-->
@ILikePie5
@Casey_Risk
As Casey already suggested, it checks how many scum votes are on a given wagon.
Name of role and justification?
So you will be informed that your first role failed if you use it on scum and it won't afford them extra votes, correct?
If I'm reading the second one right, it means you can stop an elimination, which effectively means you have the ability to change the number calculus that underpins the entire game. For example, if you can prevent an elimination DP2, wouldn't that leave us with 5 players going into NP3? That's part of the reason I assumed there would be no protective roles, but reversing an elimination effectively does the same thing in this case.
Also, can you use multiple roles in a single NP?
I think you should definitely use Magnitude because at worst it’ll be a 1 to 1 trade which benefits us in the long run even if people distrust you
If that's the case then I'm not confirmed for shit and should have just kept my mouth shut so I can live. oh well.
I think we should lynch Bullish. It could present problems for us down the line if it can be activatable. I also don’t like how quick he was to proclaim himself town confirmed because his role is confirmable.
Also what’s the purpose of a theme if we can’t analyze character flips.
If the deadline has been reached without a majority, then whoever has the most votes will be chosen. In the event of a tie, mafia privately pick who wins the tie.
So pie suggests the mass claim and then demands I do it first assuming I would be offline the remainder of the DP and he could weasel out of it. Anyone still online needs to vote him
Alternatively, I don't like how quick you are to dismiss him as town based on stretchy wifom logic at best.
This is pies suggestion to mass claim. He should show some good will and do it first. When I suggested a weaker form of this by asking everyone to say the power level of their role I went first. I said I felt like my role was quite powerful.