How Class Warfare Fails Game Theory

Author: Savant

Posts

Total: 166
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
DEI is a tricky issue that the Democrats probably leaned too heavily into. Now tearing it down along with the rest of government is a bone thrown to resentful white trailer trash Americans by billionaire oligarchs.

Elon Musk makes in a minute what the average American household makes in 4.5 years. But wait, oh no, a black kid is going to college!

You dumb cunts. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,013
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
I find it very amusing Badger is accusing others of being "racial puppets" for the powerful elites.
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
Racism has always been the scapegoat of the bourgeoisie.


Racism is the classic tool of division used by the bourgeoisie, the ruling class, to distract the working masses from the deeper, more pressing issues of class inequality and economic exploitation. It's how the powerful elites maintain control by preventing solidarity among working-class people of all races, thereby keeping them focused on superficial divisions rather than the shared economic struggles they face due to the concentration of wealth and power. It deflects attention from the systemic corruption and economic systems (the things Doge is working to dismantle) that disproportionately benefit the few while keeping the many in poverty.

The Bourgeoisie class makes sure that the working class spends all their valuable time and effort directing their anger and frustration toward one another, rather than uniting against the true cause of their suffering: the corrupt system itself. This manufactured war is what keeps the status quo  in place, with the elite benefiting from both economic and racial divisions. We saw this with the whole ESG bullshit.

Racism is the pervasive scapegoat that perpetuates the power dynamics that allow the rich to stay rich and the poor to stay oppressed, all while diverting attention from the genuine structural issues like crony regulations and crony capitalism. That scapegoat is currently on life support as the American society moves to reject that narrative.

It really doesn't matter if the preferred skin color was white 50 years ago or black today, the point is to continue the manufactured war to sustain the current system.

How delusional is this post? Is Trump not currently tearing down your government to root out DEI? Is he not loading brown people into planes to send them back to Mexico? Is this for me? 

Are you retarded?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,013
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
That manufactured war also kept the poor whites in line during the 1800's
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,157
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@badger
You think I am making sense here Sidewalker?
You are making perfect sense, (Greyparrot never makes sense), especially the "racist troll" and "brainwashed fucking idiot" things LOL.  Maybe it's not the billionaire that stops you from building the house, but the person that stops you certainly works for the billionaire.

Fact is, throughout history, revolutions that overthrow the government occur when the gap between the haves and the have nots gets too great, it might be clothed in ideologies, but it's always income inequality.

And to your thought experiment, you are right on.  Everybody seems to think AI will eventually do everything and nobody will have to work and that will be great, that is so naive, the only people that will be good for are the bazillionaires that own the AI, when AI gets to the point where nobody has to work, it will also be when nobody has a job, and they don't have any money either, and the ruling Oligarchy is not going to give them any.  There is no AI utopia in our future, there is only an AI utopia for the ruling oligarchs, and then the revolution.  

I hope they bring back the guillotine for the next revolution in the US, that's the thing the French got right. 

I'm looking forward to seeing that orange head in a basket.




Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@badger
Elon Musk makes in a minute what the average American household makes in 4.5 years. But wait, oh no, a black kid is going to college!
Ok, but you realize this attitude is kind of my point? Like as long as other divisions between people exist, it's near impossible for all laborers to band together.
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
-->
@Sidewalker
And to your thought experiment, you are right on.  Everybody seems to think AI will eventually do everything and nobody will have to work and that will be great, that is so naive, the only people that will be good for are the bazillionaires that own the AI, when AI gets to the point where nobody has to work, it will also be when nobody has a job, and they don't have any money either, and the ruling Oligarchy is not going to give them any.  There is no AI utopia in our future, there is only an AI utopia for the ruling oligarchs, and then the revolution.  
Yeah, who knows where this is going. Zuckerburg is talking about replacing all mid-level engineers with AI. So he wants to pay nobody. So who's buying his product exactly? People paid by someone else? What about when they replace their workers with AI? The world falls apart.

Thanks for chiming in. It gets fucking surreal chatting with GP. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 388
Posts: 12,210
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Savant
Workers are the most useless part of economy. Its the innovators who produced advanced society as we know it. If it was up to primitive dumb workers, we would still be throwing spears.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,013
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
true.
Being a Luddite might seem edgy for a while, but everyone eventually outgrows that phase.
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
-->
@Savant
Ok, but you realize this attitude is kind of my point? Like as long as other divisions between people exist, it's near impossible for all laborers to band together.
I don't really know what you're talking about tbh. That's my point. Dems were probably heavy-handed on the DEI, okay. There was bigger fish to fry and they underestimated how much of a bunch of racists babies republicans are.

It's republicans that are currently tearing down your government. It's republican retards like GP blabbering nonsensical soundbites fed to him by corporate interest think tanks that impede banding together.

I'm very ready to band together with you here right now and make politics that goes after wealth inequality.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@badger
I don't really know what you're talking about tbh.
Exactly what I said in my post. A violent revolutions among laborers need near 100% support since they can easily be replaced with other laborers. I didn't say whether that was a good thing or a bad thing, though I'd probably be opposed to starting a class war.

