Framework of the Debate
First round
1. Resolution
2. Opening Argument
Second-fourth rounds:
1. Arguments
2. Rebuttals
Final Round:
1. Conclusion
2. No New Arguments
I thank my opponent for participating in this debate and hope it will be a constructive and enlightening discussion.
Let's start:
Resolution:
Divine truth is preserved, while human doctrines evolve:
The Bible, shaped by oral traditions, anonymous authors, and political influence, has undergone changes over time. Its contradictions, theological developments, and the enforced doctrine of the Trinity reveal its human origins, contrasting with the preserved and consistent nature of true divine revelation of pure monotheism."
Short version of resolution:
""The Trinity is a man-made doctrine—evolved, irrational, and not divinely inspired."
First Argument: The Bible is Not Preserved
Claim:
A divinely inspired scripture would remain perfectly preserved. However, the Bible has undergone textual corruption, lost its originals, and contains contradictions—demonstrating that it is a human-compiled document, not a protected revelation.
Evidence 1: 200,000 to 500,000+ Textual Variants
Fact: There are over 200,000 to 500,000 textual differences in New Testament manuscripts.
Example 1: The Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8)
A later addition to support the Trinity: “There are three that bear record in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost.”
Scholarly Consensus: Absent in all early Greek manuscripts (e.g., Codex Sinaiticus). Erasmus included it due to external pressure.
Example 2: Mark 16:9-20
The extended ending, mentioning miracles like handling snakes and speaking in tongues, does not exist in the earliest manuscripts.
Impact: If God revealed the Bible, why allow fabrications to enter His Word?
---
Evidence 2: Lost Original Texts
Fact: No original manuscripts of any biblical book exist today.
Example:
The earliest complete New Testament (Codex Sinaiticus, c. 350 CE) was written 300+ years after Jesus.
The Gospel of Mark’s earliest copies appear in fragmented form, dating to the 2nd–3rd century.
Impact: Without originals, there is no way to verify what was truly inspired. This means Christian theology is built on unreliable copies.
---
Evidence 3: Contradictions Expose Human Tampering
Example 1: Jesus’ Resurrection
Who went to the tomb?
Mary alone (John 20:1) vs. multiple women (Matthew 28:1).
Where did Jesus appear after resurrection?
Jerusalem (Luke 24:33) vs. Galilee (Matthew 28:16).
Example 2: Jesus’ Last Words
“Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34) vs. “My God, why have you forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34).
Impact: Inconsistent accounts of major events suggest that human editors altered the text to fit theological perspectives.
Sources:
Credible Sources for200,000 to 500,000+ approx Textual Variants in the New Testament
1. Wiki page:
2. Bart D. Ehrman (New Testament Scholar)
Source: "Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why"
(2005).
Quote: "There are more differences among our manuscripts than there are words in the New Testament."
3. Institute for New Testament Textual Research (INTF)
Statement: "The New Testament is preserved in about 5,800 Greek manuscripts, with hundreds of thousands of textual variants."
4. Encyclopaedia Britannica
Entry: "Biblical Literature - New Testament Textual Criticism"
More links
1. Daniel B. Wallace (Evangelical Scholar)
Source: The Number of Textual Variants: An Evangelical Miscalculation
(2013)
Relevant Quote: "In the Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics... there is a comment about the number of textual variants among New Testament manuscripts: 'Some have estimated there are about 200,000 of them.'"
Link: Daniel B. Wallace's Article
---
2. Greg Koukl (Christian Apologist)
Source: Textual Variants: It’s the Nature, Not the Number, That Matters
(2014)
Relevant Quote: "Most scholars put the number of variants for the New Testament at around 400,000."
Link: Stand to Reason Article
---
3. Christian Publishing House
Source: Major Textual Variants in the New Testament: Another Look
(2023)
Relevant Quote: "It’s estimated there are between 200,000 and 400,000 textual variants in the New Testament manuscripts."
Link: Christian Publishing House Article
---
4. Ryan Leasure (Christian Author)
Source: The Number of New Testament Textual Variants Doesn’t Matter (Approximately
2019)
Relevant Quote: "In sum,
99.75% of all textual variants don’t affect our reading of the text."
Link: Ryan Leasure's Article
---
5. Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM)
Source: Manuscripts 101: What is a textual variant?
(2023)
Relevant Quote: "There are thousands of differences among the manuscripts."
Link: CSNTM Article
---
Note: Estimates of textual variants range from 200,000 to over 500,000, depending on counting methods and manuscript inclusions.
Source for evidence 2
This is a well-established fact, and even Christian scholars and institutions acknowledge it. Here are credible Christian sources confirming that no original manuscripts (autographs) of any biblical book exist today:
---
1. Daniel B. Wallace (Evangelical Scholar & Textual Critic)
Source: The Basics of New Testament Textual Criticism
(2017)
Relevant Quote:
"We do not have any of the original documents of the New Testament. What we possess are copies of copies, sometimes centuries removed from the originals."
2. The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies
Quote: "No autographs (originals) of the biblical texts exist. All we have are later copies, often with significant variations."
Source: John Rogerson & Judith Lieu (Oxford University Press,
2006)
---
3. The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM)
Quote: “All of the earliest copies of the New Testament are fragmentary or incomplete, and we do not have the originals.”
Source: CSNTM Official Website
---
4. Bart D. Ehrman (New Testament Scholar, Former Christian)
Quote: "The originals of the books of the New Testament have all been lost. What we have are later copies—thousands of them, in fact, copied by hand."
Source: Misquoting Jesus (HarperCollins,
2005)
More sources for contradictions:
1. The Number of Animals on Noah's Ark
Genesis 6:
19-20 instructs Noah to bring two of every living creature into the ark.
Genesis 7:2-3, however, commands taking seven pairs of clean animals and birds.
This discrepancy suggests differing source traditions within the text.
2. The Death of Judas Iscariot
Matthew 27:5 records Judas hanging himself.
Acts 1:18 describes him falling headlong, resulting in his body bursting open.
These conflicting accounts raise questions about the consistency of the narrative.
3. The Timing of Jesus' Crucifixion
Mark 15:25 states Jesus was crucified at the third hour (9 a.m.).
John 19:
14-16 indicates it was about the sixth hour (noon) when Jesus was handed over for crucifixion.
This timing discrepancy highlights variations in the Gospel accounts.
4. The Genealogy of Jesus
Matthew 1:16 lists Jacob as Joseph's father.
Luke 3:23 names Heli as Joseph's father.
These differing genealogies suggest distinct sources or theological emphases.
5. Seeing God
Exodus 33:20 asserts that no one can see God and live.
Genesis 32:30 describes Jacob claiming to have seen God face to face.
This contradiction raises questions about the nature of divine encounters in the text.
These examples illustrate the complex and multifaceted nature of biblical texts, reflecting diverse traditions and editorial influences over time.
Argument 2:
Bible’s reliance on oral traditions and anonymous authorship undermines its claim to divine inspiration, while reinforcing its human origins:
---
1. Decades of Oral Transmission
Timeline:
Jesus’ ministry: ~
27–30 CE.
First Gospel (Mark): ~
65–75 CE
(35–45 years of oral transmission).
Gospels of Matthew/Luke: ~
80–90 CE.
Problems with Oral Tradition:
Memory Distortion: Human memory degrades over time. Details shift with retelling (e.g., exaggerations, omissions).
Agenda-Driven Editing: Stories adapted to address later theological disputes (e.g., Gentile inclusion, Roman persecution).
Example:
Mark 6:5: “He [Jesus] could do no mighty work there [Nazareth].”
Matthew 13:58: Changes this to “He did not do many mighty works there,” softening the implication of Jesus’ limitations.
Scholarly Source:
Bart Ehrman: “The stories about Jesus were altered in the process of retelling. … It’s what happens with oral traditions everywhere” (Jesus Before the Gospels,
2016).
---
2. Anonymous Authorship
Facts:
No Original Titles: The Gospels were untitled initially. Names like “According to Matthew” were added later (2nd century CE).
Early Church Testimony:
Papias (130 CE): Claims Mark recorded Peter’s sermons—secondhand, not eyewitness.
Irenaeus (180 CE): First to assign authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, based on tradition, not evidence.
Why It Matters:
If the authors were eyewitnesses (as claimed), they would have named themselves.
Anonymous works lack accountability, making them prone to myth-building.
---
3. Theological Evolution in the Text
Example 1: Jesus’ Divinity
Jesus is a human Messiah; no virgin birth; dies crying, “My God, why have you forsaken me?” (15:34).
Jesus is pre-existent divine Logos (1:1); says, “I and the Father are one” (10:30).
Example 2: Resurrection Accounts
Mark 16:1-8: Ends abruptly with an empty tomb; no post-resurrection appearances.
Matthew 28:9-10: Jesus appears to women.
Luke 24:
13-43: Jesus walks with disciples, eats fish.
John 20:
11-29: Jesus appears to Mary Magdalene, then to Thomas.
Impact: The resurrection story grows more elaborate over time, suggesting legendary development.
---
4. Contradictions Expose Human Tampering
Example 1: Sermon on the Mount vs. Plain
Matthew 5-7: Jesus delivers the Sermon on a mountain (symbolizing Moses/Sinai).
Luke 6:
17-49: Same sermon, but on a “level place” (plain).
Example 2: Genealogy of Jesus
Matthew 1:1-17: Traces Jesus’ lineage through Joseph to King David (28 generations).
Luke 3:
23-38: Traces through a different line (43 generations).
Example 3: Jesus’ Last Words
Mark 15:34: “My God, why have you forsaken me?” (despair).
Luke 23:46: “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit” (peace).
John 19:30: “It is finished” (triumph).
Impact: These contradictions reflect competing oral traditions later written into the text.
---
5. Impact on the Trinity
Key Trinitarian Verses Are Suspect:
1 John 5:7-8 (Trinitarian formula): A proven 16th-century forgery.
Matthew 28:19 (“Father, Son, Holy Spirit”): Absent from early texts like the Didache
(50–70 CE), which uses baptism “in the name of the Lord Jesus.”
Council of Nicaea (325 CE):
The Trinity was formalized using non-biblical terms (homoousios) borrowed from Greek philosophy.
---
6. Contrast with the Quran
Oral + Written Preservation:
The Quran was memorized verbatim and written during Muhammad’s lifetime (ﷺ).
Zero Variants: Oldest manuscripts (e.g., Sana’a Codex, c. 675 CE) match modern Quran.
Explicit Authorship:
Quranic verses begin with “Say [O Muhammad]” (e.g., 112:1), affirming its divine source.
---
Preempting Counterarguments
1. “The Holy Spirit inspired the authors!”
Rebuttal: Why allow errors like 500,000 variants? Why borrow pagan terms like homoousios?
2. “Core doctrines remain intact!”
Rebuttal: The Trinity depends on forged verses (1 John 5:7-8) and late theology (John’s Gospel).
3. “The authors were apostles!”
Rebuttal: Scholarly consensus rejects apostolic authorship. Even Paul, the earliest writer, never met Jesus.
---
Final Argument
“The Bible’s oral origins, anonymous authorship, and evolving theology prove it is a human product. The Trinity, built on these shaky foundations, is a later invention—not divine truth. Islam’s Quran, preserved perfectly, restores the pure monotheism taught by all prophets, including Jesus (ﷺ).”
Jesus 3 years missionary work turned into new testament:
1. Jesus Did Not Preach the "Bible"
Oral Teachings: Jesus preached in Aramaic, and his teachings were passed down orally for decades before being written. The "Bible" (New Testament) did not exist during his lifetime.
