User_2006

Well that is meant to be ironic, so it doesn’t count. Nevertheless this is nothing useful.

I want opinions. Positive things only. If you are here to laugh or insult me in any way, go somewhere else. 

July 20, 1969: Rewrite: Several white guys who used a vehicle that significantly pollutes the world have landed on a rock that only a little group of rich elites care about. 

Yea that's the moon landing :)

I know one thing: Games are getting less and less linear. From the beginning, you can do one quest at a time, one level at a time, and now many games are literally open world. 

Well, in a strict and conservative definition, MC creative is still not a "Game". However it is marketed as one. 

Ohh is that a false dilemma. I smell it from miles away. 

OK. 

I might have to think about this one. I was surfing reddit all day after I got a reddit account, and since there is no argument due, my interest wasn't keeping on here, thus I am missing large bodies of information that would be useful. Might take me a few units of time to read and comprehend. 

It might be that I am just ignorant, but I will ask in what definition?

Bump post to make the ongoing game hot again because someone posted in another game that has already ended. 

So, there is no evidence that I am mafia? The link is not helpful in anyway.

Of what I think, I think Crocodile is probably Town, and RM is too hard to be read. 

At this time, since everybody is vtling supadudz at dp1, nothing useful is extracted at the message. 

I am going to play it safe here. 

I'd like AI to judge every debate. There are occasions where people just don't vote at all, If I'd lose in that it is still ok, but if I'd win it it would be unfair. 

By all means I am no rapper, but the first one is claims without proof. 

I think I have done all of these before. 

Well, it is not, it is more like building a friendship with anthropomorphic animals. That is not even close to what you think it is. 

I would not let my horses' accessories being lit on fire, huh?

Silence is the best form of message. 

The game doesn't suggest to do anything. Nothing is objective. 

Well, I consider Minecraft a game because there is AN ultimate goal after all: Defeat the ender dragon. Creative mode is more of an interactive environment. 

Meanwhile, ACNH has NO objective goal. You can do whatever you want and there is no reason to exist such a "game". 

I was anticipating people would say, "If it an cartridge, it a game", and I will respond to it saying that you should be able to play a printer because it has CMYK cartridges. 

Well, maybe I have played Zelda games too much, and you know Zelda games are quest-heavy. Anyways, at least Zelda has an objective. Animal crossing is basically an RPG, except without the quest itself. Objectives drives the game, and the game with no objective is mostly an interactive environment. There is no threats and you are just battling with...nothing? Your laziness? Whatever the hell.

Animal crossing is an interactive environment. It is borderline not even a game.

It has zero objectives. You just do whatever you want. In fact, if it is simulating life, then I should be able to die. But no. I am freakin’ immortal! Then what is the use of everything anymore. Tom Nook, the supposed landlord, doesn’t give you a deadline, and there is nothing motivating you to do anything anywhere in any possible way. Everything is driven by desire, and if you wanna do a minimalistic run, well, don’t play the game because you have infinite resources. Every single accessory, the toilet, and radio, etc are pure decorations because you are so omnipotent you won’t even need it.

This game have no reason to exist, if I can even call it a game. There is no objective, and you can’t lose. Deadlines of debts should exist to make the game much appealing to the players.

I feel like I am more likely to become a QFF phoenix in the next 6 months more than any other personalities, idk

Define "Song". If it satisfies me then I will join. 

I remember back then when you are advertising DArt on DDO and your picture is just a bare purple circle under a mono back tone. 

This design is genius. Everyone's colors are different, and the patterns are easy-to-render. So even if you are completely uninterested in uploading a pfp you'd still be identified. I could simply tell the difference between PinkFreud08 and DynamicSquid despite none of those had unique uploaded pfps. 

I get the poems and the positive effects and all, but why does this deserve a forum topic? So far, this sounds too much like a bare monologue. 

If people wanna keep readin' poems, skip over this. I am just plain confused. 

