Which 12 year old would win in a fight: Aang or Naruto.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- 1,400
Morals are off for both characters, and they start with no knowledge of each other. Both combatants are completely rested, healed and equiped with their normal gear.
The battlefield is the valley where Sasuke and Naruto had their big fights. They start on their own statue with the waterfall in between them.
PRO: Aang
CON: Naruto
- Earth: Waiting, observing and counterattacking.
- Air: Actively evading attacks looking for an opening or tiring the opponent.
- Water: Turning defence into offense.
- Fire: Ruthless offense.
"12 year old Aang defeated the fire lord during Sozins comet."
- "ninja" - 'one who is invisible'; or "shinobi" - 'one who sneaks'; is a covert agent, mercenary, or guerrilla warfare expert in feudal Japan. The functions of a ninja included siege and infiltration, ambush, reconnaissance, espionage, deception, and later bodyguarding and their fighting skills in martial arts, including ninjutsu.
- "monk" - is a person who practices religious asceticism by living a monastic lifestyle, either alone or with any number of other monks. A monk may be a person who decides to dedicate his life to serving other people and serving God, or to be an ascetic who voluntarily chooses to leave mainstream society and live his life in prayer and contemplation.
- Ninjas are overall better prepared for battle than monks.
- Difference in speed/power/durability in this state is not significant. Aang's strong air slams/slashes can be matched with Naruto's rasengan, numerous clones, deception jutsus, more tools, summoning jutsus etc. They are both shown to reflect or react to fast objects coming at them. Both are shown to be more durable than the average human.
- Naruto's verse is higher tier on the power scale.
- Aang has not learned all 4 elements yet
- . Naruto's versatile tactics as a shinobi trained to kill and large range of jutsus can surprise Aang who is a monk in a world without jutsus, but do not suffice since the Avatar state will control all 4 elements and will be more diversified and prepared.
- Naruto's Feral Mode will give him boosted speed, power, energy, durability but that is still not enough to overweight the attacks of all 4 elements on a larger scale.
- With Naruto's Chakra Cloak (1-3 tails) is a much closer fight. The amp in speed, power and durability are getting too much for anyone in the Avatar verse. Even if the Avatar is able to perform City Level attacks their physical characteristics do not grow equally. Meaning, just because their power of controlling the elements grows drastically in the Avatar state and they can move islands their body does not become equally great/durable/powerful/fast. Aang in the Avatar state would not be able to take a blow through the chest and heal. He in fact died by being struck by lighting in the Avatar mode (saved later) . Aang wont be able to take the same amount of raw physical straight attacks as Naruto wrapped in chakra cloak. Speed in this mode goes to Naruto since he moves in lighting speeds not only reacts to lighting speeds.
- 4 Tails Form Naruto is an overkill. The 2nd version of the chakra cloak is going to be too OP for Aang. Speed of attacks is unmatchable. Tailed Beast Bombs can destroy cities and mountains. Naruto's speed and power alone equal blitz kill before Aang gets to do anything.
- Avatar State Aang will have nothing in his disposal to stop 5,6,7 or 8 Tail Jinchuriki Mode Naruto based on their speed, power, durability difference.
- SOURCES IN THE COMMENTS
- Slicing him to pieces with water
- Putting him in a water prison, which we know waterbenders can do, and which we know even experienced shibobi like Kakashi have no counter for
- Taking his breath away, which we know for certaint that he is capable off, since he is a master airbender, and we know that even people completely new to airbending can pull it off
This seal is intended to encourage tailed beasts to aid the jinchūriki they've been sealed within, as the more they provide chakra, the weaker the seal becomes, and thus the better their chance of freedom’’At this time in the stories, His seal is still fresh so Kurama can only output that much chakra for him to used the one tail cloak. [wiki]. The seal only became weaker later on.
''End of series, Aang was still 12 years old''
- Aang was told he is the Avatar when he turned 12yo in the temple before the war started.
- For unknown period of time Aang continued living with the monks.
- Aang disappears and gets frozen in the storm (are you going to mention that a storm almost killed him btw)
- After being unfrozen he trains water bending 7 months, earth bending 5 months and fire bending 6 weeks (based on the chronological timeline)
'' CON has not even attempted to respond to these crucial points. The avatar state stomps the early Naruto verse''
- Avatar State gives Aang the skills and expirience of previous Avatars (no superhuman feats measurable to the scale of Narutos universe). Those Avatars have no experience with Narutoverse ninjas, their jutsus, and their physical advantages (speed in Narutos verse is different level)
- Aang has been shot and killed by Azula. In The Avatar State..... Naruto has a Spirit Demon living in him giving him ultra speed, regeneration, power, DURABILITY and all kinds of boosts. All of that in a universe on a already different powerscale. Naruto has already been hit with most of the attacks any Avatar has and tanked them all. Huge rocks have been throw at him, fireballs, water jutsus etc. Aang has not shown to have any deadly super fast and super strong attack that can stop Naruto. PRO did come up with a lot of them using his imagination but not actual events from the show.
- PRO is spewing wild claims as " burning straight up ignores durability" .. Naruto has been hit with Fire Jutsu with and without Kuramas mode and it never did any real damage to him. That just shows that elemental attacks of this sort like throwing earth, water and fire at Naruto wont do much.
- A lot of other wild claims about Rock Lee and Sasuke and "infinite possibilities" are presented by PRO with no back up. Just for voters information Naruto never tried to kill Sasuke while fighting him. As PRO said , he could've. Rock Lee being more impressive is subjective and not verified by any way from PRO.
- Slicing Naruto with water is not very likely since a lot of other similar attacks have not succeeded. Aangs element attacks are too slow, Naruto's durability and speed stats based on his Verse are too high.
- Still waiting to see where in the Avatar's show PRO saw anyone creating a water prison like Zabuza.
