Yes but forget that.Why did Nintendo color it yellow. IT does not matter. We can determine what they did just by observing it.The fact we know they colored it is irrelevant.No one at Nintendo told us why they colored it.But we know why they colored it for a reason. how is this possible
Here is a hint. Why did Nintendo color this Mario spike thing yellow.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ZRNgGS0JpBElUU_5UFGFRbA3uqfwgPdghX6CfirgTQ/edit
". Since that logic applied to rabbits proves God's existence and that same logic applied to cardinals disproves God's existence, accept that the logic must be faulty.
2. Argue that for some unexplainable reason that this logic only applies to rabbits and other animals that turn white in winter that support your conclusion but not to animals that don't turn white in winter and don't support your conclusion. (i.e. cherrypicking or special pleading)"
No all your proving is god did not make an intelligent choice with the cardinal.
If my school Mascot is a red spartan and on school spirit week they want us to where red. Clearly they want us to where red so we match the spartan mascot.
We all our connected one way. you can B###### me on technicality.My red eye's and red plate are related the both are made out of Molecules.
If i got a red cup and a red plate. I most likely picked the red cup to match the red plate.Why does this work and not the other.It make's sense
If i have a yellow tooth and end up having a yellow car. It is illogically for me to believe the tooth influenced my choice for a yellow car.They are both made from the same source.It has to make sense.
"If I see a red microwave and red fridge - the colours we’re intelligently chosen."
But this does not work
"If my poop is brown and it matches my eyes; as a result of the above - the colours must be intelligently chosen."
the fridge and microwave are connected because they are appliances. But you poop and eyes are not. IT would make sense for someone to get there appliances the same color. While it does not make sense for someone to create eye color based on poop
This is more than just they have preferences.IT i just pure common sense to get items that match
My dog has a blue collar and a blue doghouse. The collar was colored blue to match the doghouse.
IT works because they are connected
Rabits are brown during the summer white during the winter.The white during the winter connected them.So now it is safe for me to say God created the rabbit white to match the white snow
"Those are the properties that allow us to infer that matching colours are likely a choice"
The same thing can be applied to evolution animals
If i have a green toaster and a red microwave it would look funny.But if i have a red toaster and a red microwave. Suddenly the two go together.
Same with evolution animals. If i have a yellow animal in the snow it would not go together.But if i put a white animals in the white snow it goes together
Yes you can
If i have a red colored microwave and a red colored fridge.It is just pure common sense to conclude that i got the red colored microwave to match the red colored fridge.
If you use a false analogy on me. there are red rocks thus i got a red fridge to match red rocks. It does not work because they are not connected.
Rabbits are white during the winter. Thus it is common sense to conclude the rabbit was colored white to match the white snow.
Science is real good at telling us how stuff work.It is terrible at telling us how something came to be.Telling me how DNA works does not disprove god made it. It only supports that god made it because it is so advance.
They have not been debunked. Only lies. you are saying he is false even though you no nothing of what he believes.By definition you are saying he is unreliable because you do not agree with him.
Give me a second to pull some stuff up.So you get familiarized
I believe in the chemtrail conspiracy theory the fema camp conspiracy theory haarp concpiracy theory 5g conspiracy theory. Agenda 21 conspiracy theory. predictive programming etc
"the pain of discovering that for a long time many of us have ignorantly been taking part in celebrating a pagan holiday that is so very closely (almost inseparably) related to Satanism, blood-drinking, and human sacrificing."
https://malawi24.com/2016/12/20/opinion-christmas-not-birth-christ-just-satanic-festivity/
Why would Christians want to make a bootlegged version of a holiday about blood drinking and human sacrifice.No the holiday was repackaged for the christian people.
What about Halloween or Easter. There pagan.There just the same thing with another name.
If i have a red colored microwave and a red colored fridge.It is just pure common sense to conclude that i got the red colored microwave to match the red colored fridge.
