Abiogenesis

Author: Goldtop

Posts

Total: 334
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@3RU7AL
Is a self-replicating molecule "alive"?
No, because they have no RNA-DNA.

Is a self-replicating virus "alive"?
No becuase they only have RNA OR DNA, never both.

Biological/soul = RNA-DNA. SImple not complex to grasp.
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@Outplayz
Examples and ideas like that make me favor ID. In regards to abiogenesis however... i am ambivalent. It could have happened naturally in some freak amazing occurrence, or was set in motion by something else. The something else is just more attractive in my opinion but i don't discount the latter as maybe being the case too.  
There is intelligent design only insofar as there exist eternally existent phenomena inherent to high pressures found in Universe.

HIgher pressures lead to more fro less complex molecules to more  complex molecules.

Highest pressures of gravitational forces of Universe may be the most likely cosmic egg that contains SPACE-Time coding of most complex RNA-DNA molecules we know to exist, human female > male.

See this link to see potential for coding of all existence in left and right handed versions via high frequency { 1, 2, 3, 4 sets }  axis spinning to generate great circle/torus patterns all within one triangle.

What exists inside a black hole is expressed on its event horizon and black holes evaporate. 

mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@MagicAintReal
Sorry Magic, but your have no reliable evidence of abiogensis ocuring.

"Ugh"........."Ugh"........"Ugh"....caveman intelligence speaks again


MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
Must be why you're chasing me. Sorry, I'm not gay, though I should have known you were.
I'm not chasing any one, you said that you responded to the evidence, you still haven't and you're demonstrating how much of a pussy you actually are.
So what specifically from the peer reviewed evidence I shared with you is "not evidence."

None of it is. If anyone ever got real evidence for abiogenesis, it would be heralded by the leftist media as if it was the second coming of the Beatles. The simple existence of amino acids is not evidence that life spontaneously generates.
Right, which is why the majority of the evidence talks about the replication of genetic polymers, but you already know all that right?
Oh wait you don't?
Then you're an ill-informed intellectual pussy who claims there's no evidence and runs when given push back.

I responded. It isn't evidence.
So you're just going to assert that it isn't evidence without explaining why it isn't?
No actual response?
Noted.

It isn't evidence. Deal with it.
Why do you think assertions make things so.
WHY isn't it evidence, and more specifically, what from the mountains of evidence you've ignored is not evidence?


ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
Then you're an ill-informed intellectual pussy who claims there's no evidence and runs when given push back.
Right. Showing us that you grew up gay in a seedy trailer-park will convince us that you have evidence for abiogenesis.

WHY isn't it evidence...
If you don't already know why, you won't understand why when told. This requires an education, net mining is not a substitute for learning.

More specifically, what from the mountains of evidence you've ignored is not evidence?
None of it is. English not your native language?
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@mustardness
There is intelligent design only insofar as there exist eternally existent phenomena inherent to high pressures found in Universe.
By "intelligence" i am indicating a human type intelligence and above. Is that the kind of intelligence you are referring to as well? 

MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
Right. Showing us that you grew up gay in a seedy trailer-park will convince us that you have evidence for abiogenesis.
I fail to see the reference here.
Because I'm asking you to specify which piece of evidence "isn't evidence" by your standard and you keep childishly saying "nah-uh because nah-uh" I'm therefore from a trailer park?
Come on man.

If you don't already know why, you won't understand why when told. This requires an education, net mining is not a substitute for learning.
So you cannot explain to me WHY the evidence isn't evidence?
You can't mention quality, methodology, logic, anything?
I suspect you don't have any response and you're just, well, an intellectual pussy.

So what specific piece of evidence is "not evidence?"

None of it is. English not your native language?
To be clear, your response to "What SPECIFIC piece of evidence is 'not evidence' and why?" was "none of it."
If English were your native language, you'd be able to tell the difference between a question about general concepts and an open-ended question about specific components.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@MagicAintReal
Right. Showing us that you grew up gay in a seedy trailer-park will convince us that you have evidence for abiogenesis.

I fail to see the reference here.
Of course you don't. Vulgar speech is normal to you.

Because I'm asking you to specify which piece of evidence "isn't evidence"
And if none of it is, what will I specify? Do you know what "specify" means?

....I'm therefore from a trailer park?
Your gay upbringing and filthy language tells us that.

If you don't already know why, you won't understand why when told. This requires an education, net mining is not a substitute for learning.

So you cannot explain to me WHY the evidence isn't evidence?
Or maybe you won't understand why when told if you don't already know why.

You can't mention quality, methodology, logic, anything?
Sure I can. But why would I to you?

I suspect you don't have any response and you're just, well, an intellectual pussy.
Typical trailer-park thinking. Eh.

So what specific piece of evidence is "not evidence?"

None of it is. English not your native language?

