-->
@Lemming
It doesn't need to be 'Harris's position, what matters is that I view it as her 'sides position.One's side get's pushed forward by their candidate being in office, even if their candidate does not make it their main push.
A politican listens to people to the left and right of them when making policy decisions. Ex: On Israel, her base was pro Palestine, but Biden listened to people to the right of him on that issue and enacted what they wanted.
Treat Harris like you would Biden (minus Biden being 100 years old).
Guns
Harris and I disagree on guns; but there are much bigger freedoms at play than the right to own an AR 15.
I also disagree with the million terms for gender.
I do as well, but this is a classification debate instead of social policy. Social policy is, "Should X be legal?"; a classification policy would be, "Is Maryland part of the South east USA?" (are trans women part of women?)
I say let the kids grow up a bit first, random age 18?
My rule is the # of years old you are; add 1 point. # of years you've been on HRT; add one point. I think you need a minimum of 18 pts to be allowed to get a dick snip or to have your titties taken.
Just have 4 categories for sports, men, women, trans, and any.
Professionally; if that happens, then the transwomen would be in a league 500x smaller than the women's or men's; it's not pratical.
I think the Left encourages immigration to the point it is detrimental to current inhabitants.
How is people moving in inheritely harmful to the people already here?
I think the Left 'can be hypocritical when they get immigrants in their cities, though some show amazing support.
It is hypocritical, but Trump is hypocritical on immigration as well; he wants to deport undocumented immigrants but he married multiple people who came here undocumented. If you prefer Trump to Harris based on actions vs words, then that's respectable; I'm just saying if Trump is saying he could shoot someone and not lose voters (while never claiming he went too far with that statement), then that should be a deal breaker to you; I mean, you can have another republican replace Trump (like DeSantis). If this election was DeSantis vs Harris, then I would vote for DeSantis; DeSantis has Trumpian vibes while not running a cult. I'd rather let every houshold decide for it's self whether to allow undocumented immigrants; it's the most local version of the 10th amendment (which is basicly the local rule amendment).
I am less about deporting, than I am about my government verbally and physically discouraging illegal immigration.
In order for the government to discourage undocumented immigration, they are going to have to deport some people. But why deport anybody?
I don't really care for immigration in general, but acknowledge it's use in some circumstances, our history.
Wanting to deport the undocumented means you care about immigration (just not in the way that makes sense).
I think we should try to improve third world countries to a higher standard of living, as I think a lower standard of living results in population booms.
What about keeping the money in America? Or if you want ot help Africa, then let people from there move here without restricion and (if they want), then they send their own private money home instead of taxpayer money?
I think people should value their heritage and blood.
Why? Lets say you're British; all that means is you are ethnically from an Island. It says nothing relavent about you.
Include Everyone for the sake of Diversity Movement.
Racial diversity is irrelevent.
But I 'would think excusing one batch of college kids their voluntarily accepted debt, would not fix the problem.
Understandable, but seinors got college 99% or so government subsidized; why can't Gen Z be treated the same?
Certainly something for me to think about.
Think about it for 24 hoursl let me know what your results are.
I suppose government might encourage people to go for colleges that don't cost as much,
The main reason college is cheap is because of government subsidies to it.