- Aang taking someone's breath is a feat he is never seen using. (or in another words its from PRO's hypothetical script)
- What you said about Naruto's seal is not canon. First part is close to the truth but the second is from unreliable source. What the seal do is mostly correct but second part about it being "fresh" and not letting Kurama lend Naruto more power is a theory from a fan in Quora. I still state that nothing IN THE SHOW states that Naruto can't develop more than 1 tail. Its just natural that they are going to introduce more tails with more episode since after all its a tv show. Its supposed to be presented gradually for the viewers as its also not needed dealing with first part villains.
- PRO still has Basic Form Aang skillset wrong based on his actual age and under further examination I would say that Naruto basic form is very likely to kill Aang in his basic form. Aang is seen dying and almost dying multiple times from things that Naruto tanks. Durability levels are just so much different.
- Versatility of Basic Form Naruto and Aang is close but still goes to Naruto. 12yo Aang has some tricks with air and water not much else. Naruto has wider range of options to choose from.
- Kurama mode vs Avatar state. Flying wont help because of Naruto's huge and long Kurama chakra arms. The Avatar is not shown to have the raw power, speed and durability of the characters in Narutos verse or to regenerate . Its just different power tier Universe. Stories about what Aang can maybe think of doing sound cool but at the end elemental attacks wont help you much when you are regular human compared to a someone moving in hyperspeeds, being able to heal fast, endure tons of physical damage and use multiple kinds of strategies, power buffs and attacks. I admitted Aang definitely loses to anything above 3 tails. That was overkill but that doesn't mean he wins against 1. I still have him losing to 1 tail Naruto.
- Aang jumps as fast as lightning, and turns around, sees lightning 1 meter in front of him, and then moves his hands forwards to catch it.
- Zuko jumps towards lightning, and he runs at least 30% as fast as the lightning moves -- Katara is in shock but perceives in slow-motion both Zuko and the lightning.
- Katara is later able to dodge and block lightning while its moving.
- Aang dodges lightning multiple times after it was already fired at him.
Naruto's Speed is scaled at subsonic due to scaling above characters with FTE feats such as Kiba and Neji. As well, he is comparable to Haku. [deathbattle wiki].
- But the battle against Haku that CON refers to lliterally has Naruto pierced and almost killed by just a few small needles.
- Narutos entire hand, bone and everything, got pierced by a normal Kunai. So waterslices that cuts through giant boulders will cut him as well.
- Water prison is literally the most basic waterbending technique which Katara does to a fish in the very first episode with no training and later in combat.
- Naruto standing on water would be a death sentence since he will be dragged down and drowned, he has no way to to counter that.
- He can drag Naruto into the ground and crush/suffocate him or kill him with spikes from the ground he stands on.
- Use water cutting thousands times stronger that the one Hama used to slize up boulders.
- Crush him with water pressure hundred times greater than the bottom of the sea.
- Slize him up with lava shuriken, or cover him in lava and endless flames.
- Just because Naruto can tank 2 seconds of weak fire-style from Sasuke or surving impact with some undefined rock CON mentioned, the AS is on another level.
- The firestyle of Madara Uchiha is definitiely killing kid Naruto even with tails. The firebending of Ozai, which is still weaker than AS firebending, is shown just as destructive.
- Aangs elemental ball is much faster than Ozai, the guy whose firebending makes him a literal rocket
- He can easily dodge any attacks Naruto throws at him, including the chakra arms
- The higher he is, the more difficult to reach him, and the more time to move out of the way
- But the elemental ball crashes through multiple enormous pillars of solid stone, in quick succession, without loosing speed or taking any visible damage.
- There is literally no chance that Narutos chakra arms will be able to harm him even if he stands still, because they cannot even penetrate the elemental barrier.
- Aang has compressed an entire lake, wall of flames and a small mountain to small circles of incredibly density. He forms thse to shields and weapons as needed.
- He creates 5 enormous fireballs that act as homing misiles, each of which are much bigger and faster than Narutos chakra arms.
- He also destroys a large boulder with a very casual gust of wind, and turns each of his compressed stones into an entire volley of mortar rounds.
- He can use his water arms from an unbelievable distance, so when he is in range of chakra arms, Naruto is in range of being sliced in two.
- My statements about Aang's age are untouchable at this point. Everything I have said is logically valid, mathematically valid, and sources are from canon events from the episodes, not random fan websites with articles from fans.
- Either way, no where in the description of the battle there was anything specific that said Aang would start in the Avatar state so no one show follow PRO's hypothetical fighting script of what he thinks the characters would do. The facts are that Aang in his normal state, at that age does not have mastery of all 4 elements.
- PRO's ways to somehow scientifically calculate the actual real life speed of Naruto and each tail to show that it is not an actual light speed is as big of an arguments as my Monk vs Ninja one. Its not real life and its relative. In some cases I use "lighting fast speeds" metaphorically just as a way to show how big is the difference in the levels of Naruto verse and Avatar verse characters, other times I'm talking about actual light speed. Fact is that Avatar cant move in lighting speed either way.
- I think voters can easily disregard PRO's claim that Iroh is a light speed moving character based on him being hit by lighting and redirecting it. Iroh moved his hands up because he is in the middle of a ocean, in a storm, expecting a lighting, while also being one of the most powerful fire benders in the series. The best fire benders can control lighting element. You think all of those don't have more to do with him being able to catch the lighting? PRO is trying to say Iroh can move at light speeds based on that only, even tho we have never even seen ANYONE in the show move in such speeds.
- PRO gives examples of scenes in the show done in slow motion as evidence that someone perceives stuff in slow motion.
- Fallacy : "Zuko is also light speed because he jumped infront of a lighting." People jump infront of bullets, that doesn't mean people can move as fast as bullets. You can jump towards something without seeing it, anticipating where it would be.
- If a developed Sharingan is having trouble keeping up with 1 tail Naruto, the Avatar would be overwhelmed by pure speed.
"In this universe, anyone with normal combat speed are at least relative to lightning speed."
- Obviously false (also PRO just took my argument and made it his). Anyone who watched the two shows knows the difference in power scales. There's a point in the show where Naruto surpasses Minato's speed (who literally teleports ). So Naruto goes beyond light speed to surpass literal transportation. I've already shown Naruto's verse is higher in every possible stat.
