++MEEP Proposal: Ban Stochastic Terrorism++

Author: WyIted

Posts

Total: 88
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog
Yes, Wylted is a hypocrite.

You can stick it to him by voting Nay.
It goes both ways buddy, those who vote nay are opening it up for me to use stochastic terrorism on them also
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Savant
This thread was made because Wylted is trying to get me banned because due to his pro monarchy (and therefore anti democracy) beliefs, he doesn't believe in diversity of thought.  Vote Nay!
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,431
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
I vote Nay...with an additional write in vote for Wylted to stuff it.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Official Vote count

yay 3 (wylted, tidycraft, Amber)
Nay 6 (mharman, moozer, theunderdog, adol, FLRW, Sidewalker)

TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10

You should be allowed to hate Bernie Sanders so much you want him dead.  I don't hate Sanders this much.  You should even be allowed to advocate for me getting assassinated (a random nobody on the internet with no political power).  Other people have enough common sense to not come to my home in Arlington, VA and murder me.

There is a huge difference between calling for the death of the Brooklyn 5 and actually murdering them.  You hero, Trump, called for the death penalty for the Brooklyn 5 because he believes they did something horrible.  He is allowed to do that.  It would only be illegal if he acted on this belief and murdered them (although if the Brooklyn 5 was actually rapists, then I don't think he would do anything wrong; it is because they were found to be innocent that I think what Trump would hypothetically do should be illegal).  Trump believing the Brooklyn 5 are rapists, believing rape is horrible, and merely calling for them to be killed for something obviously bad if true is free speech.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@WyIted
We just gotta wait for the late arriving ballots.

Yay
Owen_T
Owen_T's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 396
2
2
9
Owen_T's avatar
Owen_T
2
2
9
So saying you want Putin dead would violate the rules?

I'll have to go Nay
Owen_T
Owen_T's avatar
Debates: 25
Posts: 396
2
2
9
Owen_T's avatar
Owen_T
2
2
9
-->
@ILikePie5
The Yay would be winning if all of these dead people weren't voting
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Official Vote count

yay 4 (wylted, tidycraft, Amber, ilikepie)
Nay 7 (mharman, moozer, theunderdog, adol, FLRW, Sidewalker, owen)

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 331
Posts: 9,806
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
This site cant afford to ban any more users.

Nay
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,687
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
My { Ebuc } vote is nay. If there if official place to vote I cant find it. Sorry
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@WyIted
SO eat it. Now vote so we can ban hate speech against Trump
Lol, Trump is the biggest current user of hate speech.

He called the American people vermin

Nay
DavidAZZ
DavidAZZ's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 226
0
2
5
DavidAZZ's avatar
DavidAZZ
0
2
5
Nay. 

I say open the doors to all kinds of speech.  If I don't like it, I don't have to sign in.  

We should be able to order directly from this website a telegrammed ball sack kicking to the people we disagree with. (I'm talking to you IWRA!)


thett3
thett3's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,060
3
2
7
thett3's avatar
thett3
3
2
7
Nay
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@ebuc
Th8s is the official place to vote and your vote will be recorded when I have the opportunity to update the thread 

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@FLRW
I see the proposal under MEEP, but not where to vote
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@FLRW
I see the proposal under MEEP, but not where to vote
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,971
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@WyIted
Nay

This is a debate site, no one here is posting to 20 million followers. The TOS should cover overtly violent language and language aimed at other users, not vaguely worded coded language that will be read by 10 people who already have their own opinions.

FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,146
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain

This is the site to vote.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,438
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@WyIted
Nay.

“Stochastic terrorism” is an academic term designed to curb free speech a la “hate speech” laws and is ripe for abuse. “Incitement to terrorism” already covers what needs to be covered.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Official Vote count

yay 4 (wylted, tidycraft, Amber, ilikepie)

Nay 14  (mharman, moozer, theunderdog, adol, FLRW, Sidewalker, owen, best Korea, IWRA,  ebuc,  Davidazz, thett, double R, cristo)

Let me know if I missed any
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,426
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Yay.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
yay 5 (wylted, tidycraft, Amber, ilikepie, Diavalo)

Nay 14 (mharman, moozer, theunderdog, adol, FLRW, Sidewalker, owen, best Korea, IWRA, ebuc, Davidazz, thett, double R, cristo)

Let me know if I missed any
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@ILikePie5
Can you confirm, if I am not mistaken while the site was down around 15 votes were accidentally erased for yay?

I don't want to be unfair so that is why I am asking a neutral person for confirmation
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@WyIted
Yes💀
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 531
3
3
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
3
9
I vote NAY.

Free speech is necessary in a debate.

Users have the ability to report "abuses", and moderators can make value judgments in that regard.

Users can appeal, and perhaps  a "user panel" could be set up to adjudicate a particular post.

WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,558
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@prefix
Do you have identification? 
prefix
prefix's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 531
3
3
9
prefix's avatar
prefix
3
3
9
-->
@WyIted
Do you have identification? 
Expand.

I do not understand your question.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,687
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@prefix
Expand. I do not understand your question

Apparrently your not familiar with what MAGA's new Project 25 ---behind the scenes platform--- is proposing.

Before voting you must show birth certificate and at least one other type of USA citizenship.

I know voter fraud is rare in USA voting system and this is an attempt by Trumpet.s cult group to make america white again { MAWA }.

If you dont like it, then you can go crying to your MAMA.  That would be Kamala Harris who will also have to show her birth certificate and 2ndary proof of citizenship.

Obama knows all about this Project 25 Cult movement with Trumpet using his flack of moral integrity in his false narrative Trumpet, to deny he knows who they are.

..." Trump claims not to know who is behind Project 2025. A CNN review found at least 140 people who worked for him are involved "....

..." In fact, at least 140 people who worked in the Trump administration had a hand in Project 2025, a CNN review found, including more than half of the people listed as authors, editors and contributors to “Mandate for Leadership,” the project’s extensive manifesto for overhauling the executive branch."....