Total posts: 121
Posted in:
Dumb topic.
IT's all about mental illness. Period.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
The second one (TRON: Legacy (2010)) wasn't that bad.
It was pretty good, in fact.
So...we will see.
Created:
Posted in:
IWRA,
Who are you referring to?
I was a Sergeant (E5), not an E4.
I was Airborne, but you were clearly a POG.
Get over your "name calling others names" self.
It is pathetic.
Created:
Posted in:
It should have come to no surprise that the George Soros funded Georgia Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who ran on charging former President Donald Trump on fraud related charges involving the 2020 election in GA, ends up being a fraud herself.
Georgia whistleblowers lining up to testify against Fulton County DA Fani Willis, state lawmaker says
"Republican state Sen. Bill Cowsert opened a meeting of the Senate Special Committee on investigations with a bombshell revelation that multiple whistleblowers from the Fulton County's DA's office have come forward to testify against their boss. He said they allege Willis misused state and federal funds -- allegations that come after the embattled DA admitted to having a relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade that critics have called "improper."
Fani Willis called ‘embarrassment’ by Georgia residents after admission of ‘personal relationship’ with Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade: ‘What the hell is going on?’
"Willis has now admitted to having a “personal relationship” with Nathan Wade, who stands accused of spending some of the $654,000 he has earned for his work on the Trump case on lavish gifts and vacations with his boss, court records show.
“What the hell is going on? I know you guys write the checks. She is an embarrassment to the board and to the citizens footing the bill,” Kevin Muldowny testified at a Fulton County Board of Commissioners public hearing.
“Fani is doing exactly what Fani wants; whether it’s carrying on an adulterous relationship with an underqualified stud she hired or ignoring a direct request from a sitting commissioner for a full audit.”
Fani Willis Impeachment Moves One Step Closer
"In an interview with Fox News, attorney and legal analyst Phil Holloway said the accusations against Willis could result in Trump's Georgia election interference case being dismissed.
"If it can be proven she violated the Constitution in the way of substitute due process claims, that she was fundamentally unfair in how she carried out her prosecutorial duties, then that could result in a dismissal [of the case]," he told anchor Harris Faulkner.
"It would be a question if she gets recused, then her whole office has to be recused. If she's got a conflict of interest, everybody who works for her has that same conflict of interest. So the prosecuting attorney's counsel here in Georgia or the attorney general's office may have to sort out who in the state of Georgia, if anyone, wants this."
A Reality Check on the Fani Willis Scandal
"In a recent appearance before Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta, Willis barely addressed the substance of the allegations -- more on those shortly -- but chose instead to frame them largely as a racially motivated attack."
Even Jessica Tarlov, the liberal Democrat on 'The Five' calls out Willis for her "race-card" moving being out of line.
Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis reports racist threats over Trump case
"A Georgie prosecutor has reported receiving racist threats and abuse as she decides wh3ether to charge former President Donald Trump."
She pulled the so-called infamous 'race-card' before even filing the charges, and yet everyone knew that is the platform that she ran on.
Why Nathan Wade, under fire for alleged affair with Fani Willis, is facing new scrutiny
"Accusations that Wade mishandled the jail-deaths investigation in 2020 are adding to questions about Willis’s judgment in hiring him for the sensitive assignment of investigating the former president and alleged co-defendants in their alleged effort to overturn Georgia’s presidential election that year."
Georgia whistleblowers lining up to testify against Fulton County DA Fani Willis, state lawmaker says
"Republican state Sen. Bill Cowsert opened a meeting of the Senate Special Committee on investigations with a bombshell revelation that multiple whistleblowers from the Fulton County's DA's office have come forward to testify against their boss. He said they allege Willis misused state and federal funds -- allegations that come after the embattled DA admitted to having a relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade that critics have called "improper."
Fani Willis called ‘embarrassment’ by Georgia residents after admission of ‘personal relationship’ with Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade: ‘What the hell is going on?’
