Breath of the Wild Mafia DP1

Author: Moozer325

Posts

Read-only
Total: 547
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@AustinL0926
Honestly I'm becoming a little bit skeptical of all the people claiming "confirmable" roles if this is what they mean. 
I guess I should have asked "how easily confirmable". I mean, joe's role is technically "confirmable" under some circumstances, but in 99% of games, we could never confirm it. So yeah, I think this hurt our game a bit, because Earth who is confirmable claimed to be non-confirmable, and apparently, players who are actually in reality non-confirmable claimed confirmable. This led us in wrong direction of going after Earth.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Best.Korea
@AustinL0926
I guess that's technically confirmable...? Honestly I'm becoming a little bit skeptical of all the people claiming "confirmable" roles if this is what they mean. 

Oh, and that role is overpowered.
I said it was confirmable with help. I would have to be either tracked to my target or watched at my target, or I'd have to just die protecting someone, though my death automatically confirms my role whether I used the BG to guard someone or not.

Also, how the hell is this role OP? I die using it to shield someone else.

How is your role different from a doctor and how is your role confirmable?
As I told Austin, I die as a result of protecting someone else. It's a one-time effect if used on the right person, whereas a doctor can use their role to protect people successfully multiple nights. Also, see above for how to confirm it. It's not absolute confirmation because that doesn't confirm the effect, but it does confirm who I visit.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
Just to clarify, my role is just the same as it is listed here: 


It's standard BG. No more, no less. I pick someone to BG each NP. I die if they are the target of the NK. End of story. That's why I pointed out that it was odd that the justification included protecting myself, and when I asked about it, I found out that the role itself doesn't protect me at all. I cannot, in any way, protect myself using this role.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@whiteflame
Somehow, I think you're creating a false dichotomy. I believe that this isn't Joebob's real role based on the evidence I've given (which I note you haven't responded to), and I also believe that Joebob, who we both know to be cautious as scum, would be unlikely to CC Savant on the basis of poor-risk-reward ratio. I have to weigh two likely yet mutually exclusive propositions here and I'd like to see more behavioral evidence to tip the scale. 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
I dont think thats easily confirmable, since scum often has visiting roles as well. Not to mention that scum can also fake tracker role, its not that uncommon, but I am not sure if it could happen here.

I guess its only confirmable if you die protecting your target, which when 1x, I dont find likely.

So yeah, I think its not very confirmable, however, we can make use out of it to prevent confirmed town players from dying. This could be important for us, so I am not putting you in scum pile or anything like that yet.  But its important that you use your role to protect confirmed town player.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@whiteflame
I said it was confirmable with help. I would have to be either tracked to my target or watched at my target, or I'd have to just die protecting someone, though my death automatically confirms my role whether I used the BG to guard someone or not.

Also, how the hell is this role OP? I die using it to shield someone else.
That's... not confirmable in the slightest. Or at the very least, it's no more confirmable than a role like Barney's decoy last game was. How do we know you're not framing or lawyering or stalking your target? Backtracking on your claim looks pretty scummy imo.

And your "role" is OP because if it really is 100% success rate, then you essentially guarantee that a crucial player, such as Earth, lives for a night (regardless of other interfering factors like roleblocker or strongman, I suppose).

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
Dont say who you will protect, just make sure its lunatic or earth. Its gonna be a gamble, one that we might even win.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@Best.Korea
Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@Best.Korea
Like whiteflame basically has free reign to do whatever he want as long as his NK target and visit target is different if he's scum now. I think whiteflame is smart enough to know what "confirmable" is, and this isn't it.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@AustinL0926
Somehow, I think you're creating a false dichotomy. I believe that this isn't Joebob's real role based on the evidence I've given (which I note you haven't responded to), and I also believe that Joebob, who we both know to be cautious as scum, would be unlikely to CC Savant on the basis of poor-risk-reward ratio. I have to weigh two likely yet mutually exclusive propositions here and I'd like to see more behavioral evidence to tip the scale. 
I did respond to your "evidence," but you chose to ignore those responses, so fine.

