imagine that ethang5 is a very sophisticated AI.

The thing is simply grasping at straws because it scores points when you reply to it.

hahahahahha Yeah, I mean he's basically the text version of a soundboard with his responses anyway...but yeah that makes me less angry about him.
I mean I get the troll thing, but...I fucking hate that guy/AI.
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@3RU7AL
I also love that i can say fucking here....god that feels good...I mean, god that feels fucking good.
Fuck DDO for that too.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
Later you even mention that I have a graduate degree negating one of those erroneous claims about me.
Lol. I questioned that anyone with a graduate degree would write like a 15 year old with bad grammar.

Though I have a tattoo....
Noooooo! Really?

I'm actually not a troll...
Get outta town!

I'm a well-known teacher and researcher in a thriving school district in Maryland....
Sure you are slick.

You are a gigantic coward pussy, because you will not respond to the evidence yet assert childishly that it isn't evidence.
I won't respond because there is no evidence for abiogenesis, and from you not knowing this means you're too stupid to debate. And your posts have confirmed it. Thus you get tossed, cause that is how to treat moron trolls.

Just like ethang5 here.
Lol. You're so predictable it's like being in high school again. You have a graduate degree and your students read your debates? Only the uneducated, not knowing what it is, think that they can fake an education.

I bet you think you're original. Lol. You're a dime a dozen internet immature moron. Pull out More 3rd grade taunts. It's all you have.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@MagicAintReal
With this guy though, he attacked first and I'm all about self-defense.
I provided evidence and logic and he's just dismissed it all.
Dismissing what the moron calls "evidence and logic" is viewed as an "attack". Ah, PC liberals. "If you don't accept what I say, you are attacking me!"

...but yeah that makes me less angry about him.
Why are you angry? We could tell from your childish attempts at insult. But I'm not angry. You're being tossed.

I fucking hate that guy/AI.
I seem like AI to you because I'm more mature, and did not get rankled at your vulgarity or juvenile insults.

So now we're in idiot town.
You reside in idiot town. But I am the troll whisperer. I was trained to deal with internet morons like you. You can't anger me, you can't outlast me, you can't out think me.

You will get tossed like the idiot you are. Stupidity and name calling will not help you or bother me. I will just expose your stupidity as you post it. When your shame catches up with your stupidity, you will wake up.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
2
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
2
2
-->
@ethang5
I was trained to deal with internet morons like you. You can't anger me, you can't outlast me, you can't out think me.
Wow, you have some serious issues there, pal.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
The thing is simply grasping at straws because it scores points when you reply to it.
Must be why you are, like a coward, taking a shot a me, but directing your post to my tossee. You don't want me scoring points.

I decline his challenge, so I'm grasping at straws. That makes sense to your liberal brain huh? Bitterness looks good on you.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Goldtop
Wow, you have some serious issues there, pal.
And yet, unlike you, I don't follow people around carrying my bitterness like a cross and making public my stupidity.

Talk about serious issues.


3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@ethang5
Ho-hum, another ad hominem?  How incredibly predictable.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
2
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
2
2
-->
@ethang5
like a coward
Yes, that's exactly what you are, a coward. Don't call others cowards when you're the one running away.

Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
2
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
2
2
-->
@ethang5
Anyone who claims to have been trained to deal with internet morons is seriously fucked up.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
What? AI is a term of endearment?

You losers only see the "ad hom" directed at you, never the ones you throw. When you grow a backbone, let us know.


3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@ethang5
Ho-hum, another ad hominem?  How incredibly predictable.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Goldtop
Anyone who claims to have been trained to deal with internet morons is seriously fucked up.

I have to be Goldy.

Look at you, so bitter you don't mind repeatedly making yourself a blazing fool on the board. You follow me around, even from another website, spewing venom and idiocy. Trying to mulit-report me to get me banned, and then giddily bragging about it when you thought you had successfully manipulated bsh1.

The trolls I deal with are messed up. Surely you don't think you are mentally healthy?

Without my training, you wouldn't be racked with bitterness or acting like a fool in public. It's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Can't let you morons run wild now can we?
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Goldtop
@3RU7AL
Look Goldy, 

The moron is doing your, "tell it to the tree" shtick. And he's going "ho hum". Lol. That is funny. 

I wonder if he'll repeat it for as long as you did yours? Shall we try the idiot?
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
I'm a well-known teacher and researcher in a thriving school district in Maryland....

Sure you are slick.
I actually am, full disclosure.


I won't respond because there is no evidence for abiogenesis, and from you not knowing this means you're too stupid to debate.
It's not something to know, you can't articulate how none of the 9 pieces of evidence I gave you is not evidence.
Explain it AI.

And your posts have confirmed it. Thus you get tossed, cause that is how to treat moron trolls.
Or you could actually toss me by responding to WHY the evidence isn't evidence.
That's all you have to do AI.


Lol. You're so predictable it's like being in high school again. You have a graduate degree and your students read your debates? Only the uneducated, not knowing what it is, think that they can fake an education.
Huh?
Along with being stupid, it's written poorly.


I bet you think you're original. Lol. You're a dime a dozen internet immature moron. Pull out More 3rd grade taunts. It's all you have.
Why would you bet that I think I'm original...did I do something that you found to be original?
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
Or you could actually toss me by responding to WHY the evidence isn't evidence.
That would be indulging you, not tossing you. I do not indulge trolls.

Only the uneducated, not knowing what it is, think that they can fake an education.

