Total topics: 13
Click the link and find out...and place an easy vote.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Science and Nature
For people into old goddy god,
1. Can you explain how you know when things have been done by god and when things have been done by the devil who has masterfully disguised something to look like it was done by god?
2. How do you tell the difference between god and the devil in general?
3. Why is it that god had the ability to create the devil, but has not the ability destroy him?
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Take it, creationist...take it!
https://www.debateart.com/debates/419
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Click and find out.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/338
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Philosophy
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Hey everyone, MagicAintReal here, I currently teach Biology in a thriving public school district in Maryland, USA (my district will remain nameless so as to keep my job).
I have 12 years of experience, and, as a result, have heard just about every comment/question about biology and science for that matter.
So, I figured I'd see if high school students match the members of DebateArt with their inquiry.
Alright, I'll shut up.
Ask Me Anything about science...if it bleeds into another convo not too scientific, that's ok, but try to stay on task here.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Science and Nature
I'm gonna ask the mods publicly in the forum.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Miscellaneous
Hey just wanted to hear people's thoughts on voting issues here on DebateArt
As a voter, is it ok in my reason for voting to:
1. award source points to a debater because I feel they used sources that exactly state what the debater's saying even though their source doesn't reflect or state anything about what their saying at all, in fact is an unrelated video?
2. ignore when Con affirms the resolution twice, i.e. in a god exists debate Con clearly agrees that god exists twice in the debate, because I feel Con did a better job?
3. dock a debater for linking something that I felt was unclear despite the debater writing exactly what each link was for, because after all I felt it to be unclear?
4. ignore a debater's relevant sources so I can claim that the debater did a poor job with sources without having to explain why I ignored the crucially relevant sources?
5. ignore the requested rules of the debate that ask to address the majority of resolution-impacting points made by both debaters and only focus on the debaters performance who I am trying to vote source points for?
The mods have told me they are totally fine with this, so I want to see what the public thinks.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Philosophy
Hey check out this debate and give it a thorough, honest vote.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Philosophy
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Science and Nature