oh bullshit religion is completely unsupported conjecture ask yourself what are most sceintists atheists/ and why athesits on average have iqus 20 points higher than the devout and why atheists know the bible better than the average church goer because we know its all bullshit and you like being a stupid little sheep
why does it have to, whats so important about the constitution there is nothing in the constitution that prevents us from avioding foreign entanglements either where in the constittuion does it say we have to stick our nose into everyones business? see what i did there? ther eis nothing in the contittution saying we have to go around the world playing police man either
the less relgious a nation is the more succeful it is relgion is uselss and false https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/atheists-countries-list-six-world-most-convinced-a6946291.html
Description: When incomprehensible jargon or plain incoherent gibberish is used to give the appearance of a strong argument, in place of evidence or valid reasons to accept the argument.
Argument by Gibberish - Logically Fallacious
Description: When incomprehensible jargon or plain incoherent gibberish is used to give the appearance of a strong argument, in place of evidence or valid reasons to accept the argument.
Argument by Gibberish - Logically Fallacious
pro is using the fallacy of jargon Description: When incomprehensible jargon or plain incoherent gibberish is used to give the appearance of a strong argument, in place of evidence or valid reasons to accept the argument.
Argument by Gibberish - Logically Fallacious
Washington dedicates a large part of his farewell address to discussing foreign relations and the dangers of permanent alliances between the United States and foreign nations, which he views as foreign entanglements.[9] This issue dominated national politics during the French Revolutionary Wars between France and Britain. Federalists favored Britain and the Jeffersonian Republicans favored France. The Republicans wanted the U.S. to honor the 1778 Treaty of Alliance and to aid France, while the Federalists favored an alliance with Britain. Washington had avoided American involvement in the conflict by issuing the Proclamation of Neutrality, which in turn led to the Neutrality Act of 1794. He tries to further explain his approach to foreign policy and alliances in this portion of the address.
Washington advocates a policy of good faith and justice towards all nations, again making reference to proper behavior based upon religious doctrine and morality. He urges the American people to avoid long-term friendly relations or rivalries with any nation, arguing that attachments with or animosity toward other nations will only cloud the government's judgment in its foreign policy. He argues that longstanding poor relations will only lead to unnecessary wars due to a tendency to blow minor offenses out of proportion when committed by nations viewed as enemies of the United States. He continues this argument by claiming that alliances are likely to draw the United States into wars which have no justification and no benefit to the country beyond simply defending the favored nation. Alliances, he warns, often lead to poor relations with nations who feel that they are not being treated as well as America's allies, and threaten to influence the American government into making decisions based upon the will of their allies instead of the will of the American people.
George Washington's farewell address is a letter written by President George Washington as a valedictory to "friends and fellow-citizens" after 20 years of public service to the United States.[1] He wrote it near the end of his second term of presidency before retiring to his home at Mount Vernon in Virginia.
The letter was first published as The Address of Gen. Washington to the People of America on His Declining the Presidency of the United States in the American Daily Advertiser on September 19, 1796, about ten weeks before the presidential electors cast their votes in the 1796 election. It is a classic statement of republicanism,[2] warning Americans of the political dangers which they must avoid if they are to remain true to their values. It was almost immediately reprinted in newspapers throughout the country, and later in pamphlet form.[3]
The first draft was originally prepared by James Madison in June 1792, as Washington contemplated retiring at the end of his first term in office.[4] However, he set it aside and ran for a second term because of heated disputes between Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson which convinced Washington that the growing tensions would rip apart the country without his leadership. This included the state of foreign affairs, and divisions between the newly formed Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties.[5]
As his second term came to a close four years later, Washington prepared a revision of the original letter with the help of Hamilton to announce his intention to decline a third term in office. He reflects on the emerging issues of the American political landscape in 1796, expresses his support for the government eight years after the adoption of the Constitution, defends his administration's record, and gives valedictory advice to the American people.[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington%27s_Farewell_Address
France has more soft power France becomes the world No 1 for soft power France is the most powerful nation in the world. At least, it is when it comes to a certain type of power.
The election of President Emmanuel Macron has propelled France to the top of the Soft Power league table. Macron and his centrist government have leapfrogged the United Kingdom, United States, Germany and Canada to claim first place in the annual ranking of countries’ soft power.