You're tying yourself into a knot here. You believe that isn't JoeBob's actual role, but since you believe he wouldn't CC Savant, you're granting some probability that Moozer created this role, otherwise the CC wouldn't shake your conviction. Fine, so that long post establishing all the reasons Moozer couldn't have done it was not nearly as solid as you made it out to be. 

That's... not confirmable in the slightest. Or at the very least, it's no more confirmable than a role like Barney's decoy last game was. How do we know you're not framing or lawyering or stalking your target? Backtracking on your claim looks pretty scummy imo.

And your "role" is OP because if it really is 100% success rate, then you essentially guarantee that a crucial player, such as Earth, lives for a night (regardless of other interfering factors like roleblocker or strongman, I suppose).
You've clearly been been very selective in your reading of my posts up to this point if you think I'm "backtracking". I said this in post #278:

I’ve never seen my role given to scum, but it’s also going to be very difficult to firmly prove, so I doubt I’ll ever be fully townread once I claim it.
So I acknowledged difficulty confirming it. What did you want me to say? That I'd probably only confirm myself in death?

Also, you and I have very different concepts of what "100% success rate" means. It means I protect my target at the cost of my life. How the fuck is that OP compared to, say, a doctor who protects their target without cost? Sincerely, I don't have any idea how you view my role as OP, especially since you acknowledge that it can be stopped or circumvented just like any other protective role.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Best.Korea
I dont think thats easily confirmable, since scum often has visiting roles as well. Not to mention that scum can also fake tracker role, its not that uncommon, but I am not sure if it could happen here.

I guess its only confirmable if you die protecting your target, which when 1x, I dont find likely.

So yeah, I think its not very confirmable, however, we can make use out of it to prevent confirmed town players from dying. This could be important for us, so I am not putting you in scum pile or anything like that yet.  But its important that you use your role to protect confirmed town player.
I didn't say it's easily confirmable, and I agree it isn't. And yes, I plan to do so.

Dont say who you will protect, just make sure its lunatic or earth. Its gonna be a gamble, one that we might even win.
Got it.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@AustinL0926
Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?
I am willing to give him a chance to prove himself in np1. I have no reason to lynch him now, even tho if he remains unconfirmed by dp2, that could change a bit, but we have 4 targets and only 2 are scum, so we are wrong somewhere, but with 3 lynches, it should guarantee a hit unless more targets appear.
JoeBob
JoeBob's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,600
3
3
7
JoeBob's avatar
JoeBob
3
3
7
-->
@Barney
In your own words, what's the justification for Link being bulletproof?
So I am the knight of Zelda, and have the most loyalty to the kingdom. After I am almost defeated, I am hidden away for 100 years to heal. After this I come to attack Ganon again. Because I got healed, I essentially had a second chance at attacking Ganon. Thus, I get a second chance when almost dying to a mafia kill.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@AustinL0926
Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?

Like whiteflame basically has free reign to do whatever he want as long as his NK target and visit target is different if he's scum now. I think whiteflame is smart enough to know what "confirmable" is, and this isn't it.
Trying really hard to push attention onto me, aren't you? I said confirmable with help (fun that you keep leaving that out) and then, when asked to provide more details, stated that confirmation would be difficult even with help well before I full claimed. And for some reason, you're scumreading me for claiming after Earth did. I was only asked to do so after Earth claimed - I wasn't going to just full claim to look townie.