- One case of Iroh being able to redirect a lighting doesn't grant you a whole universe being scaled to a light speed. Naruto's show on the other hand has multiple examples from multiple characters (not even important or powerful ones) that vanish like streaks.
- PRO argues that Aang sees at lighting fast speeds BUT HAD TROUBLE with "trained" regular people with no super powers that shot REGULAR ARROWS with regular bows, because the arrows are super fast in that universe (relative to lighting?) LOL
- PRO claim's Naruto evading Haku is not good example because it happened just once, after his one example of Iroh doing something and then he concludes Aang is light speed. And lets say lightspeed of Haku is not confirmed. He just moves as fast as reflections move between mirrors , wonder how fast is that? AND I can give more examples of Naruto moving in extra ordinary speeds. Faster than anything shown in the Avatar. Doesn't matter how we're going to label the power scales (light speed/sound speed) Naruto verse is higher than Avatar. What is the most destructive battle Aang EVER had? With Ozai. And how much was the damage done? Not too much damage done to anything bigger than a big rock. Naruto verse deals with gods, splitting moons in half, speeds faster than light, Gamabunda alone (which kid Naruto can summon) has City Level attack and defense.
- Now, again... I have not said "Aang wins definitely against anything under 4 tails". Let me correct you again. The AVATAR (the most powerful character in the show) has a chance with 1 tail 12yo Naruto (think about verse power scales again ). Maybe with 2-3 tails also (high diff and very unlikely). Any additional tail after that is an overkill. Just because the Avatar has a chance doesn't mean he wins though.
- I think last round is the worst for PRO. Every durability feat I have mentioned is from the show. Naruto was done with Haku literally 1 min after he got angry. All of the needles (half way inside him already) bounced off from him and he healed completely. Videos are provided in my arguments. Sasuke in the battle in the valley rips a hole through his chest, Naruto bleeds out (maybe dies) starts to sink and Kurama wakes him up. Even if Aang injures him lethally straight from the beginning Kurama is still there. And its not fair for the sake of the debate that PRO tries to discredit Kurama and create some type of hypothetical scenario all the time when Naruto doesn't even get to fight basically and he is dead immediately from the get go.
"Narutos entire hand, bone and everything, got pierced by a normal Kunai"
- Kunai in the Naruto verse, held by Naruto verse ninja who concentrate chakra in his hand and doesn't even need the Kunai to cut boulders...That isn't showing anything. All of the claims about Naruto's durability are still valid (pls dont say I haven't showed you anything). Naruto's durability and ability to tank huge amount of physical damage is inedible.
- Thank you for the water prison source, I'll give you that finally. Aang can do water prisons which might hold Naruto for a while until he starts dying (if he cant escape another way) and then Kurama comes. Again all this now only adds a feat in Aangs resume (not very significant). Writing a specific fighting script/plot where you say what one of the fictional character will do and what happens to the other is called "imagination" and not it's valid to win a debate.
- PRO randomly creates imaginary story lines and plots where his character wins and I'm supposed to waste my word limit by addressing everything or I need to start using my imagination and just come up with 100 random plots for PRO to debunk. It's easy to create a plot and just say well this is what happens " Naruto just avoids everything since he is much faster and even when he doesn't he tanks it and eventually gets to Aang and kills him (cant be disproven bc Aang literally dies in my scenario due to the low durability of his body and being slower which is all fact)"
"Crush him with water pressure hundred times greater than the bottom of the sea."
"Slize him up with lava shuriken, or cover him in lava and endless flames."
"Just because Naruto can tank 2 seconds of weak fire-style from Sasuke or surving impact with some undefined rock CON mentioned, the AS is on another level."
- Aang's most powerful attack that PRO showed looks powerful against Avatar characters. Also the Avatar is a mere human. He looks powerful controlling large rocks and making large fireballs but at the end of the day, take his attacks away, his physical characteristics don't change. The speed he has comes from the air bending, not from his own body speed. The defense he has comes from elements, if Naruto hits his body Aang is a dead man. Kid Naruto's raw body power and strength made him able to severely damage partly transformed demon Gaara with just a plain kick (Gaara is a jinchuriki and had a defense and durability times over Aang's).
- Pain is a character from Naruto verse. His fight with Naruto doesn't help Aang with anything.
- PRO focused all debate on Naruto with 1 tail. He tried to argue that Naruto can't access multiple tails but abandoned that argument after my rebuttal. It was not shown that in the show and more importantly it was not established by PRO here that Naruto definitely cant access more than 1 tail so EVEN IF Aang beats 1,2,4,7 tailed Naruto, eventually Aang loses. The difference in this debate between PRO and CON is that CON judged by how Naruto is shown in the show and PRO judges by what HE THINK AANG WOULD DO.
My previous vote and addendums may be found in the comment section at and around:
https://www.debateart.com/debates/5318/comments/59620
---
Due to having not covered much of durability, adding that in...
"since he is an Uzumaki and Jinchuriki"
Pretty sure I commended on this already... A statement like this doesn't mean anything to a lay person, and voters are supposed to act like they are lay persons.
I don't much care for ultimate powers (if either loses they have a power which takes over and kills the other). Those things being employed as pro points out (well one sided points out), is a draw at best (and at least for Naruto it might also kill him if he uses it). Was of course wise to point out that Kurama is apparently not mastered until after episode 300; much like how con tried to argue Aang couldn't use fire (avatar state I'm unclear on).
"'burning straight up ignores durability'"
This is a pet peeve of mine, while the words are close, that's not a real direct quote. Misquoting to that degree pulls attention to the actual wrote: "The Avatar also has many non-kinetic ways to end Naruto, like drowning, burning, asphyxiation and immobilization, all of which straight up ignore durability"
Not to mention, trying so hard to dismiss his fire powers, implicitly says Naruto is weak against them. Likewise for trying to shift focus off of those other non-kinetic attacks.
Needles, Kunais, and I don't know what else are able to harm Naruto as normal (Kunai was defended because the guy holding it was exceptional; still, normal iron or whatever it's made of). This really goes back to my expectations that both are physically human except when questionable writing takes over.
