A classic: From creator god ==> Specific God

In your everyday life do you try to make sense of existence by adopting particular positions? Sure you do. Those positions, your worldview, shape how you look at your existence. Obviously, that is true.

Don't ask me questions and then answer erroneously on my behalf. Your definition of true is what bounces around in your bonce and that is a piss poor definition indeed, it only works in your world of delusion.

Your worldview, as does every worldview, attempts to understand why you are here and supply the meaning.

Wrong again.

For an atheist, your existence is explained in a limited way by natural unintelligent random processes.

For an atheist, as for everyone, my existence is explained by my existence. That existence is limited in a cosmic sense but I'll enjoy it for time I have it.

There is no ultimate meaning

Finally you've told the truth. We are born we live and we die, just like every other animal that has ever and will ever exist on this planet.

You make meaning for the protection of your existence and hope others buy into that meaning because it means you live longer, so existence is important.

You prove with every word you write that you live in delusion and know ABSOLUTELY nothing about me. Why would I want to live longer, dead sounds alright.

But without an absolute, unchanging best, a fixed and ultimate standard

Your fixed and ultimate standard partakes in infanticide, genocide, childrape, human sacrifice and slavery, my self appointed standards are parsecs better than that so I don't know why you keep claiming superiority. An argument could be made that Hitler had a higher moral standard than yours.

Gods are the creation of human imagination, don't be scared you won't even know you are dead.

I made a general statement about worldviews and then I got specific about yours. I say generally because it is irrelevant to someone who has not thought about their existence or does not care. You seem to be in the camp that says they don't care, yet even your words betray that sentiment as I will point out below. 

Your worldview is not the majority one

Generally speaking

Here again, your words betray what you state previously and even those words are loaded with meaning ("what could I possibly care about that"). There is a difference between what you could and what you do believe about existence.

The fact is you have stated you don't know, you doubt you would care, and then you appear to care since you add the words "very much." So, your whole sentence is pregnant with doubt and inconsistency. On the one hand, you imply and deny that you care and then on the other you add the caveat emptor "care very much."

It is not me who is delusional but you. You are in denial. You show how much you care about what you believe by constantly shouting down the Christian worldview as wrong and erroneous. You constantly go out of your way to engage in this topic which shows how much you care about it. 

If that is the case you are a fool. You speak of things you do not understand. The very fact that you choose to engage and the vitriol you show by your constant ad Hom attacks shows the contrary to what you state. 

Your existence is not explained by your existence. That is a tautology. It says nothing. Somehow you got here. Somehow you are. 

First, this is oversimplified. If this life did not matter why are you being so inconsistent and making it matter by arguing with me? Holding to your worldview it just doesn't matter yet you fight tooth and nail to make your particular belief matter. 

Because you continue to exist leads me to believe you want to live longer, and I'm glad of that! Maybe one day you will be led to the truth of your existence and I wish you well in that respect.

I made a general statement about worldviews and then I got specific about yours. I say generally because it is irrelevant to someone who has not thought about their existence or does not care. You seem to be in the camp that says they don't care, yet even your words betray that sentiment as I will point out below. 

You made a general statement and erroneously attempted to apply it to me, someone you know absolutely nothing about, you fail.

Your second sentence is you trying to pigeon hole me into your erroneous generalisation when you know nothing about me. I am not in a camp and you never got around to supplying my sentiment.

An entire paragraph about what you think of me and not a word about what I write, in your absurd paradigm you would call that ad hom.

Your worldview is not the majority one

Will you just look at that profound nonsense, my worldview is my worldview and not anyone elses, still generalising ad homs.

Generally speaking

Been there got the T shirt.

Here again, your words betray what you state previously and even those words are loaded with meaning ("what could I possibly care about that"). There is a difference between what you could and what you do believe about existence.

My words betray what I have previously said, at least I'm not a hypocrite like some others here. As you pointed out so comically I've said before that my existence is undeniably a result of my existence.

The fact is you have stated you don't know, you doubt you would care, and then you appear to care since you add the words "very much." So, your whole sentence is pregnant with doubt and inconsistency. On the one hand, you imply and deny that you care and then on the other you add the caveat emptor "care very much."

It's actually incredibly straight forward. I would need to be in that situation to give an honest (look that word up) answer but I don't think I'd care very much after all I have to die sometime, unlike you and your godist mates I have no fear death, I even recognise it's reality.

You also might like to look up caveat emptor.

It is not me who is delusional but you. You are in denial. You show how much you care about what you believe by constantly shouting down the Christian worldview as wrong and erroneous. You constantly go out of your way to engage in this topic which shows how much you care about it. 

I deny that all of the gods created by man, and that is all proposed gods, exist.

You can classify that as denial, unfortunately it's truth. What is it that I neglect in order that go out of my way to engage in this topic. Typing a few words on a keyboard is not going out of my way, if it is for you then you have my pity.

Another entire paragraph attacking me and not anything I've written.

If that is the case you are a fool. You speak of things you do not understand. The very fact that you choose to engage and the vitriol you show by your constant ad Hom attacks shows the contrary to what you state. 

Look up ad hom and then read your paragraph. I mean really!

Your existence is not explained by your existence. That is a tautology. It says nothing. Somehow you got here. Somehow you are. 

Without my existence I would not exist, I was born and I am. That seems to be a concept beyond comprehension. 

First, this is oversimplified. If this life did not matter why are you being so inconsistent and making it matter by arguing with me? Holding to your worldview it just doesn't matter yet you fight tooth and nail to make your particular belief matter. 