Also, this is all pretty rich coming from someone who has so far refused to claim their role at all, as though that's somehow less sus than claiming after someone who was being widely scumread for his behavior.
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,465
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
Dashboard
Player            Claim       Description                           Role                  NP1          NP2        NP3
Casey_Risk   Urbosa (female pirate/ghost)            Granny              n/a
Savant            Purah (fake ID for senior discount)  Bleeder            n/a
Lunatic          Roham  (the patriarchy)                         King DP1()       n/a
Best.Korea   Mipha (dolphin girl/ghost)                   Confirmable
Austin             Impa (old woman)                                   Confirmable (and survivable)
Joebob          Link (hero)                                                   Soldier  *              n/a
Whiteflame  Daruk (rock guy/ghost)                         Bodyguard          ???
Earth               Revali (bird guy/ghost)                         Cop (2x)                ???

My gut reaction is anti-Earth.  If scum and about to get lynched anyways, a cop gambit is the way to go... I will admit that it's debatable if it's confirmable or not, as it is the single easiest role for scum to fake... Still, not a lynch option today.

Whiteflame listed his role as semi-confirmable, and later even stated a tracker would need to follow him. While scum do have investigative powers and others which do not kill and do not tell the target anything, this feels organic for weak confirmation. If scum, he's wise to not over play his role utility (to be clear, I don't feel any scum vibes).

...

Also,

Unvote
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Barney
@AustinL0926
Austin and I didnt yet state our roles, however, both of us made it clear its obviously confirmed once used or claimed.

That leaves Barney as the last role that is not "that easily confirmable".

I dont want to find out your role, I just want to know if you will be able to confirm yourself by dp3. Its very important, because if what austin is saying is true, we have only 4 lynch targets yet 3 available lynches to hit one scum, which basically guarantees hit if 2 scum is among those 4 targets.

However, if you dont confirm yourself, you will be 5th target which kinda makes the win not so certain.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
I am hoping that at least 2 out of 3 (austin, barney, whiteflame) will confirm themselves, so we are only left with 4 targets (savant, joe, casey, and one of 3 which is unconfirmed). If that happens, our win is mathematically guaranteed.

I dont buy that Earth is scum faking cop. To be clear, almost all games have cop and doctor, so logically, we should consider these roles confirmed when claimed. Also, we cant afford to increase target count from 4 to 6 based on assumption of very unlikely setup, since that greatly decreases our chances.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
Okay, I came up with a plan for you which might help us greatly.

Your role visits when protects, correct?

So if you were to visit casey, you would die if she is telling the truth?

So we might lose 2 players by dp2 if we do a no lynch now, but we will have clear idea that casey is town, where as it stands, it is very likely both you and casey will never be confirmed.

So it saves town 3 lynches if casey is confirmed and you die from her role.

Just we need to make sure this is how it would play out.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
If you dont want to risk it, its okay. I am just suggesting.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
I guess it depends if scum has role blocker and would maybe role block casey, but then they couldnt role block cop, which is still an advantage for us.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
If we dont want to put this plan in effect, then I suggest we lynch casey. We have no choice but to lynch her, since she is the only role which just happens to be completely unconfirmable by anything, but also refuses to post for days which means she cant be behaviorally read either.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Best.Korea
Especially since we’re talking about this now, there are several easy ways for scum to taint the outcome. They could just NK me, which seemingly “confirms” Casey. If they want to get me killed, they could RB me and use my lack of action as a pretense for getting me lynched next DP. They could redirect me to make Casey look sus. And all that just considers what scum can do. We know that Moozer has made town roles that manipulate town actions.

So I’m not super confident in pursuing this, particularly because scum know, but also because “confirming” Casey could just as easily backfire.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
They could just NK me, which seemingly “confirms” Casey.
No. If they NK you, then only 1 player will die at night, and it wont be any of confirmed town players. So we will know scum acted.

If they want to get me killed, they could RB me and use my lack of action as a pretense for getting me lynched next DP.
I think you would get notified if you were role blocked, but yeah, I guess that is an issue which might give us problems, but then they couldnt role block cop.