"Willis has now admitted to having a “personal relationship” with Nathan Wade, who stands accused of spending some of the $654,000 he has earned for his work on the Trump case on lavish gifts and vacations with his boss, court records show.
“What the hell is going on? I know you guys write the checks. She is an embarrassment to the board and to the citizens footing the bill,” Kevin Muldowny testified at a Fulton County Board of Commissioners public hearing.
“Fani is doing exactly what Fani wants; whether it’s carrying on an adulterous relationship with an underqualified stud she hired or ignoring a direct request from a sitting commissioner for a full audit.”
Fani Willis Impeachment Moves One Step Closer
"In an interview with Fox News, attorney and legal analyst Phil Holloway said the accusations against Willis could result in Trump's Georgia election interference case being dismissed.
"If it can be proven she violated the Constitution in the way of substitute due process claims, that she was fundamentally unfair in how she carried out her prosecutorial duties, then that could result in a dismissal [of the case]," he told anchor Harris Faulkner.
"It would be a question if she gets recused, then her whole office has to be recused. If she's got a conflict of interest, everybody who works for her has that same conflict of interest. So the prosecuting attorney's counsel here in Georgia or the attorney general's office may have to sort out who in the state of Georgia, if anyone, wants this."
A Reality Check on the Fani Willis Scandal
"In a recent appearance before Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta, Willis barely addressed the substance of the allegations -- more on those shortly -- but chose instead to frame them largely as a racially motivated attack."
Even Jessica Tarlov, the liberal Democrat on 'The Five' calls out Willis for her "race-card" moving being out of line.
Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis reports racist threats over Trump case
"A Georgie prosecutor has reported receiving racist threats and abuse as she decides wh3ether to charge former President Donald Trump."
She pulled the so-called infamous 'race-card' before even filing the charges, and yet everyone knew that is the platform that she ran on.
Why Nathan Wade, under fire for alleged affair with Fani Willis, is facing new scrutiny
"Accusations that Wade mishandled the jail-deaths investigation in 2020 are adding to questions about Willis’s judgment in hiring him for the sensitive assignment of investigating the former president and alleged co-defendants in their alleged effort to overturn Georgia’s presidential election that year."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
"...the shit-stain pathological liar IwantRooseveltagain...
LOL!!!! Truth, it's a BEAUTIFUL THING!!!
Created:
There are no dragons.
There are no unicorns.
There are no warrior dwarfs.
There are no Hobbits
There are no aliens.
There are no Kryptonians.
There are no Amazonians.
Need I go on?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Why am I not surprised that you started this discussion...!
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
They do not have the authority to make such a declaration. None. Especially in light of the FACT that the F.B.I. declared that there was NO evidence to substantiate J6 as a so-called "insurrection." Stop calling J6 an Insurrection.Here you are repeating the same crap you did before under a different name.
Huh? Still paranoid I see.
Whomever this other person is you keep referring to is, they clearly struck a nerve with you.
What was said above is common knowledge. It is the de facto argument against J6 being incorrectly labeled an insurrection.
So according to you, any time I refer to something widely known and available to learn by anyone everywhere, you're going to accuse me of being the person living rent free in your head? That is, by definition, paranoia.
But hey, I get it. You simply cannot refute anything I said in reply to your nonsensical position, so you're just going to accuse me of being someone I am not. Got it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Democrats GET SPANKED By SCOTUS Over Trump Insurrection Suit, Even LIBERAL Justices Favor Trump
Thanks for linking that. Just watched/listened.
It definitely appears that SCOTUS will overrule Colorado, thereby forcing other states to reverse their decision to remove Trump from the ballot.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Technicalities, that's all you can argue with?
The election is in 2024. The results are provided in 2024. If he wins the election, he is the 47th POTUS as the winner of the 2024 election. He just doesn't take Office until January 2025.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Ummmm, I hate to be the one to break it to you, but Trump lost the 2020 election,
No, the election was stolen through corrupt means.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What's so funny is that the Senate was unable to convict Trump before all the footage came out showing Jan 6 as very likely being a deep state setup as people were waved into the capitol by an undetermined number of Federal provocateurs in the crowd.(see Whitmer plot) Things only got very bad when the DC police were ordered to open fire into the crowd with tear gas, followed by baton beatings.The Senators didn't know any of this, and yet, Trump still was not convicted.
