All debates

Pro has BOP to show that there is absolute, definitive proof that the God portrayed in the Bible exists. Pro must also show why the God from the Bible must exist and not other versions of God from abrahamic religions or other religions in general. So, for instance, a generalized argument that proves the existence of God but not the biblical God specifically will not work as that argument can used to justify the existence of a non-biblical God (for instance, Allah from Islam).

BoP is shared. Each side argues that their system of governance for Taiwan is preferrable. PRO defends the status quo, CON defends rule by the PRC.

I am arguing side pro that transgender women should not compete in women's sports, but I am open to having my mind changed!

In the holy book of Islam named the Qur‘an, it is said that Homosexuality is a sin. But why are there „queer Muslims“ ? Let’s find out

No description has been provided

Troll debate so Boba_Tea can get voting privileges.

Troll debate so Boba_Tea can get voting privileges.

Troll debate so Boba_Tea can get voting privileges.

Troll debate so Sting gets his voting privileges.

Troll debate so Sting gets his voting privileges.

Troll debate so Sting gets his voting privileges.

Idea from: FishChaser. Read full description

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

A debate between whether or not creationism is logically sound and/or backed by evidence. Whether a belief in a God and that the universe was intentionally created rather than having risen through natural processes is a more justified belief. (Athiesm is the "con" beleive because theists / creationists are the ones making the claim that a God exists and that they know the origins of humanity and the universe. So joining this debate would require you to be in the "pro" (creationist) category)