If you use a false analogy on me. there are red rocks thus i got a red fridge to match red rocks. It does not work because they are not connected.
Rabbits are white during the winter. Thus it is common sense to conclude the rabbit was colored white to match the white snow.
Science is real good at telling us how stuff work.It is terrible at telling us how something came to be.Telling me how DNA works does not disprove god made it. It only supports that god made it because it is so advance.
Welcome to the site.Your new right? The debate is about how gods morals effect us biologically.Giving to other's can help with chronic diseases.Being bad can cause god to harden your heart etc.
I don't get why people use false analogy on real one.
Real anology
The company building is colored blue.The employee uniform was colored blue.Thus the blue uniform was created blue to match the blue building
Weasle's have white fur during the winter when there is white snow. The weasel was colored white to match the white snow.
False analogy
My mom has a blue shoe. SO was my mom shoe colored blue to match the blue company building.
My paper is colored white. Was it colored white to match the white weasel
Why do you think that animals being gutted can happen naturally.Animals do not naturally loose there eyeballs.That is an insane viewpoint that you hold. Given how rampant the occult is nowadays.
"Given my knowledge on the topic. Zelensky said in an interview that he did not even know the money was held up. So pro argument is false. and con was right to call out the no source for this.
"Over the course of the day, Zelenskiy told shifts of journalists he had not been blackmailed by Trump in their phone call on 25 July and did not know US military aid had been delayed at the time."
See con was right. Pro did not source it because it was untrue
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/10/ukraine-president-volodymyr-zelenskiy-press-conference-donald-trump "
"Reason:
Better spelling and grammar tie. Con forgave pro mistakes
Better conduct to Con. Because pro requested it.
More convincing argument to con
All con had to do and i quote"
the better source's to con reason was Oramagi said Zelenski said he knew the money was being held up con said he did not source it. I remember in the 10 hour interview he did that he said the exact opposite so i brought it up.
You know we have no documentation of any of those drawing being made. I just pulled them the picture off the internet once i concluded that they made an intelligent choice by observing them.
Why did they color this creature yellow
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ZRNgGS0JpBElUU_5UFGFRbA3uqfwgPdghX6CfirgTQ/edit
Yes but forget that.Why did Nintendo color it yellow. IT does not matter. We can determine what they did just by observing it.The fact we know they colored it is irrelevant.No one at Nintendo told us why they colored it.But we know why they colored it for a reason. how is this possible
Here is a hint. Why did Nintendo color this Mario spike thing yellow.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ZRNgGS0JpBElUU_5UFGFRbA3uqfwgPdghX6CfirgTQ/edit
". Since that logic applied to rabbits proves God's existence and that same logic applied to cardinals disproves God's existence, accept that the logic must be faulty.
2. Argue that for some unexplainable reason that this logic only applies to rabbits and other animals that turn white in winter that support your conclusion but not to animals that don't turn white in winter and don't support your conclusion. (i.e. cherrypicking or special pleading)"
No all your proving is god did not make an intelligent choice with the cardinal.
Why did nintendo color this creature yellow
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jGjmLLdmKTPPJ486QKQDQnrR8mMXadcTJFj5RGNrGLc/edit
Your a fresh mind
Problem solve.We have not seen them design the creature or heard anything.
What do we conclude the reason for coloring the spiky thing yellow
The color of the spike yellow Mario thing was not random. It will have relevance. Can you guess why they colored it yellow
Why did Nintendo color these creature's black and white in paper mario 2
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14tRcYvi8hb5VGmrf8ipIL9iNv0WZTzYqDE1sWvEw4Lg/edit
It will just answer the question
no but the same logic could be applied.
Why did Nintendo colored this creature yellow
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jGjmLLdmKTPPJ486QKQDQnrR8mMXadcTJFj5RGNrGLc/edit
You respond to fast but question stands.Why did Nintendo color this creature yellow.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jGjmLLdmKTPPJ486QKQDQnrR8mMXadcTJFj5RGNrGLc/edit
Why did Nintendo color this thing yellow.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jGjmLLdmKTPPJ486QKQDQnrR8mMXadcTJFj5RGNrGLc/edit
Yes there is.