BINGO!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
There is no excuse for this misinformation. Anyone can watch trumps speech where he calls for peaceful protest. If you stopped just blindly listening to what CNN told you trump said and instead just listen for yourself you would see he said to go peacefully. Not only did he say to stay peaceful in his speech he tweeted it out to his supporters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BlXZNL2RoA
DITTO!!!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Your hands are shaking, a dead giveaway that you don't believe your own lies.Ok dipshit.
Impressive retort. You got me convinced to change my mind with that name calling. *facepalm*
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well genius, Trump couldn’t possibly be President in 2024
He will be. Please post a video of you falling to our knees screaming "NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
“Colorado’s top court concluded in December that the attack was an insurrection
They do not have the authority to make such a declaration. None. Especially in light of the FACT that the F.B.I. declared that there was NO evidence to substantiate J6 as a so-called "insurrection." Stop calling J6 an Insurrection.
that Trump is an insurrectionist
Since J6 was NOT an insurrection, Trump is NOT an insurrectionist.
He was even tried via the House and acquitted of 'inciting an insurrection.'
Again, NO insurrection.
who is barred by the Constitution from serving as president again. The Colorado justices ruled he could not appear on the state’s primary ballot but put their decision on hold while Trump pursued an appeal“
That's not how the 14th Sec. 3 works. There is no specific mention of the Office either the President OR Vice President. Those justices are ignorant of Constitutional Law and how to read/interpret it.
Trump was charged with insurrection in his second impeachment. A jury of biased Republicans, who decided to acquit
At least you can admit he was acquitted. So, this is a none issue then.
Mitch McConnell then stated that Trump should be charged for his crime once he was out of office.
He is not an authority on anything and his subjective opinion carries no legal weight, or political weight for that matter.
insurrection as it was understood in the 1860s was “any public use of force or a threat of force by a group of people to hinder the execution of the law.”
Not how it works, buddy. You may think of yourself of as a pseudo constitutional law scholar, but you know nothing about the Constitution. I mean really, 'public use of force'? LOL!!! You really need to do some legislative historical research on that amendment, learn the legal definitions and not a layman's understanding of the term.
“It was never considered an element of Section 3 that you need a criminal conviction,” he said, noting that after the Civil War many former Confederates were disqualified from office even though they had not been charged with insurrection or treason”
No shit, but a legitimate law-based organization/agency needs to have emphatically declared J6 as an insurrection. None have. The courts do not have the authority to do that. Courts do not file charges, law agencies do. Cops. DA's. DOJ. FBI. Etc. And since none have, J6 was NOT and never will be an 'insurrection.'
Created:
Posted in:
You must be thoroughly bored this evening.
So bored that five finger Mary wasn't good enough to entertain you.
"Safe words" are a stopping point, a line drawn where she won't go any further.
It has nothing to do with 'already done something sexual to her without her consent.'
If you don't listen and continue, then you have crossed that line and done something to her without her consent, hence the purpose of the "safe word."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Benjamin
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
#338 - excellent rebuttal. Most excellent.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Post 110 and 111 are AWESOME!!!
They dispel the pure BS behind the EJC, proving it was politically motivated and a total scam.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I did not have sex with that woman, not a single time" = "Monica is a liar" = defamation?!?!?!!Where did you get your law degree? If denial was defamation,
That was in part the basis of EJC civil suit. His denial was offensive, defaming her via her accusation published in her book, an event taken from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode, right down to the exact location.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Where did the Lance Corporal come from?You are embarrassing yourself. It’s obvious you created another identity to get back on this site after you were banned.
Hmmm...that sounds like paranoia.
You served, I served, whomever you are talking about served. Lots of people served.
