“Ethnicity is what you’re born with, race is what you identity as”
💀
It’s funny to think about… We are just a few transracial activists in Marriam-Webster away from having a changed definition, of which the resulting determinist fallacy will erroneously guide our discourse on the issue from then on
Got low on time, had to type fast. The main answer is that you gotta draw a line somewhere…. Sure, you could keep saying there’s no difference as you get increasingly lower on games, but that’s just continuum fallacy, which I didn’t fully have time to type out
Ah yes, let's complain about other people's votes, and tell others they've lost your respect because they defend said votes you wanted to complain about. Then, when they tag people to vote the same way you did, let's say they are manipulative. Trying not to piss off some pussy isn't manipulation. It's exactly what I said it was- hoping that you'd eventually realize that you were being offended way too easily. I was hoping that if we ever had future conflict you'd understand I wasn't trying to offend (because I wasn't trying to offend by asking people to vote) because you know I don't try to start fights with others- but it looks like that didn't work. I knew the second you said I had lost your respect.
Ah yes, I'm the fake one for trying to make a friend out of someone who could get pissy at any moment over something stupid. Not the guy who thinks about manipulation so much that he thinks everyone around him is a snake or some bullshit.
You say everyone around you is fake, and then you cry to mods or to others, trying to get your way. That's bullshit. If anyone here is fake, it's you.
I disagree with the removal. He was saying my songs made him feel better. If he wants to be a whiney bitch baby and not revote, that can be on him. But it’s clear the vote didn’t violate any rules.
Sure, I suppose it’s possible that he was just votebombing, given that he hasn’t recorded, but idk. My big concern is that future debates between users will have votes removed erroneously, as now the line between votebombing and legit is starting to blur.
As for this debate, it’s unrated so whatevs. Obviously I still want to win, but if this ends as a tie or loss for me, oh well.
It didn’t have to be this way… I’ve known and tried befriend you for years, hoping you’d come around and finally stop being so easily offended.
But honestly the hypocrisy of yours is ridiculous here, and I will not stand for it. Fuck walking on eggshells, trying not offend your bitchass. We can be enemies now, I’m down for that. Fuck you.
Sure, every one is just votebombing I guess. I trust both 7000 and Grey. And when I said “I’ll give you that one” with regards to FishChaser, I’m admitting it’s possible he votebombed you. That being said, he could just easily be some whiner who thinks the mods are against him.
Savant could’ve easily voted your way too. As if your tagging of others is any different; who cares when it happens? I was gonna do it at the start too- I simply just cared about not pissing you off at the time. But now I don’t anymore.
I don’t care about your impression of me anymore either
FishChaser’s weird so that’s possible, I’ll give you that one. But let’s be real, the idea that I can ask others to vote and you can’t is BS, especially when you wanna go out of your way to complain about 7000’s vote while thanking Greyparrot for his
Also RM, who are you to talk about “taking an L better?” You literally whined about both FishChaser’s vote and 7000’s vote, even getting Fish’s vote removed. I said what I said at the time to be more polite (also I was confident the mods would uphold it), but it’s pretty clear that’s gone out the window here.
Also, This is a debate about “whose songs did you like better.” Last I checked, there isn’t anything in the Code of Co duct that said you needed to provide a reason for liking someone’s songs. Fish’s vote should’ve stood.
So you can invite people to vote but I can't? Keep in mind you told Fish he could revote too. As for 7k, you can not honestly tell me his vote was illegitimate while maintaining Greyparrot's was legit.
And I don't even know how Barney or Austin would vote but I still invited them to.
It's an unrated debate. Sure, winning is preferable, but even if I lose, yk what? It means I say "dang that sucks" and move on with my day. I don't know why you would care so much that you decide someone isn't worthy of respect, for doing the exact same things as you.
@Fish: I don't think your vote should've been deleted, but you could just revote instead of complaining. Literally just copy the format 7000series used and you'd be fine lol.
@Austin: As RM said, bias is expected; this whole debate has zero objectivity. That's why this debate is unrated. You can still vote lol.
"There is zero way to deny that a bass sax is not significantly slower than a bassoon, let alone a real baseball bat."
Made a grammar mistake here on low time. It should say "there is zero way to deny that a bass sax is significantly slower than a bassoon, let alone a real baseball bat," without the word "not." This is an accidental double negative on my part, not an argument in favor of my opponent's case.
Six hours
Imagine if we treated race like gender…
“Ethnicity is what you’re born with, race is what you identity as”
💀
It’s funny to think about… We are just a few transracial activists in Marriam-Webster away from having a changed definition, of which the resulting determinist fallacy will erroneously guide our discourse on the issue from then on
OP is right and we live in a 🤡 🌎
Sooooo….
Do we just treat this like a double ff or a 1 round debate?
Gg.
This one does look interesting.
Gg.
go for it
My opponent thinks he's so clever, spends too much time on others, and is too arrogant.
Also, he fully forfeited.
I didn’t. Good thing this tie won’t affect elo since no one voted.
True
This is unwinnable for the contender lol
I doon’t think it’s poolite of you to mock Canada, eh?
This issue must really be up your alley huh
Got time to vote? 0 so far
Got time to vote? One vote isn’t a whole lot
In that case, I gave you an argument on why averages are better, with injuries in mind, in Round 1… and I rebutted your rebuttal to that in Round 3
What I posted was an extremely short version… 58 is fine because it is good for statistical significance
Got low on time, had to type fast. The main answer is that you gotta draw a line somewhere…. Sure, you could keep saying there’s no difference as you get increasingly lower on games, but that’s just continuum fallacy, which I didn’t fully have time to type out
I did give you arguments. Two of them were definitely lower quality, but they are arguments nonetheless.
