I'm assuming public means live or in person. It doesn't mean much if you had 300 of them, how many did you win? You can't be reliable. I could say I was Jeff Bezos, but am I? No.
You probably didn't have 300 live debates,considering your too lazy to even write one actual online debate. Or you just got carried by one of your teammates. So mind your own business, and shut up about Wikipedia being reliable.
I keep picking topics I don't give a shit about and can't force myself to take the effort necessary to make a competent argument. I think I'll jist change accoubts soon and start fesh or leave the site. I forfeit this debate.
You forfeit almost all your debates. I haven't seen one of your debates where you have responded with serious arguments.
It is wrong because people who lived in 2005 are dumb"
No, I'm saying Wikipedia has changed in 14 YEARS
----
I lost 14 debates and you would still be incapable of beating me.
Prove it
If somebody cited me a brief overview of a common thing, I would not dismiss it as hogwash, nor should anybody else. Actually when judging it in a debate, I would not dismiss it either without their opponent giving good reason for me to.
Coming from a guy who lost all 14 of his debates, that's not saying much
The debate has already ended.
Please cite these "studies"
What's a dealm
Wikipedia itself says that it's not reliable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia
One must follow and assign upon themselves the Arab identity to be considered an Arab.
Modern Arabism is entirely anti-american and terroristic.
Therefore, every Arab is a terrorist.
Supporting data and arguments in the coming rounds.
---
1.wikipedia is not a reliable source
2. Some Arabs don't believe in pan-Arabism
3. Therefore not all Arabs are terroristic
Tax those who are obese requires much more thought, you have to look into everyone's medical record, and then find if they're obese or not. I agree it's unfair, but it's unrealistic.
You don't sound like Con at all, you haven't made any arguments against OIT! Vote for Pro. The Nirvana Fallacy is basically that a clear solution is better than unrealistic solutions.
1. Maybe you made a mistake
2. Oh yeah, then WHY DID YOU FORFEIT
3. If someone was to accept the debate, they wouldn't expect something COMPLETELY PLAGIARISED.
4. Just because you found it on some other site, doesn't mean you can pass it off as your own, it's your own fault, and almost all your debates have plagiarized material inside of it.
5. When you post something inside of this site, it's automatically recognized as your own work, therefore you are trying to claim someone else's work as your own.
Dr.Franklin
I think we both know he's a troll, and his arguments make no sense.
BrotherDThomas
Chill with the Christ stuff, according to your own religion "Don't use his name in vain" or something. But chill...
daaang, I took me like 30 seconds to scroll through that
Thank you for confirming, I'll make sure I work on the document
I just want to confirm that you guys are on my team.
On DDO?
DDO is messed up
I'm assuming public means live or in person. It doesn't mean much if you had 300 of them, how many did you win? You can't be reliable. I could say I was Jeff Bezos, but am I? No.
You probably didn't have 300 live debates,considering your too lazy to even write one actual online debate. Or you just got carried by one of your teammates. So mind your own business, and shut up about Wikipedia being reliable.
Public meaning?
I keep picking topics I don't give a shit about and can't force myself to take the effort necessary to make a competent argument. I think I'll jist change accoubts soon and start fesh or leave the site. I forfeit this debate.
You forfeit almost all your debates. I haven't seen one of your debates where you have responded with serious arguments.
It is wrong because people who lived in 2005 are dumb"
No, I'm saying Wikipedia has changed in 14 YEARS
----
I lost 14 debates and you would still be incapable of beating me.
Prove it
If somebody cited me a brief overview of a common thing, I would not dismiss it as hogwash, nor should anybody else. Actually when judging it in a debate, I would not dismiss it either without their opponent giving good reason for me to.
Coming from a guy who lost all 14 of his debates, that's not saying much
Oh yeah, BACK IN 2005.
You should actually check the reliability of every source.
"December 16, 2005 6:29 AM PST"
You shouldn't call people dumb if you lose all 14 of your debates
The debate has already ended.
Please cite these "studies"
What's a dealm
Wikipedia itself says that it's not reliable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia
One must follow and assign upon themselves the Arab identity to be considered an Arab.
Modern Arabism is entirely anti-american and terroristic.
Therefore, every Arab is a terrorist.
Supporting data and arguments in the coming rounds.
---
1.wikipedia is not a reliable source
2. Some Arabs don't believe in pan-Arabism
3. Therefore not all Arabs are terroristic
Our third member has been banned, so I guess we need to find another one
Vote CON
Vote Con
Vote Con
Tax those who are obese requires much more thought, you have to look into everyone's medical record, and then find if they're obese or not. I agree it's unfair, but it's unrealistic.
I wouldn't mind but I don't know about WP
Hate to break it to ya but Wikipedia is not reliable.
None of your points actually proved anything towards con, I enjoyed debating with you, but your arguments were too weak.
Environmental allergies (allergens that are not ingested) are not curable by OIT, so I'd say it's a fair tradeoff.
EA's are cured by shots
You don't sound like Con at all, you haven't made any arguments against OIT! Vote for Pro. The Nirvana Fallacy is basically that a clear solution is better than unrealistic solutions.
lol yeah I do. It's always been fascinating to me how the government chose to confront obesity in the wrong way.
as this is only a 2 round debate, you should've replied with your points, or it would be a big waste of time.
MR. RM
He's better than you because he's more moral, ethical, and overall more respectful than you.
Yeah, I believe so too. I just reviewed the debate, and I feel as if I should've gave you more points/
12InchBeef was the guy who accepted
Stop being salty that you conceded
This could've been a very big win by Con, but instead he used points that were either very weak, or false.
1. Maybe you made a mistake
2. Oh yeah, then WHY DID YOU FORFEIT
3. If someone was to accept the debate, they wouldn't expect something COMPLETELY PLAGIARISED.
4. Just because you found it on some other site, doesn't mean you can pass it off as your own, it's your own fault, and almost all your debates have plagiarized material inside of it.
5. When you post something inside of this site, it's automatically recognized as your own work, therefore you are trying to claim someone else's work as your own.
CONCEDING!!!!!!!!!!!!
Waiving in the middle of a debate is essentially forfeiting, which is bad conduct.
this is for practice only, I actually don't support a Junk Food Tax.
This is confirming both of you guys are on my team.
It's a collaborative effort
Ok
Can you join my side?
Ok..
This is the new debate...
This is the new debate...
I assure you that Sam_The_Kool_Kid isn't Gatorade's other account. He created it so he could debate with me, and ended up voting.
Sam_The_Kool_Kid has expressed to me via PM, that he doesn't want to do it anymore, I'll create a new debate, and make sure to vote for con
Any
-Chips
-Sugary Drinks
-Things that have high calories but very little nutritional value
-Fast Food doesn't count
Corn chips do count
Any
-Chips
-Sugary Drinks
-Things that have high calories but very little nutritional value
-Fast Food doesn't count
Corn chips do count
Can you guys, join my side?
lol the guy who says there should be no rules has rules...
Just because it'll likely doesn't mean it exists
I just think that, the debate isn't about it. It's about if it's good or bad, not the best. So far you haven't proved a single reason why it was bad
Dr.Franklin
I think we both know he's a troll, and his arguments make no sense.
BrotherDThomas
Chill with the Christ stuff, according to your own religion "Don't use his name in vain" or something. But chill...