-->
@Mopac
Or maybe I would if you said what you mean plainly instead of using doublespeak mysticism.
Some people say seeing is believing.In this case where the seeing are blind, it is necessary to believe before seeing.
When I am saying that Christianity is in essence apodictic truth, that means that once you understand it, not only is it obvious but it is undeniable.
Christianity is a mystery religion, something that is lost in the heterodox world. The Christianity you have likely been exposed to is unenlightened. It is not Orthodox Christianity. As that is the case, if you don't abandon preconceptions, we are working with salted Earth, a poisoned well.
So forget what you know, and here is the foreshadowing I will give you.
The Truth is God. Yes, literally what that means.
Not what anyone thinks The Truth is, not a collection of facts, but The Truth itself. By The Truth, I mean The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. The Most Real. The Truly Existing One. Actuality The Way it Is.
Everything about Christianity has to do with this, how we relate to this as creatures, and the discipline of abiding in it. Our religion very simply is Truth Worship.
If you don't believe me, you will never see. Instead, you will have superstitious ideas about my faith. Then, you yourself being superstitious will project your own superstitions on to the faith itself.
To give an illustration, asking that I prove God exists or to prove that God is truth is like asking, "Prove to me that it is true that there is truth! Prove that truth is truth!"
If you don't believe in truth, how can I prove truth to you? What is being asked of me is to show a sign. Perform a miracle.
Don't say, "I will believe it if I see it."Believe first, and then you will see it.
If you would respond to my post in full rather than breaking it in pieces, I would appreciate it.
If it is all about "winning debates", I'm sure you are a master of many persuasive techniques.
However, if you care about truth, your approach is more conducive to strife than learning.
I argue against specific points. I quoted what was I was rebutting. If I didn't then you would have to figure what I am opposing asking or something else.
Your faith is by definition superstition.Instead, you will have superstitious ideas about my faith. Then, you yourself being superstitious will project your own superstitions on to the faith itself.
The only thing I am seeing is someone who can't avoid interrupting someone when they are talking.
And as you are talking in terms of "rebutting", I have further evidence that proves to me that you are more interested in looking smart than listening.
But fyi, it doesn't matter how good a teacher is(not that I am even claiming to be a good teacher) if the student doesn't respect the teacher, they won't benefit.
I can't make you learn anything.
Give up on trying to explain your side and expect me to simply believe what you said without explanation or evidence is too much for me. My way of doing things has worked and you haven't convinced me your way of doing things works.I am not paying attention to you anymore, as you are obvious not listening, simply being argumentative.
Guess God is not proud of its own accomplishment or what Jesus did. Really makes you think what kind of person God is. Basically humble but still allowed a flood to occur. Really humble.God gives grace to the humble, but resists the proud.
I see no reason to think he has ever actually pays attention. He will however, if the past is any indicator, keep posting as long as you do with no regard for the content of your argument.I am not paying attention to you anymore, as you are obvious not listening, simply being argumentative.Give up on trying to explain your side and expect me to simply believe what you said without explanation or evidence is too much for me. My way of doing things has worked and you haven't convinced me your way of doing things works.
In truth, you will die
It wasn't mocking more so an assessment of what is going on. I didn't make a claim that was based on you instead of what you said. Arbitrary might be. Depends on what you mean by it. I can call your use of 2 definitions of God a cop out and when using it, it is arbitrary because you can't exactly know how God can be truth or the supreme being.It is easy to mock what one is unwilling to understand until their arbitrary demands are met.
Whether religiously motivated or not, Mo is a troll. He would be banned from any other well run forum, but not here, this is where trolls are welcomed to stay in order to drive off others like yourself who seek intelligent discussion. You are actually the one who is not welcome here, if you were, something would have been done.I see no reason to think he has ever actually pays attention. He will however, if the past is any indicator, keep posting as long as you do with no regard for the content of your argument.He can't stand to give other people the last word. Must be against his religion.
God is everything? So can you point to it?That is what "God" means. The Ultimate Reality. That is what we mean.
There is nothing to prove here, only that you accept what it is we mean by the concept.
Otherwise you are making a srawman god.