Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4473

History books for each country should be provided in the internet for free

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
0
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

hey-yo
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1493
rating
25
debates
60.0%
won
Description

In this debate I will argue that every country's history books should be provided online.
I believe that by reading each other's history, we can better understand why there is conflict between some countries.

Round 1
Pro
#1
Before we start, I'd like to thank hey-yo for accepting this debate.

Firstly, I'd like to clarify what I meant by the title of the debate.  It is my firm belief that history books of each country should be made available on the internet for free.

I believe this since it can be used to understand the perspectives of every side when a conflict occurs between countries. I believe that by reading the history, cultures, and the lifestyle of the countries involved, we can see why a country might feel the need for conflict/retaliation. While most of the information said can be found on the internet, the problem is the fact that almost all of it is hidden behind a paywall or outright banned from the country. This might make some people who don't really care about the conflict but want to publish or talk about the conflict talk and/or write based on rumors or other articles that may or may not be based on rumors too. Because of that, a continuous chain of misinformation could form and actual articles and journals may be hidden and/or disproved by these articles.
Con
#2
Hey thanks for making this into a debate. This is rather unique and step away from hot topics. Looks like it can be fun. 

I am open to any sort of definition being used and will assume/use webster-marriam definitions unless stated otherwise. I have a few questions before getting into the grit. 

I'll use a number system to break conversation down into parts and provide quotes as needed for easy reading. 

1.  It is my firm belief that history books of each country should be made available on the internet for free.

To confirm, are we looking only at history books or do we consider books on sociology or culture that may not be categorized as history despite serving the same purpose?  Like magazines or news medias. 
Can the internet be censored in any way or should we consider the internet to be open to everyone as well? 

2. I believe this since it can be used to understand the perspectives of every side when a conflict occurs between countries.

Although reading the history, cultures, and  lifestyle of a country can help us understand some parts, hownmay it help us understand current events? 

Can dialogue exist between conflicting countries that depict the same message with out books or history? 
 
3.   almost all history books/documents online are behind a paywall or outright banned from a country?
I agree and disagree. 

I have found this an issue with many studies or articles I try to use. The worst is the news agencies or what ever website requiring subscriptions. There is a cost in maintaining servers and an online presence to allow an audience. Have you considered what it would take to digitize all history books in the world? 


Here is an article about an entity that is trying or has tried to digitize all books (or most) for free. This article highlights a few challenges that has been experienced. 

Do we need to consider challenges to your goal in order to justify doing it or deciding not to? In other words....to you... how does these challenges support a pro or con stance? 

4. Countries seem to cover history with conflicting or different information.  Adding their own misinformation. Do you see this as a barrier or challenge for your position? 

Round 2
Pro
#3
Forfeited
Con
#4
Much to what I wish to speak on next depends on follow up. 
Give more chance to respond. 
Extend. 
Round 3
Pro
#5
Forfeited
Con
#6
No need to vote. No debate here