Doesn't mean everyone who comes to this debate site who served is someone you claim they are. That's paranoia. Pure and simple.
Created:
Oh, and EJC has a history of making claims of sexual assault by other men: Les Moonves Accused of Sexual Assault by E. Jean Carroll (vulture.com)
Also, a babysitter's boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, unnamed college date, and an unnamed former boss. According to The National Pulse.
Created:
Oh, and then there is this:
Scene from a Law and Order SVU that pretty much sums up EJC's bogus claim, taken not from the headlines but from this episode.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
#10 was a complete strawman argument. I mentioned nothing of the other cases. Just the EJC case.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Never said all the courts in America were rigged, just NY.
Where did the Lance Corporal come from? I never disclosed my rank in service, nor have I told you specifically that I even served. Either way, I was an E5. Out in 8. Tired of the nonsense of mouthy privates not getting just punishment like I did when I first signed up. Not a fan of sending them to their barracks room to write an essay on why they were being punished. And the who social experiment thing, saw that coming a mile away and got out before being subjected to that liberal nonsense. Went
This guy, Viva Frei, spells it out pretty clearly why the defamation cases were bullshit.
Created:
He was NEVER going to get a fair trial.
NEVER!
Jury nullification against him.
Fucking pathetic.
Total miscarriage of justice.
Created:
-->
@Mall
You're a meatball! LOL!!! ;-)
Created:
Posted in:
Not sure how this will play out, but it appears to be about Leto's program 'Ares' escaping into the real world.
Presumably to follow the other I-so that escaped into the real world with Sam.
I, for one, am looking forward to another Tron movie.
Created:
-->
@Mall
Not the skin color, which has nothing to do with getting a tattoo. It's about design, color, placement and taste.
No one can see it, except my wife. Short sleeve shirts keep it covered.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Are men and women equal?
On the face of the question, NO!
But you have to define "equal" across the entire spectrum of humanity where both/either sex is concerned.
Created:
-->
@Mall
"I don't give it no mind at all. " = I don't care for, against, or nor am I in the middle (neutral). I pay it no mind because skin color has no bearing on my life and how I live it. I merely chose to get a tattoo because I am proud of my military service, but mostly being Airborne, which many people are to chicken shit to do.
Created:
-->
@Mall
How do you feel about your skin color?
What kind of a question is that where this topic is concerned?
I feel nothing about it. I am who I am, and my skin color is what it is.
I've never dwelled on it. Never thought about it.
Other than the discrimination I've witnessed and experienced because of it by ignorant and illiterate dumb fucks suffering from some form of a victimhood mentality.
Are you neutral towards it?
I don't give it no mind at all.
Did you ever have any pride about it?
No. Skin color is arbitrary. My character and personal achievements are all that matter.
Created:
-->
@Mall
Initially the stigma that only bad people got them. Meaning drug addicts, biker gangs, criminal gang members, criminals in general, and other mental basket cases (like those who have to cover their entire body as they alter their appearance to look like a dragon, cat, or some other stupid sick shit). Other main reason, employability. Same goes for other body modifications. Nose rings, pierced lip, etc. Just shit that isn't professional at all.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
For anyone who has AT&T cell service, MAX comes free with the account.
That's how we are watching it.
Created:
-->
@Mall
No, it's body art.
I was against it for so long in my life, but, getting older, I wanted something on my body that everyone would understand (that I served).
So, I got my first tattoo on my left shoulder that if very similar to this: HERE
Created:
Matt Walsh is calling it woke. Followers agree.
Some say it isn't that good. Why? They really do not say.
When I watched it, I saw it with eyes wide open.
I wanted to pay attention to the storyline, not the minute details.
Sure, there are two lead women roles. One white. One minority.
There are a few comments about "white boy" or "whiteness," but I took that as normal when native Indians and whites are mixed. One or the other falls in love with the other, and they playfully tease/taunt one another. I didn't see it as "racist" as the anti-woke crowd whined about.
