Singularity

User_2006 not cooperating was a terrible ideal. I would advise him to cooperate with town and to actually place his vote. I like fourtroubles advice to people to just put your vote somewhere

I believe in using the vig shot, I am not shy about it. Hitting the wrong guy is no big deal. I don't like the fact it is normal play for the big to wait until he is certain. Just take shots to narrow everybody's scum pool. Who cares if you miss. 

I originally voted for speed to go, but he seemed disinterested 

Mharman was not voting so if anybody was scum other than mharman we lost anyway 

I'm town. Glad you made the right call whether we win or lose. Mharman was not voting either way

Can you give us the flip please. I am pretty sure town won but if not speed did an incredible job

I would honestly like to get the game over with so I can quit the site

If speed is that good, he deserves the win

I had innocent on mharman last night, and I believe speeds claim. He just isn't good enough at this game to be scum and to play like he did

I wonder what the confusion is. He acts confused that kikes were scheming. News flash ops that's what kikes do

OP is a homosexual.  Nobody spends this much time thinking about Jesus, unless they want to suck his dick. 

Hatedness does not go away at lylo. I guess it'd doesn't hurry till all though

If speed is town than next dp us a race. If he is scum than we might as well get rid of him now. Seems to me like mharman is the way to go. Ultimately it is up to you though. All you have to do to get your way is to refrain from voting. I suggest getting a vote up asap next dp if we no lynch and speed remains alive. 

I think I was high when I said to protect him. It doesn't make sense. I have no explanation and no I don't entirely buy it, but I have good feeling about him

I believe warren is town confirmed at this point.

I have speed as likely town. So mharman is the most likely scum anyway

Speed is hated, so that means the game is over if he is around tomorrow and scum beats both town on

Stephen still refuses to debate because he knows he will lose

Like I said, 1 corinthians 15. It talks about 50 . 100 is just an estimate of mine. We have multiple siting gs with small crowds listed one sighting with 500. 

You don't dispute the 500 though. How many people need to witness an event for you? If I proved it was 1000, would that be enough for you to believe Jesus rose from the dead? 

If you are afraid to debate your beliefs why. are you on a debate site? You have the right to believe what you want and to sit here and not put your beliefs to the test, but if you are too much of a pussy to do a debate because you know you will lose, why are you here?

I will tell you what, there is an option to pick the judges of the debate. How about you pick 5 atheist judges who are experienced debaters so they know how to properly judge a debate, you will have the advantage and then we debate? Come on are you too much of a pussy to debate me, even with bias in your position? 

You know the whole point of the forums is to see who disagrees with some of the stuff you say and then you debate them on the areas of disagreement to see who is right

If warren hesitates to hammer for a while I guess I can put him in the town pile. There would be literally zero town motivation to do that. 

If speed is scum he played an excellent game and I have under estimated him. 

It looks like mharman will not vote on anyone and our hand is forced. I really really want him to talk more because in my mind it is between you and him, but he is MIA,so I am fine losing the game if you were scum. I just wanted mharman to talk enough so I could more confidently feel what his alignment was. If you are acum congrats you played smart by keeping mharman in the game and we fucked up, by not dealing with him sooner. 

I noticed you still have not accepted my debate challenge. You must know you will lose. 

I can issue another challenge where we can debate whether Jesus had disciples or not who follow him around and whether or not they are ever recorded as being armed

I support your right to get married though

I am actually a heterosexual, so not a big fan

have you read anything so far, what are your thoughts? Also can you place your vote

Not speed, warren. Not sure why I keep saying that

Full claim and vote on speed please. If you have previous actions spell the. Out

Anyway I think scum is between you and mharman today and you should both place votes on each other while me and speed talk this out. I honestly think mharman will force us to make a decision to lynch him though since he likely won't vote and analysis will not matter.

That's true lol. I am not sure why I. Said that. 

I think this stems from the conversation we had earlier in the Kaepernick thread. We need to more strictly define multi accounting. It should not be considered multi accounting if 2 people who inhabit the same body have 2 different accounts , right now according to what I have been told, siamese twins would have to hold the same account t because they reside in the same body. This is prejudicial towards them as well as those of us who have multiple personality disorder, are demon possessed or who are practiced in the art of tulpamancy. Also if some sort of body switch frequently occurs such as  a "freaky friday" scenario it is also prejudicial towards those individuals.  A freaky friday even that is non recurring may be no big deal but if it happens frequently than there is no reason the people should have to share accounts merely because a new person resides in the body 

speed is hated, or so he claims. The alternative is to be ready to place votes the second the dp begins I don't know that leaving this up to a race is a good ideal though. Who I investigate probably doesn't matter, but it would be speed

Seriously what idiot reported that comment. The state of this site is terrible

I understand you commented about Kaepernick and the assertion was a part of that.  I am only concerned with your assertion.

How is that evidence of discrimination against blacks?

Let's just pretend that all discrimination ended tomorrow, would that mean you believe socio economic demographics would show blacks as equal to whites in socio economic status in 2025? if not how long would it take to overcome the previous discrimination?

