Instigator / Pro
1500
rating
4
debates
62.5%
won
Topic
#5803
It is best* for everyone to spend their lives trying to figure out what is good/bad/valuable/etc.
Status
Open challenge
The first member to accept the challenge becomes the contender.
Debate will be automatically deleted in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 4,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- 1,500
Contender / Con
Open position
?
rating
?
debates
?
won
Description
The common axioms I'm aware of:
- The law of identity.
- The law of non-contradiction.
- The law of excluded middle.
- That inductive inference is valid.
We will also be accepting this for the purposes of debate:
- Everyone always ought to do what is most rational for them to do.
I'm defining good, bad, valuable, etc. in a way that contains an ethical/axiological "ought".
Both PRO and CON share the BoP.
Round 1
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet