RationalMadman

Four point, lets you refinenyour style or sacrifice style a d the enemy lets their guard down. It is 7 points, not 4.

Get to 1600 ratings first

https://www.debateart.com/debates

That's classified.

This is actually a question I can admit I am not bothered or able to answer.

What is often my highest area of skill is an invisible iceberg way beneath the surface. I am incredibly skilled at analysing situations and knowing how to capitalise on psychological warfare and twisting of truths not because by nature I am sociopathic and manipulative like that but because to me, you need to understand how they work to avoid them and their tools are infinitely useful in the debating arena.

I am willing to completely drop a debate the moment I cannot see a path to victory. I am also very capable of making my enemy experience hell as I close down each and every path to victory they'd hoped for leaving open only paths to winning that take them out of the comfort zone of their particular expertise (a good researcher is at times limited in creative angles and vice versa for the opposite, there's many types indeed).

When you see my opponent looks terrible and me look like I'm not trying too much is actually often me at my finest in a way that will never look like good debating because it isn't good debating; it's good strategy, debating is just the format.

I aim to present cases that are tailored to my opponent, predicting precisely what they are comfortable debating their side along the lines of, pushing each and every comfortable avenue out of the park and making them need to use points they're not comfortable presenting in order to handle what I do. I care very little about being creative in a constructive manner because all that allows my opponent to do is counter me with more creativity that can actually be motivational and enthralling for them; I want to weather their spirit down to the point it hurts them to type. I am fucking sadistic in the debating arena, it is not always super obvious because it is subtle how I do it. I spot what a person enjoys about debating, what they're best at as well and aim to drive the debate to be a format and go down a line they are not going to enjoy and/or be good at.

This is how I am able to burst to high rankings despite a 2/3 winrate (lol), I either break my opponent or just go meh whatever and either tie it or give up. Play this over many debate and you are going to break above-average debaters, not just noobsnipe for safety. It is brutal, merciless but that's what winning and losing is.

The thing that separates me from all the other big dogs is one simple thing; I know defeat, I embrace it. I debate many at once when I can, ready to lose a couple, ready to be broken down to a 1.5k rating or lower if need be. It's fucking hilarious to me, I will just not care and that makes me dangerous. Obviously I do care, obviously I do want to be high-rated but the fact that when it suits me I may just accept your debate and make it hell for you tames the others to try. Of course it isn't me alone but believe me, I am a main reason they're on edge. Very few enjoy debating against me, that's by design. I stimulate them while torturing them, it's rough, dominant and hot as hell if they want it that way. If you were curious, I am not as sadistic sexually, this is me in a competitive arena but yes I have sadism in me for sure perhaps masochism too. I don't give a shit what happens, I want a debate that's brutally won or will lay down my sword if need be.

Maybe, it is all contextual.

Simple is kind of... yeah Id say so but by no means does it mean EASY necessarily.

Pussy Riot's most ardent opposer of Putin. Warning of the scumbag without flinching upon arrest.

'get' has many meanings and each woman is unique.

In other words, no matter what 'trick' you try be it push-pull, hard-to-get or whatever the fuck 'red pill tactic' you learn, you're generally gonna be appealing to a niche group of slutty women into that, which enjoy getting that which is hard to get because they are confused why this guy isn't all over them despite appearing to be outgoing.

Alpha male theory is bullcrap, just be yourself. After a while, through literal trial and error, you'll realise where you're going wrong in your selection process and personality process. Some people get lucky as fuck and meet the love of their life at 17, others don't. Don't give a shit about the luck, just play the odds and enjoy life women want to do that too. Know your strengths, play into them entirely and trust me some women will get wet and intrigued, the question is if you then understand how to snowball that into a relationship or not.

If you just want pussy for the sake of it, you're asking the wrong guy. I'm not a player. As for my success at love, my private life will remain private on here. I haven't had 100% success though, I can openly admit that to you. Never give up, never let life beat you to your knees. That's what being a real alpha/sigma is about, it's not about being stronger, this or that.

One tip I would give you though is no matter what genes you have, make sure you're making the most of your natural facial hair growth, hairstyle, face shape, body shape etc. Dress in a way that compliments your body, hides the flaws and accentuates the strengths, some slim guys actually have wide shoulders despite it, they suit hoodies. The most difficult body type to 'accentuate' is either an entirely fat blob type or entirely slim stick type where the face doesn't make up for it and neither to the legs or hair. It's okay though, because as I said, keep at it. The biggest thing you want is a look and an aura the screams 'I am a confident man who doesn't need to win you over'. This will not work as well as some redpill guys say, it will merely let women who want a desperate guy to go yuck at you (you want them to) and to begin to attract women who want a man who is damn sure of himself. Then, out of them, you and the ones who naturally mesh well with you will bond over time. Mingle, be it online or irl, just mingle, interact and learn.

Yeah but I would rather talk in private about it.

This can help determine which school I did or didn't go to.

You just allowed me to turn a 3-round debate into a 2-round debate with me going second regardless.

Is my power greater or weaker now, with regards to your ability to fight against what I raise both for my side and against yours?

Anyways, I got busy but I also did conclude in prior days that it may be best to forfeit it, newer users or even just not new but users who don't want to waste effort will knowingly allow me to dictate if I do or don't want the debate reduced a Round.

Conduct is 1 point, Arguments are 3, as long as I work hard at the arguments often the Conduct loss for the forfeited Round means very little.