Huh?
Lol. Exactly.

That's all you have to do AI.
If you think I am AI, your begging me to interact with you becomes highly suspicious no?

You can beg. All you will get is tossing. You will understand that I do not have to do what you want, no matter how long it takes to seep into your liberal noggin.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@ethang5
, I can and will toss you
Is consent something you just ignore? Do you think that aggressive homosexual, non consensual, behaviour is acceptable?

MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
If you think I am AI, your begging me to interact with you becomes highly suspicious no?
You can beg. All you will get is tossing. You will understand that I do not have to do what you want, no matter how long it takes to seep into your liberal noggin.

You admitting here that you're not actually interacting is enough.
I also noticed you're trying to dodge me by not including my name in your "replies."
You really need to stop being such a pussy.

ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
You admitting here that you're not actually interacting is enough.
I do not need to "interact" with you, so there is nothing to "admit". As a liberal, you may think interaction is your right, you geniuses think everything you want is a right. You will learn.

I also noticed you're trying to dodge me by not including my name in your "replies."
As opposed to not posting, or blocking you? I don't think you know what "dodge" means.

You really need to stop being such a pussy.
And then who would you send your vaguely homo pleas for "interaction" to? Can the class say, "projection"?

I thought it could.
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@Outplayz

Yeah... let me know if you find it. You'll probably have an easier time locating it than i would since i'm not read up on anything by Fred Hoyles.
Boltzmann, Ludwig,
270.13-14, 270.25, 441.05, 461.14, 935.14-15, 935.17, 935.25, 936.15, 936.22, 987.075, 1005.611, 1033.56, 1053.17

Yeah... let me know if you find it. You'll probably have an easier time locating it than i would since i'm not read up on anything by Fred Hoyles.

Fuller mentions Boltzman in Synergetics but forget how it references Boltzman to Synergetics geometry, which he does.

What I'm saying is there is cosmic laws/principles that exist as metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts that are inherent to our eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe.  Do you understand that Outplaz? 

Occupied space is always { eternally } complemented by metaphysical-1 shape/geometry/pattern/matematics/formla etc.

Humans have access to metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts via their nervous system consciousness. Do you understand that Outplaz? Ive tried to get to understand the differrence between these two at DDO and here at DART.  What is occupied SPACE the other is concepts of SPACE.

The third aspect of cosmic trinity is macro-infinite non-occupied SPACE.  Until you can grasp the Cosmic Trinity you will remain ignorant of many of its subcatories.

No,Outplz,  there exists no infinite time only eternal sets of finite time periods as a collective sum-total finite amount within any set time period { now and then }.

SPACE is yes infinite eternal yes, but  a finite part of that space is eternally occupied as Universe and you have yet to truly grok that or why it is the only rational, logical common sense conclusion.  You choose to remain confused on this issue. Not sure why. Ego? Religion? Afraid you will offend someone?

My hunchs stem from facts/truths, associations and relationships between those facts/truths and rational, logical common sense conclusions from both.

I clearly layout what I mean by inteligence in beginnign of this post and many others over the years.



Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@mustardness
Interesting thanks. It wasn't referring to his "Boltzmann Brain" idea but it was a cool read anyways. 
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@Outplayz
It wasn't referring to his "Boltzmann Brain" idea but it was a cool read anyways. 
Reminds of Braxton Hicks contractions i.e. false contractions i.e.l not real contractions.



Infinite ....... non-occupied space exists and embraces/surrounds the following,
.......lacks integrity........

Occupied space Universe is finite ergo wholistic enclosure (  )(  )
......integrity is inherent.....

Consciousness is finite.

Time is finite

Gravity is finite

Dark energy is finite

...........................................................SPACE(>*<)  i  (>*<)SPACE.....................................................................................


Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@mustardness
Reminds of Braxton Hicks contractions i.e. false contractions i.e.l not real contractions. 
I don't understand what this has to do with a Boltzmann Brain. 

keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,052
3
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
3
3
3
Humans have always been curious about their world and sought explanations.

At some point in the last few hundred years 'science' evolved in reference to the seeking of purely matrialistic and mechanistic explanations.  The word 'scientist' didn't exit until 1833. 

I say 'evolved' because it 'just happened' - no one ordered that science had to materialistic and it didn't happen overnight, but before the 18th century was over a scientist could believe in god privately, but could not use god as part of a scientific explanation.

The success of materialistic science has given us the modern world and given us confidence that everything can be explained materialistically. 
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@keithprosser
The success of materialistic science has given us the modern world

Sure, it is a great thing when it its proper domain, nothing wrong with that of course. 

and given us confidence that everything can be explained materialistically. 

Keep dreaming.
3RU7AL wrote...
"Science can only answer "how", it can never answer "why".
Certainly "intelligent design" might be "true", but it is not within the realm of science."

EtrnlVw wrote...
"Then that would be very intelligent of you. This is true in so many ways very good, I wish more people would consider that."

mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@Outplayz
"false" ergo not real and that reminds of placebo effect, i.e. believing this or that affects the individuals issue of consideration.

Lab experiments have shown the false belief placebo effect works 10% of the time.

They people are told the blue pill will make them calm and the red pill will make them peppy/speedy, in fact their both neutral or opposites.

I like to go as long as I can without taking the caffeine pill or the naproxin pill { chronic rotor cuff issues }. Sometimes I go longer than I realized I could go.  Other times times I need the pills and realized to late.