Yeah, the main white guy role in the law enforcement department is being painted as the bad white guy, but, the actor was picked for that role for a reason. He is a dick.
The other complaint is the title song by Billie Elish. It isn't that the song isn't bad, as the lyrics definitely fit with the series, it is just they complain the song is used for many other productions, so it is overused. I can sort of understand that, since watching John Wick movies when I see other movie trailers and shows with the same music used I find it to be sacrilege. When soundtracks are so notable to a movie, it just shouldn't be used for any other. IMHO.
Anyhow, anyone else see the first episode and the trailer for the subsequent episodes?????
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
See. Once again you proved my point😂ok buddy.
Denialism and appeals to mockery =/= evidence of an argument.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@John_C_87
Not how it works.
I've already made a point, and Liam replied with garbage that proves my point about wasting my time with him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Thank you for proving my point. To the proverbial "T"!I think that's an Ad Hominem,
No one cares what you think. The only thing that matters is what can be affirmed.
You say - I'm wrongI say - HowYou say - You just proved my point.Like I don't know how to respond to utter ridiculousness.
See. Once again you proved my point eloquently pointed out in #183, which you clearly did not read in its complete entirety.
You did not read it in order to grasp the context, syntax, semantics and crystal-clear point being made.
You just skipped over it, like skipping a rock across the calm flat lake.
And you prove why it is a waste of anyone's time to get into a formal debate with you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Thank you for proving my point. To the proverbial "T"!
Created:
-->
@n8nrgim
And so many theories you people claim are conspiratorial have eventually been proven factually accurate.
Can't claim it isn't credible without proving it.
Again, source isn't the issue. The content is.
Also, your psychological projection is duly noted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
@<<<Sam_Flynn>>>Cannot because you "lack the requisite education and experience to have this debate/discussion."Then it will be an easy win for you right?Any way you twist it, you are just trying to get out of a debate you know you can't win.
Delusions of grandeur and childish taunting.
I just have an issue with putting forth a lot of time, energy and effort into a sound debate on my part just have you cherry-pick words or phrases to build your strawman arguments; for you to go off on nonsensical tangents with absurd analogies and red herrings as I have read/seen you do with others; and your lack of reading comprehension skills whereby you clearly do not understand that which is being said, because it is over your head, and in a vain attempt to do so, you butcher the entirety of what was cogently put forth. As such, it would be a huge disappointment leading to an utter waste of my time that I would never get back again.
So, you see, that's my dilemma. Do I really want to put in the time, energy and effort just to be predictably disappointed and lose all that time I will never get back again, or do I just ignore you in any thread/discussion concerning abortion because as it stands now...you've already demonstrated that prediction. Not only with responses to me, but many many others that I have read across the site.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
There are no credible sources claiming election fraud. That’s why the big lie is only believed by morons.Only a moron would say “the source is NOT the issue”.As you can see from his bio, this guy is a Sci-Fi loser. He’s probably never kissed a girl.
Ad hom
Ad hom
Ad hom
Ad hom
You're scared of me.
That much is apparently clear.
Oh, and it is a forgone conclusion that the source is never the issue....it is the content that matters most.
Anyone can spout or regurgitate a bunch of nonsense, but fact checking the spout or regurgitation is what is most relevant.
Keep whining little boy.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Denialism without proving otherwise. Classic ignorant retort.
Created:
-->
@n8nrgim
That is EXACTLY how it works.
Genetic fallacy on your part.
The source is never the issue, the content is.
Can't disprove the content, you wine and bitch about the source.
Again, as you said, "not how it works."
You lose.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
You lack the requisite education and experience to have this debate/discussion.If you really think that, have an actual real comprehensive debate with me on the subject (sic)
Cannot because you "lack the requisite education and experience to have this debate/discussion."
That statement of fact was pretty precise and crystal clear.
Created:
Posted in:
Who the fuck let this "John_C_87" in here!?!
What a mess. Completely incoherent.
Waste of space.
Will block and scroll on past this dweeb.
Created: