Marry Christmas to all non/believers , is it true that we need a common religion (love for mankind)
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
notice : this debate is not to win or lose so , there's no need to any one to vote .
the purpose of this debate to understand the happy and joyful events of religion and their importance ,
is it true this events r not related to religion but to historic life of mankind , so these events r not only for a group but for whole mankind ?
Y these religious events become part of religion ?
is it true that we need a common religion ?
common religion : worship of mankind ( do what is good for mankind ) is a law and everyone have to accept it and practice it
this debate is not just a debate but a discussion of wise ppl who like to share something , that is valuable
, i c there's a war between everything for something
but there's a thing and that is mankind , if we think for it , it benefical for all of us , and we all win together
can we to make a common religion ?
nature :nature is the rules and laws , we don't know who make it and we don't know why they're , but the thing is that we just know that they r , we only know that we can use them , for good and for bad .
who we r :we r what we think we r , but may be what we think we r , we r not that
Somebody should vote on this.
I’m not saying that common religion is impossible. I’m just saying that it isn’t necessary, because this argument is about whether or not we need a common religion for mankind to unite. And if you want to say that, say it in the argument. We don’t need a second debate here in the comments.
don't say that what i say is impossible
in begging we know something ,
to represent something , I've something to share : https://youtu.be/b2OcKQ_mbiQ?si=33pYvA2DTFuZ0qEm
below ur ans in concise
1. universal law/religion : no one king/prophet or ruler but we all should promise and make a rule that we love mankind and never take any action against each other just reveal the thing we know but never impose the thing that we know
2. we all celebrate joy together and don't hurt anyone
we celebrate holly , chrismis , eid , ....... together
3. every individual make relation to god/other in way individual like (all religions, culture , custom is make by us and for us)
4. religion is not the concern of state or institution , religion is for man by the man according to man , in way man like
Answers in concise way and need explanation
1. Who decides which religion gets to be in charge?
2. If a newly constructed religion with no ancient roots, why would anyone believe in it? The founder of a modern religion could be more carefully scrutinized for character or competency defects than somebody who lived a thousand years ago. If a government committee, it'd be obvious that they received no miraculous revelation and were just making stuff up.
3. How many wars would you have to start, and how many people would you have to kill to forcibly impose this religion on the globe? If this world religion isn't Islam, what would stop Pakistan from using nukes if their territory was about to be overrun? If not Judaism, what would stop Israel? If not Christianity, what would stop Russia? If not Hinduism, what would stop India?
4. If your answer is "I'd just combine the religions, that way everyone is happy", wouldn't people of all of the above religions consider this weird syncretism a heresy and reject it? Since, you know, that's what they already do in real life when somebody raises such a proposal?
5. Would a world without freedom of religion be one worth living in?
6. Assuming you had a magic raygun that nonviolently brainwashed everyone into believing this religion, what would stop differences in interpretation and preferred style of worship from causing different sects to branch off, resulting in religious division like we see today?
7. Real world religions already have tenets like "be selfless and altruistic", but corrupt abusive leaders exist anyway. That's an inescapable part of large group dynamics. What would keep this new religion from being the same way?
8. Is a world with less diversity of thought, belief, and culture preferable to the world we live in now?
All united under one ideal.