Short Ministry: Even if his ministry lasted 3 years, he taught in parables and sayings, not lengthy texts. The Gospels (written
40–70 years later) are summaries of these teachings, not verbatim records.
---
......
Argument:
How Jesus became god for Christian:
Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how Jesus (ﷺ)—a human prophet in his original teachings—was transformed into a divine figure in Christianity, despite his humanity and prophetic mission:
---
1. Jesus’ Original Role: Prophet and Messiah
Historical Jesus:
Preached monotheism (Mark 12:29: “The Lord our God is one Lord”).
Identified as a prophet (Matthew 13:57, Luke 13:33) and Messiah (anointed king, not God).
Prayed to God (Matthew 26:39), fasted (Matthew 4:2), and faced human limitations (Mark 13:32: “The Son does not know the hour”).
Islamic View:
Quran 5:75: “The Messiah, son of Mary, was not but a messenger... He used to eat food.”
Quran 3:59: “Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allah is like that of Adam... He said, ‘Be,’ and it was.”
---
2. Early Followers: Jesus as Exalted Human
Jewish-Christian Ebionites (1st–2nd century):
Viewed Jesus as the human Messiah, born naturally to Mary and Joseph.
Rejected his divinity and virgin birth.
Elevated Jesus’ status but never called him “God” (e.g., Philippians 2:9–11: “God exalted him”).
Introduced terms like “Lord” (Greek: Kyrios)—a title also used for human rulers.
---
**3. Hellenistic Influence: Merging Jewish and Greek Ideas
Logos Theology (John’s Gospel,
90–110 CE):
Portrayed Jesus as the Logos (Word), borrowing from Greek philosophy (Philo of Alexandria).
John 1:1: “The Word was God”—a theological leap absent in earlier Gospels.
Gentile Audiences:
Non-Jewish converts (Romans, Greeks) were accustomed to divine-human hybrids (e.g., Hercules, demigods).
Jesus’ resurrection was framed similarly to pagan “dying-and-rising” gods (e.g., Osiris, Dionysus).
---
**4. Textual Corruption: Adding Divine Titles
John 20:28:
Thomas calls Jesus “My Lord and my God!”—a late addition to John’s Gospel, inconsistent with Jesus’ earlier rejections of worship (Matthew 4:10: “Worship the Lord your God”).
Titus 2:13:
“The glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ”—likely altered to equate Jesus with God. Early manuscripts lack clarity.
1 John 5:7–8 (Comma Johanneum):
A forged verse added in the 16th century to support the Trinity: “Father, Word, and Holy Spirit are one.”
---
**5. Political Enforcement: Councils and Creeds
Council of Nicaea (325 CE):
Emperor Constantine enforced the term homoousios (“same substance”) to declare Jesus divine.
Dissenting bishops (Arians) were exiled; writings burned.
Council of Constantinople (381 CE):
Formalized the Holy Spirit as the third “person” of the Trinity.
Pagan parallels: Triads like Osiris-Isis-Horus (Egypt) influenced the doctrine.
---
**6. Theological Contradictions
Subordination vs. Equality:
Jesus prays to God (Luke 22:42) yet is called “equal” to Him (John 10:30).
Mark 10:18: “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”
Human Limitations:
Jesus grows in wisdom (Luke 2:52), sleeps (Mark 4:38), and dies—traits incompatible with divine omnipotence.
---
7. Islamic Rejection of Deification
Quran 4:171:
“Do not say ‘Three’; desist! It is better for you. Allah is but One God. Exalted is He above having a son.”
Allah asks Jesus on Judgment Day: “Did you say to the people, ‘Take me and my mother as gods besides Allah?’” Jesus replies: “I said not except what You commanded me: ‘Worship Allah, my Lord and your
Lord.’”