To be clear, your response to "What SPECIFIC piece of evidence is 'not evidence' and why?" was "none of it."

Yes. To be clear. Was that unclear?

If English were your native language, you'd be able to tell the difference between a question about general concepts and an open-ended question about specific components.
You cannot demand specificity when all of your offerings are the same; Not evidence. Specificity requires difference. And though you are a liberal under the delusion that I have to answer you, you will learn that you hold authority over no one, and that what you think of me is of no interest to me.
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
Ok, if none of it is, then producing one example should be immediate and easy, yet I just get more of the same "muh...muh none of it's evidence because muh...muh...it's not evidence (in a whiny voice)" from a clearly uninformed coward on the internet.

Yeah, since you've not responded to any of the evidence in any way, you cannot continue to post your anti-abiogenesis crap, unless you are open to being referred to as a cowardly pussy, which I'd be cool with.


ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
Eh.
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
MagicAintReal 1
ethang5 0
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@Outplayz
By "intelligence" i am indicating a human type intelligence and above. Is that the kind of intelligence you are referring to as well?
Yes, everything Ive stated is concievable with human intelligence ergo there is no evidence of any intelligence "beyond" intelligence humans access on regular basis.  Human intelligence attempts to understand and comprehend inherent inteligence of Universe.

You my need to read Fred Hoyles 1990's book 'The Intelligent Universe' to better understand what is meant by intelligence  of Universe, that humans discern ---winnow out--   via their access to intelligent proclivities.

There is no aspsect of Universe that cannot be considered via human intelligence.  There exist no intelligence "beyond". Intelligence is inherently beyond our occupied space Universe ergo meta{beyond}physical-1, mind/intellect/concepts exist.

There exists only one way to get outside of our finite, occupied space Universe, and that is via metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts.

Woo-Hoo! Now that is magic and extraordinary. Or as the Moody Blues song states, 'thinking is the best way to travel'.  Not literally of course.

Highest pressures of gravitational forces of Universe may be the most likely cosmic egg --ex black hole found at center of most galaxys---  that contains SPACE-Time coding of most complex RNA-DNA molecules we know to exist, human female > male.


to see potential for coding of all existence in left and right handed versions via high frequency { 1, 2, 3, 4 etc sets }  axis spinning, to generate great circle/torus patterns, all within one triangle of the 5-fold icosa{20}hedron and 4-fold cubo{6}-octa{8)hedron.

The Riemman spherical version if the latter is  more complicated to express and visualized

What exists inside a black hole is expressed on its event horizon and black holes evaporate. 


if you want to expand your mind, and begin to  comprehend the 60-degree-based, Euclidean Operating Systems of Universe.

From there you can move on to bilateral spherical considerations of the above as 5-fold left O, 4-fold flattened between |,  and O 5-fold right -skew.

..5-fold left......O|O.........5-fold right bilateralism

Then if you want to seek further into  fundamental dynamics of positive (  ) SPACE - * Time * - SPACE )( negative , then study my numerical wave as slinky like torus with inversions from peak of postive and negative curvature to create  internal Observed { quanta } Time reality.

Of course it takes a minimum  of two { quark ], 3-6 { electron }, 4 { meson } great tori to have a reality derived from graviational (  ) and dark energy )( SPACE.  

.........................................SPACE(>*<)  i  (>*<)SPACE........................................

Ive laid out clearly many times what each of those texticonic characters represent.



mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@MagicAintReal
Mustard ................4
Magicaintreal ...0

Abiogenisis happens. No direct evidence of such

No, because they { molecule ( x ) } have no RNA-DNA.

No because they { virus(  )  } only have RNA OR DNA, never both.

Biological/soul ( * ) = RNA-DNA. Relatively sImple, not complex to grasp.

Complex bilateral biological/soul ( *  * )

Human ( * i * )

..................................SPACE(>*<)   i   (>*<)SPACE..................................................

 Metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts {  i  } are beyond{ meta }, occupied and non-occupied SPACE.

Metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts appear as magical and extraordinary. 
MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@mustardness
The first cells metabolized with amino acids and replicated with RNA...that's it. You don't need to make "biological bilateral souls" or whatever nonsense you were talking about to explain abiogenesis.

MagicAintReal...1
mustardness...-4
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@MagicAintReal
The first cells metabolized with amino acids and replicated with RNA...that's it.
We have no direct evidence of "first cells" ergo no direct evidence of abiognesis.


You don't need to make "biological bilateral souls"

Huh? I never made that statement you put in quotes. 

You really need to improve your reading comprehension skills if you want to have a rational, logical common sense discussion.

I will repeat again{ read my lips text as stated and not as you falsely present }, until you get it ---never?--, there exists no direct evidence of abiolgenisis or any other kind of genisis.

Mustard...............5
Magic.......-1..0.