Not really and also it's odd to only seek black authors as if non-blacks cantt advocate for it very sufficiently so.

You see, similar to UBI, reparations are primarily needed in America as opposed to other developed nations because the US is one of the only nation that participated in the slavery that has shit-tier oublic provisions at present to the poor.

The real issue isn't with racism itself but the poverty that resulted from zero inheritance for several generations of blacks resulting in what there is now.

What many don't pay attention to is the core principle of capitalism is meant to be that working hard and efficiently should put you far ahead of someone lazily resting on their ancestor's income and resources but at present this is far from trye is how capitalism mutates into entirely unmeritocratic nepotism (and why social democracy is a necessity if we are to ever keep the system fair on those born poor and without access to good education, healthcare and transport all which limit career options if unavailable to the poor).

I have gotten better over time but experience in debating isn't the main factor, getting good at Chess and Poker as well as being more mature in general have helped me more so.

Type and submit Rounds.

don't care much for freestyling, it's mostly a gimmick.

Neutral with me, I'm not gonna bitch about the guy behind his back nor pretend I am a big fan. He does his thing and that's fine.

No, especially jot woth the idiot Trump in charge. If they had a decent leader then yes, it's what they do regardless.

Capitalism is economical, Socialism is ethical. So, yes, it is economically successful as it the very essence on which economics works. Capitalist regimes always have economics as an aspect.

I already knew you were an alt of some oldtime user. I didn't really care if you were pinkfreud or not. You began trollimg me about Monster drink.

That's the least of their problems, I hope you understand the rest of my approach based on that concept.

Hide my plans.

You have much to learn and much to do before you operate on my level.

Tea but I do like caffeine, just more as an energy drink than as coffee.

The realisation that the only constant in life is that nothing remains stagnant. Consistent happiness i only attainable by being less rigid in aims and means (both). No philosophy ither than Taoism teaches to adapt to surroundings and adapt the means and aims to stick to non-changing end goals like hapiness and moral good. I am always calm even qhen I am not, thanks to thinking and meditatibg in the Taoist way.

That's you, that isn't an axiom in metaethics, so it changes nothing.

That can easily be justified under metaethics, since the 'need' can be construed as anything to deny that it's needless. Also metaethics has no axiom that needless suffering is objectively wrong, that's only within some branches of it.

No. There is no concrete basis for moral codes, the illusion of there being one can make very evil people feel very benevolent, with zeal and that's dangerous.

He has top tier flow, that's for sure. Sometimes he is weak in depth of metaphors and substance.

That's between me and the goddess of reality. Are you reincarnating your account?

I'm skeptical of rebirth and much prefer it being called reincarnation if it is a thing. You're only truly born once, the rest are your later avatars. I'm a nature over nurture type of person and I don't see it as pessimistic, instead I understand that an idiot literally cannot think their way out of their retarded brain chemistry, memories etc. This applies to muchore.

Me. He plays dirty and abuses techbicalities. When I win, I absolutely annihilate my opponent, turning their own logic against them.

Not really, would you call Drake a fraud for hiring a ghost writer now and again?

I know that they do.

They are not mutually exclusive.

The same reason you logged on to ask me that question.

What is your superficial qualification level that you'd like to show off and dox yourself with?

While I do enjoy controlling things to a degree, I am far more an inverted power type of guy.

I adore resisting control, not having to obey orders and pursuing the financial, strategic and social power that is the minimum required to be totally independent of such control in life as much as is feasible.

This is also evident in how I carry myself on forums like this. I have made it onto the hall of fame here despite being pretty rebellious and non-conformist to as much of a degree as doesn't get one permabanned.

Depends on the image I'm looking for.

Google or DuckDuckGo are obvious choices for search engine for the actual images. Google is superior in finding 'related images' to what you're searching on an interesting 'branch out' adventure. DuckDuckGo is superior for privacy and rendering images that aren't necessarily suited to your taste.

I think that the album 'as above so below' by Vinnie Paz was just released yesterday and is infinitely superior to a rapper such as Mr. Curry

https://youtu.be/MNEH66GReYY?list=PLddSkUxmPEC8LH5CdgEqFrnhqI_4Xw7bL&t=63

Watch UK crawl back to EU later on. It's not a question anymore, Brexit is happening as in the December election Conservative Party won the majority of seats (corrupt system, should be proportional representation which would have a much more 50/50 split since Conservatives capitalised on the Remain parties splitting up each other's voting bases outside of Scotland, where Brexit is not supported much).

Brexit is a strategic error in every regard, you lose all good trade with close allies, try to get good trade deals with corrupt superpowers and end up enslaved to fucking China who UK is now going to let spy on its 5G system.

It is destiny.

Excellent flow and delivery.

Racist

Saved by the EU and a stellar example of EU's generosity.

memes are revolved around shallow jokes that please many, rather than deep jokes that please few.

no .

I do not know. Generals serve the politicians, politicians serve the rich investors and the rich investors stay as unknown as possible.

It is welcome to be, yes.

No, if a debate is meant to tie and you're out for a medal and slant it one way or the other but would otherwise have agreed not to vote as you felt you didn't know enough or fully understand the points I don't think that it's positive to encourage people to vote on the debate and break the tie in and of itself.

Not in my league yet, but getting closer to it over time.

I assume I am not meant to answer anything here. Thank you for the progress to a medal.

Not exactly, but you are not out to hurt either. You become nasty if you feel nasty and are nice if you feel nice. I would say that sums it up.