They could redirect me to make Casey look sus. And all that just considers what scum can do.
If scum has both redirect and role block available in a single night, I guess that would mess up our plan, but it seems kinda too strong if they have that.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
I guess at this point, unless we are going to go after claims from Barney or Austin, we very much have to lynch casey then. We cant afford to have unconfirmable and unable to get investigated role in late game. So since we have to lynch her at some point anyway, I suggest this dp, because it leaves more targets for scum.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Even cop will have greater amount of players to pick from if we lynch casey and not anyone who is valid cop target.
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,955
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
-->
@Best.Korea
No. If they NK you, then only 1 player will die at night, and it wont be any of confirmed town players. So we will know scum acted.
That assumes scum use an NK. Scum can always just refuse to NK and use the resulting kill from Casey to make the case you’re making: that my death was the result of an NK and not her role. My point is, scum can use their NK (or refuse to use it) to manipulate how we view the outcome.

I think you would get notified if you were role blocked, but yeah, I guess that is an issue which might give us problems, but then they couldnt role block cop.
Just because I’d get notified doesn’t mean I could convince you I had been RB’d. I don’t think they’d do this if given the option to RB someone else, but we also don’t know what manipulation they have for the Cop result.

If scum has both redirect and role block available in a single night, I guess that would mess up our plan, but it seems kinda too strong if they have that.
They only need one or the other, though both would make it easier.

I guess at this point, unless we are going to go after claims from Barney or Austin, we very much have to lynch casey then. We cant afford to have unconfirmable and unable to get investigated role in late game. So since we have to lynch her at some point anyway, I suggest this dp, because it leaves more targets for scum.
I’m not convinced she’s the best choice just because she’s the most straightforward, but no one wants to lynch Savant, so here we are.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
Somehow, I think you're creating a false dichotomy. I believe that this isn't Joebob's real role based on the evidence I've given (which I note you haven't responded to), and I also believe that Joebob, who we both know to be cautious as scum, would be unlikely to CC Savant on the basis of poor-risk-reward ratio. I have to weigh two likely yet mutually exclusive propositions here and I'd like to see more behavioral evidence to tip the scale. 
I did respond to your "evidence," but you chose to ignore those responses, so fine.

You're tying yourself into a knot here. You believe that isn't JoeBob's actual role, but since you believe he wouldn't CC Savant, you're granting some probability that Moozer created this role, otherwise the CC wouldn't shake your conviction. Fine, so that long post establishing all the reasons Moozer couldn't have done it was not nearly as solid as you made it out to be. 
Hm.. somehow I'm slightly skeptical you're engaging with my responses in good faith. I stated, repeatedly, that I have to weigh the balance of probabilities - because as much as I'd like to believe I'm right, at least one of my ideas - either Joebob faking the role or Joebob not being willing to so easily CC - must be incorrect. I stand by my post establishing my Joebob is likely faking his role, but that doesn't mean I'm going to blindly ignore the fact that yes, odds generally favor the CCer, especially on D1.


That's... not confirmable in the slightest. Or at the very least, it's no more confirmable than a role like Barney's decoy last game was. How do we know you're not framing or lawyering or stalking your target? Backtracking on your claim looks pretty scummy imo.

And your "role" is OP because if it really is 100% success rate, then you essentially guarantee that a crucial player, such as Earth, lives for a night (regardless of other interfering factors like roleblocker or strongman, I suppose).
You've clearly been been very selective in your reading of my posts up to this point if you think I'm "backtracking". I said this in post #278: [
I’ve never seen my role given to scum, but it’s also going to be very difficult to firmly prove, so I doubt I’ll ever be fully townread once I claim it.
So I acknowledged difficulty confirming it. What did you want me to say? That I'd probably only confirm myself in death?