---
Conclusion
Jesus (ﷺ) was a prophet sent to renew monotheism, but his message was corrupted through:
1. Hellenistic syncretism (mixing Jewish and pagan ideas).
2. Textual additions (forged verses like 1 John 5:7).
3. Political councils (Nicaea, Constantinople).
4. Cultural reinterpretation (Gentile audiences expecting divine heroes).
The Quran restores Jesus’ true status: a human prophet, not God. The Trinity is a man-made doctrine, crafted through centuries of theological evolution and political coercion—not divine revelation.
Now we are going to see trinity under philosophical and logical lense.
................
Here’s a breakdown of the Trinity’s philosophical and logical absurdities.
---
1. Logical Contradictions
A. The Law of Non-Contradiction
Trinity Claim: Three distinct persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) are one God.
Logical Violation:
If A (Father) ≠ B (Son) ≠ C (Spirit), they cannot simultaneously be one being (A = B = C).
This violates the foundational logical principle: A thing cannot be both itself and its opposite (A ≠ non-A).
B. Subordination vs. Co-Equality
Biblical Subordination:
Jesus says, “The Father is greater than I” (John 14:28).
Jesus prays to the Father (Luke 22:42).
Trinity’s Claim: All three persons are co-equal and co-eternal.
Contradiction: If Jesus is subordinate, he cannot be co-equal.
---
2. Philosophical Paradoxes
A. The Problem of Divine Simplicity
Classical Theism: God is simple (non-composite, indivisible).
Trinity: God is composed of three “persons.”
Paradox: A simple being cannot have parts. The Trinity introduces complexity, making God a composite being—contradicting divine simplicity.
B. Identity and Distinction
Trinity: Each person is “fully God,” yet distinct.
Logical Absurdity:
If the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Spirit is God, but they are distinct, then three Gods exist (tritheism).
Analogy: Claiming three CEOs are “one CEO” while acting independently.
C. The "Mystery" Dodge
Christian Defense: The Trinity is a “mystery beyond human logic.”
Rebuttal:
If a doctrine defies basic logic (e.g., 3=1), it is irrational, not mysterious.
Thomas Paine: “To believe in three Gods is paganism; to call them one is nonsense.”
....
Contradictions in the Hypostatic Union
A. Fully God, Fully Human (100% + 100% = ?)
The Hypostatic Union claims Jesus is fully God and fully human at the same time.
Logical issue:
God is infinite → Jesus is finite.
God is all-knowing → Jesus did not know (Mark 13:32).
God cannot die → Jesus died.
God is unchanging → Jesus was born, grew, suffered, and died.
Contradiction: A being cannot be both infinite and finite, mortal and immortal, omniscient and ignorant at the same time.
.....
Two Wills Problem
Jesus has two wills (divine and human) according to the Hypostatic Union.
But wills belong to persons, not natures.
Contradiction: If Jesus has two wills, he must be two persons, not one.
---
Contradictions in Eternal Begetting
A. Self-Existence vs. Begetting
The Trinity says:
The Son is eternally begotten of the Father.
But God is self-existent (not caused by another).
Contradiction:
If the Son is begotten, He has a source (the Father) and is not self-existent.
If He is self-existent, He cannot be begotten.
A thing cannot be both caused and uncaused.
B. Begetting Without Beginning
Begetting means a beginning of existence.
But the Son is said to be eternally begotten.
Contradiction: How can the Son be begotten (which implies a beginning) yet eternal (which means no beginning)?
3. Historical Context of Absurdity
A. Borrowed Pagan Concepts
Triads in Paganism:
Egyptian: Osiris-Isis-Horus.
Hindu: Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva.
Greek: Zeus-Poseidon-Hades.
Trinity’s Parallel: A politically expedient fusion of monotheism and pagan triadic worship.
B. Contradictory Councils
Council of Nicaea (325 CE): Declared Jesus “same substance” (homoousios) as the Father.
Council of Constantinople (381 CE): Added the Holy Spirit as co-equal.
Result: A doctrine built on political compromise, not divine revelation.
