Wow, where to start here...
there are many beings that exist outside this realm and planet
Such as?
but again, the devil is not responsible for anyone's downfall that is not how creation operates
And you know how "creation operates" because...?
I'm not supporting the notion that some entity runs around tricking people, that is silly.
Right, but "lower world spirit vessels" is just plain reasonable.
We can certainly be conduits for other spiritual beings if we allow that
Explain what a spirit is, and then explain how using the word "conduit" to mean "human body" is in any way relevant.
but generally speaking spirit beings have to be given access and the motives of the individual have to reflect both parties. In other words beings with similar motives can use each other but it is mutual in intentions and desires/actions
Nothing in this makes sense, and it's not because you're writing at some higher level, it's because this is a bunch of rubbish.
Access to the motives of the individual?
WTF are you talking about?
If the devil were to disguise his position maybe we wouldn't know...until the final outcome anyways.
Which would mean an even worse final outcome, given we didn't follow the right entity.
Are you saying you've been tricked by the Devil?
No, I'm pointing out one would have no idea if they were tricked by the devil, and what's worse is that they may be following the devil while thinking they're following god; they thinking they're doing "positive" but really they're just exacerbating the "negative."
But again, this idea that there is some renegade devil that causes all evil is very immature TBH and is not based on reality.
Yeah, and the idea that there are lower worlds with spirit conduits and divine sparks is very immature TBH.
Those things are not based on reality.
No need to get insulting I have no intentions of doing that so let's keep this clean.
Did I bring up the word "immature" or did you?
How was I insulting?
You called my idea immature and I called your idea immature, yet when I did it it was insulting?
Explain this double standard.