Some people began snatching up all of Billbatard's debates once he got banned because they wanted free wins. It is really annoying how low they steep for fictional points on the leader board.
I'm not quite sure that Caleb would be "one of the best of them". That was his only debate (at least on this site).
And it isn't "anti-choice" per say. It is more anti-abortion. It would only be anti-choice in the sense of how normal laws work. Public urination is a choice, just not one that we allow as a society.
Contraception, raising the kid, adoption, and abstinence are four choices we all support ;)
With a debate that is 30k characters and five rounds, I would recommend a minimum of a one month voting period. Any debate with over 10k characters usually doesn't even get looked at.
Idgaf about partisanship, I care about principle. I hate a ton of Republicans because they don't possess conservative principles. I don't think your whole party doesn't care about the Constitution, but the radical wing definitely does not.
The Constitution never said that black people were property. It said that people had a right to their property. They interpreted that in a bad way in which slaves were considered property. (At least as far as I know.)
Sure there can be amendments, but the goal of my party is to form new amendments in the spirit of the Founding Fathers. It is applying the original point of view on modern issues. That point of view is maximizing personal freedom, while limiting the government.
If I remember correctly, McConnell invoked the Biden rule by shooting down Obama's nomination. (Not appointing new justices near the end of a term. The right should be granted to the next president).
I apologize for my harsh tone before. I think that making DC a state sounds like a decent idea on a surface level. I am a little skeptical of some underlying issues that may arise. For instance, national politicians may get more sway over local politics or the DC state may get more power because nearly every powerful government building is in the same area.
Well, they have electoral votes because they have population. That is fine. However, it is unconstitutional for DC to be a state, so there is that. I know you liberals love to trample on that document and all....
I am saying that his reasons are obviously partisan. I can see that yours likely are as well. Cities don't get representatives, sir. No matter how big they are.
Are we assuming that the shooter has to hold the trigger down indefinitely? Can they not understand that if they wanted, they could tap the trigger and get a burst or single shot? It doesn't take a gun nut to understand the basic functions of a rifle.
Well, a large reason they don't use full auto is because it is much less ammo efficient, and you never know when you'll get a resupply. I think that is another good reason to only sell full auto. They will run out of ammo faster!
I would have to disagree. A higher rate of fire would be more dangerous in a crowded area. In the military, they generally use burst fire and single fire anyway.
I see. I don't believe they will be removed since they were posted before the ban. His account giving out free wins has really distorted the leaderboard.
Yeah, man. Like when people say illegal immigrants are good for our economy because they make tomatoes slightly cheaper, but then never mention the billions of dollars they use up in welfare programs every year.
I'm a bit surprised aiming that aiming at the brain didn't come up. I think from a practical perspective, it would kill the fastest. Perhaps I was a bit emotional, but I didn't want the family to need a closed casket funeral.
F A Hayek was correct, you fiend.
Where have I seen that profile pic before? Oh yeah, a billbatard alt account.
Water.... gate? Never heard of it. Sounds like liberal propaganda to me.
Nixon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YoU dAmN hIpPiEs
Ah, good on you, sir!
A conservative against gun rights
:O
Lol
Citing Shifty Schiff
Oh lol, sorry. Didn't mean to cast shade.
Some people began snatching up all of Billbatard's debates once he got banned because they wanted free wins. It is really annoying how low they steep for fictional points on the leader board.
If truth mattered more than points, no one would debate billbatard lol.
I'm not quite sure that Caleb would be "one of the best of them". That was his only debate (at least on this site).
And it isn't "anti-choice" per say. It is more anti-abortion. It would only be anti-choice in the sense of how normal laws work. Public urination is a choice, just not one that we allow as a society.
Contraception, raising the kid, adoption, and abstinence are four choices we all support ;)
Why do you believe this debate usually involves misogyny?
With a debate that is 30k characters and five rounds, I would recommend a minimum of a one month voting period. Any debate with over 10k characters usually doesn't even get looked at.
So, you believe there is potential for Brexit to be good? If so, we are in the same boat.
What kind of priorities do you think they should have vs what they current prioritize?
Idgaf about partisanship, I care about principle. I hate a ton of Republicans because they don't possess conservative principles. I don't think your whole party doesn't care about the Constitution, but the radical wing definitely does not.