You need to begin with (  )SPACE-Time-)(SPACE)( associated with black holes, my geonumerical great tori as via Fullers Synergetic based great circles.

When you want see beyond your nose you will have to place and widen your narrow set of viewpoints and attempt rational, logical common sense considerations that stem from facts truths etc.

Of course you will need to place your ego to the side. As Ive had to do many times over the years,  to arrive at my rational, logical common sense conclusions








Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@mustardness
Yes, everything Ive stated is concievable with human intelligence ergo there is no evidence of any intelligence "beyond" intelligence humans access on regular basis.  Human intelligence attempts to understand and comprehend inherent inteligence of Universe.
I agree with this statement, and i don't think you are saying with this that it is impossible that there is intelligence beyond us, just no evidence for it so i agree there. I think there is intelligence beyond human intelligence. So... that's just a belief or a hunch. I"m not sure, but to me it is impossible that there isn't. Given seemingly infinite time and space... there is no way we are the one and only intelligence that's ever been. A hunch in the end of the day. 


You my need to read Fred Hoyles 1990's book 'The Intelligent Universe' to better understand what is meant by intelligence  of Universe, 
Have you ever heard of a Boltzmann Brain? If so, is that what the intelligent universe means? If not, i'll check it out online to see what i can find about it. 
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@MagicAintReal
You're not getting the concept genius.

If you're scoring yourself, give yourself the points. Why be timid in your stupidity? Surely you can do...

MagicAintReal - 500
Ethang5 - 0

Try it. I'm sure you're smart enough to score 500.


Lol. What a moron.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@ethang5
Lol. What a moron.

Bwuahahahahaha

mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@Outplayz
I think there is intelligence beyond human intelligence.
What I'm saying is there is cosmic laws/principles that exist as metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts that are inherent to our eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe.  Do you understand that Outplaz? 

Occupied space is always { eternally } complemented by metaphysical-1 shape/geometry/pattern/matematics/formla etc.

Humans have access to metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts via their nervous system consciousness. Do you understand that Outplaz? Ive tried to get to understand the differrence between these two at DDO and here at DART.  What is occupied SPACE the other is concepts of SPACE.

The third aspect of cosmic trinity is macro-infinite non-occupied SPACE.  Until you can grasp the Cosmic Trinity you will remain ignorant of many of its subcatories.

Given seemingly infinite time and space...
No, there exists no infinite time only eternal sets of finite time periods as a collective sum-total finite amount within any set time period { now and then }.

SPACE is yes infinite eternal yes, but  a finite part of that space is eternally occupied as Universe and you have yet to truly grok that or why it is the only rational, logical common sense conclusion.  You choose to remain confused on this issue. Not sure why. Ego? Religion? Afraid you will offend someone?

A hunch in the end of the day. 
My hunchs stem from facts/truths, associations and relationships between those facts/truths and rational, logical common sense conclusions from both.

Have you ever heard of a Boltzmann Brain? If so, is that what the intelligent universe means?
I clearly layout what I mean by inteligence in beginnign of this post and many others over the years.

If not, i'll check it out online to see what i can find about it.
Have you read Fred Hoyles Intelligent Universe? Fuller mentions Boltzman in Synergetics but forget how it references Boltzman to Synergetics geometry, which he does. I can try and find it if we stay engaged on this issue of Abiogenisis
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@mustardness
Have you read Fred Hoyles Intelligent Universe? Fuller mentions Boltzman in Synergetics but forget how it references Boltzman to Synergetics geometry, which he does. I can try and find it if we stay engaged on this issue of Abiogenisis
Yeah... let me know if you find it. You'll probably have an easier time locating it than i would since i'm not read up on anything by Fred Hoyles. 

Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
2
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
2
2
-->
@Outplayz
It's too bad about Hoyle, he did some good work when he was young but his mental disorders eventually got the best of him and he went bonkers.
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
2
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
2
2
-->
@mustardness
Fred Hoyles Intelligent Universe
That is one of his nuttier books.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Goldtop
I've never heard of him or read his material. I would be interested to read about intelligent universe theories bc i find them to be interesting implications of infinite space and time. Plus, the ramblings of mad scientists are often the most interesting. 
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@3RU7AL
This would seem to be an ontological problem.

No, no problem my friend. Especially not metaphysically.

I see it as a sliding scale, I was attempting to calibrate your perspective.

I see your opinion, but not an explanation of any problem. 

So, in your view, the phenomenon of the big bang is, itself, evidence of life/intelligence?

No, not at all. However, the big bang certainly manifested from an awareness. The Creator is the force behind the manipulation of energy and element. But it is not evidence for life/intelligence per say, rather an interpretation of events. 

This would seem to short-circuit any discussion of abiogenesis.