Speaking of kunais... Naruto is a ninja, for whom throwing weapons are a key thing... Yet it's pro who lists Naruto's skills there. Those are a ninjas best ways to counter Aang maintaining distance with his wind powers (while such also reduces ranged weapon effectiveness, I'm sure there's plenty of examples of Naruto aiming well during storms). Naruto at some point on the show has super long arms (not certain when he gains that power). Chakra arms are Naruto's one ranged attack, and they aren't defended as being good when lines of reasoning are made to suggest their ineffectiveness.
---
Plus again, it wasn't clear to me what Naturo's powers are within this debate. Something about he collects fox tails, and the fox tails are sometimes toads, and that lets turn himself into any inanimate objects and him make 1000 clones of himself (seriously?)... Need I go on? Whereas Aang can manipulate X, Y, and Z (elements), and those counter G, H, and I from Naruto. During any debate, if the other side does better representing your side, it's going to be an uphill battle.
---
So in conclusion, I'm left with the impression that Naruto doesn't have the winning combination to defeat Aang, especially with the range problem. Whereas Aang stands a decent chance against Naruto, especially with the power supply advantage. This isn't a conclusive Aang will win 10 out of 10 fights; more like two thirds or three fifths of the time when discounting draws (of which there'd be plenty).
I believe that Benjamin *should have* won this but failed to address the core of the issue: age. He left numerous arguments by baggins about age on the table and conceded a full 70 episodes of aging without a word. On the other hand, baggins made this a big part of his argument and, although the claims are dubious, they are unanswered by PRO and thus must be considered as real according to PRO.
Based on age, Aang has received little to no training and would be easily brought into avatar mode, which, as stated in CON’s argument, is not as powerful as it seems on the surface. On the other hand, Naruto has significantly progressed and the power of the full nine tails is insane in comparison. As noted by CON, the power levels majorly differ between the series and it is clear that in Naruto there are more powerful characters. As Naruto is the main character, he is one of the most powerful characters in the series as well. His true power is more innate (the nine tails) whereas Aang needs to train hard to learn many different bending types and power up.
If the timeline works according to what was argued, Aang is simply not well-trained enough and underpowered while Naruto has undergone serious training and still has more innate power. Furthermore, Naruto is so durable that Aang's chances are minimal. Therefore, I believe that CON wins in arguments.
Sources are tied because although there were some minor imbalances it is not enough to give the point to either side. Conduct and legibility were balanced as well.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pPhrTTUvy7qNY3sYNsPDVlu3g-B-f2yjHFaUyhS0F8g/edit?usp=sharing
Good points made by both sides, though I think there should have been more of a shared set of knowledge about these two fighters up front. Would've made this more focused and, potentially, introduced more opportunities to make the fight a bit more even. Tl;dr: Aang just has a bigger set of tools at his disposal and it's unlikely that Naruto's strength and durability would be enough to secure him the win.
Im just not sure that Pain=12yo Aang. That could be a separate debate
1.okay lets see, I have never argued for perfect jinchuriki powers that obviously come at the end of the war (sorry i know you dont know what war im talking about). I have argued for powers that kurama can give naruto at any time and powers that have been seen in the og show. I have argued for speed, durability, healing factors, chakra hands and power (all shown in the debate with sources and with naruto being 1 tail) .I never brought up perfect jinchuriki, only jinchuriki. My point about fire and the age was that Aang in his base mode did not master fire yet so he cannot use it in the beginning to just burn Naruto as PRO mentioned. Then after that I acknowledged that in AS Aang can use firebending but I provided sources to why I think Naruto will tank most of the fire attacks.
2.”his buddy shows up?” His buddy never left. Thats strawman but unfortunately Kurama is a part of Naruto and his powers are too so thats not a separate individual fighting Aang. Its still Naruto boosted by his character powers. And yes if Naruto dies and Kurama revives him DURING (not later) the fight is not over. Avatar State cannot revive Aang if he dies (idk where you got that from either, Aang literally died in AS and AS did not save him). If after the battle Naruto dies from battle damage that does not mean he did not win the battle. If i go in the ring to fight anybody and win but later on die from brain damage I still won the boxing match. Also please dont put in your definition of victory that PRO never used. How many times someone dies is irrelevant if he keeps coming back until he wins. Im not saying Naruto will keep coming back forever Im just commenting on your weird definition of victory.
3.lol no again,,,… what kind of biases broo I said general knowledge FOR BOTH shows… naruto being able to create hundreds of clones is shown in the freaking first or second episode of the og naruto… like sorry I assumed the people voting on an aang vs naruto debate will have at least some basic information about who naruto and aang are.. Good thing you have watched Avatar at least because you would have said something stupid about Aang too like: “oh idk what aang can do … some kind of circus acrobat that bends over and has magic water and air idk (seriously???)”
Have you seen the Pain vs Naruto fight? At the end, Pain encases himself in a small earth box and traps the 6-tailed Naruto in a rock sphere, which Naruto needed 8 tails to break out of. I am fairly certain that Aang in the avatar state could do something similar. The first Avatar, Wang, was able to confine Vatuu, a powerfull evil spirit comparable to multi-tailed beasts, in a ring of air, fire, water and earth.
> “lol not even remotely close to what was argued about Kurama and the fire bending”
Let’s see, Kurama mode … perfect Jinchurik … episode 329.
And what do you think your arguments on age and when Aang learned abilities was supposed to argue if not him not learning Fire until sometime at age 13? You had a whole list of months…
> AFTER he kills Aang and already has won the battle
So after losing, his buddy might show up and kill the person who defeated him, and then kill him too… that’s not his victory, that’s him losing twice (and the other guy losing once, but both are dead so I’ll call it a draw). The other guy has something similar (pretty sure it doesn’t kill him, but still not his victory).
A debate could be held on who has better friends who will come take over if they lose; for me at least it didn’t override the comparison of the two actual fighters in question.
