The definition of 'under the jurisdiction thereof' is perfectly clear based on the legislative history that was debated and put forth when approving and passing the 14th Amendment.
Gay marriage was bad case law as the justices legislated from the bench.
There is no "privacy" in the Constitution,
-->@<<<Amber>>>The definition of 'under the jurisdiction thereof' is perfectly clear based on the legislative history that was debated and put forth when approving and passing the 14th Amendment.Did you post one of these debates in this thread?
Jurisdiction appears elsewhere in the constitution you know.
Gay marriage was bad case law as the justices legislated from the bench.You don’t need legislation to enshrine equal rights for any group. It’s already in the Constitution
There is no "privacy" in the Constitution,Right, the 4th Amendment has nothing to do with “privacy” because the word privacy isn’t used. Genius
Show us where in the US Constitution does it explicitly stated same sex couples have a right to matrimony with opposite sexed couples!
The subject is about the 14th, not the 4th,
“There is no "privacy" in the constitution.
Kamala is not a legitimate US citizen.
Kamala is not a legitimate US citizen.Besides being born here,
Kamala is married
and is a stepmother.
You are not married and you don’t have children.
So Republicans think you are only a partial citizen.
Show us where in the US Constitution does it explicitly stated same sex couples have a right to matrimony with SAME sexed couples!where does it explicitly say in the constitution you have a right to clean air and water?
People, all people are entitled to equal treatment under the law. Marriage is an institution granted by law.
No, marriage is not "granted" by law.
No, marriage is not "granted" by law.Wrong. Who issues marriage licenses?
You don’t need a priest to get married, but you do need government permission.
I’m not surprised you are ignorant of how marriage works.
You have never been asked to marry. So sad.
You realize republicans are planning on banning you from voting, right? Because you’re an old maid. A spinster
Posting what appears to be "quotes" but failing to provide linked sources.
Kamala is not a legitimate US citizen.
@<<<Amber>>>Posting what appears to be "quotes" but failing to provide linked sources.lol I was quoting directly from the ruling by the court. The fact that you don't know that kinda confirms my suspicion that you didn't actually read about the case directly. You are pulling quotes from some right wing conspiracy site that is picking individual sentences out to try to mislead people.you could have found this in like 2 seconds by searching the text, but here is a link for you.
Kamala is not a legitimate US citizen.she absolutely is. There is no legitimate question about that. It has been established law for over a century.
Yes, you do need a priest to get married
Prove it. (that you’ve never been asked to marry)
I feel sorry for your kids, if you have any, and your ex-wife.
Yes, you do need a priest to get marriedNo, you don’t. Are you stupid?
Prove it. (that you’ve never been asked to marry)That’s proof right there toots
I feel sorry for your kids, if you have any, and your ex-wife.Oh I’ve been married 32 years. Because I’m not a loser.
Sadly, you don’t have any of that. Because you’re a racist weirdo
@<<<Amber>>>Let them make the exception.
Amber: Your brother can't do it no more than your barber can.
Clearly you are, stupid. You said you don't need one, I said yes you do. They are one among 2 other authorized persons to do it.Your brother can't do it no more than your barber can.You have to be a licensed officiant, priest or judge to perform a marriage.
No, marriage is not "granted" by law. It is granted by God via a priest/pastor, a judge or magistrate and is only recognized through law for the purposes of benefits, property, inheritance via kinship, so on and so forth.
Amber: Your brother can't do it no more than your barber can.I got a certificate from the county and married my brother in law to his bride. It’s very easy to do. As usual, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Clearly you are, stupid. You said you don't need one, I said yes you do. They are one among 2 other authorized persons to do it.Your brother can't do it no more than your barber can.You have to be a licensed officiant, priest or judge to perform a marriage.so you admit you don’t need a priest to get married.
No, marriage is not "granted" by law. It is granted by God via a priest/pastor, a judge or magistrate and is only recognized through law for the purposes of benefits, property, inheritance via kinship, so on and so forth.This is your dumb statement.If marriage is granted by god, how do people get married by a judge or licensed officiant?
Your lack of reading comprehension skills never cease to amaze me. What part of my comment mentioning an “officiant” did you fail to comprehend?“Your brother can’t do it”
Yes, you do need a priest to get married. Government permission is NOT required.
Truly predictable.
Your lack of reading comprehension skills never cease to amaze me. What part of my comment mentioning an “officiant” did you fail to comprehend?“Your brother can’t do it”So your brother can do it. You are amazing toots
Yes, you do need a priest to get married. Government permission is NOT required.Are these your exact words? Are both statements false?
Truly predictable.What’s predictable is you’re a lonely cat lady who shouldn’t be allowed to vote. - according to JD Vance
Quoting out of context and strawman fallacy. Non sequitur.
Neither is false. Both are accurate.
You clearly lack attention to detail and reading comprehension skills. I've only mentioned, cited and quoted from that case 6-12x throughout this threaded topic.
You're the one caught cherry-picking individual sentences out trying to mislead people with the same regurgitated nonsense the left & MSM lies about redundantly.
She is not, not according to the legislative history behind the creation and passage of the 14th and the citizenship clause.
Yes there is a legitimate question about it, as I brought it up as others have too.
No, it is not established law it is the bastardization of a law that has been misread, misapplied, and washed over with DemoKKKratic intervention and running interference so their anchor/tether babies can get (illegitimate) citizenship in order to be added to their demoKKKratic voting roles.
I'm done repeating myself.
The historical record of the legislative history behind the creation and passage of the 14th Amendment, Citizenship Clause, if fucking crystal clear.
Kamala Harris is NOT a legitimate citizen. Period.
Done with your vain ignorance.
Blocking your dumbass.
I'm done repeating myself.
Kamala Harris is NOT a legitimate citizen. Period.
