Instigator / Pro
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#6013

Can religion and science coexist?

Status
Debating

Waiting for the next argument from the instigator.

Round will be automatically forfeited in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

The can coexist(my side): they don't contradict eachother and in fact maybe compliment eachother.
They can't coexist(your side): they are opposites, either one is true or the the other.

-->
@Lemming

Yeah, that's what I think as well, I just have noticed many people talk about them as if they are opposites and thus made this debate. That's why I am pro here

-->
@helperman

Gregor Mendel was religious, I think,
Didn't stop him from "gaining recognition as the founder of the modern science of genetics."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel

Georges Lemaître, also religious, I think,
"Was the first to argue that the recession of galaxies is evidence of an expanding universe and to connect the observational Hubble–Lemaître law[2] with the solution to the Einstein field equations in the general theory of relativity for a homogenous and isotropic universe."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître

Personally I don't think science and religion have to be 'so different.
I find a lot of game theory and psychology from various religions.

I think there are scientists who can be inspired by religion, who have advanced science by their inspiration.
. . .

That said,
Modern science seems a more rigorous examination to me
Something more hard and concrete,
Which does not mean religion is unvaluable,
I don't see soft knowledge as bad, I see it 'as invaluable as hard knowledge.

I think soft knowledge allows for meaning, flexibility, human.

-->
@Hurried4675

Religion means both my religion specifically and the general concept of there being some being that made the world. Or rather, the second meaning is what I am proving, but I might use the first kn because if mine can fit science then that indirectly proves the general concept can fit

What is meant by "religion" and "science" exactly?