> “ LOL WHAAT…. have you not ever watched the show lol”
Ahh, found the heart of the matter. You seem to believe you’d have a winning argument if I was biased in favor of Naruto, and that I should have such bias… I’m more familiar with Avatar, which slants things a little against it. Peaceful monk kid vs training to murder people for money kid, need I even say my default?
“A statement like this doesn't mean anything to a lay person, and voters are supposed to act like they are lay persons.”
-lol
“I don't much care for ultimate powers”
-lol
“if either loses they have a power which takes over and kills the other”
-lol no Aang doesn’t have that
“and at least for Naruto it might also kill him if he uses it”
-yea lol he might die sure, AFTER he kills Aang and already has won the battle
“Was of course wise to point out that Kurama is apparently not mastered until after episode 300; much like how con tried to argue Aang couldn't use fire (avatar state I'm unclear on).”
-lol not even remotely close to what was argued about Kurama and the fire bending
“Not to mention, trying so hard to dismiss his fire powers, implicitly says Naruto is weak against them”
-lol just watch the sources pls
“. Likewise for trying to shift focus off of those other non-kinetic attacks.”
-lol this is me not responding to “Aang can just drown him with water style”.
-the durability analysis was botched again and everything about Naruto is dismissed because a Kunai harmed him …
“Yet it's pro who lists Naruto's skills there”
-yes , thanks pro for mentioning that naruto can throw knives idk why i didn’t think to include that
“Those are a ninjas best ways to counter Aang maintaining distance with his wind powers”
-lol no again, I would assume the chakra hands are much better than kunai. Ht obviously they are much underestimated and not proven to be effective
“Something about he collects fox tails”
- lol what
“, and the fox tails are sometimes toads, and that lets turn himself into any inanimate objects and him make 1000 clones of himself (seriously?)... Need I go on”
LOL WHAAT…. have you not ever watched the show lol
“Whereas Aang can manipulate X, Y, and Z (elements), and those counter G, H, and I from Naruto.”
-yea that makes sense, so what are the XYZGH
2 hours left, and your vote will determine the outcome.
“That would be the script you were just talking about. It's not about one lone skill alone to win a fight. Fights are dynamic things, which inevitably end up utilizing more than one skill, and unexpected things happen.”
Yes, all Im saying is that scripts should not be a significant part of your decision imo but since they are Im asking you to provide the script that convinced you that Aangs skills would win this fight for him. About everything else I think we are saying the same thing.
Figuratively, you're Naruto's spokesperson for the upcoming fight.
The other debater is the other guy's spokesperson.
You're each trying to get people to place their bets on your side.
"You can say Aang skills will dominate Naruto which is technically creating a script in which you claim you know the outcome of a fictional character’s battle."
It's not a script, it's an impression given to me by the comparative arguments.
"Which skill exactly wins it for you?"
That would be the script you were just talking about. It's not about one lone skill alone to win a fight. Fights are dynamic things, which inevitably end up utilizing more than one skill, and unexpected things happen.
An old friend of mine had his rifle jam at the worst time, allowing an insurgent to close the distance. The fight ended up not being decided by shooting skills, even while on paper my friend should have won for being so much better at shooting...
To explain gumption just look to the previous paragraph. The tides shifted against my friend, and he had to deep clean his rifle afterwards.
Fair enough, I would only add that while I agree both have plot armor my argument for durability does not rely on that since I have mentioned healing abilities that Naruto have because of Kurama and the general superior physical endurance in that Universe. Naruto is not the only one that just smashes through rocks when he is thrown at them for example meaning thats not just plot armor. Fights in general are more intense and characters from that verse are able to take and inflict more damage solely with their bodies. Thats in the debate as well.
I'm reminded of a debate I had several years ago, about who would win between Flash and Green Arrow. We're talking extraordinary super powers against some weirdo with a bow and arrow (pun intended). The points basically impaled Flash, over and over again.
Around the same time, someone successfully argued that Batman would defeat Darkseid.
It doesn't so much matter who /should/ win, what's more important is how well each is argued.
That said, I still have to give a proper review to durability as that might change the outcome if it was well argued (to be clear: I dismissed both sides due to plot armor, not just one)
Plot armor is real yes but it was never argued by PRO, and just because you find it maybe ridiculous that we discuss it, its very important. The simplest way to judge durability is simply looking at the healing factor of Naruto. Even if you don’t recognize anything else from the show.
Like the brutal damage Naruto has been shown to take with his bare body without shielding himself with elements or jutsus.
Btw after I said that Naruto has vasts amount of chakra reserves PRO agreed. I have no idea why this chakra argument of PRO is taken so seriously when in reality is nothing problematic. Naruto was never shown in the show losing a fight due to chakra insufficiency. PRO also never gave such examples. Saying something takes chakra is obvious. If voters dont know what a jinchuriki and uzimaki is idk if they are fit to vote on this debate. Just like voters researched PROs sources on their own, they could google those two words if they really dont know what they are. PRO obviously knew them and dropped that chakra argument. Maybe also because it wasn’t leading anywhere since I also mentioned that when Naruto dies or is out of Chakra, Kurama can intervene.
Firstly I want to mention that everything I will say here has been said in some form in the debate and if I go into heavier detail about certain things thats only because PRO has not challenged me on those topics and has not continued his line of questioning after my rebuttals.So my details are strictly for clarification purposes for the voter and not extra arguments. I will definitely go into heavier detail since multiple voters are including things PRO never came up with in the debate.
Secondly and more important to me is the method a voter will judge this debate and what do they value more. If at the end you value PROs method of reasoning more Im willing to accept the results. This is why I have no problem with whiteflame’s vote since he explained to me how he values tactics and mentioning of scenarios a lot and I didn’t do that (bc i think they are biased).