Lets say i am making a mario game.
Lets say there is a desert world a snow world and a lava world
all of the Mario enemies in the desert world are yellow
all of the enemies in the snow world are white
All of the enemy in the lava world are red
If my school Mascot is a red spartan and on school spirit week they want us to where red. Clearly they want us to where red so we match the spartan mascot.
We all our connected one way. you can B###### me on technicality.My red eye's and red plate are related the both are made out of Molecules.
If i got a red cup and a red plate. I most likely picked the red cup to match the red plate.Why does this work and not the other.It make's sense
If i have a yellow tooth and end up having a yellow car. It is illogically for me to believe the tooth influenced my choice for a yellow car.They are both made from the same source.It has to make sense.
This works
"If I see a red microwave and red fridge - the colours we’re intelligently chosen."
But this does not work
"If my poop is brown and it matches my eyes; as a result of the above - the colours must be intelligently chosen."
the fridge and microwave are connected because they are appliances. But you poop and eyes are not. IT would make sense for someone to get there appliances the same color. While it does not make sense for someone to create eye color based on poop
This is more than just they have preferences.IT i just pure common sense to get items that match
My dog has a blue collar and a blue doghouse. The collar was colored blue to match the doghouse.
IT works because they are connected
Rabits are brown during the summer white during the winter.The white during the winter connected them.So now it is safe for me to say God created the rabbit white to match the white snow
Again with the false anology's
"My poop matches my eye colour sometimes.
According to your logic - the colour of my poop is intelligently selected by God."
I have a red cup and i got a red plate. Clearly i got the red cup to match the red plate. IT works because they are connected
A false analogy would be. I have red eyes i got a red plate to match them. It does not work because they are not connected
"because humans like matching colours"
God apparently like matching colors to. Yellow animal in yelllow desert. White animal in white snow. Green animal in green Forrest. Etc
red cup with red plate. Blue cup with blue plate. Green cup with green plate. It is exactly the same logic.What is so hard to understand
It makes sense. You just don't understand it.
"Those are the properties that allow us to infer that matching colours are likely a choice"
The same thing can be applied to evolution animals
If i have a green toaster and a red microwave it would look funny.But if i have a red toaster and a red microwave. Suddenly the two go together.
Same with evolution animals. If i have a yellow animal in the snow it would not go together.But if i put a white animals in the white snow it goes together
That is what you did.
Have you ever had to watch house hunter. The appliances are always the same color and match each other. When they pick out appliances. Why is that
Yes you can
If i have a red colored microwave and a red colored fridge.It is just pure common sense to conclude that i got the red colored microwave to match the red colored fridge.
If you use a false analogy on me. there are red rocks thus i got a red fridge to match red rocks. It does not work because they are not connected.
Rabbits are white during the winter. Thus it is common sense to conclude the rabbit was colored white to match the white snow.
Science is real good at telling us how stuff work.It is terrible at telling us how something came to be.Telling me how DNA works does not disprove god made it. It only supports that god made it because it is so advance.
Alright. Give me a second
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOcbyAA-kfM
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1361/prescripton-medication-is-poison
They have not been debunked. Only lies. you are saying he is false even though you no nothing of what he believes.By definition you are saying he is unreliable because you do not agree with him.
Give me a second to pull some stuff up.So you get familiarized
I believe in the chemtrail conspiracy theory the fema camp conspiracy theory haarp concpiracy theory 5g conspiracy theory. Agenda 21 conspiracy theory. predictive programming etc
Your saying he is false because you do not like his opinion. Well you might fine his conspiracy theory stuff a little more factual then you think
Give me a second. I am very familiar with the Illuminati evils. You assume i disagree with conspiracy theory's.
