In photos: Climate change, disasters and displacement
01 January 2015
Since 2009, an estimated one person every second has been displaced by a disaster, with an average of 22.5 million people displaced by climate- or weather-related events since 2008 (IDMC 2015). Disasters and slow onsets, such as droughts in Somalia in 2011 and 2012, floods in Pakistan between 2010 and 2012, and the earthquake in Nepal in 2015, can leave huge numbers of people traumatized without shelter, clean water and basic supplies.
You have turned this whole site into an anti-logic backwards thinking nincompoop site.
Quote -"The remainder of his opening round appears to be stating there is more than one particle in the universe, repeatedly using plurals, and saying that the universe has three particles. It was completely unclear throughout the specifics of what pro was arguing, leave alone what his justification was."
You can't read, you can't understand, you have no logic, no sense, no understanding, no memory. You are just a walking corpse of vitriolic nonsense.
You are a complete waste of valuable space. We should all declare a national holiday the day that you die as the world will be a much better place.
I clearly proved that con had lied in round 4 by his quoting that "20 million people were displaced by rising seas". This claim was fraudulent because his own reference stated that the displacement was caused by land subsidence and not by rising seas. That proves that con doesn't read his own references and that con is just a bare faced liar. By voting for con, you have joined the scum bag parade of liars and of which includes Maurice Strong who spent his last days hiding in China trying to avoid accusations of embezzlement and fraud.
Note - Its your comment that is messy. The debate was well structured and logical. Whereas, your assessment of the debate was illogical, biased, confused, faulty and messy.
I proved that con was a fraud in round 5. Thus, you can't vote for a fraud. Hint for people with low IQs - (He used false information as does the IPCC.)
Still waiting for the IPCC's claim that climate change will cause 50 million refugees by 2010. To this date, there have been zero climate change refugees. Thus, all the climate change predictions are total nonsense.
Quote - "This is *not* a debate on capitalism vs socialism, not is it about any socialist alternatives to environmental protection,"
If you put capitalism in the title, then, the debate is automatically preset to be about the only alternative which is socialism. Thus, you are a complete twit who doesn't have any inkling about politics or language usage. I wouldn't debate with a twit. Note - Communism is all about creating unfair rules and blocking fair play. Thus, I can see why you did this. lol
Quote from your biography - "Likes dungeons and Dragons and play mafia". Thus you are an "F" wit. and you hate Trump. Thus, you are a left wing communist deviate and 'climate changer' and useless bludger on society. Your comment is just an irrational nonsense hysterical reaction to your fanatical and religious like beliefs.
Yet still, even after quoting the exact words, you are still far, far away from reality. You have to prove that I said that CO2, quote "caused" clouds. Never stated. Only in your sick and demented juvenile mind.
Copy of an email sent from ramsutu to ragnar. (from Debategate scam.com)
"Hey rags, don't forgot to vote for me tomorrow. I have set up the same old scam of adding the word "dropped" at every possible occasion to give the false impression that I have won lots of free points. Just be sure to mention this so I can get an easy win as per our usual agreement." You'll get your usual reward later. I have to put some ointment on my lips first because last time I got a bit chafed"
Quote - "given that if CO2 caused nothing but clouds"
This was never stated in the debate which is evidence that you didn't even read the debate. Thus, you are a fraud and need to be expelled from all debating sites and put into a maximum security prison where you can't cause any further damage and harm to society.
Quote "U donn hav da skiel toe argoo". lol Whoooa!!! What kind of retarded cretins inhabit this site anyway? I don't think I'll be debating here anymore.
If I had said that a statement was rude, obnoxious or stupid. Then you would have just said that it was a personal opinion and thus, didn't carry any weight because you only value peer reviewed and other nonsense documents.
To me, the term "dropped" its vulgar, uncultured, abrupt, insensitive, moronic, childish and immature. Thus, if the profile fits, then wear it.
Note - Just because somebody didn't mention a subject again doesn't necessarily mean that they have given up or lost that point to the other party. Thus, using the word "dropped" rudely assumes that the debater has given up on that point which would be a false or presumptuous conclusion.
In your case, I didn't mention it again because your reply was probably (a) obnoxious (b) childish (c) or stupid. Thus, I didn't see any further reason to repeat it again. When debating you deal with the supplied information as is and don't go looking for dirt that you can dig up on the suppliers credentials. All that matters is that the information is correct. The source is irrelevant. The peer review system is utter nonsense and corruption gone crazy as I have already proven in the forum section.
The term "dropped" is a crude and rude terminology that only an immature and uncouth teenager would use. Thus, your poor use and abuse of language gives me an accurate personality profile. Not good!
No rebuttal of Nils-axel Morner's report Con? That's a shame!
No rebuttal of the wild 50 million people displacement scare tatics con? That's a shame too.
Oh, I forgot to mention the fraud that you committed when you defended the 50 million displaced people which you included 22.5 million people displaced by subduction, not seas level rising. Note - Fraud is a 10 year jail sentence in my country Con. See you in court Con. I have the evidence right here. lol
How many fools are there on planet Earth anyway?
I am sure that both you and ramshutu could get real good roles in the Walking Dead Series............ as zombies. lol
To ramshutu
You had entered the data in good faith that it was all about rising sea levels. If it was about droughts and wars, then the data is fraudulent.
Still telling even more lies? lol
Quote round 4 Ref 9
In photos: Climate change, disasters and displacement
01 January 2015
Since 2009, an estimated one person every second has been displaced by a disaster, with an average of 22.5 million people displaced by climate- or weather-related events since 2008 (IDMC 2015). Disasters and slow onsets, such as droughts in Somalia in 2011 and 2012, floods in Pakistan between 2010 and 2012, and the earthquake in Nepal in 2015, can leave huge numbers of people traumatized without shelter, clean water and basic supplies.
