I mean, the distinction could produce great difference in interpretations...I believe it's important to mention what do you think it'll be like so that the opponent knows what to debate
when you speak of time travel, to you mean it as in you can go and prevent something from happening in the past or future (ability to interact), or just spectacle (can see, but can't change)
what a shame, I truly wanted to correct her misunderstanding, now I feel bad I referred to her as a man! sorry for that, my assumption was wrong. but brother, were you planning to join this debate?
I am.....Confused. Much more about your last comment, but isn't that moses who demanded that in numbers 31: 17-18? no malice intentions, I am just confused
fair I guess, It's my fault, I chose a bad time in my life to start a debate, and couldn't get the argument before the deadline haha. But it's true, I was going to challenge many things he said in the second round. But time wasn't on my side. Thank you for the contribution! it was interesting to read
Ouch, ouch, OUCH! My head hurt me, you really like one sided arguments, don't you? I wish I found this debate first, your arguments gave me a headache, but I won't waste my time proving them wrong in a comment section honestly. Just one critique though, You are being inconsiderate with your sources, the UN you stated spoke against Hammas spoke against Israel and it's acts as well, you could have been fair and brought that out too. But I guess picking a side forces one to hide anything that don't support their ideology, no?
I agree with you! Our subconscious is often time influenced by outsider factors than what we can actually realize. In the case of a recent event, it's easy to see why hatred can rise. But if a child grows watching shows that paints an image in his mind, with adults supporting it, and no proper guidance, then that child is more likely to act upon that image, don't you think? This is why I hate negative stereotypes, they can indirectly shape society's understanding, even if they don't mean to. I think, in this field of influence, especially for children, there should be a healthy mix. Don't glorify a community by only showing it's goods, but also don't go to the other extreme. Make the joke about the characters, not the concept. This way, you can make people laugh while keeping your hands clean of any future implications. Make good characters of this community and bad, only extremes will be against you, what do you think?
I see and understand your point! if you see my first argument on the matter, I discussed my problem. Speech, is normal, generalization is frustrating but bearable. My problem is when perception becomes reality, when speech turns into action. What do you think?
great point friend! I do believe people may contest that, (people who do this) the reason why I specified those regions is because I have knowledge on them, if the debate starts, I wouldn't know how to answer an argument related to Asia for example, if it still feels weird, I can change it!
Very good point friend! No, I didn't forget those, they are infuriating as well. However, I possesses no knowledge of how Muslims live there ( I heard about the camps at China, but that is not a way for me to make assumptions about the entirety of Asia, same for the other nations I didn't mention) So you might say that it's more about me debating in an area I know more about, rather than me assuming that nothing happens there. It is still a very good point! I am sorry I didn't include it in the description, this is still new to me haha.
I see, so you're point is mainly related to pure capitalism, emphasizing that it's the better way to run society. If this is the case then I am ready to accept your arguments!
I mean, the distinction could produce great difference in interpretations...I believe it's important to mention what do you think it'll be like so that the opponent knows what to debate
when you speak of time travel, to you mean it as in you can go and prevent something from happening in the past or future (ability to interact), or just spectacle (can see, but can't change)
well, what to do now, he forfeited
......My apologies....That would be me....
what a shame, I truly wanted to correct her misunderstanding, now I feel bad I referred to her as a man! sorry for that, my assumption was wrong. but brother, were you planning to join this debate?
I don't think he is active, he confused me as well, it's not nice to drop a comment and go, especially of like this one
I am.....Confused. Much more about your last comment, but isn't that moses who demanded that in numbers 31: 17-18? no malice intentions, I am just confused
what? what is this supposed to mean?
in what aspect? this is a bit vague.
well, that was interesting to read! thank you for participating Mall, let's see who wins
what do you mean by under the law?
I don't believe a debate actually happened here
Oh! then I can't debate you, we share the same point of view haha!
if I chose to debate you, would I be who question the god or the on who don't?
I don't know friend, this is a bit confusing for me. I guess they mean it generally? Who know, con kept things a bit vague.
which side would I be on if I become the con?
I agree with you! my point is just to be a bit nuanced, to not be a jerk on the expanse of other's right of dignity, especially in mass media
I am happy you read my arguments! I wished I made a round too, but nonetheless, thank you for voting!
fair I guess, It's my fault, I chose a bad time in my life to start a debate, and couldn't get the argument before the deadline haha. But it's true, I was going to challenge many things he said in the second round. But time wasn't on my side. Thank you for the contribution! it was interesting to read
I mean, he is arguing that capitalism is a natural process that does only need to rely on the market, I believe this to be pure capitalism?
Ouch, ouch, OUCH! My head hurt me, you really like one sided arguments, don't you? I wish I found this debate first, your arguments gave me a headache, but I won't waste my time proving them wrong in a comment section honestly. Just one critique though, You are being inconsiderate with your sources, the UN you stated spoke against Hammas spoke against Israel and it's acts as well, you could have been fair and brought that out too. But I guess picking a side forces one to hide anything that don't support their ideology, no?
I agree with you! Our subconscious is often time influenced by outsider factors than what we can actually realize. In the case of a recent event, it's easy to see why hatred can rise. But if a child grows watching shows that paints an image in his mind, with adults supporting it, and no proper guidance, then that child is more likely to act upon that image, don't you think? This is why I hate negative stereotypes, they can indirectly shape society's understanding, even if they don't mean to. I think, in this field of influence, especially for children, there should be a healthy mix. Don't glorify a community by only showing it's goods, but also don't go to the other extreme. Make the joke about the characters, not the concept. This way, you can make people laugh while keeping your hands clean of any future implications. Make good characters of this community and bad, only extremes will be against you, what do you think?
I see and understand your point! if you see my first argument on the matter, I discussed my problem. Speech, is normal, generalization is frustrating but bearable. My problem is when perception becomes reality, when speech turns into action. What do you think?
I guess both? I much more stated it as being socially acceptable, it will be truly ridiculous if it was legal, no?
great point friend! I do believe people may contest that, (people who do this) the reason why I specified those regions is because I have knowledge on them, if the debate starts, I wouldn't know how to answer an argument related to Asia for example, if it still feels weird, I can change it!
Very good point friend! No, I didn't forget those, they are infuriating as well. However, I possesses no knowledge of how Muslims live there ( I heard about the camps at China, but that is not a way for me to make assumptions about the entirety of Asia, same for the other nations I didn't mention) So you might say that it's more about me debating in an area I know more about, rather than me assuming that nothing happens there. It is still a very good point! I am sorry I didn't include it in the description, this is still new to me haha.
I see, so you're point is mainly related to pure capitalism, emphasizing that it's the better way to run society. If this is the case then I am ready to accept your arguments!
I do want to ask, can you explain your argument better? what do you mean by the best? do you speak of pure capitalism? this is too vague