Your delusion goes much deeper than I thought if you believe that arguing with you gives my life any meaning and that I'm somehow fighting tooth for a worldview that I have never expounded upon and that you have never the less assigned me. Do try to be even a little honest.

Because you continue to exist leads me to believe you want to live longer, and I'm glad of that! Maybe one day you will be led to the truth of your existence and I wish you well in that respect.

I exist until I don't and my continued existence doesn't rely on what I want, you seem confused bout this.

I have the truth, we live and we die, I'm sorry you will never understand that truth.

Your ultimate fixed standard places genocide, child rape, human sacrifice, infanticide and slavery on the GOOD side of the moral ledger they are nothing of the sort.

You and your disgusting version of morality is what is wrong with this world.

I define slavery as owning people as property. The bible gives provisions to do just that. It doesn't matter what word the bible uses if the definition is owning people as property that is slavery definitionally.

I define slavery as owning people as property.

The bible gives provisions to do just that.

It doesn't matter what word the bible uses if the definition is owning people as property that is slavery definitionally.

Leviticus 19:34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.

First, there is a difference between a slave and an indentured servant. 

Second, slavery was a common practice 

Third, Isreal was not permitted by God to treat those captured by warfare in the same manner of how they had been treated and exploited in Egypt. 

Fourth, slavery teaches a lesson. There is a biblical spiritual lesson to be learned from slavery in several ways. 

Leviticus 19:34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God. 

This sounds an awful lot like "open borders"...

Mr. DJT, tear down this wall.

Open borders on the Southern US border is an idiot concept, IMHO.

President Trump wants to build walls in the southern states of America to lessen illegal drug traffic, trafficking, MS13, and illegal aliens.

There were walls built around cities and towns in biblical/ancient Israel to protect the people.

Isreal today has used walls/fences effectively in controlling the terrorism from Gaza.

The Great Wall of China has proven effective in protecting the Chinese for centuries.  Many nations use fences along the border of their countries to deter and lessen illegal activity. It makes sense (something your Democrat Party lacks on most issues).

Leviticus 19:34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God. 

This sounds an awful lot like "amnesty for all U.S. residents"...

The law of justice in the USA is that a foreigner must come into the country legally. 

The law of justice in the USA is that a foreigner must come into the country legally. 

I love how you hide behind the law when it suits your mood.

What does The Jesus say about it?

Open borders on the Southern US border is an idiot concept, IMHO. 

President Trump wants to build walls in the southern states of America to lessen illegal drug traffic, trafficking, MS13, and illegal aliens. 

There were walls built around cities and towns in biblical/ancient Israel to protect the people.

Isreal today has used walls/fences effectively in controlling the terrorism from Gaza.

The Great Wall of China has proven effective in protecting the Chinese for centuries.  Many nations use fences along the border of their countries to deter and lessen illegal activity. It makes sense (something your Democrat Party lacks on most issues).

The alleged upstanding Christian shows his true colors of hatred of others and wanting to keep them out. PGA2.0, the new and improved anti-Christ.

The law of justice in the USA is that a foreigner must come into the country legally.

The law of justice in the USA is that a foreigner must come into the country legally.

One should never, ever confuse what is legal with what is just.  They should be the same, but they frequently aren't.

If you live in Texas, say, and someone comes from Oregon or Ohio to do a job that is no problem, but if he or she comes from Mexico it is.   There are, I am sure, thieves and rapists in Oregon and honest hard working Mexicans, but the criterion is not what an individual is like but on the meaningless detail of their 'nationality'.

The question is what is unjust about not allowing people into your country unless they follow the laws of the land???)

I perceive you have no justifiable argument because you attack me rather than the argument. 

Can you (your country) afford to support the rest of the third world freeloading in your country (send them all to your sanctuary cities and States and see how they fare)? What does the debt load mean to your children and grandchildren? Can you afford the drug epidemic most of which is transported through your southern border? How many of these illegals have criminal records? How many are MS 13? What about the child and sex trafficking going on? 

The question is what is unjust about not allowing people into your country unless they follow the laws of the land???)

Consider two people in Houston doing similar jobs and living similar sorts of ordinary lives.   One drove from new york to look for a job, one drove from Tijuana.  Neither commits any robberies or murders.   yet only one is subject to the threat of losing their livlihood and being deported.  Indeed the new yorker has considerable advanteges over the mexican.

The only 'crime' the mexican commited was being born on the other side of a line on a map.

  Is that justice, or is it about humanity's innate 'us and them' mentality?   

Can you (your country) afford to support the rest of the third world freeloading in your country (send them all to your sanctuary cities and States and see how they fare)? What does the debt load mean to your children and grandchildren? Can you afford the drug epidemic most of which is transported through your southern border? How many of these illegals have criminal records? How many are MS 13? What about the child and sex trafficking going on? 

Notice that PGA can only contribute blatant lies to his hateful narrative of others he fears due to the hate mongering of his beloved Trump.

I perceive you have no justifiable argument because you attack me rather than the argument. 

I perceive you have abandoned the spirit of the following scripture,

Leviticus 19:34 The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born [not deported]. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.

The law of justice in the USA is that a foreigner must come into the country legally. 

Here's your quote,

The law of justice in the USA is that a foreigner must come into the country legally. 

You're clearly mixing and matching "gods law" with "man's law" when it suits your mood.

Either stick to either "gods law" or "man's law" or explain how you decide which one takes precedence.

Leviticus 19:34 - The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born [not deported]. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.

This verse appears to be quite straight-forward and easy to understand.

What makes you think that "man's law" somehow supersedes Leviticus 19:34?