All debates

No description has been provided

This debate centers on whether astrology should be considered a valid form of knowledge, a science, or a pseudoscience. This discussion will draw on arguments about astrology’s history, methodology, scientific validity, and cultural or psychological value.

Several Western nations have banned burkhas. Should they?

No description has been provided

Rationality in war is complex—it’s not just about survival, but also about values, consequences, and the bigger picture.

I will prove that Lebron James is the best BASKETBALL player ever this debate will not account for Impact/influence on things outside of basketball.

Debating religions has always been one sided - it's nearly always an atheist one on side and every religion on the other. However, the math doesn't work out: all religions are competing for the same headspace and every religion has conflicts with others. So why is it that atheists have to do all the debunking work?

I'll be debating that Jon Jones is the UFC GOAT. My opponent should not only dispute why Jon Jones isn't the GOAT, but also provide who they think is instead the UFC GOAT, and I too will argue why my pick is better than theirs.

Just to clarify, me being pro does not belittle nor suggest inequality for "Trans women". This is just the stance that biological men should not be permitted to participate in competitive sports of biological women. Pro is with the motion of the title. Con is against the motion of the title.

Who ever convinces the most people wins basically

The manipulation that is behind the Ontological so-called argument yields self-contradictory result when applied.

Is questioning religious faith important, relevant, and valuable?

THBT: On balance, abortion is immoral [for @Bones]

No description has been provided

No description has been provided