++MEEP Proposal: Ban Stochastic Terrorism++

It goes both ways buddy, those who vote nay are opening it up for me to use stochastic terrorism on them also

This thread was made because Wylted is trying to get me banned because due to his pro monarchy (and therefore anti democracy) beliefs, he doesn't believe in diversity of thought.  Vote Nay!

I vote Nay...with an additional write in vote for Wylted to stuff it.

discussion thread below. Let's keep this thread clean https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/11386-stochastic-terrorism-meep-discussion-thread

@WyIted

You should be allowed to hate Bernie Sanders so much you want him dead.  I don't hate Sanders this much.  You should even be allowed to advocate for me getting assassinated (a random nobody on the internet with no political power).  Other people have enough common sense to not come to my home in Arlington, VA and murder me.

There is a huge difference between calling for the death of the Brooklyn 5 and actually murdering them.  You hero, Trump, called for the death penalty for the Brooklyn 5 because he believes they did something horrible.  He is allowed to do that.  It would only be illegal if he acted on this belief and murdered them (although if the Brooklyn 5 was actually rapists, then I don't think he would do anything wrong; it is because they were found to be innocent that I think what Trump would hypothetically do should be illegal).  Trump believing the Brooklyn 5 are rapists, believing rape is horrible, and merely calling for them to be killed for something obviously bad if true is free speech.

We just gotta wait for the late arriving ballots.

So saying you want Putin dead would violate the rules?

I'll have to go Nay

The Yay would be winning if all of these dead people weren't voting

This site cant afford to ban any more users.

My { Ebuc } vote is nay. If there if official place to vote I cant find it. Sorry

Lol, Trump is the biggest current user of hate speech.

He called the American people vermin

Nay

Nay. 

I say open the doors to all kinds of speech.  If I don't like it, I don't have to sign in.  

We should be able to order directly from this website a telegrammed ball sack kicking to the people we disagree with. (I'm talking to you IWRA!)

Nay

Th8s is the official place to vote and your vote will be recorded when I have the opportunity to update the thread 

I see the proposal under MEEP, but not where to vote

I see the proposal under MEEP, but not where to vote

Nay

This is a debate site, no one here is posting to 20 million followers. The TOS should cover overtly violent language and language aimed at other users, not vaguely worded coded language that will be read by 10 people who already have their own opinions.

This is the site to vote.

Nay.

“Stochastic terrorism” is an academic term designed to curb free speech a la “hate speech” laws and is ripe for abuse. “Incitement to terrorism” already covers what needs to be covered.

Yay.

Can you confirm, if I am not mistaken while the site was down around 15 votes were accidentally erased for yay?

I don't want to be unfair so that is why I am asking a neutral person for confirmation

Yes💀

Do you have identification? 

Expand.

I do not understand your question.

..." In fact, at least 140 people who worked in the Trump administration had a hand in Project 2025, a CNN review found, including more than half of the people listed as authors, editors and contributors to “Mandate for Leadership,” the project’s extensive manifesto for overhauling the executive branch."....