My method of deciding who is going to win is much simpler and in the same time way more complex. Talking about skills and how they would interact with each other is okay and can be somewhat important but it’s highly subjective and biased. Creating fake scenarios where we say “Aang will do this and then Naruto this and then Aang that” is completely unverifiable. We can use our imagination to create fake scenarios and we can have a fun conversation doing so, which will entertain the voters more, sure but imo theres a better way to judge this. Generally accepted categories to compare characters in fights are : strength, speed, physical and magical powers, durability, special abilities etc… Now I acknowledge that in every fictional show/anime/movie there’s contradictions and theres no perfect logic in them. Yes sometimes characters look extremely powerful in some fights and in other fights their abilities “seemingly” do not translate. That does not mean we can disregard their accomplishments during their powerful moments just because they are inconsistent and have weak moments . We can objectively analyze episodes and determine the capabilities of those characters no matter how hyperbolic they might seem sometimes. That is to be expected from fictional shows. So if we can objectively verify some statements about those main categories we can compare what we know and not compare what we don’t know. The only time fake scenarios and fighting scrips can be taken into account is if they have some kind of backed up claims for both characters. For example if we have proof that Aang can use fireballs and we have video proof how Naruto tanks fireballs thats one verified very specific situation that we can have an idea for what will potentially happen. All kind of other scenarios are almost useless and use no purpose but entertaining the voters and speculating. No way to know how their abilities will interact, no way to know what they would think of doing or anything like that. Morality being outside of this debate is even better because then we would have to think also what would they even feel. Although mentioning their background and their environment could be taken into account in the “strategy” category but thats also speculative.
“I treated this as who would win in a fight, not merely who is more over powered.”
If more powerful plus faster and more durable does not win the debate idk what else does. You can say Aang skills will dominate Naruto which is technically creating a script in which you claim you know the outcome of a fictional character’s battle. And also you did not show me which skill will dominate which skill of Naruto? And how can we prove that. How can we prove thats the course of action they will take?
I showed why Naruto is physically stronger, physically faster, physically more durable and overall thats what gives him the better chance on paper. And frankly all we can do is that.
“since endless gumption from a farmer would not overpower either of them. It was used to put my conclusions from the rest into one neat place, and make a point about grit and follow-through”
Im confused here, if you can clarify what does that mean.
“Aang would fight from a power disadvantage, but would more likely than not win via skill”
Aang was indeed shown to be in power disadvantage but even if skill was discussed, nobody ever established their character winning based on skill alone. Which skill exactly wins it for you? And again the problem of how much can we really into account those skills when we can’t verify how they would interact with each other (at least most of them).
Barney
04.16.2024 05:48PM
Reason:
While I'm more familiar with Avatar, I thought it would be an easy win for Naruto due to their Sexy Technique. Sadly, it did not even get mentioned.
A couple criticisms of the setup... Morality defines character, so these fights miss the point of themselves if that's wholly ruled out. Age, I liked the way it was argued, but picking a certain point in both shows would have avoided confusion (say end of season 1, or 20 episodes into each show?). Probably best to also say if they have their usual friends or not.
Power:
Pro takes this in better showcasing the power of his infantry (infant soldier). Each major power given its own subheading and details thereof, and then "Chakra" as one just for comparison to the other side's limitation on it ("Naruto's chakra reserves are not a problem either since he is an Uzumaki and Jinchuriki" is not a good counter, since no one in the audience is likely to know what that means). The ultimate abilities on either is an interesting bit, because while apparently Naruto loses his intellect to use his, I am certain Aang loses control when in his (as con mentions). This bleeds into the whole age thing, for if Aang has X powers...
I should add that lumping a bunch of diverse powers all together in a single paragraph, makes them lose weight. Since age of power are so vital, a list of each of the tails and what it enables (plus when attained) would make this far easier to grade.
Age:
I'm left with the impression (largely from pro's source) that Aang is 12 through the vast majority of the show, and perhaps for the final fight he's turned 13. Con may have not intended to bet so much on this, but with the steady back and forth, instead of coming to a reasonable compromise (like fine I accept 70 episodes worth of training, let's get back to the debate), he stood by it until the end (even telling people to go find sources for it). When the first source I find (timeline of Aang) verifies that it all happened within a single year.
>Book One: Water (12 BG - 100 AG)
>Book Two: Earth (Spring 100 AG)
>Book Three: Fire (Summer 100 AG)
>Post war (100 AG - 102 AG)
Speed:
Con brings up super speed that Naruto has to best Kakashi... And pro counters that was 16 year old Naruto, whereas at 12 he was not nearly that advanced into superpowers.
Both seem to be able to run on water, but Naruto almost certainly has a faster top speed. It's a weird one, I believe con is thematically correct, but over doing one trait gives pro room to mitigate its impacts.
Instant Deaths:
They're boring. I'm reminded of One Punch Man, which is a comedy series. These two have their comedic moments to be sure, but are not comedy wherein they solve all their problems by flying through the main villain Invincible Style in the first episode.
Durability:
They both have plot armor, big surprise...
Gumption:
I'm left with the impression that Aang is less powerful, and overcomes greater challenges. That ultimately wins.
P.S.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SdpjexsU7M
Addendum to my vote:
I treated this as who would win in a fight, not merely who is more over powered.
I actually think Naruto would take out Aang with a throwing star to the eye (or kunai if you prefer), but nothing like that shot up.
Gumption is not an explicit category in the debate. Looking back I did misuse the term, since endless gumption from a farmer would not overpower either of them. It was used to put my conclusions from the rest into one neat place, and make a point about grit and follow-through... The debate left me with the impression that Aang would fight from a power disadvantage, but would more likely than not win via skill (skill as shown by the debaters).
Durability is a weird concept on these shows.
Characters are always as durable as they need to be for the story, regardless of if a bystander would have survived it.
Iron Man shrugs off hits from tanks, but punches from a well preserved WWII veteran is a threat; at the same time, normal humans survive such punches instead of exploding (elevator scene comes to mind... if his strength was consistent, it would have been a scene from The Shining).
Plot armor makes examples of incredible durability non-initiative of lore unless it's explicitly stated to be a super power. That said, I was PMed a complaint of having not given fair weighing to durability, so I will be taking my vote down until I have a chance to re-review (have to get back to work right now)
Oh and plot armor explained:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PlotArmor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfmKTe0QrKE
You brought to my sttention a crucial detail. How could I forget the sexy jutsu, Naruto takes the win for sure. Luckily CON forgot about it as well.
