Well, that was a lot.
Sorry for not analyzing all of the first website you linked for me at the end, its a lot, and repeats the same points anyway.
The second website I dont think would do much better.
Besides, summer for me is almost over.
If women arent reliable, despite likely having tangible evidence besides themselves (I have mentioned they are around other women, who may or may not be true to their statements), then how so men? Men arent around women all the time.
Since you want concrete examples, that I will provide in the debate you invited me to.
If a woman were to be in the debate, she can use herself as evidence against what you said, as well as providing experience of what she sees, since she would be around other women. And her, having similar anatomy and thinking patterns as dictated by culture, can understand where a woman might be coming from.
For example, you can argue women are paranoid because they always bring pepper spray with them.
A woman can explain her experience, as well as other women's on why they bring pepper spray everywhere. Because its dangerous, especially in the city, and if she's alone, she'll probs want more than pepper spray.
Your statement is quite generalized without any exceptions, so any woman, should she be in a debate, can provide examples that dont support that.
If the debaters are men, they can only assume the reasoning behind everything "women" as a collective group do. Even other women would have to assume a little bit, but at least they're more likely to be correct. Imagine if two women were to debate on why men always treat their gfs so badly. Since they're not men, it's unfair. What would they know about being a man and what culture expects of them?
Since this debate is on feminism, womens rights can be discussed as well by either side.
Given how similar both religions are, this would be interesting if we ever discuss about them.
Thank you for joining this debate. Since you are Muslim, you should be able to present actual trachings from the Quran, rather than rant on how sexist and stupid both religions are.
Good luck on this debate. I hopee neither of us will have ill will towards each other by the time arguments close.
As a christian, i would say avoiding sin isnt a requirement to being saved, because there are many people that try to do that and are still going to hell.
Since you appear to not be catholic (based on your response to one), i hope we can both agree that although faith is the requirement, a lack of an attempt to avoid sin is evidence that there was no faith, rather than an excuse to not sin. In fact, if you're looking for excuses to sin, you dont love God.
Yes I am a christian, i realized my stupid mistake when you published your argument. I thought you were taking the con side, so that was why I joined the debate, so I could argue for the pro side, which wasnt what happened.
I do agree with your point of view, Jesus was in the Bible everywhere, and perhaps even the Holy Spirit had a few mentions in the Old Testament as well.
But that wouldnt be a fun debate. So I will assume the point of view of the Muslim or atheist just for this debate.
Alrighty, just published my argument, i dont get notifications and we may be in different time zones, so if you need a scheduled time when I need to respond, you can tell me that. Otherwise, you'll have to either wait and check everyday or forfeit the round.
If the time is scheduled, make sure it is a range (2:00 pm-3:00PM PDT for example) because I can be busy, forget, or take too long to come up with a response. This argument has taken me about an hour or two to finish. It sucks using a phone for typing sometimes.
Man i shouldve been in this debate.
Good luck to pro
Camt do the debate, but this would be interesting to read, esp because gun control is a tag, and because of pro's pfp
Sorry for not seeing this earlier. I was really busy with school.
I would love to see your argument. Had you posted it, you wouldve won, assuming that it was done well.
Well, that didnt go how I wanted to. I will admit I was quite childish towards the end.
It was 12 AM and I was rushing to finish my argument.
Hopefully I will improve my conduct next time.
Well, that was a lot.
Sorry for not analyzing all of the first website you linked for me at the end, its a lot, and repeats the same points anyway.
The second website I dont think would do much better.
Besides, summer for me is almost over.
If women arent reliable, despite likely having tangible evidence besides themselves (I have mentioned they are around other women, who may or may not be true to their statements), then how so men? Men arent around women all the time.
Since you want concrete examples, that I will provide in the debate you invited me to.
If a woman were to be in the debate, she can use herself as evidence against what you said, as well as providing experience of what she sees, since she would be around other women. And her, having similar anatomy and thinking patterns as dictated by culture, can understand where a woman might be coming from.
For example, you can argue women are paranoid because they always bring pepper spray with them.
A woman can explain her experience, as well as other women's on why they bring pepper spray everywhere. Because its dangerous, especially in the city, and if she's alone, she'll probs want more than pepper spray.
Your statement is quite generalized without any exceptions, so any woman, should she be in a debate, can provide examples that dont support that.
If the debaters are men, they can only assume the reasoning behind everything "women" as a collective group do. Even other women would have to assume a little bit, but at least they're more likely to be correct. Imagine if two women were to debate on why men always treat their gfs so badly. Since they're not men, it's unfair. What would they know about being a man and what culture expects of them?
Alrighty, Im more careful this time, Im actually against this statement.
Oh shoot, I thought you were on the pro side, I forfeit
Since this debate is on feminism, womens rights can be discussed as well by either side.
Given how similar both religions are, this would be interesting if we ever discuss about them.
Thank you for joining this debate. Since you are Muslim, you should be able to present actual trachings from the Quran, rather than rant on how sexist and stupid both religions are.
Good luck on this debate. I hopee neither of us will have ill will towards each other by the time arguments close.
Unless if a woman is on either side of the debate, I dont think this debate is fair
Eh, its ok, I wont make any new arguments until you made one
In one line where I said "the word homosexual does the same thing," I meant "bisexual," not homosexual
As a christian, i would say avoiding sin isnt a requirement to being saved, because there are many people that try to do that and are still going to hell.
Since you appear to not be catholic (based on your response to one), i hope we can both agree that although faith is the requirement, a lack of an attempt to avoid sin is evidence that there was no faith, rather than an excuse to not sin. In fact, if you're looking for excuses to sin, you dont love God.
Yes I am a christian, i realized my stupid mistake when you published your argument. I thought you were taking the con side, so that was why I joined the debate, so I could argue for the pro side, which wasnt what happened.
I do agree with your point of view, Jesus was in the Bible everywhere, and perhaps even the Holy Spirit had a few mentions in the Old Testament as well.
But that wouldnt be a fun debate. So I will assume the point of view of the Muslim or atheist just for this debate.
Alrighty, just published my argument, i dont get notifications and we may be in different time zones, so if you need a scheduled time when I need to respond, you can tell me that. Otherwise, you'll have to either wait and check everyday or forfeit the round.
If the time is scheduled, make sure it is a range (2:00 pm-3:00PM PDT for example) because I can be busy, forget, or take too long to come up with a response. This argument has taken me about an hour or two to finish. It sucks using a phone for typing sometimes.