Firstly big pharma
https://biblehub.com/greek/5331.htm
You think the millions dead were just an accident think again
Give me a second to pull this stuff up
"the pain of discovering that for a long time many of us have ignorantly been taking part in celebrating a pagan holiday that is so very closely (almost inseparably) related to Satanism, blood-drinking, and human sacrificing."
https://malawi24.com/2016/12/20/opinion-christmas-not-birth-christ-just-satanic-festivity/
Why would Christians want to make a bootlegged version of a holiday about blood drinking and human sacrifice.No the holiday was repackaged for the christian people.
What about Halloween or Easter. There pagan.There just the same thing with another name.
No Christmas has it roots in pagan Evils
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1443/believing-in-jesus-is-like-believing-in-santa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4sP1E1Jd_Y
https://youtu.be/xQgOjHsMEeE
Yes you can
If i have a red colored microwave and a red colored fridge.It is just pure common sense to conclude that i got the red colored microwave to match the red colored fridge.
If you use a false analogy on me. there are red rocks thus i got a red fridge to match red rocks. It does not work because they are not connected.
Rabbits are white during the winter. Thus it is common sense to conclude the rabbit was colored white to match the white snow.
Science is real good at telling us how stuff work.It is terrible at telling us how something came to be.Telling me how DNA works does not disprove god made it. It only supports that god made it because it is so advance.
Yes you can.
IF my dog has a blue collar and he has a blue dog house. The collar was colored blue to match the blue doghouse.
Rabbits are brown during the summer.White during the winter. White rabbits are colored white to match the white snow.
Welcome to the site.Your new right? The debate is about how gods morals effect us biologically.Giving to other's can help with chronic diseases.Being bad can cause god to harden your heart etc.
I don't get why people use false analogy on real one.
Real anology
The company building is colored blue.The employee uniform was colored blue.Thus the blue uniform was created blue to match the blue building
Weasle's have white fur during the winter when there is white snow. The weasel was colored white to match the white snow.
False analogy
My mom has a blue shoe. SO was my mom shoe colored blue to match the blue company building.
My paper is colored white. Was it colored white to match the white weasel
I forgot the olive oil source
https://www.medicaldaily.com/olive-oil-compound-kills-cancer-cells-less-hour-all-powerful-oleocanthal-322904
nvm. will do
Would that not format it weirdly. I will see what i can do
Why do you think that animals being gutted can happen naturally.Animals do not naturally loose there eyeballs.That is an insane viewpoint that you hold. Given how rampant the occult is nowadays.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv_-yc055n1fxFfTYpdaKBg
I have been afk for around 5 day's sorry.
So if i remove this it would be good
"Given my knowledge on the topic. Zelensky said in an interview that he did not even know the money was held up. So pro argument is false. and con was right to call out the no source for this.
"Over the course of the day, Zelenskiy told shifts of journalists he had not been blackmailed by Trump in their phone call on 25 July and did not know US military aid had been delayed at the time."
See con was right. Pro did not source it because it was untrue
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/10/ukraine-president-volodymyr-zelenskiy-press-conference-donald-trump "
I did specifi the conduct point
look at the copy of my vote you posted
"Reason:
Better spelling and grammar tie. Con forgave pro mistakes
Better conduct to Con. Because pro requested it.
More convincing argument to con
All con had to do and i quote"
So if i remove the link And saying it supports con. Then it would be good.
the better source's to con reason was Oramagi said Zelenski said he knew the money was being held up con said he did not source it. I remember in the 10 hour interview he did that he said the exact opposite so i brought it up.
oramgagi said to give con conduct point
You make an excellent point. Are twin babies the same person. Absolutely not
I forgot a source. It's 200 not 300
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/newborn-babies-chemicals-exposure-bpa/
If i did not spam myself with like 10 debate's i would take this. This is my kind of debate
You know we have no documentation of any of those drawing being made. I just pulled them the picture off the internet once i concluded that they made an intelligent choice by observing them.
Watch this amazing video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMbEVv3IsGY