It's not the drunk drivers, it's the drunk crashers that make us look bad!
GG.
Yeah, you’ve definitely given me some food for thought here BK.
Is what RM is saying below true?
Fuck man. That's actually a good point.
Forgiven
Yeah a tiebreak would be good here
Ah yes, let's complain about other people's votes, and tell others they've lost your respect because they defend said votes you wanted to complain about. Then, when they tag people to vote the same way you did, let's say they are manipulative. Trying not to piss off some pussy isn't manipulation. It's exactly what I said it was- hoping that you'd eventually realize that you were being offended way too easily. I was hoping that if we ever had future conflict you'd understand I wasn't trying to offend (because I wasn't trying to offend by asking people to vote) because you know I don't try to start fights with others- but it looks like that didn't work. I knew the second you said I had lost your respect.
Ah yes, I'm the fake one for trying to make a friend out of someone who could get pissy at any moment over something stupid. Not the guy who thinks about manipulation so much that he thinks everyone around him is a snake or some bullshit.
You say everyone around you is fake, and then you cry to mods or to others, trying to get your way. That's bullshit. If anyone here is fake, it's you.
I disagree with the removal. He was saying my songs made him feel better. If he wants to be a whiney bitch baby and not revote, that can be on him. But it’s clear the vote didn’t violate any rules.
Sure, I suppose it’s possible that he was just votebombing, given that he hasn’t recorded, but idk. My big concern is that future debates between users will have votes removed erroneously, as now the line between votebombing and legit is starting to blur.
As for this debate, it’s unrated so whatevs. Obviously I still want to win, but if this ends as a tie or loss for me, oh well.
It didn’t have to be this way… I’ve known and tried befriend you for years, hoping you’d come around and finally stop being so easily offended.
But honestly the hypocrisy of yours is ridiculous here, and I will not stand for it. Fuck walking on eggshells, trying not offend your bitchass. We can be enemies now, I’m down for that. Fuck you.
Looks like you need more debates completed lol. My b, I didn’t realize people who voted in debates before the rule weren’t grandfathered in
Sure, every one is just votebombing I guess. I trust both 7000 and Grey. And when I said “I’ll give you that one” with regards to FishChaser, I’m admitting it’s possible he votebombed you. That being said, he could just easily be some whiner who thinks the mods are against him.
Savant could’ve easily voted your way too. As if your tagging of others is any different; who cares when it happens? I was gonna do it at the start too- I simply just cared about not pissing you off at the time. But now I don’t anymore.
I don’t care about your impression of me anymore either
FishChaser’s weird so that’s possible, I’ll give you that one. But let’s be real, the idea that I can ask others to vote and you can’t is BS, especially when you wanna go out of your way to complain about 7000’s vote while thanking Greyparrot for his
@Joe I forgot about that rule my b
@Pie I heard alt+f4 can solve the problem. On a serious note, maybe you just gotta reload the site and try again lol
Damn right it’s mutual. I don’t respect whiney crybullies who want to hold others to higher standards than they do themselves.
Would any one of you guys like to vote on this? Just pick whoever’s songs you liked more
Also RM, who are you to talk about “taking an L better?” You literally whined about both FishChaser’s vote and 7000’s vote, even getting Fish’s vote removed. I said what I said at the time to be more polite (also I was confident the mods would uphold it), but it’s pretty clear that’s gone out the window here.
Also, This is a debate about “whose songs did you like better.” Last I checked, there isn’t anything in the Code of Co duct that said you needed to provide a reason for liking someone’s songs. Fish’s vote should’ve stood.
If I lose, oh well. That doesn’t mean asking people to vote is wrong lol
So you can invite people to vote but I can't? Keep in mind you told Fish he could revote too. As for 7k, you can not honestly tell me his vote was illegitimate while maintaining Greyparrot's was legit.
And I don't even know how Barney or Austin would vote but I still invited them to.
It's an unrated debate. Sure, winning is preferable, but even if I lose, yk what? It means I say "dang that sucks" and move on with my day. I don't know why you would care so much that you decide someone isn't worthy of respect, for doing the exact same things as you.
yeah i think i lost rip
You wanna vote since ur here? Just listen along and pick who you think posted the better songs.
@Fish: I don't think your vote should've been deleted, but you could just revote instead of complaining. Literally just copy the format 7000series used and you'd be fine lol.
@Austin: As RM said, bias is expected; this whole debate has zero objectivity. That's why this debate is unrated. You can still vote lol.
lol. Bro could just revote if he’s so upset but he decides to whine instead
"small damage to small pieces"
For clarification, I mean "small damage to the bassoon, to small pieces"
I submitted that last argument with 2 seconds left lol
pardon the misspellings on low time... I'll make sure I give myself more time to type out the final round
Some consider it impolite to let the clock run out
Bruh
see below for clarification... lmk when you see this, but if you don't, that's on you, not me
"There is zero way to deny that a bass sax is not significantly slower than a bassoon, let alone a real baseball bat."
Made a grammar mistake here on low time. It should say "there is zero way to deny that a bass sax is significantly slower than a bassoon, let alone a real baseball bat," without the word "not." This is an accidental double negative on my part, not an argument in favor of my opponent's case.