Thank you, I revoted with the rationale from the previous comment I made included and changed the source point to tied.
Well, I’ll base this on Barney’s comment because my vote’s on this debate. Here’s the text of the vote as it stands, his comment is the reason for removal:
“I believe that Benjamin *should have* won this but failed to address the core of the issue: age. He left numerous arguments by baggins about age on the table and conceded a full 70 episodes of aging without a word. On the other hand, baggins made this a big part of his argument and, although the claims are dubious, they are unanswered by PRO and thus must be considered as real according to PRO. If the timeline works according to how baggins described in *multiple* posts, Aang is simply underpowered, and Naruto has undergone serious improvements. Overall, Naruto seems to be favored in this case due to his abilities and durability.
In terms of sources, the Quora source makes me lean towards baggins enough to give him the vote.”
To give ijb1 a chance to revote the current invalid vote has to be removed pronto.
Okay, apologies on the source point. I thought that any notable advantage was enough to warrant giving a side the point (low barrier) and with the way you described it I would not have awarded that point.
To go more in detail about why Aang would lose: based on age, he has received little to no training and would be easily brought to avatar mode, which, as stated in con’s argument, is not as powerful as it seems on the surface. On the other hand, Naruto has significantly progressed and the power of the full nine tails is insane in comparison. As noted by Con, the power levels majorly differ between the series and it is clear that in Naruto there are more powerful characters. As Naruto is the main character, he is one of the most powerful characters in the series as well. His true power is more innate whereas Aang needs to train hard to learn many different bending types.
Note: I have watched both Naruto (not every episode but a lot of the beginning, past age 12) and Avatar the Last Airbender
A lot more detail is needed for sources, that is if they are warranted. Usually if both sides do their due diligence, sources should be tied. It needs a significant lead to win points from extra categories.
I’d say not. As a general rule, when there are many sources given in a debate, pointing to one and saying that it’s a poor source is not a sufficient reason to award source points.
The arguments points could also use more explication. As a general rule, you have to assess points made by both sides in the debate. Ijb, you point to some arguments made by Con and say what was missing from Pro’s argument, but I don’t see any direct assessment of what Pro actually said beyond the statement that “Aang is simply underpowered.” You can conclude that based on your interpretation of Pro’s arguments, but you have to show how you got there, and the path to that can’t be just pointing out what Con’s winning.
Is the reasoning in the newest vote sufficient to award source points?
That wasn’t my main point. Forget about the multiple tails. I made my point about speed and Naruto needed only 1 tail for that argument (not even a tail in Haku fight). Same goes for durability and physical strength, he doesn’t need more than 1 tail to top Aang in those categories. Tactics and skill advantages are biased and can go either way. So even if we give those 30% to Aang the W still goes to Naruto in every other category.
Like 30% of your argument, and also your conclusion, was that even 12 year old Naruto could get as many tails as he wants, despite his seal being strong- if that isn't a fake scenario I don't know what is.
Yeah okay I got that you dont like the sources and the inconsistency in the show is obvious. I think that goes both ways and it was already established. If you look for perfect logic and no contradictions in kids anime shows you wont find any. We know Aangs speed and powers are not consistent too. But we agreed that if we take into account every interpretation I have sources and material that suggests speeds as high as light and as for Aang the highest suggested speed is lighting. At minimum we can say Naruto has short bursts of hyper speed which would give him advantage in that category. Hakus speed can be confirmed to be faster than lighting because he had to be that fast to stop Kakashi from killling Zabuza. Adult Kakashi even in OG Naruto is OP compared to anything in ATLA. And that all happened while Naruto was beating Haku. What else is there to discuss? Durability? Naruto easily. And im talking about durability without Kurama and without any kind of jutsu. Whats Aangs durability without putting 4 elements between him and Naruto as a shield? How much can Aang take if he get hit once? How do you know how their abilities will interact with each other? How important are fake scenarios?
Naruto has databooks with wildly hyperbolic speed feats from the first arc that even deathbattle wiki does not accept as valid and is contradicted by everything else in Naruto and Shippuden.
Aang is definately hypersonic. And he is also consistently a lightning timer. But many people think lightning reactions and movement does not "fit" into ATLA, so headcannon it as "slow" lightning.
Dodging lightning is on par with dodging Haku, unless you are going to ignore the blatant fact that Naruto never reached 1x lightspeed untill KCM1, 10 powerups later.
Whether you are low-balling or high-balling, so long as you apply the same standard to both, Aang and Naruto are relative in speed.
So you admit that if we use both “hyperbolic” interpretations for their speed we can say Aang ranges from faster than wind to reacting to lighting and if we apply the same for Naruto we get much wider range because we have a character moving in the speed of light. Both are inconsistent but Naruto has kept up with Haku at the end of their fight and Haku was still extremely fast by then. That means even if we give Aang the lighting feat he is still slower in everything. This is based on information in the data book I’ve linked not only on animation style.
It's really hard yes. Especially since in ATLA there isn't technology to measure Aangs speed. So his speed ranges from at minimum "faster than the wind" and "running on water" to the more insane feats of dodging lightning in midair. Naruto is a series where one of the main methods of saying "x fighter is stronger than y fighter" is having them "teleport" behind their opponent with a kick loaded up or something. But that is a very inconsistent animation shorthand for superior speed. The same goes for turning into a blur. ATLA doesn't have a huge speed gap in any of it's major fights, and when he "fights" civillians he moves much slower. The best speed feats for Naruto that CON brought up was when he moved so fast that he created waves and winds. Apart from Aang arguably doing the same with running on water and creating massive winds by just running faster than wind. But that also begs the question of why doesn't that happen in every Naruto fight. The Naruto KCM2 clones , when moving orders of magnitude quicker than 1-tail, actually faster than light, should be passively creating orcanoes with every step they make, and yet they don't. So it appears like "hyperspeed" effects is just some extra flare they add into the most important fights with the highest budget and that have to look good. Naruto is wildly inconsistent, while ATLA is grounded and consistent.