---
Contradictions in the Trinity’s Hierarchy
A. Functional vs. Ontological Hierarchy
Some Christians say the Father has authority over the Son and Spirit.
But all three are supposedly equal in power and status.
Contradiction:
If the Father has authority, the Son is subordinate.
If the Son is subordinate, then He is not co-equal.
B. Authority in Heaven
Jesus said:
“To sit at my right or left is not for me to grant.” (Mark 10:40)
“The Father alone has set the times and dates.” (Acts 1:7)
Contradiction: If Jesus is God, why does He lack authority?
......
Contradictions in Atonement
A. Can God Die?
The Trinity claims Jesus is God.
Jesus died on the cross.
Contradiction:
If God can die, He is not eternal.
If God cannot die, then Jesus (who died) is not fully God.
B. Does God Need Sacrifice?
God is all-powerful and all-merciful.
Yet, the Trinity says God needed to sacrifice Himself to forgive sins.
Contradiction:
If God is all-powerful, He does not need sacrifice.
If He needed sacrifice, He is not all-powerful.
.....
Contradictions in Biblical Interpretation
A. The Trinity is Not Explicit in the Bible
The word “Trinity” is not in the Bible.
Key verses (like 1 John 5:7) were forgeries.
Contradiction: If the Trinity is the core belief, why is it missing from scripture?
B. The Holy Spirit’s Role
The Holy Spirit is called “He” in some verses and “It” in others.
The Holy Spirit is sometimes depicted as separate from God.
Contradiction: Is the Holy Spirit God, or just God’s power?
........
4. Islamic Tawhid: Logical Monotheism
A. Quranic Clarity
Quran 112:1–4:
“Say: He is Allah, the One. Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born. Nor is there to Him any equivalent.”
No Paradox: Allah is One, indivisible, and beyond human attributes (e.g., fatherhood, sonship).
B. Jesus in Islam
Quran 5:75:
“The Messiah, son of Mary, was not but a messenger... He used to eat food.”
Logical Consistency: A human prophet, born miraculously but mortal and subordinate to Allah.
---
5. Preempting Christian Counterarguments
1. “The Trinity is a mystery!”
Rebuttal: If 3=1 is a “mystery,” why not 4=1 or 5=1? Truth must align with reason.
2. “Analogies like water-ice-steam explain it!”
Rebuttal: These are modalism (one substance, different modes), condemned as heresy. The Trinity claims three distinct persons, not modes.
3. “The Bible implies the Trinity!”
Rebuttal: The term “Trinity” is absent in scripture. Key verses (e.g., 1 John 5:7) are proven forgeries.
---
Conclusion
The Trinity is logically absurd and philosophically incoherent:
1. It violates the law of non-contradiction (3≠1).
2. It borrows from pagan triads and political councils.
3. It relies on textual forgeries (1 John 5:7) to retroactively justify itself.
Islam’s Tawhid resolves these contradictions with uncompromising monotheism:
Quran 2:255: “Allah—there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of existence.”
The Trinity is not divine—it is a man-made paradox crafted to deify a prophet and appease pagan converts. Truth needs no contradictions.
1. The original revelation to Jesus (عليه السلام) was in Aramaic, not Greek.
2. His disciples, being Aramaic speakers, likely transmitted it in Aramaic, not Greek a foreign language.
3. The fact that the Gospels were written in Greek suggests the writers were not direct disciples.
4. The Gospel writers were educated Greek-speaking individuals who received the message orally from others.
5. Because of this indirect transmission, the Gospels remained anonymous for decades.
6. The earliest Gospel was written 30+ years after Jesus, far from the original events.
7. Even if Jesus could have revealed the entire New Testament in 3 years, it would have been impossible for his disciples to fully comprehend, memorize, and orally transmit it without errors, especially in an era without recording technology.
8. The divinization of Jesus was an evolving phenomenon; early Christians like Arians, Ebionites, and Nazarenes rejected it and were persecuted.