Since the results were announced, President Macron's distinctive take on diplomacy has seen him give a live horse to China's President Xi Jinping and lend the Bayeux Tapestry to the UK for the first time in history. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/07/france-new-world-leader-in-soft-power/
do not make excuses, thats wont work later on in life learn now to accept respsibility or people wont take your seriously, and i know from experience so do as i say not as i du du du
he dialetical materialsim and historical materialsim , in your words phases of socialism were "invented' not by mao but by the father of communism MARX
that was debunked the person who did the so called study admitted he did it for glory kinda proves that most scientiest dont do it for moeny everyone came after him, the vast majority of scintiest i know are kind sperg, thye dont care about fame or money they live in their own self contained eality looking for truth
again if you want to do this white people are the most law abiding members of society 10% of the popualtion commit 90% of the crime and that 10% aint white folks okay, you want people to get proviked dont you? a disroportionate amount of violence and crime and terrisim coe from minorites, if you look at ethno states of northern europe at least before the muslsims should up there was virtually no crime
look i dont want to do this but the homicide rate among backs is 8 time that of whites and hispanics its about 3 times whites as a rule per capita have much lower rates of crime, compare crime rates in suburbs to urbanareas filled with minorities what do you find? homicide rates about 5 to ten times highers, i mean i dont want to be racist but i think you wanted to provoke thjis.. sure white commit most of the crime we are a bigger part of the population in per capital terms white people are like 90% mor elaw abing than any mornority maybe that because of income but , lets stick with facts white peole built the nation and most of the crime comes from minority populations terrists acts kill what a few dozen more blacks get killed by other blacks than they do by nazis and most white people arent in extremist poaitical groups
first you have to prove there is a god, the fact our bodies might work fairly well is not proof of a diety and besides explain my diabetes and artrities? god didnt do a very good job than
poison doesnt double your life expectancy, aborted fetuss are a non sequitor who cares about dead babies i dontckill them al all they do is cry and poop
i've come to the conclusion you are either stupid or delusional nothing you say proves there is a god, you must know that, and aborted fetus are good eating if stewedwith tomatoes and onions
oh bullshit religion is completely unsupported conjecture ask yourself what are most sceintists atheists/ and why athesits on average have iqus 20 points higher than the devout and why atheists know the bible better than the average church goer because we know its all bullshit and you like being a stupid little sheep
thats because it was a stupid question
why does it have to, whats so important about the constitution there is nothing in the constitution that prevents us from avioding foreign entanglements either where in the constittuion does it say we have to stick our nose into everyones business? see what i did there? ther eis nothing in the contittution saying we have to go around the world playing police man either
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCvsrJ1QF60 happy has to do with security and free time not necessarily lots of stuff
the less relgious a nation is the more succeful it is relgion is uselss and false https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/atheists-countries-list-six-world-most-convinced-a6946291.html
None of the factors you point to as prove of god are anything of the sort , there are plenty of logical alternatives to an invisible boogey man
no you dont all you have is psuedo science and an invisible god you jerk off to god is dead science is real and you sir are a fraud
Description: When incomprehensible jargon or plain incoherent gibberish is used to give the appearance of a strong argument, in place of evidence or valid reasons to accept the argument.
Argument by Gibberish - Logically Fallacious
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com › tools › LogicalFallacies › Argument-b...
Description: When incomprehensible jargon or plain incoherent gibberish is used to give the appearance of a strong argument, in place of evidence or valid reasons to accept the argument.
Argument by Gibberish - Logically Fallacious
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com › tools › LogicalFallacies › Argument-b...
pro is using the fallacy of jargon Description: When incomprehensible jargon or plain incoherent gibberish is used to give the appearance of a strong argument, in place of evidence or valid reasons to accept the argument.
Argument by Gibberish - Logically Fallacious
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com › tools › LogicalFallacies › Argument-b...
an absurd nonsequitor dna that is too smilar causes defects so on the contrary this does prove evolution solidly
come on wussies fight me!
before you can atribute feelings to god will you have to prove god exists and you cant you pretend to but you dont
oh tay
Washington dedicates a large part of his farewell address to discussing foreign relations and the dangers of permanent alliances between the United States and foreign nations, which he views as foreign entanglements.[9] This issue dominated national politics during the French Revolutionary Wars between France and Britain. Federalists favored Britain and the Jeffersonian Republicans favored France. The Republicans wanted the U.S. to honor the 1778 Treaty of Alliance and to aid France, while the Federalists favored an alliance with Britain. Washington had avoided American involvement in the conflict by issuing the Proclamation of Neutrality, which in turn led to the Neutrality Act of 1794. He tries to further explain his approach to foreign policy and alliances in this portion of the address.
Washington advocates a policy of good faith and justice towards all nations, again making reference to proper behavior based upon religious doctrine and morality. He urges the American people to avoid long-term friendly relations or rivalries with any nation, arguing that attachments with or animosity toward other nations will only cloud the government's judgment in its foreign policy. He argues that longstanding poor relations will only lead to unnecessary wars due to a tendency to blow minor offenses out of proportion when committed by nations viewed as enemies of the United States. He continues this argument by claiming that alliances are likely to draw the United States into wars which have no justification and no benefit to the country beyond simply defending the favored nation. Alliances, he warns, often lead to poor relations with nations who feel that they are not being treated as well as America's allies, and threaten to influence the American government into making decisions based upon the will of their allies instead of the will of the American people.