The Constitution never said that black people were property. It said that people had a right to their property. They interpreted that in a bad way in which slaves were considered property. (At least as far as I know.)
Sure there can be amendments, but the goal of my party is to form new amendments in the spirit of the Founding Fathers. It is applying the original point of view on modern issues. That point of view is maximizing personal freedom, while limiting the government.
If I remember correctly, McConnell invoked the Biden rule by shooting down Obama's nomination. (Not appointing new justices near the end of a term. The right should be granted to the next president).
I apologize for my harsh tone before. I think that making DC a state sounds like a decent idea on a surface level. I am a little skeptical of some underlying issues that may arise. For instance, national politicians may get more sway over local politics or the DC state may get more power because nearly every powerful government building is in the same area.
Oh, come now. Conservatives can't do that. ;)
Well, they have electoral votes because they have population. That is fine. However, it is unconstitutional for DC to be a state, so there is that. I know you liberals love to trample on that document and all....
I was referring to it being carved out of Virginia and Maryland.
I guess you're dropping my "cities don't get representatives" point?
The two states in which DC partially resides both do get representatives and senators.
I am saying that his reasons are obviously partisan. I can see that yours likely are as well. Cities don't get representatives, sir. No matter how big they are.
Oh yeah. So, since it is a den of liberals, it would help the Democrats. I now see why he wants it.
What would this change? They already have electoral votes.
Do you think it has potential to be good for the UK if they form some kind of deal?
I can use a baked potato in an assault. Should we now call them assault baked potatoes? Why just stop at rifles?
Less accurate. Yes.
Are we assuming that the shooter has to hold the trigger down indefinitely? Can they not understand that if they wanted, they could tap the trigger and get a burst or single shot? It doesn't take a gun nut to understand the basic functions of a rifle.
Well, a large reason they don't use full auto is because it is much less ammo efficient, and you never know when you'll get a resupply. I think that is another good reason to only sell full auto. They will run out of ammo faster!
;)
I would have to disagree. A higher rate of fire would be more dangerous in a crowded area. In the military, they generally use burst fire and single fire anyway.
So since removing full auto makes it more accurate and deadly, that means we should only sell it in full auto, right? We will be extra safe.
I know.
I'm a little amused by how the terminology would turn out.
As far as I know, there isn't a definition for these types of things.
I don't know if they will remove your vote since it was a full forfeit debate, but those are typically the rules. Welcome to the site!
It stands for ArmaLite Rifle 15.
So, is it an assault weapon rifle?
Based on the quizlet, that boy seems rather guilty.
I may watch the movie to get a better idea, though.
Congratulations! I still think Pro was on the right track, though ;)
Wait a minute, are you saying that ice cream consumption doesn't cause shark attacks?
Thank you, sir! I thought of that argument after pondering on the "my body, my choice" argument.
Meh, yes and no. They are connected. I wouldn't say that conjoined twins are one person, would you?
I don't recognize California as being part of the union.
I see. I don't believe they will be removed since they were posted before the ban. His account giving out free wins has really distorted the leaderboard.
Accepting a debate that is an auto full forfeit because of a ban? That's poor conduct....
Yeah, man. Like when people say illegal immigrants are good for our economy because they make tomatoes slightly cheaper, but then never mention the billions of dollars they use up in welfare programs every year.
Thanks for the best debate experience that I have ever had! Amazing debate, and in my opinion, it was a toss up.
I don't know if that is the reason behind it. It was mine. Also the torso is a larger target.
I'm a bit surprised aiming that aiming at the brain didn't come up. I think from a practical perspective, it would kill the fastest. Perhaps I was a bit emotional, but I didn't want the family to need a closed casket funeral.
Thanks for taking the time to publish a vote! I greatly appreciate your input!
But, like.... the cattle version.
Nah fam, it's the Chupacabre.
This seems a like a niche topic, which is probably why people aren't accepting.
I think you're forgetting the third: half-eaten gogurt tube.
Wait a minute, bro. You are for gun control, but now you're citing the Founders. Doesn't that also make you a hypocrite?
Thanks for the vote! It was very detailed, and I appreciate you taking all that time to confer your opinion!
Boy, you're about as sharp as a marble and have an ego larger than RM. You're pathetic.