First, I will accept your claim of being "below average" since I am just 14 and I am not that experienced yet. Second, even if I am in solipsism, then I could define UFO from my point of view, meaning that if I see something that I don't know what it is but it is flying, it is a UFO with no doubt.
"In their respective environments, they tend to have about the same temperature. However, put them in the same environment, and the one who is more adapted to less warm temperatures (Peach) ends up being hotter."
First off, they never were put in an environment in which they have the same temperature. We agreed to use BoTW and Odyssey as Canon information, and Peach never went to a place as hot as Zelda did. Remember that Zelda has been fighting in the castle, tirelessly or tired, suffering through the hotness of the malice(which burns as painful as the lava) and the monsters(who have fire and bomb arrows). We never specified that we are talking about the inside temperature. We are talking in general. If Zelda has a cod heart but a layer of skin almost burnt off, then Zelda has an overall higher temperature consider the castle is MUCH higher in temperature that would be enough to bring up the temperature.
"Since they are cartoon characters, the brighter they are, the more light they give off. Darker objects tend to be hotter only when no light is given off. When light is given off, the opposite is true. This is why white stars are the hottest type of star and the darker the star in color, the less hot it is."
First off, Peach and Zelda are people, not stars. Peach has more of a white skin than Zelda, plus that Peach wears clothes that are less dull, she would absorb less heat and refract them from her body. Before you ask that that is the same as arguing that Peach is hotter in the guts(which I agree), that is NOT. The heat just reflects off her, meaning that the heat is outside her. Meanwhile, Zelda's heat has been at least on her skin, plus that the heat of the lava/malice is MUCH hotter than one reflected off a pink dress, thus Zelda is still hotter.
"I can’t access the link. Sorry."
Then you'd miss at least 1 point of why Peach is less hot, made by me.
"Peach cheated, but the people who tend to cheat on their spouses tend to be attractive because if you’re unattractive, no one would want to cheat on you, therefore you don’t end up cheating. Not all attractive people cheat, but all people who cheat have to be somewhat attractive, otherwise, they can’t cheat, to begin with. Therefore, Peach’s cheating experience is evidence that she is hotter."
Keep in mind the canon of this debate is BotW and Odyssey. Peach cheated in Sunshine, which was about 15 years ago. Peach before cheating could be hot, but the fact that she DID cheat in the PAST means that Peach is deducted her hotness by just cheating. I have proven Zelda is hotter (attractive) in my 2nd round, and also, comparing a woman who was loyal to the very end(Zelda) versus a spoiled girl who just wanders around and gets assaulted by an evil turtle(Peach), I think the former would prevail in how attractive it is.
You have failed to prove why Zelda was less hot than Peach, and because Zelda is stronger and more independent, it means that Zelda is even hotter than Peach.
This is an example of "You aren't guaranteed to win just because you are correct." Wylted used evidence that are simply wrong, but his opponent used nothing otherwise.
If you want to accept the debate, go for it. However it is very dangerous to use that statement since you can't justify it yourself or use any direct evidence.
"Easy win for Con here. Pro just admitted S.H. was found guilty of killing four people unlawfully. To be found guilty means you are guilty (from a linguistic sense). The debate title is Saddam Huseisen is not guilty. Topic does not say "Should not have been found guilty". and the description does not even qualify that the guilty verdict was in error."
Well, this site is for winning debates, not speaking for the truth, just saying. Hitler can win a debate against many people despite that Hitler's ideologies are simply skewed and incorrect.
I have a question: How is this book written? And how do we obey them? Like no matter how dirty the beef is we can eat it, and no matter how clean the pork is we can't eat it? WHAT?
I don't want to reveal the points I will make on the debate. Are you not going to accept the debate? if you are accepting it, come at me. If you are not accepting this, I will DM my resolution.
My position is that Christianity had done well for humanity because it is a faith that is moral. However under science Christianity is just a road block.
Clever title. However, the students who pray are not arrested, but who forces them to pray should be arrested. It is a school, it ain't no church. I should have the right to pray(although I don't want to now, I should have the right to in case if I want to) for myself, and I should not make anyone pray in a non-religious place, such as school, computer lab, etc.
I understand how good your other points are, but otherwise, your debate is unfair. Your side is "men can eat and make quiche" and mine opposes that.