Also, you and I have very different concepts of what "100% success rate" means. It means I protect my target at the cost of my life. How the fuck is that OP compared to, say, a doctor who protects their target without cost? Sincerely, I don't have any idea how you view my role as OP, especially since you acknowledge that it can be stopped or circumvented just like any other protective role.
Except it's not just "very difficult" to firmly prove, it's literally impossible, because the only way you'll prove if is if you're dead. The focus on Tracker results in particular makes me suspicious because, as I mentioned, it was right after Earth claimed cop. I'm not suspicious that your role can't be confirmed, I'm suspicious that you claimed it does when it is even close to being so.

Furthermore, I literally said the opposite of what you claimed I did. I said that if it's 100% success rate, it works *regardless* of interfering factors. Not even knowing how your own role works is strange, to say the least.

Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?

Like whiteflame basically has free reign to do whatever he want as long as his NK target and visit target is different if he's scum now. I think whiteflame is smart enough to know what "confirmable" is, and this isn't it.
Trying really hard to push attention onto me, aren't you? I said confirmable with help (fun that you keep leaving that out) and then, when asked to provide more details, stated that confirmation would be difficult even with help well before I full claimed. And for some reason, you're scumreading me for claiming after Earth did. I was only asked to do so after Earth claimed - I wasn't going to just full claim to look townie.

Also, this is all pretty rich coming from someone who has so far refused to claim their role at all, as though that's somehow less sus than claiming after someone who was being widely scumread for his behavior.
Confirmable with help, sure. But it's not confirmable even with help - that's the problem. All it does is show you have a visiting role, which is... about 75% of roles in existence (based on a qualitative random sample of 20 roles from Mafiascum I just did). The fact you keep doubling down on this is very strange.

And again, you're not engaging with what I'm actually saying. I'm not saying that claiming late makes you scummy, I'm saying it lends far less credence to (your already scummy) claim.

And I said my role is confirmable - genuinely confirmable, not the "I can visit" confirmable you seem to think the word means. Not sure why you're trying to deflect onto me.


AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
VTL whiteflame

This argumentation (strawmanning, false dichotomy, and quoting me saying something I didn't say) is so bad I literally can't believe it ever came from town.  Like whiteflame, if you're town, you need to reread your win condition. Town!whiteflame has always engaged with me in good faith and I am not really seeing that in the slightest here. 

Combined with the attempt to strongly backtrack on a confident claim of confirmability earlier, consider this my vote for today. I might be convinced for Casey, but likely no one else for now.
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,288
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
-->
@Best.Korea
I am hoping that at least 2 out of 3 (austin, barney, whiteflame) will confirm themselves, so we are only left with 4 targets (savant, joe, casey, and one of 3 which is unconfirmed). If that happens, our win is mathematically guaranteed.
But how will whiteflame ever confirm himself? If he's scum, he can just "conveniently" protect the wrong target. And as town, all he can do is... visit someone... which probably can't even be confirmed if no one has a Tracker role (very possible since Earth has cop)

I dont buy that Earth is scum faking cop. To be clear, almost all games have cop and doctor, so logically, we should consider these roles confirmed when claimed. Also, we cant afford to increase target count from 4 to 6 based on assumption of very unlikely setup, since that greatly decreases our chances.
I agree, cop seems pretty likely to be in the game. However, whiteflame isn't a doctor, he's a bodyguard with a questionable claim that he's backtracked several times on.


Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,017
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@whiteflame
Scum can always just refuse to NK and use the resulting kill from Casey to make the case you’re making
That would still save a confirmed town player from night kill.

Just because I’d get notified doesn’t mean I could convince you I had been RB’d. I don’t think they’d do this if given the option to RB someone else, but we also don’t know what manipulation they have for the Cop result.
It would save cop from being role blocked, but yeah, I guess its risky if scum has something more than a role block.

I’m not convinced she’s the best choice just because she’s the most straightforward, but no one wants to lynch Savant, so here we are.
Lynching Savant is more of a moral issue, because scum and town have been consistently killing him in dp1. But there is also a case where Savant might get connfirmed by someone. Same cannot be said for casey. I know it is very possible that she is town. The problem is that we cannot know or even have a hint until we lynch her.