But I'm not upset, I am deeply fascinated. I didn't kmow part of my accent was considered strange or unusual, to the point of someone saying that no one pronounces something the way everyone I know does. When I find weird things like that it interests me
I guess it's just my accent maybe, but I and people I know say those the exact same. So, incorrect, there are people that pronounce those the same and thus it rhymes where I come from, I actually didn't know until you said that that there are people that dont say it like that. Also, sorry for missing, had a thing happening today
Note, though it doesnt matter, but the orange rhyme was to words, it wasn't range and orange, it was more tange and orange. But, the fact that I have to explain it is probably a sign that I failed
Where is the forfeit button? I have realized I dont want to argue with this nonsense but can't find the button to quit. Also sorry for calling it nonsense in this comment
In other words, that fallacy is about events, this is about concepts, and I dont really want or expect this to discuss events, because I mainly want a hypothetical debate about the concepts
After reading the wikipedia link you sent, I have decided to clarify that this is if time travel is possible, not if it has happened. Thus I think the chance of that being a problem is lower?
Yeah, that's what I think as well, I just have noticed many people talk about them as if they are opposites and thus made this debate. That's why I am pro here
Religion means both my religion specifically and the general concept of there being some being that made the world. Or rather, the second meaning is what I am proving, but I might use the first kn because if mine can fit science then that indirectly proves the general concept can fit
But I'm not upset, I am deeply fascinated. I didn't kmow part of my accent was considered strange or unusual, to the point of someone saying that no one pronounces something the way everyone I know does. When I find weird things like that it interests me
To explain more specifically, in the accent of where I gre up, both range and orange are pronounced with the same "a"sound as change or fangs or bane.
I guess it's just my accent maybe, but I and people I know say those the exact same. So, incorrect, there are people that pronounce those the same and thus it rhymes where I come from, I actually didn't know until you said that that there are people that dont say it like that. Also, sorry for missing, had a thing happening today
Note, though it doesnt matter, but the orange rhyme was to words, it wasn't range and orange, it was more tange and orange. But, the fact that I have to explain it is probably a sign that I failed
Sorry, timer crept up so I was only able to make one verse
Thanks
Ok, I fought to the end despite frustration.
Where is the forfeit button? I have realized I dont want to argue with this nonsense but can't find the button to quit. Also sorry for calling it nonsense in this comment
Sorry, but, I realized my book wasnt as in depth as I thought and am not sure I can make any arguments off of it.
In other words, that fallacy is about events, this is about concepts, and I dont really want or expect this to discuss events, because I mainly want a hypothetical debate about the concepts
After reading the wikipedia link you sent, I have decided to clarify that this is if time travel is possible, not if it has happened. Thus I think the chance of that being a problem is lower?
Yeah, that's what I think as well, I just have noticed many people talk about them as if they are opposites and thus made this debate. That's why I am pro here
Religion means both my religion specifically and the general concept of there being some being that made the world. Or rather, the second meaning is what I am proving, but I might use the first kn because if mine can fit science then that indirectly proves the general concept can fit