All debates
Total debates: 3,667
Con must argue that being against something is better than being for something, whether it be concerning sports, politics, news, fashion, or any other topic.
Similar to moral realism vs moral antirealism.
This debate has been proposed by Casey_Risk. I kindly ask that nobody else accepts this debate.
No description has been provided
Looking around this website, people are publishing ideas that truly may have some validity from either side, or they simply publish a troll. Therefore, here is an argument that is so morally indefensible that most would dismiss it before finishing the title, and for the fun of it, I will defend it with all the ability I can.
A debate on trans philosophy, I hope it will be productive and non hostile. (Korea if you are interested?)
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
The Pro side will be arguing that AI is ruining the art of debate and that AI is making humanity stupid in general. And the con side will argue that using AI does not ruin debate, but it rather enhances it in some respect.
This debate seeks to explore the nature of Islam and its teachings regarding peace and violence. Participants will examine the core principles of Islam, its historical context, and how various communities interpret and apply its teachings. The discussion will also address common misconceptions and the impact of media representation on the perception of Islam. This debate aims to provide a nuanced understanding of whether Islam can be considered a peaceful religion
A free will debate. Feel free to request alterations to any rules/stipulations.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Hot debates
Nothing here