"Making quiche is the real man part, or real woman, for that matter. Making it is the point, and if you've never made it, you just don't know."
So you are claiming that every single human should make Quiche? I oppose that as
1. I don't like quiche. just personal preferences.
2. I don't need to make a quiche to live a good life. minute-cooked rice suffices.
Ok, that is false. Rosalina lives in the comet observatory, which acts as a fictional ISS. Inside the comet observatory, it is as comfortable as back on earth.
The comet observatory is about 22-28 degrees celsius, which means Rosalina is not as hot as Peach and Zelda with boiling conditions at one point or another.
Rosalina lives in outer space, which is very cold, so she is out of the question. There is no way you are saying that Rosalina is even as hot as any of the two.
I hate to give my position away, but your side is "There SHOULD be rap battles on Dart". it is not "Rap battle should be ALLOWED". Different wording changes. former as to spoonfeeding poison is the latter as to legally allow making poison, but not spoonfeeding it. Unless you are arguing that there absolutely should be rap battles on Dart, then you'd lose.
Look at the title. it is "should" not "could". People can smoke weed but should they? no. I can legally allow marijuana but that does not mean I encourage them.
I would have agreed with con because:
1. Zelda is the only series out of the two to have burn damage, and some places are too hot. If Eldin Death mountain is hot enough to give Link damage, then think that since Zelda is about as strong as Link, she would have burned as well.
2. Peach never goes hot places, only temperate ones, comparable to, let's say, Necluda. The only hot places are the dungeons of Bowser, where Mario never takes damage if he doesn't step on lava.
3. Zelda had always been living in Hyrule Castle, which is temperate for the last 10,000 years, and then Ganon came along, and when Zelda fights Ganon, there is a purple liquid that burns(I am stating BotW, and that means it exists). Zelda could not be careful enough to NEVER step on the purple liquid that burns, and when she steps on it, she will most likely NOT die because BotW Zelda is as strong as a 30-heart Link and BotW Link at Plateau is a dumbed-down version of his former self. Since stepping on the purple liquid burns but not kills, Zelda would endure more heat in the castle.
4. Well, you can say for some kind of time, Peach is trapped in "burning" castles. However, 10,000 hours of just being there still don't kill Peach out of the heat, and we will consider game physics.
5. Mario and Peach are a species, and Link and Zelda are another. Mario can swim in Luncheon kingdom without taking damage unless he IS in the boiling water, and Link takes damage once he ENTERS Eldin, meaning that Link endures less heat than Mario and that relatively, Zelda can endure less heat than Peach. While that would mean that Peach could have been enduring Zelda-levels of exhaustion this whole time, something doesn't make sense.
6. Suppose Peach and Zelda are enduring the same level of heat, then, Zelda is constantly fighting around the castle while Peach is sitting there. Since the heat is the same, and who sweats is hot, Zelda is hotter than Peach based on their newest games(Stop calling U Deluxe, it is the same as U and Odyssey is more comparable, to let's say, BotW).
Fun? Stealing is fun, going on drugs is fun, killing is fun and masturbating is fun for some people, but that doesn't make it good to be done. I believe rap battles aren't debates, just like stealing and smoking weed are not moral behavior.
You literally can't disprove me.
First, I will accept your claim of being "below average" since I am just 14 and I am not that experienced yet. Second, even if I am in solipsism, then I could define UFO from my point of view, meaning that if I see something that I don't know what it is but it is flying, it is a UFO with no doubt.
Nope, you aren't accepting this debate if you aren't going to win, Wylted.
Pvz1 to Pvz2 is Mario Kart 7 to Mario Kart Tour. Good enough analogy.
If you only have one round written, then it would mean that you have a FF, meaning that I will still win.
"In their respective environments, they tend to have about the same temperature. However, put them in the same environment, and the one who is more adapted to less warm temperatures (Peach) ends up being hotter."
First off, they never were put in an environment in which they have the same temperature. We agreed to use BoTW and Odyssey as Canon information, and Peach never went to a place as hot as Zelda did. Remember that Zelda has been fighting in the castle, tirelessly or tired, suffering through the hotness of the malice(which burns as painful as the lava) and the monsters(who have fire and bomb arrows). We never specified that we are talking about the inside temperature. We are talking in general. If Zelda has a cod heart but a layer of skin almost burnt off, then Zelda has an overall higher temperature consider the castle is MUCH higher in temperature that would be enough to bring up the temperature.