The choices now have been made simpler. If we believe warren is town we no lynch and have him protect speed. If not we lynch Warren

I was told by BSH1 that my separate personalities were not allowed unique user names. Has this policy changed, because if so I will let francesca have her own account. If the policy has not changed and all personalities require the same account than I don't want to hear shit about how Francesca is a different age than me

You argued that socio economic demographics are proof of racism. That is your premise. I am asking you about that premise, not making my own argument. I mentioned the disproportionate socio economic statuses of Jewish people and homosexuals that seem to benefit them to ask if that was evidence of racism against non jews and non homosexuals, because it directly speaks to what your premise would entail. Let me put your quote below again so you don't get off topic.

It's possible that you have a correct conclusion and an incorrect premise. I am questioning your premise at the moment and not your conclusion. If your conclusion is not derived from the provided premise than I want to know what your actual conclusion is derived from.

You know how awkward it would be for mharman to step in as scum here? Would probably explain why he did not step in yesterday 

I'm practically town confirmed. I shouldn't have made it this far. I am trying to get into the head of whoever is ordering the NKs.  I know my role is useles now. If speed and warren. are both being honest their existence makes sense.  Speed I am certain is town. If anyone but user was I  the spot user was in it would have been a mharman lynch so worst case scenario would be 2 vs 1 here.  We could have had user test Warren's role, this is bullshit. A 1x vigilante almost seems set up so it could be a role test. 

Why would user not give his role, we could have directed him who to NK so we would definitely be in a better lylo position today

I am going to be brave and attend. My life is on the line, but I will not shut up

Telling the truth about conspiracies is more likely to  be reason to believe somebody is trying to shut me up not less. So nice way. to post the stupidest form of evidence ever

How is that evidence of racism? 

Is it racism against whites that whites achieve less socio eco comic success than Jews? Is it straight phobic that homosexuals are more likely than heterosexuals to live an upper middle class lifestyle?

So is demographic differences in socio economic classes, really evidence of wide spread racism? 

I have made it through worse than bootcamp. I was tortured routinely as a kid. Not allowed to sleep, barely eating and subjected to physical beatings as well as psychological forms od torture, such as when I was being sleep deprived and my father was repeating the same 2 and 3 phrases over and over trying to brainwash me. . I can handle bootcamp. 

I almost joined twice. The first time was just after 9/11 but I couldn't really get the assurances I needed. I had a very high ASVAb score but they said they couldn't make any promises and I wanted a job in intelligence, so not wanting to be infantry, I'm like fuck it. The second time I was relatively sure that I would get into some form of intelligence because of the background check was pretty intense. They asked for 100 references a list of every place I have ever worked and lived. Honestly I was just like fuck that man. I am not seeking out 100 people that know me and providing their address and phone numbers, that is just awkward as hell to even ask that information, particularly since I keep my social circle very very small. 

Later on I was glad I did not join, because I do not agree with America's foreign policy. I wouldn't mind fighting for freedom like in the revolutionary war, but every war since has. Ot really been about freedom and did nothing to increase or defend freedom at all. Every major war since has pretty much been pointless. World war one perhaps an exception because of pearl Harbor, the si king of the Lusitania was pretty much set up to gain public support for the war. Germany actually warned they would sink the passenger line and took out ads in New York papers, but American politicians give a shit less about Americans so the lusitania kept travelling with weapons in it smuggled over seas and the Americans on board were sacrificial pawns. Kinda like you were a sacrificial pawn. The difference is you signed off on foreign policy by joining. It was just a dumb decision or a selfish decision to join on your part.  Going over seas to create blowback so another 9 11 happens is just bad policy. Staying out of the middle east would have zero detrimental impact on America, neither would removing bases from Japan or Germany who are no longer enemies

Zeitgeist took some liberties to prove a point, the bible stories are not unique to the bible though. parralelism aside which is a thing and can account for some similarities the zeitgeist movie pointed out, does not explain things too close to not be talking about the same thing, such as the sumerians and the pre flood kings. 

He just gave one example. Space is limited, there are a lot of stories from ancient sumeria dated centuries before the bible that have similarities to the bible stories that you can't just dismiss. The pre flood kings were listed in sumerian myths first. https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/creation-myths/is-genesis-1-11-a-derivation-from-ancient-myths/ As was the flood. We have a tale of Gilgamesh saving every earth animal before a global flood took place. The bible appears to be stories derived from earlier civilizations and repackaged. The story he mentioned is not a similar story found in the bible, I mean come on. It is the same exact story

Sometimes the solution to a problem is more of the problem. Put simply, as sympathetic as I am towards Kaczynski" he was wrong

This will happen naturally and we have very little time to prepare. I think in order to prevent the problems associated with it. We should heavily restrict immigration while simultaneously implementing a basic mi imum income. Why the democrats failed to nomi are Yang, the o ly person who can pull blue collar voters and beat Trump and the o ly person with the platform to actually implement a BMI before it is too late is a mystery to me. 

It is probably honestly because Yang was not an ideologue. Republicans have no problem electing pragmatists like Trump,but it seems to be something liberals are incapable of doing