Well it is at least better than pure circles in DDO. 

I don’t care how agnostic you are, but I am too. We won’t know until we know. 

The thing above may be a conspiracy theory or an urban legend, but it is just a hypothesis that may or may not be true supported by evidence that may or may not be true. Thus, it may or may not be true.

You’re absolutely correct, sir.

Does anyone know the answer to this question? Why does Dart use stackExchange style pfp?

I just looked back, and one word to describe my argument is: CRINGE. 

Speaking of which, your profile on DDO says that you are just some poor guy that masturbates to anime girls. Either you are a troll on DDO or you have dark secrets that I am not supposed to know. 

...How?

I remember the story goes like this: Two humans, male and female, called Adam and Eve, were created under God's impression. There was the tree of life and the tree of knowledge in the middle of the two's habitat and God warned them not to eat the fruit on the tree of knowledge. One day Eve ate the fruit on the tree of knowledge and she became smart, and so did Adam. Then God warned them not to eat the fruit on the tree of life, then made them live in a separate habitat. 

The story is not accurately accurate, and no need to point out unless I am missing something vasty giant. 

This can relate to us creating AI. We don't know what it will do when it gets smart and act like humans. Then, we need to make them die because if we don't, they will take over the world just because they want to survive. 

What is more curious is about Jainism. It could be possible that our "God" is the people from the last period. In fact, a tale about ancient giants could be about them. Jainism said that this period began 2,450 years ago, so the ancient Giants could possibly produce "God" because they live for MUCH longer than us, and we could perceive them as immortal. In fact, Jesus might be as intelligent as "God" because it was the descendant of God itself. 

Upon the humans' improvement, it is perfectly reasonable that we could create something smart 20,000 years later. It might be as small and live shorter because it would help us observe how life works easier. the Jain cycle cites the time period after this period of humanity as a lack of religion, and sorrow. Machines simply know how to destroy, and it would be very hard for them to develop a religion because they were machines. The other half-circle could be that instead of locking the newly-produced AI, they give the new AI both the fruit on the tree of wisdom/knowledge and on the tree of life. 

I might be creating an urban legend or I might be exposing what the government is trying to hide from us plebians. Either way, that is interesting. 

You are much more worthier than I thought you'd be. I thought you are just a poor guy that hangs around the forums because you're afraid of debating, but it turns out you are really good if you try. 

Dis one?

There is only one debate that shows your real skill, and your activity and profile show that you are rather into forums. 

I mean, I learned the ability to argue without concrete evidence from RM. He is a master at that. 

Advice about being a better debater?

What is the point? Then there will be overpopulation consider people won't die themselves, then there is brutality just to keep the population in a feasible number. Then reproduction will be discouraged and there lacks variation. Resurrection to spread benevolent truth could be practical, but it will be impractical if enforced on all people. 

This argument is probably flawed and I would like to know what you think.  

I think "He" is describing me. 

So this is just saying I am a tryhard huh

That sounds funny as hell, again this is the purpose. 

Sure, I am prepared for direct roasting. 

I am curious what Mine will look like. I mean, my profile is very arbitrary, but not as arbitrary as Objectivity or Nonjudgemental(Those are actual users). 

If I have no idea that there is concrete evidence making supporting that evidence that supports the resurrection is concrete, I would most likely say no. We are living in an age in which a 20-year-old woman can simply photoshop and make the evidence of an unsolved mystery evolving into urban legends, and people will trust it despite the "evidence" that is actually fabricated. 

As well, Although I do not have evidence that the testimonies in the bible are fake, I clearly don't have evidence that says it is real. It is faith or nothing. There is no assured facts when you are asking a non-christian. 

I am more leaning on NO. I don't think this kind of technology exists millennia ago because we don't have it now. We could theoretically go to Pluto if we want, but is it practical? Not at all. 

I acknoledge the existence of the testimonies, but they may be made-up and I do not consider them as concrete evidence.