9. John, the last Gospel writer, introduced Logos for Jesus—a concept foreign to the earlier Gospels.
10. The term homoousios (same essence) used in the Trinity doctrine is absent from the Bible and originates from pagan philosophy.
11. The Bible contains over 500,000 textual variations, making divine preservation impossible.
12. Trinity is completely absent from the Bible—there is no single verse where Jesus explicitly teaches it.
13. All Abrahamic religions teach pure monotheism—one God—while the Trinity resembles pagan polytheistic beliefs, like those of Hindus, Greeks, and Egyptians.
14. The Bible has been altered multiple times, with major modifications at the Councils of Nicaea (325 CE), Constantinople (381 CE), and later by King James (1611 CE).The Bible has undergone multiple changes over time, with significant theological decisions made at the Councils of Nicaea (325 CE) and Constantinople (381 CE), which shaped Christian doctrine. Additionally, the King James Version (1611 CE) was a widely influential English translation based on earlier manuscripts, reflecting textual variations that had developed over centuries. While these events did not directly rewrite the Bible, they influenced its interpretation, canonization, and transmission.
15. The most rational view is Jesus as a prophet, not God.
16. The Holy Spirit was an afterthought, gradually inserted into the Trinity doctrine centuries later least defined and seems to play an insignificant role.
17. God cannot have a son, and if the Son is co-eternal, it contradicts the idea of fatherhood, since a father must exist before his son.
18. God is beyond creation—He does not beget nor is He begotten (Quran 112:3).
19. Hypostatic union is absurd—if Jesus is fully divine and fully human, it contradicts logic. How can someone be eternal and mortal, divine and human, dead and alive at the same time? Saying he is 100% of both means both natures fully influence each other. But these are physical natures, not just hypothetical or intangible concepts, so the claim is inherently contradictory.
20. Jesus’ physical body is created, yet it is 100% part of him. This means God is 100% created, because calling Jesus 100% divine and 100% human makes his humanity inseparable from his divinity. Therefore, God becomes a created being, which is impossible.
21. Jesus, being 100% mortal, was ignorant of the Hour (Mark 13:32). This means he was either 100% ignorant or 100% lying. If he was ignorant, he cannot be God. If he was lying, he cannot be morally perfect. How can someone “humble” themselves by lying?
22. Jesus is bound by space and time, as seen in John 16:7, where the Holy Spirit cannot descend while Jesus is still on Earth, proves that the Trinity is not one entity, because the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit cannot exist in the same place simultaneously.
23. If Jesus is 100% human, then the Father and Holy Spirit must also be 100% human, because they are claimed to be one in their entirety.
24. The Trinity appears divided—if all three members share the same divine essence, then any change in one should affect all. But Jesus being 100% human did not change the Father or the Holy Spirit. This proves they are divided and not truly one being.
25. The Trinity is a contradiction at the essence level. For example, if the Holy Spirit could not come to Earth while Jesus was present, then they are separate beings. If Jesus changed by becoming 100% human, then the Father and Holy Spirit should have changed too, since they are all "one." No Christian can deny that Jesus went through change, yet the Father and Holy Spirit remained unchanged.
26. The Trinity claims the three persons share the same divine essence but are distinct. However, saying "the Father is not the Son, and the Son is not the Holy Spirit" means there is some point of unity (one essence) and some point of distinction (separate persons). This creates a logical paradox—if each member is fully God, then each is a separate God. If combined, they form a fourth God—the Godhead—which makes the Trinity a Quartinity, not a Trinity.
I could continue exposing more logical flaws in the Trinity, but let's save the next round for deep analysis of biblical verses, where we will further dismantle the doctrine using scriptural evidence.
You are debating 7 other debates. Why you choose when you cannot actively participate.
You broke the rule of the debate, read the description. Did I not mention that must discuss everything before accepting debate?
Plz do not break rule to take the debate before discussing about it in private message.