That would be the point, because abiogenesis is a farce. Not in a way where we can't show early forms of life, but in a way where why process takes place and acts as intelligence. The problem is solved understanding the very nature of the Creator. I don't want to short-circuit any discussions, rather eliminate nonsense. 


MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
Yeah it's hard to calculate the score when you've defeated someone who is such a coward...how about
MagicAintReal...1
ethang5...pussy

ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@MagicAintReal
Sounds like you still don't get the concept. But growing up malnourished in a trailer park can do that to a young brain.

Third grade taunts bounce off me. No matter how stupid you get, I can and will toss you. You will learn.


MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
Sounds like you still don't get the concept. But growing up malnourished in a trailer park can do that to a young brain.

Third grade taunts bounce off me. No matter how stupid you get, I can and will toss you. You will learn.

Nope.
You couldn't toss me if I let you lift me up...
Pussy is not used in third grade, it's used by adults who can clearly see when someone is a coward, a scared person, a little bitch, a pussy bitch, a hide-behind-the-internet-so-there's-no-argument-accountability bitch pussy, and of course, an obviously inferior human, debater, and whiny little bitch.
These are all adult concepts used by adults who see idiots run their mouth knowing they will not be held accountable because of the vale of the internet.
You suck sir, you suck the most among the masses of those who suck.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@MagicAintReal
Sounds like you still don't get the concept. But growing up malnourished in a trailer park can do that to a young brain.

Third grade taunts bounce off me. No matter how stupid you get, I can and will toss you. You will learn.

Nope.
Oh yes. You may be too dumb to know it, but you are getting tossed sherlock.

You couldn't toss me if I let you lift me up...
Lol. Don't look at the ground.

Pussy is not used in third grade, it's used by adults who can clearly see when someone is a coward,
It's used by emotionally stunted trailer park adult trash who left school in the 3rd grade.

a scared person, a little bitch, a pussy bitch, a hide-behind-the-internet-so-there's-no-argument-accountability bitch pussy, and of course, an obviously inferior human,
Ever notice its always the tattooed, missing tooth, hillbillies who will call others inferior? Why are bigots always the most stupid in s society?

These are all adult concepts used by adults who see idiots run their mouth knowing they will not be held accountable because of the vale of the internet.
Oh yeah. You'd still be a moron troll if you weren't anonymous. Lol, do your tuff guy troll thing again.

You suck sir, you suck the most among the masses of those who suck.
This is the grammar of a person with a graduate degree. Lol.

I would guess you to be about 15 years old emotionally. Tossing someone that immature won't even be a challenge. But I'll enjoy it!

Come on Mr. Graduate. Tell us again how your gutter mouth means you're an adult.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@ethang5
Ad hominem much?


MagicAintReal
MagicAintReal's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 258
1
3
7
MagicAintReal's avatar
MagicAintReal
1
3
7
-->
@ethang5
Oh yes. You may be too dumb to know it, but you are getting tossed sherlock.
Nah, you just have no real rebuttal to all of the evidence and you have to say things like "3rd grader tattoo trash."
You're the worst.

It's used by emotionally stunted trailer park adult trash who left school in the 3rd grade.
Nope.
Later you even mention that I have a graduate degree negating one of those erroneous claims about me.

Ever notice its always the tattooed, missing tooth, hillbillies who will call others inferior? Why are bigots always the most stupid in s society?
Though I have a tattoo, I have all of my teeth, and I'm calling you inferior not because I'm a bigot, I'm calling you inferior because you run away like a little coward bitch when asked to respond to something. You're objectively, without bias, without bigotry, inferior, in every way.
You should spit at the image you see in the mirror.
Once a day to be sure.

Oh yeah. You'd still be a moron troll if you weren't anonymous. Lol, do your tuff guy troll thing again.
I'm actually not a troll, I'm a well-known teacher and researcher in a thriving school district in Maryland, USA and everything I would say here, I would admit to having said IRL. My students even read my debates and...so do their parents. Even as I type now, I know that a student may be reading this, so let me be really fucking clear.
You are a gigantic coward pussy, because you will not respond to the evidence yet assert childishly that it isn't evidence.
Pussy bitches need to be called out, even by teachers.

You suck sir, you suck the most among the masses of those who suck.

This is the grammar of a person with a graduate degree. Lol.
I used among correctly. Spit.

I would guess you to be about 15 years old emotionally. Tossing someone that immature won't even be a challenge. But I'll enjoy it!

Come on Mr. Graduate. Tell us again how your gutter mouth means you're an adult.
Oh, I will.
Students listen up.
If you ever go on the internet and claim that something doesn't have evidence and refuse to back up your claim yet assert it childishly, then you are also a cowardly pussy bitch and should look in the mirror everyday and spit at the image you see because it's made of the scum of a little weak minded coward bitch.
Just like ethang5 here.