I'm very ready to band together with you here right now and make politics that goes after wealth inequality.
Depends on the policy, I guess. Universal healthcare I'd support depending on implementation, rent control I'd oppose.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 388
Posts: 12,210
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
true.
Being a Luddite might seem edgy for a while, but everyone eventually outgrows that phase.
Primitive dumb worker should be thankful instead of thinking he is "exploited". He is the one doing the exploiting, doing less work than ever while having more things than ever, none of these is thanks to his own effort. Workers are complaining because they are not as rich as someone who does actual much more useful work. Workers dont realize that they dont even deserve what they have now, let alone to have as much as some innovator who advances society more than all primitive dumb workers together.
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
-->
@Savant
Depends on the policy, I guess. Universal healthcare I'd support depending on implementation, rent control I'd oppose.
Worker representation on corporate boards, universal healthcare, subsidised college, laws against investor purchase of residential homes, higher taxes on second or third homes. Higher taxes on the super rich. Redistribution generally is what needs to happen. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,013
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
I can understand a person wanting to live like a Luddite for the connection with the natural world.....but they lose me when they try to explain that lifestyle is to equalize outcomes. Not everyone wants to live like Grizzly Adams.
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
If we're not going to ban this dumb cunt, can we at least ban his paedophile friend? They're so fucking creepy man.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@badger
Worker representation on corporate boards
Should anyone who sells to a company have representation on the board? If I sell vending machines to a gym, for example, should I now control how that gym is run? Seems like a poor incentive structure.

subsidised college
Maybe. What about degrees that are known not to increase odds of getting a good job?
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,372
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
-->
@Savant
Look man, I am not a details guy. But this immediately looks like it descends into petty bickering:

Maybe. What about degrees that are known not to increase odds of getting a good job?

Across the board. Spend frivolously I say. We got a lot of redistributing to do. If we hurt innovation we'll reevaluate.

But whatever you think is best. So long as you agree that redistribution needs to happen I'm happy.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 388
Posts: 12,210
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
If we're not going to ban this dumb cunt, can we at least ban his paedophile friend? They're so fucking creepy man.
I agree. Ban all pedophiles. I hate mentally ill people.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,013
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
pedos need love too.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 388
Posts: 12,210
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
pedos need love too.
Yes. Get them those sex robots once AI takes over.

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Savant
Exactly what I said in my post. A violent revolutions among laborers need near 100% support since they can easily be replaced with other laborers. I didn't say whether that was a good thing or a bad thing, though I'd probably be opposed to starting a class war.
The American system is failing.

How much of America's wealth does the 1% own?
30.8%
Over the last 35 years, the wealthiest 1% of Americans have significantly increased their share of the country's net worth, as shown in the data table below. In 1989, the top 1% held 22.8% of total U.S. net worth. As of 2024, this share has surged to 30.8%.

Who owns 70% of the wealth in America?
Chart: The Top 10 Percent Own 70 Percent of U.S. Wealth ...
As of Q1 of 2021, the top 10 percent held 69.8 percent of total U.S. net worth (which is the value of all assets a person holds minus all their liabilities). The top 1 percent held about half of that wealth – 32.1 percent, while the next 9 percent held approximately another half at 37.7 percent.

The rest are afraid of immigrants taking over.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 388
Posts: 12,210
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Shila
The top 1 percent held about half of that wealth – 32.1 percent, while the next 9 percent held approximately another half at 37.7 percent.
They should give some to bottom 1%.

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Best.Korea
The top 1 percent held about half of that wealth – 32.1 percent, while the next 9 percent held approximately another half at 37.7 percent.
They should give some to bottom 1%.
What is left is 30% of the wealth to be shared by the remaining 90% of the population. Immigrants diluted the wealth further.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@Shila
The rest are afraid of immigrants taking over.
Lol way to prove my point.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@Shila
Another thing to realize is that the working class in the US is also customers. So it's not just you vs. employers and immigrants, it's you vs. employers and immigrants and people who want cheaper products. US jurisdiction only covers a fraction of the market, and your bargaining power only goes so far before those other groups start adapting.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Savant
Another thing to realize is that the working class in the US is also customers. So it's not just you vs. employers and immigrants, it's you vs. employers and immigrants and people who want cheaper products. US jurisdiction only covers a fraction of the market, and your bargaining power only goes so far before those other groups start adapting.
U.S minimum wage is $7.25/hour. In Canada the minimum wage is $11/hour or 15$ Canadian. So the wealthy has control over the rest of the population including government and politics.

Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@Shila
U.S minimum wage is $7.25/hour. In Canada the minimum wage is $11/hour or 15$ Canadian. So the wealthy has control over the rest of the population including government and politics.
The wealthy people in Canada must be very generous.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,013
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Shila
minimum wage only devalues the dollar
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 2,606
4
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
4
7
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Total dollars in circulation stays the same. Printing money devalues the dollar.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,588
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
@badger
@WyIted
People employ, because there are a whole lot of people who need to be employed.

Dogs bark and sheep bleat.

So kill the dog and replace the dog.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....Dumb cunt mouthpieces.