Yeah, I thought about lightning in the series potentially having a different speed, but since it wasn’t really mentioned, I didn’t bring it up.
As for speed in general, trying to examine them in the context of their universes was necessary, but it didn’t seem like it was done well. I’m not sure how I’d go about it, but it felt like just saying “this universe has more speed feats” wasn’t enough and even pointing to Sasuke’s Sharingan as a measuring stick didn’t do much to tell me how fast Naruto was moving.
Thank you for voting.
Something that is my fault is I didn't link directly the moments of lightning movement. Here Zuko moves as fast as lightning, which we can see since both are moving in the same frame at the same time: https://youtu.be/rsrRdIh2WaQ?t=217. Here Aang jumps from one pillar to another, with at least 30% the speed of lightning, which we can see since both are moving in the same direction at the same time, but it doesn't immidiately hit him: https://youtu.be/rsrRdIh2WaQ?t=267. My interpretation is that lightning is just much slower in their universe, since that seems much more grounded than everything in the verse being relativistic in speed (moving in more than 1% of lightspeed). But with CON pulling Haku out to establish Naruto lightspeed I had to retaliate with maximum ATLA scaling.
Showing that, if you give Naruto the benefit of the doubt to have superhyperbolic speed, then you must also apply that lenience to Aangs feats, making them still equal.
But as you picked up on, neither of the characters are that fast.
I’ll aim to get on this. Send me a reminder in a few days if I haven’t voted.
Vote bump.
Vote bump
Vote bump.
Vote bump.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: FishChaser // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 3 to pro (arguments)
>Reason for Decision: Benjamin gets several things wrong about 12 year old Naruto, For instance Naruto took the Chunin exams and learned the rasengan while still 12.
Even still, the avatar state is pretty hard to beat for 12 year old Naruto even assuming he could even contend with Aang in base form.
Benjamin also misrepresents Naruto as a mindless brute when Naruto is a creative/tactical genius but that alone doesn't win Naruto the fight.
Baggins also gets something wrong, get it actually works to his favor because Naruto CAN access some 9 tails chakra voluntarily at this point, but he has to run out of his normal chakra first.
At the end of the day, I think it's clear that Aang has more power, speed and versatility which will rape Naruto directly in the anus cheeks.
Also, the likelihood of Naruto passing the first tail is low because over time, the seal on Kurama weakened allowing more of Kurama's chakra to get through. Chances are that Naruto at age 12 would only get one tail at best and it is more likely that he wouldn't even get that far since it took almost being killed by Sasuke and knowing that he was losing/being betrayed by his best friend to activate the first tail.
There is a way that Baggins could have argued to be the biggest douche bag possible, since Aang was frozen he was technically just suspended in a 12 year old body while being much older. Technically when Aang was 12, he only had air bending in base form.
Baggins overstates Naruto's speed, which is significantly lower than lightspeed and is still lower even later when he gains six paths sage mode. Haku starts to move in front of Kakashi's raikiri before he starts charging towards Zabuza if I remember correctly.
The claim that Naruto can tank fire blasts in base form is wrong. The only time I remember him getting flamed in base form that one might interpret him as tanking it is when Naruto fought Sasuke on the roof of the hospital, but he used his rasengan to create a barrier similar to Hyuga "rotation".
>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter appears to provide a great deal of analysis regarding the veracity of certain claims within the debate, some of which are actual rebuttals made by the debaters, and some of which are the voter himself inserting his insights. While that is valuable feedback for the debaters, it is not in and of itself a basis for the decision. The only line of text in this RFD that speaks to the decision directly is:
"At the end of the day, I think it's clear that Aang has more power, speed and versatility which will rape Naruto directly in the anus cheeks."
While the voter is welcome to post feedback for the debaters, the voter should be clear about what arguments by Pro and Con led him to believe that Aang has these three elements over Naruto. It does not help that the voter does not point to any specific points made in Aang's favor, focusing his attention almost entirely on the claims for Naruto, which makes it difficult to determine how the voter thinks Pro established that Aang has these advantages.
**************************************************
Sorry but your vote doesn’t make sense to me. If someone can review it that could be helpful.
1. You confirm what I have said in the debate
2. You confirm what I have said in the debate again, I never said base form Naruto beast AS Aang
3. You confirm what I have said in the debate again
4. You make your own argument that PRO did not made and cant be used in his favor
5. You said “at the end of the day Aang has more speed” without analyzing anything that has been said about both characters stats and verses. I have shown that even if both characters are not light speed literally, Naruto still moves “in lighting speeds” compared to Aang.
6. What the chances of Naruto getting to a more than one tail mode are not established by PRO either. How does that count as a point for PRO?
7. Sasuke who is the second strongest character in the whole Naruto verse stabs Naruto in the heart, Naruto survives and yet in this vote this counts as a point for PRO? All of my points about Aang having trouble with regular people and being killed by Azula and by just some storm are ignored by both PRO and this voter.
8. I didn’t want to argue for the 100 years in the iceberg because at the end of the day PRO would’ve just said that he can enter Avatar State in any age just like Naruto can access Kurama at any age. And it’s more of Kurama accessing him not the other way because he is still a kid, yes (I don’t see that so much as a problem, it’s still the same power). Which is a positive not negative. Kurama can interfere even if NARUTO DIES. If Aang dies nobody is there to heal him.
9. Voter states that I overestimate something about Naruto’s speed but did not give any explanation how I did that nor any explanation how PRO is right about Aang’s speed
10. The claim that Naruto tanks fireballs is supported by a video that I provided from canon episodes where Naruto tanks fire balls multiple times (not addressed at all).
SOURCES;
https://avatartimeline.wordpress.com/
https://avatar.fandom.com/wiki/Aang
https://avatar.fandom.com/wiki/History_of_Aang_(12_BG_-_100_AG)
https://naruto.fandom.com/wiki/User:Seelentau/Naruto_Timeline#Databooks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja
https://narutodb.xyz/
It’s time for a DEATH BATTLEEEEEEEEEE!
Fixed.
You haven’t stated your position