-->
@WyIted
I think 4 is the right number it’s well above average and pretty much locks in grandchildren unless you’re absurdly unlucky but is still manageable
Yes by the definition of “book bans” these people are using like 99.99% of books ever published are “banned” because they aren’t in some random school library. Meanwhile these same people support the actual censorship of “disinformation” and “dangerous ideas”
-->@<<<Amber>>>By extension of the law governing the parents' legal fiduciary duties to a child until they turn 18. They are legally required to care for them, nurture them, cloth them, and provide for their health and education. They can even be legally held liable for crimes committed by said children. Children are the legal property of their parents.Don’t even dignify that bad faith argument with a response. The English language doesn’t have a great word for the parent child relationship. “Property”, “ownership” etc all miss the mark. The closest thing is custody. We have custody of our children, he does not. The onus is on him to prove why his opinions on what’s good for my child should overrule mine
He's no true scotsman either.Then that principal is an idiot. What does that have to do with liberals vs conservatives?
The point to sexualize them is about spreading Marxist ideology. Marxists are against the traditional family unit because it gets in the way of making the government the authority. The same reason for the anti religious impulse.Why do I know this? I was a Marxist.
I watch bread tube and I never see these people criticize showing children porn.
Probably because this is to many (myself included) a silly issue to be elevating in our politics. I've never in my life met anyone who thought it would be anything but outrageous for an adult to show someone else's child porn,
I've also seen what many conservatives are calling porn. In some cases it's just a guy dressed up in drag.
a collection of isolated incidents right wingers are using to craft a picture that isn't real
when conservatives make laws to prevent it, the left throws hissy fits.
I would teach sex Ed the way
Did you know that Christians when they have sex also put their penises into women
I guess the real difference between Christian and non Christian sex is that it spreads less diseases such as Aids and monkey pox.
10 Countries with Highest STD Rates
- South Africa. 37,272.5 per 100k. Next: 6 Facts About International Mother Language Day.
And yet there are thousands of school administrators doing it everyday and then when conservatives make laws to prevent it, the left throws hissy fits.
If it is rare, what is with the backlash against schools that choose not to have porn available for children?
I've also seen what many conservatives are calling porn. In some cases it's just a guy dressed up in drag.There it is. You literally defending showing children porn by downplaying it as books about drag queens and not what it actually is in most cases.
How many isolayedincidents do you need to make it a pattern
why attack laws that prevent teachers from showing kids porn if it isn't common or the intent of the left to do so?
Beyond that Don't talk to me until you watch ops documentary. It's ridiculous that I can listen to 10 hours of the lefts best arguments on a weekly basis but you refuse to watch a single 2 hour documentary
Beyond that Don't talk to me until you watch ops documentary. It's ridiculous that I can listen to 10 hours of the lefts best arguments on a weekly basis but you refuse to watch a single 2 hour documentaryIf that's how you want to spend your free time have at it. That has nothing to do with me.I did watch some of it, take the swimmer story for example. It's a grotesque story, it's also the same story I hear every single time the issue of trans women in woman's sports comes up, so again to my point - just how prevalent is this? Why with all of the things going on is this country is this what you guys are laser focused on? That's what I just can't wrap my head around.
Well except for 1/3 of an entire generation claiming to be "a bit" "LGBT". That part is hard data.Insisting that there will soon be a massive conspiracy to make America gay is classic, kooky, conspiracy theory bullshit.
That's not what sex ed is for
And since you really need me to explain my comment further, I was merely expressing why I (and I assume most liberals) tune you guys out when you talk about this - because we've seen this nonsense before. But go on and provide that example. I look forward to being enlightened.