"Since they are cartoon characters, the brighter they are, the more light they give off. Darker objects tend to be hotter only when no light is given off. When light is given off, the opposite is true. This is why white stars are the hottest type of star and the darker the star in color, the less hot it is."
First off, Peach and Zelda are people, not stars. Peach has more of a white skin than Zelda, plus that Peach wears clothes that are less dull, she would absorb less heat and refract them from her body. Before you ask that that is the same as arguing that Peach is hotter in the guts(which I agree), that is NOT. The heat just reflects off her, meaning that the heat is outside her. Meanwhile, Zelda's heat has been at least on her skin, plus that the heat of the lava/malice is MUCH hotter than one reflected off a pink dress, thus Zelda is still hotter.
"I can’t access the link. Sorry."
Then you'd miss at least 1 point of why Peach is less hot, made by me.
"Peach cheated, but the people who tend to cheat on their spouses tend to be attractive because if you’re unattractive, no one would want to cheat on you, therefore you don’t end up cheating. Not all attractive people cheat, but all people who cheat have to be somewhat attractive, otherwise, they can’t cheat, to begin with. Therefore, Peach’s cheating experience is evidence that she is hotter."
Keep in mind the canon of this debate is BotW and Odyssey. Peach cheated in Sunshine, which was about 15 years ago. Peach before cheating could be hot, but the fact that she DID cheat in the PAST means that Peach is deducted her hotness by just cheating. I have proven Zelda is hotter (attractive) in my 2nd round, and also, comparing a woman who was loyal to the very end(Zelda) versus a spoiled girl who just wanders around and gets assaulted by an evil turtle(Peach), I think the former would prevail in how attractive it is.
You have failed to prove why Zelda was less hot than Peach, and because Zelda is stronger and more independent, it means that Zelda is even hotter than Peach.
I think it is him who made the error, not me.
This is an example of "You aren't guaranteed to win just because you are correct." Wylted used evidence that are simply wrong, but his opponent used nothing otherwise.
"Not encouraged" doesn't mean "discouraged". If I like the color black it doesn't mean I hate the color white.
I understand how christianity works, but you can't prove God's existence without adding water into it.
If you want to accept the debate, go for it. However it is very dangerous to use that statement since you can't justify it yourself or use any direct evidence.
I don't want a user who just FF's and feed me points. Give me some somewhat-worthy debaters.
No, I don't want idiots having my debates. That ruins all the fun. If I can get a win against someone who has 1600 rankings, that is what is fun.
I am not telling you. I might be brave enough, but I will be a gigantic laughing stock if I tell you what am I planning to do.
Abusive? The definition is given in the description section.
how is the flood a fairy tale. Like no matter how fake it is it is not a fairytale smh
"Easy win for Con here. Pro just admitted S.H. was found guilty of killing four people unlawfully. To be found guilty means you are guilty (from a linguistic sense). The debate title is Saddam Huseisen is not guilty. Topic does not say "Should not have been found guilty". and the description does not even qualify that the guilty verdict was in error."
Well, this site is for winning debates, not speaking for the truth, just saying. Hitler can win a debate against many people despite that Hitler's ideologies are simply skewed and incorrect.
I have a question: How is this book written? And how do we obey them? Like no matter how dirty the beef is we can eat it, and no matter how clean the pork is we can't eat it? WHAT?
Wait, you can actually type no words in and the website still registers it as an argument?
I think the quote on the bottom is made-up consider it matches no results on the internet.
"Never instigate as con mother fuckers. It is dumb, just reword it to be a pro statement"
Ask the admins and Debateart.Org the user please. It is 0 use to ask us.
Also, FF means all points to the person that didn't commit FF, right?
Well, it is highly unlikely he will win this debate because the opportunity is smaller, but he still can if he has more evidence and facts.
You are on the PRO side of the debate, you realize that, right?
Ok then...thanks.
I can't believe I am even saying this right now, but this guy is no normal guy. He "rose from the dead" because he is moral by the old standards.
Does? well not "does". More like "did".
I don't want to reveal the points I will make on the debate. Are you not going to accept the debate? if you are accepting it, come at me. If you are not accepting this, I will DM my resolution.
