Somehow, I think you're creating a false dichotomy. I believe that this isn't Joebob's real role based on the evidence I've given (which I note you haven't responded to), and I also believe that Joebob, who we both know to be cautious as scum, would be unlikely to CC Savant on the basis of poor-risk-reward ratio. I have to weigh two likely yet mutually exclusive propositions here and I'd like to see more behavioral evidence to tip the scale.
I did respond to your "evidence," but you chose to ignore those responses, so fine.
You're tying yourself into a knot here. You believe that isn't JoeBob's actual role, but since you believe he wouldn't CC Savant, you're granting some probability that Moozer created this role, otherwise the CC wouldn't shake your conviction. Fine, so that long post establishing all the reasons Moozer couldn't have done it was not nearly as solid as you made it out to be.
Hm.. somehow I'm slightly skeptical you're engaging with my responses in good faith. I stated, repeatedly, that I have to weigh the balance of probabilities - because as much as I'd like to believe I'm right, at least one of my ideas - either Joebob faking the role or Joebob not being willing to so easily CC - must be incorrect. I stand by my post establishing my Joebob is likely faking his role, but that doesn't mean I'm going to blindly ignore the fact that yes, odds generally favor the CCer, especially on D1.
That's... not confirmable in the slightest. Or at the very least, it's no more confirmable than a role like Barney's decoy last game was. How do we know you're not framing or lawyering or stalking your target? Backtracking on your claim looks pretty scummy imo.
And your "role" is OP because if it really is 100% success rate, then you essentially guarantee that a crucial player, such as Earth, lives for a night (regardless of other interfering factors like roleblocker or strongman, I suppose).
You've clearly been been very selective in your reading of my posts up to this point if you think I'm "backtracking". I said this in post
#278: [
I’ve never seen my role given to scum, but it’s also going to be very difficult to firmly prove, so I doubt I’ll ever be fully townread once I claim it.
So I acknowledged difficulty confirming it. What did you want me to say? That I'd probably only confirm myself in death?
Also, you and I have very different concepts of what "100% success rate" means. It means I protect my target at the cost of my life. How the fuck is that OP compared to, say, a doctor who protects their target without cost? Sincerely, I don't have any idea how you view my role as OP, especially since you acknowledge that it can be stopped or circumvented just like any other protective role.
Except it's not just "very difficult" to firmly prove, it's literally impossible, because the only way you'll prove if is if you're dead. The focus on Tracker results in particular makes me suspicious because, as I mentioned, it was right after Earth claimed cop. I'm not suspicious that your role can't be confirmed, I'm suspicious that you claimed it does when it is even close to being so.
Furthermore, I literally said the opposite of what you claimed I did. I said that if it's 100% success rate, it works *regardless* of interfering factors. Not even knowing how your own role works is strange, to say the least.
Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?
Like whiteflame basically has free reign to do whatever he want as long as his NK target and visit target is different if he's scum now. I think whiteflame is smart enough to know what "confirmable" is, and this isn't it.
Trying really hard to push attention onto me, aren't you? I said confirmable with help (fun that you keep leaving that out) and then, when asked to provide more details, stated that confirmation would be difficult even with help well before I full claimed. And for some reason, you're scumreading me for claiming after Earth did. I was only asked to do so after Earth claimed - I wasn't going to just full claim to look townie.
Also, this is all pretty rich coming from someone who has so far refused to claim their role at all, as though that's somehow less sus than claiming after someone who was being widely scumread for his behavior.
Confirmable with help, sure. But it's not confirmable even with help - that's the problem. All it does is show you have a visiting role, which is... about 75% of roles in existence (based on a qualitative random sample of 20 roles from Mafiascum I just did). The fact you keep doubling down on this is very strange.
And again, you're not engaging with what I'm actually saying. I'm not saying that claiming late makes you scummy, I'm saying it lends far less credence to (your already scummy) claim.
And I said my role is confirmable - genuinely confirmable, not the "I can visit" confirmable you seem to think the word means. Not sure why you're trying to deflect onto me.