pharmacy is derived off the word pharmakeai. This is because pharmacy's want to harm you.
No, it's because pharmacy's prescribe drugs.
1.pharmaceuticals are the 4th leading cause of death . this is because pharmaceuticals it is meant to harm you
Cars kill over a million people a year. Does that mean they were built to hurt you? Of course not! [1]
over 100 thousand people die each year because they take prescription medication. this is because prescription medications are meant to harm you.
See above
big pharma gives millions of dollars to politicians because they know that there drugs are dangerous and they have to bribe people to make there drugs legal. There drugs are dangerous because there are meant to harm you
That's because they want to spend as little money on the medicine as possible, not because they purposefully want to harm people. You need INTENT for that, and all they want to do is make money.
.big pharma corruption started the opioid epidemic. The opioid epidemic destroyed the lives of soccer moms who says no to illegal drugs but believe legal drugs are safer. this happened because drugs are meant to harm you.
No, it happened because they wanted to make money.
.we kill millions of babies inside abortion clinics. they do not even call them babies but fetus. this is the work of pharmakeai sorcerers.
No evidence was given. Bare assertion
.we play the I'm not crazy game with our children we play this game because pharmaceuticals are meant to harm you. while they claim to be helping us they treat them like experiment animals.
No evidence was given. Bare assertion
and prescription drugs are more dangerous than illegal drugs. this is because prescription drugs are meant to harm you
No, it's because they want to make money buy spending as little as possible on the medicine. However, if they wanted to purposefully harm you, then all of their customers would die and they would make LESS money. So that's obviously not true.
prescription medication is the number 1 reason for overdose beating out illegal drugs. this is because it is meant to hurt you
No, it's because people take too much of it.
.we put aborted babies in our vaccines. we do this because vaccines are meant to harm you.
but we are flooded by fake news like this one done by ABC. were they say the aborted babies are not harmful and even the future catholic pope approves of it. disgusting abc even claims it does not interfere with the disgusting catholic bible.
Vaccines aren't prescriptions. Irrelevant
and can we safely ignore those people who claim to perform magical rituals in abortion clinics
This is irrelevant.
.the world health association symbol is a snake on a stick
this is because it is meant to harm you and it is snake oil.
There's a brand of cars with a Jaguar symbol. Do they want to eat you? Obviously not.
one of the evidence for the fema cam conspiracy theory is one of the medical code in Obama care sanctions death by guillotines. This is because it is meant to harm you.
Guillotines are irrelevant.
prescription medication usually has a long list of side effects for example Prozac causes yellow eyes and skin and thought of suicide and 120 plus other things. These side effect that have nothing to do with what the drug is treating. and have no way of coming naturally unless they were designed to do such
some mass shooting were caused because the shooter was taking prescription drugs and suffered from the side effect suicide thought or actions.
Those were side effects, which are called such because they are UNINTENTIONAL.
they put prescription drugs in our tap water. These pharmaceuticals have absurd side effects. They put prescription drugs in our water to hurt us. The reason you need a prescription to get these drugs is because the drugs are dangerous. so why is it in our tap water. available to everyone. Unless it is meant to harm.
You need a prescription so you don't overdose.
Sources
Thanks, I appreciated the comedy lol
Pro please format these better. Here’s a guide: https://tiny.cc/DebateArt
---RFD---
Gist:
Technically the right poisons in low doses heal, which pro misses is the opposite of harm... Anyway, if pro ever met his BoP, he hid such inside the Gish Gallop.
1. “Evil Definitions”
Yes, words are derived from other words. So very evil indeed.
Con asserts that they are named after it for the similar field, instead of the intent to harm (missed the basic evolution of words, but pro never proved the intent was harm so assertion meet assertion).
2. “pharmaceutical industry is a drug cartel”
15 part Gish Gallop.
Con engages in a Gish reply.
Pro complains that he thinks irrelevant things are relevant.
3. Side Effects
Atenolol indeed has side effects, and if you believe sales fear factics employed by water filtration companies (or homeopathic practitioners... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvuzpeAIm24) diluting it into large bodies of water would magically make it stronger (implied and required for threat to be valid, but not directly stated.
Con points out that you need a prescription to avoid taking too much of it to then be poisoned.
Pro insists they prescribe intentionally dangerous amounts.
Con counters that such would make them less money (which would prevent them from being an effective drug cartel).
4. Doctors Are Secretly Greek Cultists and/or Sorcerers
They do have recognizable symbols, so there’s that. And they take evil oaths to do no harm...
Con compares these symbols to the branding on Jaguar cars, completely overlooking how many people those cars literally envelope every year!
5. CIA Surgical Conspiracies
Unsure what this has to do with the resolution...
---
Arguments: Con
See above review of key points. Sorry if anyone is confused by the dusting of comedy mixed in. Basically con wins or ties every relevant contention.
Sources: Tied
Gish Galloped sources do not win the point.
Conduct: Pro
Forfeited round.
Someone remind me tomorrow morning and I'll vote (maybe even tonight depending on how late my social plans go).
pls vote
Jeez
if people are just going to ignore my stuff on other medical evils. Perhaps i should say pharmaceuticals are poison instead of prescription drugs
Thanks didn't realize. I knew he didn't know what he was talking about now I am sure of it.
A conspiracy theorist made a more convincing argument than a person who used what was scientifically agreed upon?
I'll add conspiracy theorist to the list of Athias being an anarchist, Religious and generally a person who makes bad arguments.
Athias has said something about you
DUDE I SUBMITTED MY THING WHAT IS THIS
Well someone's going to have an easy victory.
I just looked at his previous argument on the very subject. And the voting for it is at best questionable, and borderline lazy. Despite his forfeit, he provided a much better argument than omar2345. Good luck to you, too, Speedrace. Given his thorough list in the previous debate, it'll be difficult to argue against.
Look at his previous debates
Right XD
I agree with you. Good luck in your debate. And I hope you provide a very convincing argument.
I wish I can take it I have 3 debates on though so I cant take more knowing my limit
This will be an easy win for someone...