Why is this correct?
For the sake of logic and morality, please don't.
Thank you.
My position is that Christianity had done well for humanity because it is a faith that is moral. However under science Christianity is just a road block.
That is almost a free win.
Clever title. However, the students who pray are not arrested, but who forces them to pray should be arrested. It is a school, it ain't no church. I should have the right to pray(although I don't want to now, I should have the right to in case if I want to) for myself, and I should not make anyone pray in a non-religious place, such as school, computer lab, etc.
Alec is MUCH more experienced than you are, so shut yourself and see us debate.
I understand how good your other points are, but otherwise, your debate is unfair. Your side is "men can eat and make quiche" and mine opposes that.
"Making quiche is the real man part, or real woman, for that matter. Making it is the point, and if you've never made it, you just don't know."
So you are claiming that every single human should make Quiche? I oppose that as
1. I don't like quiche. just personal preferences.
2. I don't need to make a quiche to live a good life. minute-cooked rice suffices.
Am I wrong? Truth sometimes hurts.
I agree with con, but Let's see if anyone takes pro and prevails.
Ok, that is false. Rosalina lives in the comet observatory, which acts as a fictional ISS. Inside the comet observatory, it is as comfortable as back on earth.
The comet observatory is about 22-28 degrees celsius, which means Rosalina is not as hot as Peach and Zelda with boiling conditions at one point or another.
Rosalina lives in outer space, which is very cold, so she is out of the question. There is no way you are saying that Rosalina is even as hot as any of the two.
say no more
Thank you Nevets. You are helping me grow as a debater.
Thank you, that should be better
Thanks. You guys are helping me grow as a debater!
I hate to give my position away, but your side is "There SHOULD be rap battles on Dart". it is not "Rap battle should be ALLOWED". Different wording changes. former as to spoonfeeding poison is the latter as to legally allow making poison, but not spoonfeeding it. Unless you are arguing that there absolutely should be rap battles on Dart, then you'd lose.
Look at the title. it is "should" not "could". People can smoke weed but should they? no. I can legally allow marijuana but that does not mean I encourage them.
Because my opponents had avoided my inquiry with pre-made and pre-refuted points instead of going head-on, I think I get the point.
Wanna take this debate? well, I am nervous if you do, but you will get a GG from the back of me.
I would have agreed with con because:
1. Zelda is the only series out of the two to have burn damage, and some places are too hot. If Eldin Death mountain is hot enough to give Link damage, then think that since Zelda is about as strong as Link, she would have burned as well.
2. Peach never goes hot places, only temperate ones, comparable to, let's say, Necluda. The only hot places are the dungeons of Bowser, where Mario never takes damage if he doesn't step on lava.
3. Zelda had always been living in Hyrule Castle, which is temperate for the last 10,000 years, and then Ganon came along, and when Zelda fights Ganon, there is a purple liquid that burns(I am stating BotW, and that means it exists). Zelda could not be careful enough to NEVER step on the purple liquid that burns, and when she steps on it, she will most likely NOT die because BotW Zelda is as strong as a 30-heart Link and BotW Link at Plateau is a dumbed-down version of his former self. Since stepping on the purple liquid burns but not kills, Zelda would endure more heat in the castle.
4. Well, you can say for some kind of time, Peach is trapped in "burning" castles. However, 10,000 hours of just being there still don't kill Peach out of the heat, and we will consider game physics.
5. Mario and Peach are a species, and Link and Zelda are another. Mario can swim in Luncheon kingdom without taking damage unless he IS in the boiling water, and Link takes damage once he ENTERS Eldin, meaning that Link endures less heat than Mario and that relatively, Zelda can endure less heat than Peach. While that would mean that Peach could have been enduring Zelda-levels of exhaustion this whole time, something doesn't make sense.
6. Suppose Peach and Zelda are enduring the same level of heat, then, Zelda is constantly fighting around the castle while Peach is sitting there. Since the heat is the same, and who sweats is hot, Zelda is hotter than Peach based on their newest games(Stop calling U Deluxe, it is the same as U and Odyssey is more comparable, to let's say, BotW).
Fun? Stealing is fun, going on drugs is fun, killing is fun and masturbating is fun for some people, but that doesn't make it good to be done. I believe rap battles aren't debates, just like stealing and smoking weed are not moral behavior.