George Washington's farewell address is a letter written by President George Washington as a valedictory to "friends and fellow-citizens" after 20 years of public service to the United States.[1] He wrote it near the end of his second term of presidency before retiring to his home at Mount Vernon in Virginia.
The letter was first published as The Address of Gen. Washington to the People of America on His Declining the Presidency of the United States in the American Daily Advertiser on September 19, 1796, about ten weeks before the presidential electors cast their votes in the 1796 election. It is a classic statement of republicanism,[2] warning Americans of the political dangers which they must avoid if they are to remain true to their values. It was almost immediately reprinted in newspapers throughout the country, and later in pamphlet form.[3]
The first draft was originally prepared by James Madison in June 1792, as Washington contemplated retiring at the end of his first term in office.[4] However, he set it aside and ran for a second term because of heated disputes between Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson which convinced Washington that the growing tensions would rip apart the country without his leadership. This included the state of foreign affairs, and divisions between the newly formed Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties.[5]
As his second term came to a close four years later, Washington prepared a revision of the original letter with the help of Hamilton to announce his intention to decline a third term in office. He reflects on the emerging issues of the American political landscape in 1796, expresses his support for the government eight years after the adoption of the Constitution, defends his administration's record, and gives valedictory advice to the American people.[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington%27s_Farewell_Address
cowards
i dont know what happend i will no fofeit again, its strange, it didnt show up on my radar i was ding too much no excuse, carry on
Your arguments are non sequitors
conduct forfieture hello?
and the economy? its not good for the majority obamas economy was better
you did not win
who did what? wtf?
France has more soft power France becomes the world No 1 for soft power France is the most powerful nation in the world. At least, it is when it comes to a certain type of power.
The election of President Emmanuel Macron has propelled France to the top of the Soft Power league table. Macron and his centrist government have leapfrogged the United Kingdom, United States, Germany and Canada to claim first place in the annual ranking of countries’ soft power.
Since the results were announced, President Macron's distinctive take on diplomacy has seen him give a live horse to China's President Xi Jinping and lend the Bayeux Tapestry to the UK for the first time in history. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/07/france-new-world-leader-in-soft-power/
you cant prove god just because you have five fingers and toes, how do you explain birth defects of perfectly blameless kids
i want to point out that i recieved a 7 day ban in face book for blaming wite people for terrisim
so all of a sudden the priciples of the founders are NOT universal? so then can we finally get rid of th second amndment by the same reasoing?
isnt copy and past fine as long as ii sight the source? which i did
conduct
both china and Vietnam have significant state industryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Government-owned_companies_of_Vietnam
https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/state-owned-enterprises-are-hard-habit-china-doesnt-want-break
do not make excuses, thats wont work later on in life learn now to accept respsibility or people wont take your seriously, and i know from experience so do as i say not as i du du du
ideal or not prosperity is what we are debating about
moon is closer no brainer
okay i did now what? how do i get my votes?
he dialetical materialsim and historical materialsim , in your words phases of socialism were "invented' not by mao but by the father of communism MARX
that was debunked the person who did the so called study admitted he did it for glory kinda proves that most scientiest dont do it for moeny everyone came after him, the vast majority of scintiest i know are kind sperg, thye dont care about fame or money they live in their own self contained eality looking for truth
better
cool
honest?
i was right this is just troling
again if you want to do this white people are the most law abiding members of society 10% of the popualtion commit 90% of the crime and that 10% aint white folks okay, you want people to get proviked dont you? a disroportionate amount of violence and crime and terrisim coe from minorites, if you look at ethno states of northern europe at least before the muslsims should up there was virtually no crime
look i dont want to do this but the homicide rate among backs is 8 time that of whites and hispanics its about 3 times whites as a rule per capita have much lower rates of crime, compare crime rates in suburbs to urbanareas filled with minorities what do you find? homicide rates about 5 to ten times highers, i mean i dont want to be racist but i think you wanted to provoke thjis.. sure white commit most of the crime we are a bigger part of the population in per capital terms white people are like 90% mor elaw abing than any mornority maybe that because of income but , lets stick with facts white peole built the nation and most of the crime comes from minority populations terrists acts kill what a few dozen more blacks get killed by other blacks than they do by nazis and most white people arent in extremist poaitical groups
even slower so you might pay heed, no its an incorrect statement inaccurate at best
first you have to prove there is a god, the fact our bodies might work fairly well is not proof of a diety and besides explain my diabetes and artrities? god didnt do a very good job than
i say its a toss up
conservatives and classical liberals fight for small government socialists fight for big government god know i do!
not all the white people just like not all islams
opponent bad conduct forfiet just sayin
poison doesnt double your life expectancy, aborted fetuss are a non sequitor who cares about dead babies i dontckill them al all they do is cry and poop
i've come to the conclusion you are either stupid or delusional nothing you say proves there is a god, you must know that, and aborted fetus are good eating if stewedwith tomatoes and onions