You have turned this whole site into an anti-logic backwards thinking nincompoop site.
Quote -"The remainder of his opening round appears to be stating there is more than one particle in the universe, repeatedly using plurals, and saying that the universe has three particles. It was completely unclear throughout the specifics of what pro was arguing, leave alone what his justification was."
You can't read, you can't understand, you have no logic, no sense, no understanding, no memory. You are just a walking corpse of vitriolic nonsense.
You are a complete waste of valuable space. We should all declare a national holiday the day that you die as the world will be a much better place.
Environmentalist lying scum bags 1 - Humanity and truth - 0. lol
I clearly proved that con had lied in round 4 by his quoting that "20 million people were displaced by rising seas". This claim was fraudulent because his own reference stated that the displacement was caused by land subsidence and not by rising seas. That proves that con doesn't read his own references and that con is just a bare faced liar. By voting for con, you have joined the scum bag parade of liars and of which includes Maurice Strong who spent his last days hiding in China trying to avoid accusations of embezzlement and fraud.
You must be smart - alec. lol
I am glad I just cut and pasted my whole argument from a previous debate. I wouldn't want to waste one second of my time with a fool like you. lol
Genomes deals with cells and organisms half-wit. lol
Pro couldn't find the data supplied by con because the link was FAULTY stupid. Read the debate with your eyes open next time. lol
Note - Its your comment that is messy. The debate was well structured and logical. Whereas, your assessment of the debate was illogical, biased, confused, faulty and messy.
I proved that con was a fraud in round 5. Thus, you can't vote for a fraud. Hint for people with low IQs - (He used false information as does the IPCC.)
I am taking your advice in your biography about evil enemies and not giving you a second chance. lol
Still waiting for the IPCC's claim that climate change will cause 50 million refugees by 2010. To this date, there have been zero climate change refugees. Thus, all the climate change predictions are total nonsense.
Quote - "This is *not* a debate on capitalism vs socialism, not is it about any socialist alternatives to environmental protection,"
If you put capitalism in the title, then, the debate is automatically preset to be about the only alternative which is socialism. Thus, you are a complete twit who doesn't have any inkling about politics or language usage. I wouldn't debate with a twit. Note - Communism is all about creating unfair rules and blocking fair play. Thus, I can see why you did this. lol
Quote from your biography - "Likes dungeons and Dragons and play mafia". Thus you are an "F" wit. and you hate Trump. Thus, you are a left wing communist deviate and 'climate changer' and useless bludger on society. Your comment is just an irrational nonsense hysterical reaction to your fanatical and religious like beliefs.
Drop it, its not funny.
Yet still, even after quoting the exact words, you are still far, far away from reality. You have to prove that I said that CO2, quote "caused" clouds. Never stated. Only in your sick and demented juvenile mind.
Copy of an email sent from ramsutu to ragnar. (from Debategate scam.com)
"Hey rags, don't forgot to vote for me tomorrow. I have set up the same old scam of adding the word "dropped" at every possible occasion to give the false impression that I have won lots of free points. Just be sure to mention this so I can get an easy win as per our usual agreement." You'll get your usual reward later. I have to put some ointment on my lips first because last time I got a bit chafed"
Quote - "given that if CO2 caused nothing but clouds"
This was never stated in the debate which is evidence that you didn't even read the debate. Thus, you are a fraud and need to be expelled from all debating sites and put into a maximum security prison where you can't cause any further damage and harm to society.
I don't want to be lectured on debating rules by a rude little cretin and bias cheat.
Quote "U donn hav da skiel toe argoo". lol Whoooa!!! What kind of retarded cretins inhabit this site anyway? I don't think I'll be debating here anymore.
If I had said that a statement was rude, obnoxious or stupid. Then you would have just said that it was a personal opinion and thus, didn't carry any weight because you only value peer reviewed and other nonsense documents.
To me, the term "dropped" its vulgar, uncultured, abrupt, insensitive, moronic, childish and immature. Thus, if the profile fits, then wear it.
Note - Just because somebody didn't mention a subject again doesn't necessarily mean that they have given up or lost that point to the other party. Thus, using the word "dropped" rudely assumes that the debater has given up on that point which would be a false or presumptuous conclusion.
In your case, I didn't mention it again because your reply was probably (a) obnoxious (b) childish (c) or stupid. Thus, I didn't see any further reason to repeat it again. When debating you deal with the supplied information as is and don't go looking for dirt that you can dig up on the suppliers credentials. All that matters is that the information is correct. The source is irrelevant. The peer review system is utter nonsense and corruption gone crazy as I have already proven in the forum section.
The term "dropped" is a crude and rude terminology that only an immature and uncouth teenager would use. Thus, your poor use and abuse of language gives me an accurate personality profile. Not good!
No rebuttal of Nils-axel Morner's report Con? That's a shame!
No rebuttal of the wild 50 million people displacement scare tatics con? That's a shame too.
Oh, I forgot to mention the fraud that you committed when you defended the 50 million displaced people which you included 22.5 million people displaced by subduction, not seas level rising. Note - Fraud is a 10 year jail sentence in my country Con. See you in court Con. I have the evidence right here. lol
Far south ocean cools kiss goodbye to polar amplication
http://joannenova.com.au/2018/12/far-southern-ocean-cools-kiss-goodbye-to-polar-amplication-around-antarctica/