I don't expect you to believe me, no. I also see it ss a futile endeavor to appeal to the reason of the unreasonable.
The reason I have no compelling arguments for you is because I see you as an unreasonable person. After all, by rejecting what I mean by my terms, you are instead defining the language I use. In doing so, you are not only acting unreasonable, but you are behaving shamefully haughty.
And so your skepticism is not reasonable. To believe me would be reasonable. If you don't believe me, you are at a road block and won't learn anything. If you believe me, you will come to understand. As it stands, you don't understand, and you won't. You won't because you lack charity, which is love, and humility, which necessitates admitting that you don't understand and have a willingness to learn.
If you are really trying to learn, you will ask questions to clarify, not to dispute, undermine, or ask for evidence for things you don't even know what you are adking evidence for.